Letter No.1275

From SabarimuthuVyakappan 26- 3, Thattankonam Vellicode Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167 Tamil Nadu State Kanyakumari District India. To The International Court of Justice The Hague. Your Excellency President of the USA Mr. Donald Trump and President of Russia Mr. Vladimir Putin, on 8 August 2025, decided to meet in Alaska. President Mr. Trump said, “The highly anticipated meeting between myself, as President of the United States of America, and Vladimir Putin of Russia will take place next Friday, August 15, 2025, in the Great State of Alaska. President Putin, I believe, wants peace. Further details are to follow. Thank you for your attention to this matter” India endorsed the Summit. President of Ukraine Mr. Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, “Will not gift land to the occupier.” President of the USA Mr. Donald Trump, on 8 August 2025, halted trade talks with India. In response to a question on whether he expects increased trade with India, he said, “No, not until we get it resolved.” The GTRI says that India has an overall trade deficit of $ 34 billion with the USA. Therefore, it is not logical for the USA to impose reciprocal tariff against India. Apparently, White House said that it realized a mistake in the reciprocal Tariff. It is not clear, whether it is related to the revelation of the GTRI or not. The US State Department spokesperson said, America is only advancing its interest. To a question, he said, “India is a strategic partner, but won’t align all the time.” Every country must advance its own interest. If a country –big or small- commits an illegality, other countries should not support it. Then only there will be a civil society in the world. White House trade adviser Mr.Peter Navarro said, “The rationale for Indian tariff is very different from the reciprocal tariff. The imposition of an additional 25% duty on India is a national security issue associated with New Delhi’s abject refusal to stop buying Russian oil.” Now, there is no profit in buying Russian oil when one considers the overall losses of India. However, India buys Russian oil for its national security also. As the USA does not guarantee security or supply knowhow for advanced weapons, India must have a country for its security. However, India should have used the Russian oil for the benefit of 1400 million people and not to enable some private companies to launder money. Even now, it can give a pledge to the USA not to use Russian oil for resale to other countries. In this way, India can try to maintain friendship with both countries. President of the USA Mr. Donald Trump, in the Truth Social, said, “The CEO of Intel is a highly CONFLICTED and must resign immediately. There is no other solution to the problem.” India, on 8 August 2025, halted US arms purchases including missiles and combat weapons. At the same time, it inked some strategic deals with Russia. However, the defence ministry of India quickly said, “The news reports on India pausing the talks related to defence purchases with the USA are false and fabricated.” According to a report, the USA asked 1.1 million foreign students to return. It is not clear whether it is all students or those with criminal activities alone. According to another report, there was a drop of 45% in the number of student visas issued to Indian nationals by the USA between October 2024 and March 2025. However, there was a drop of only 21% in the student visas issued to the Chinese national in the same period. If the USA does not want foreign students to augment its income, it is free to stop their inflow. However, singling out Indian students is discriminatory and disheartening. This problem cannot be related to Russian oil. Even if India aligns with the USA, this problem might persist. Therefore, President Mr. Trump must show mercy and treat all alike. Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi catalyzed this problem. Former President of the USA Mr. Joe Biden said, “These are dark days. Courts matter. Law matters. Law firms matter. Constitution matters. Justice matters. Law firms are bending to pressure. The legal professionals must defend the country.” These are golden words although he acted illegally in Ukraine and Gaza. However, what he now says is applicable to Indian legal professionals. Mr. Chandrasekaran, CEO, of Tata Sons met Mr. Shapoor Ministry in connection with apportioning the assets of the Tata Trust. The Tata Trust is a charitable trust. A charitable trust cannot use its assets for personal benefit or to the benefit of private individuals other than the beneficiaries. It is concerned with its assets and not with the assets of others. However, one must go through the trust deed to form any other opinion. All charitable trusts must be transparent in their functioning. Therefore, Supreme Court must publish the Tata Trust deed. Further, trustees (including board of directors and chairman) should be committed to the charitable cause. However, the trustees of the Tata Trust usurp public assets meant for the poor. They commit crimes against humanity. The Supreme Court of India is the competent authority to appoint the trustees. Therefore, the court must appoint the trustees to run the Tata Trust consistent with the trust deed and the Charitable Trust Act. Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi said, “I know I will have to pay a heavy price for the tariff; and I am ready for it. India will never compromise. No compromise despite personal cost. India will never compromise on the interest of farmers, fishermen and dairy farmers.” He does not talk about the resale of Russian oil. He is becoming more and more popular in the name of protecting the interests of farmers, fishermen and dairy farmers. However, it is not the real problem. He discriminates against 1400 million people and appoints criminals known to him as judges. The judges - he appoints - have a record of crime against 1400 million people. They modify the Constitution of India in the pretext of amendment, plunder public assets and deny liberty to Indians. If he discriminates against 14,000 million in the matter of appointing judges, will not the leaders of other nations discriminate against Indian students? Therefore, a prime minister discriminating against 14000 people cannot remain in office even for a minute. If he thinks that he is doing some public good by discrimination, he must show this letter to the people and survive. This is letter No. 1275 dated 11-8-2025. It is addressed to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It is the one hundred and ninety eighth appeal to the International Criminal Court (ICC). It is the two hundredth and seventy first appeal to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It is the three-hundred and ninety second appeal to HEAVEN. The ICC must send blanket arrest warrants to all judges and Parliamentarians guilty of subverting the sovereignty of their Constitutions by modifying their body in the pretext of amendments. To achieve it, it must ensure liberty to the people to see these letters. It must adjudicate this letter in the light of the earlier letters. A copy each is submitted to the President of India, President of the USA, Vice President of the USA, Chancellor of Germany, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Afghanistan, former Prime Minister of England Mrs. Liz Truss, former Prime Minister of England Mr. Boris Johnson, Prime Minister of England Mr. Rishi Sunak, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Supreme Court of the UK, Prime Minister of Canada Mr. Justin Trudeau, Leader of the Labour Party UK Sir Keir Starmer, Prime Minister of Israel, Foreign Minister of Poland, Foreign Minister of Russia, Wall Street Journal, some newspapers all over the world, Foreign Minister of Norway, Foreign Minister of Ukraine, Press Trust of India (PTI), Editor’s Guild of India and the Chennai Press Club. Sabarimuthu Vyakappan India 11-8- 2025.