CHAPTER 142

142

HELLISH WORLDS

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 18 May 2010. A meeting of the Union Cabinet ensued on 19 May 2010.

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India is auditing the revenues generated by the oil and telecom companies and the share paid by them to the Government. A newspaper reported this on 18 May 2010. According to it, the audit must be completed within six months.

The above newspaper - in the same report - disclosed that the audit process would take four more months. Evidently, the probe started two months ago. But the media did not report this when the probe was ordered. The reason for the belated reporting of the audit is not known.

The Supreme Court might have ordered the probe based on this work - particularly the mail sent on 8 March 2010. However, future alone would prove or disprove this conclusion.

Until a few years ago, the Government had been fixing the retail price of even cement. Now the private companies take more than what they could hold. This is public money. Therefore, the CAG must conduct an audit of all companies - including steel and aluminium companies - that exploit the natural resources.

The audit would give hellish problem to the CAG because it is very difficult to conceal $220 billion.

The militant people killed 5 police personnel by triggering a land mine blast.

The Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), now said that he would not distinguish between public sector and private sector telephone companies. This is like saying that India would not distinguish between Indian and Chinese companies. Several TV channels telecast his principle. Perhaps, the backroom players asked him to tell this. Naturally, he wavered while telling this.

The public sector telephone companies work for public welfare. They serve the rural people. They give higher salary to the employees. They do not suppress their income. They duly pay the taxes. Above all, they carry the private companies on their shoulders. Therefore, public sector Telecom companies must be distinguished from private companies.

The Defense Minister of India on 20 May 2010 said that he was against public debate over militancy in India and the ways to handle it.

The FREEDOM of expression is a fundamental right of the people to hear the views of others. The Defense Minister must have explained this to the Congress President. But he failed to dispel her ignorance. Alternatively, he could have prevailed upon her to take over all natural assets obeying the 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court. He did not do so. In fact, there is no proper person in the Union Cabinet to give her good advice. As a result, there exists a belief that the Government kills the militant people - from Kashmir to the North-Eastern States – more for money than for the maintenance of law and order. The Defense Minister might have remonstrated with his colleagues in the Union Cabinet is a different matter.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 20 May 2010 registered a disproportionate asset case for about $4.4 million against the former chief of the now dissolved Medical Council of India (MCI). Four others were also booked under the same case. Their names were not disclosed. The names of the donors and acceptors of money were also not revealed.

The CBI on 23 April 2010 advertised throughout India about the discovery of $400 million and 1500 kg of gold besides other assets from the above man. Now the literate people weep because the CBI diluted the amount to mere $ 4.4 million. The apprehension is that the present CAG audit of the oil and telecom companies would vanish in this way. They think that there are more militant people in Delhi than in the jungles. The Defense Minister of India must tell a way to tackle them without a debate.

In the meantime, the Home Minister gave away some awards to the paramilitary personnel. It is customary for the President to give away such awards. This development shows that the Union Cabinet no longer wants the paramilitary personnel to kill anyone for money. It is indeed a transformation in Indian politics.

THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS on 21 May 2010 said- through its editorial- that the present Union Minister for Communication bestowed a benefit of over $22 billion to a few private companies. The paper asked the people to imagine the number of primary schools, hospitals and homes that could have been built using this money.

The above allegation confirms the fact that some others are getting not less than $220 billion.

Though it is a digression, it must be noted that Mr. Barack Obama, the President of the USA, on 22 May 2010 said that the USA wanted to shape a new international order.

Coming back, the new Chief Justice of India is not talking anything. In fact, he is not seen anywhere.

In this connection, it must be noted that majority of the Indians are illiterate. They do not know their fundamental rights. Therefore, the Supreme Court alone could protect their rights. In fact, the Supreme Court alone is endowed with the duty of protecting their fundamental rights. But the new Chief Justice of India considers sound sleep as his only goal. He must open his eyes to enforce FREEDOM of expression.

It is said that a man situated in a mode of ignorance goes down to the hellish worlds.

The facts from 18 May 2010 to 23 May 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 24 May 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 141

141

IGNORANCE

A woman leader of the Congress Party on 14 May 2010 said that the youth would be equipped to participate in national development.

The present writer - in the letter No.139 sent on 10 May 2010- said that the people must know how to run the affairs of their country. The above leader –without borrowing the same words –now says the same thing.

The above leader has the FREEDOM to go through this work. Her son also has the same privilege. Now she feels that the children of others –as the future rulers of India- must also know this work to run the affairs of their country. Therefore, she might overcome her inertia and tell the people that democracy in India is an illusion.

An Indian telephone operator now openly requested the Government to lift the ban on Chinese equipment. The equipment ordered was 3G compliant.

Evidently, the operator had placed orders for equipment before getting the foreign exchange clearance.

Further, the auction for the 3G spectrum is going on. Long before getting the 3G spectrum, orders had been placed for the 3G compliant equipment.

Furthermore, 7 May 2010 Supreme Court judgment, quite unequivocally, says that all natural resources must remain under the Government. The Government is forbidden from going against this order under the pretext of auction.

The present revenue of the private operators is about $134 billion per year. Their profit is $67 billion per year. The above judgment prohibits this.

The operator said that even the European countries were importing equipment from China.

In this connection, it must be noted that the USA started importing things from China only a few years ago. Now, the former owes $1 trillion to the latter. In fact, the present writer –through a mail to the present President of the USA- had said that the USA should not remain as a debtor of China. Though India is indebted to China by about $ 25 billion only, India should not have allowed the trade deficit to grow to this level.

The President of Sri Lanka would visit India on 8 June 2010. India might have requested him to visit India to convey the concern of India to the disquieting developments in Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka must take back the refugees without further delay. It must return the heavy weapons obtained from India.

Sri Lanka has every right to maintain a 2, 00,000 strong army. But Sri Lanka should not expect India to pay money for this directly or indirectly.

Further, Sri Lanka has a right to hand over its land to China for the naval base. But India would not compromise with Sri Lanka over the matters pertaining to the security of the country.

A leader of the militant people called for a 48 hour strike in five States from 18 May 2010. The name of the leader is Kishengi. His important demands are: 1. 15000 acre land in the Orissa State should not be given to the POSCO and 2.The Government should not sell the shares of 10 profit making Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

The militant people do not demand FREEDOM presumably because they do not know that there is no FREEDOM.

Now a political party wanted the Government to cancel the permission granted to the POSCO to explore the ores of iron.

It must be noted that even after the 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court, the political parties and the leaders are not exerting any pressure over the Government to take over all natural resources.

China on 17 May 2010 requested India to apply its rules fairly to all Indian, Chinese and western companies.

India has no courage even to ask its citizens to refrain from selling illegally imported items. Yet, at one time China threatens India with conflicts. At another time it demands fair play.

No other country gives nuclear reactors to the neighboring countries of India. But China does.

No other country wants to encircle India. But China does.

Many Indians live in the western countries and earn foreign exchange for India. India has an obligation to send the money back so that they would give more employment. So this money cannot be transmitted to China.

India cannot treat Chinese companies on par with Indian companies. One must overcome hundreds of hurdles in India to start an industry. This is not so in China. India does not supply even electricity. In China it is almost free.

India was nearly self sufficient in the production of potassium chlorate. Now, there is no production in India. This is due to the Chinese onslaught. In fact, several industries have been shut down.

According to some reports, the public sector Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) is talking with the private players for some joint ventures. The unconstitutional nature of the joint ventures had been pointed out earlier in this work. The 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court also forbids this.

The Home Minister on 17 May 2010 said that he was doing a tough and thankless job. He added that - unlike other ministers- he could not claim credit for, say, completing 3000 km of road works. In this way, he says that the Union Minister in charge of Surface Transport gets a huge amount as commission for awarding contract works. This is his reply to the last mail to the President. It must be noted that he talks and talks while playing a key role in suppressing the voice of 1000 million people.

The militant people killed 35 people – 24 civilians and 11 police personnel - traveling in a bus on 17 May 2010.

The Prime Minister of India did not come to the open to condemn this.

It is incredible that the militant people kill people for their small demands. Some of their demands are consistent with the 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court. Therefore, it is equally incredible that the Government refuses to concede their important demands. Now the Government would consider this as an opportunity for self annihilation by committing the armed forces.

The present writer firmly believes that FREEDOM alone would solve this problem.

The Prime Minister of India has several duties. It is not possible for him to go through the letters he receives from the public. In fact, the probability of a piece of paper from the public hitting his hands is very less. It could be as small as one in a billion. If a letter of national importance happened to hit his hands, the Government must allow the media to publish it to further the FREEDOM of the people.

In the present case, the first letter dated 1-6-2001 reached the hands of the then Prime Minister of India promptly and instantly, he initiated several steps. For instance, the bids received for the privatization of Air India (AI) was rejected only at the instance of the Prime Minister. Service Tax was imposed and the letter was discussed at several levels in several committees for about four months. Everything has been mentioned in Chapter 1.

However, the Government did not allow the media to publish it because of the fear that the letter might destroy it.

The press – one of the so-called watchdogs of democracy – also suppressed it because it went against its economic interests. Today, it is about $220 billion per year. Naturally, the voice of the press is not the voice of the people.

In these situations there exists an authority to enforce FREEDOM of expression –a fundamental right. The authority is the Supreme Court. Now this remains as an illusion. The Supreme Court cannot be ignorant of this. Perhaps, this writer failed to point out this.

It is said that illusion and inertia are the symptoms of ignorance.

The facts from 14 May 2010 to 17 May 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 18 May 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 140

140

THE GREATEST ENEMY

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 10 May 2010. On the next day, the Government decided to review the orders placed on Chinese manufacturers for 33,000MW power equipment. This shows that but for this work, 90 per cent of the industries in India would have perished due to the Chinese onslaught.

The real reason why the Union Government works against the interest of Indian industry is not known to anyone. It might have been for huge commissions. Or it might have been due to the fear that China would reveal the names of the acceptors of money. Or it might have been done to help some people to earn money through marketing rights. Or it might have been due to the nefarious ways of two or three manipulators.

While in China, a Union Minister used the word paranoid -with a double meaning- to criticize the Ministry of Home Affairs for the restrictions imposed on Chinese goods. The Union Home Minister immediately reprimanded him.

In this connection, it must be noted that restrictions were imposed only due to this work. They enacted a drama to take away the credit. This is a way of denying the BIRTHRIGHT of the people.

In the above matter, an envoy of China was asked to meet the officials of the Home Ministry on 12 May 2010. During the meeting, the envoy might have directed the Home Ministry to strange this work as effectively as before. He might have also given a secret advice to detain the people opposing Chinese products.

The Chief Justice of India –designate on 10 May 2010 declared that his only asset was his integrity. He said that he started his career as a Class IV employee. He added that he worked for the welfare of the downtrodden. He predicted that something would really happen during his tenure.

It is disturbing to note that most of the Chief Justices of India hail from Mumbai. Had there been no godfathers, the advocates from all over India would have got equal opportunity.

Further, the present Chief Justice of India- designate owns the shares of many companies. The way he buys the shares is not known to anyone. These are dangerous portents. However, his words indicate that he would support the democratic edifice without fear and take the 7 May 2010 order of the Supreme Court to its logical conclusion.

The Chief Justice designate on the next day said that judges used to differ during administrative meetings. He added that the outgoing Chief Justice never treated anyone as his opponent.

During administrative meetings, one or two judges talk in the best interest of the nation. The silent majority supports them. However, a vociferous minority, apparently, blocks everything.

China on 11 May 2010 warned India through its State-run China Daily that restrictions on import of equipment from China “could chill Sino Indian friendship”. On the next day, another Chinese daily –Sun Shihai- asked India to buy Chinese products to avoid conflicts.

In this connection, it must be stated that even if India decided to remove the illegally imported electric items, utensils, toys or ball point pens from the shops, China would issue a more severe warning or even enter Arunachal Pradesh. This is because India allowed China to taste the hard earned money of Indians. They are now selling all their products all over India through door to door canvassing to the detriment all cottage industries. This gives the impression that this land belongs to the Chinese rather than to Indians.

A Union Home Minister on 12 May 2010 requested the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) to contribute their share to put an end to militancy. Obviously, the Home Minister has started giving moral support to the militant people.

The Government on 12 May 2010 said that Her Excellency the President of India would visit China on 26 May 2010. The President must ask China not to give nuclear reactors to Pakistan, Myanmar or Sri Lanka. Further, the President must find a way to resolve the border dispute.

The Home Minister of India on 12 May 2010 said that highly educated people including university teachers and good writers were considering the Government as an “enemy” that must be fought at all levels even if it were in an armed struggle. This is his reaction to the word “enemy” present in the last mail to Her Excellency the President of India.

The present writer writes with the help of computer, dictionary and newspapers. Some words and usages are taken from other books because the interested readers must get something refreshing in English also. But the newspapers take these words from this work and not from the books in their hands. No wonder that the Home Minister indirectly described this writer as a good writer. However, the meaning of the word “enemy” must be analyzed in a proper way.

The Government has not revealed the demands of the militant people.

At one time, the militant people are called Naxalites and at another time they are called Maoists. Therefore, there is confusion in their name also.

Whether the militant people work under one leader or several leaders is not known to any one.

At one time the militant people kill paramilitary personnel. At another time the latter kill the former.

Some reports say that the militant people destroy schools and bridges.

In 1727 A.D. the people of the present Kanyakumari District –fearing the armed marauders- in a body fled to the adjoining hills complaining bitterly to the king of his effeteness and their own helplessness. Now, some reports say that the people in some parts of India are taking shelter in jungles fearing the paramilitary forces.

The present writer resolved to solve the above problem only.

But the Government threatened to use a 1967 Act. The Government actually wanted to detain this writer alone because it would not have found any other intellectuals, college teachers, writers or better men to uplift the Indian society. This alone prompted to quote Bal Gangadhar Tilak.

Tilak would not have envisaged that any Indian leader would take away the birthright of 1000 million people to pretend as the ruler of India. It is an ironical coincidence that his words fitted so dramatically with the present situation in India.

If the Government had allowed the media to publish the letters as and when they were being sent to the President of India, the people would have made this writer the Prime Minister of India long ago. Obviously, the present Government does not represent the will of the people. It is not a democratically elected Government or a one as per law established. It has no right to rule India even for one minute.

The Home Minister is not only a winner of power but also a winner of wealth. If permitted, he could donate a car each to every member of his party. His natural tendency would be to preserve his wealth. But, he need not sacrifice his material possessions at all.

However, the Home Minister knew that his mind –when it functions as his friend- says that all natural resources must be taken over and the credit given to this writer. But his own mind- when it works as his enemy- opposes this. The birthright of the people is similarly related.

Obviously, the people consider the enemy of the Home Minister alone as their enemy. The friend of the Home Minister is the friend of the people.

It is said that the mind of a man is his best friend and the greatest enemy.

The facts from 10 May 2010 to 13 May are being submitted to her Excellency the President of India on 14 May 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 139

139

BIRTHRIGHT

The Chief Justice of India –designate on 6 May 2010 thundered that one could become popular easily but one could not be correct easily. His statement shows that the present writer is a popular figure in the Supreme Court. The premonition that the Supreme Court Bench would consider the views of this writer as a correct one in the impending gas dispute judgment might have prompted him to talk like this. Further, he does not accept the method of the classification of the learned judges of the Supreme Court into attached and detached judges as a correct method.

A three judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India headed by  Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan  on 7 May 2010 declared that all natural resources must be exclusively handled by the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) rather than by the private sector. The court considered this as the “ideal” policy. The court said this while delivering the judgment of the gas dispute case between two private companies. The court explained that "a constitutional democracy like India must see that all natural assets belong to the people”.

The other judges in the Bench were Justices P.Sathasivam snd Sudershan Reddy.

The logical extension of this judgment is that the BALCO verdict has lost its validity. Further, all natural resources, including the ores and spectrum, – consistent with this work - must come under the Government. The immediate consequence is that the Government cannot give the 3G spectrum to private parties under any pretext because it would go against the spirit of the judgment.

Anyone going through this work would agree that the judgment could be construed as a theoretical victory for this work. This is the effect of more than hundred letters submitted to the successive Presidents of India and the Chief Justices of India.

However, the Court did not direct the Government to take over all natural assets forthwith. If it had done so, all natural assets would have come under the Government with effect from the date of judgment. The Supreme Court - as an institution –would have gone upward to higher planets.

Now the Government would connive at the judgment. Therefore, the tendency of the Government would be to conceal this. The people also would forget the social, economic and political consequences of this. If that happened, anyone would agree that the Supreme Court did a great disservice to the nation. The nation would go downward.

Further, it is disturbing to note that the Court did not verify the veracity of the submission that a private company was getting a profit of over $ 16 billion per year from a gas field alone.

China on 7 May 2010 decried the import ban imposed by India to Chinese- made telecom equipment. It said that security concerns cited by India were a pretext for trade protectionism. It added that the ban would be necessary only if such imports affected Indian industry.

Anyone would agree that the extraordinary pressure exerted by the present writer is yielding results.

In this connection, it must be noted that China availed itself of the services of the manipulators to penetrate deep into the Indian system. The influence of China on India is such that the latter would even think of arresting Indian citizens at the behest of the manipulators rather than confiscating illegally imported Chinese products. India has not even issued a warning for this. As a result, several Indian companies are fast disappearing.

Further, China utilized its unlimited wealth to encircle India. It has even agreed to supply nuclear reactors to Pakistan.

Obviously, a wealthy China is a threat to the security of India. Therefore, it must annul all its defense tie ups with the peripheral countries of India including Pakistan and Myanmar.

The peripheral countries of India should not be loyal to China as at present. Until this happens, Chinese engagements in India must be banned.

The militant people killed 7 police personnel on 8 May 2010. On the next day, the police killed 10 militant people. There is no use in reporting this cannibalism because the Government is not disclosing all killings.

Now, the Union Government has warned the intellectuals and others that the people supporting the militant people would be liable to be punished under Section 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

Evidently, the Government could detain anyone under the above act.

“FREEDOM is my birthright. So long as it is awake within me, I am not old. No weapon can cut this spirit, no fire can burn it, no water can wet it, no wind can dry it and no CID can burn it.

Some people have the courage to declare what is harmful to them and some have not that courage.

Who does not know the meaning of Home Rule? Who does not want it? Would you like it, if I enter your house and take possession of your cooking department? I must have the right to manage the affairs in my own house.”

When Bal Gangadhar Tilak said the above in May 1917, the then enemy of India, the British, allowed the people all over India to hear it. Now, the Government does not give even a fraction of FREEDOM given by the enemy of India. The Government does not allow the people to hear anything present in this work.

When there was FREEDOM the people fought for FREEDOM and got slavery. Consequently, people do not know that they have no FREEDOM. Now they do not know how to run the affairs of their country.

Obviously, the Government is the enemy of the people. The Government must become the friend of the people to give them FREEDOM. FREEDOM is their birthright.

The facts from 6 May 2010 to 9 May 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 10 May 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 138

138

DEMONS

A Union Minister on 1 May 2010 said that India achieved 8.7 per cent growth rate only because the Government allowed private players. This could be construed as his reply to this work. The reverberations within the Union Cabinet also would have prompted him to give this reply.

The Chief Justice of India on 1 May 2010 said that the law colleges must inculcate critical thinking among the students.

The Speaker of Parliament said that people with courage of conviction and commitment to a cause must enter political arena.

The Chief Justice of India–designate on 2 May 2010 said that judicial activism beyond a point was against the rule of law. As predicted, the learned judge is showing the characteristic reaction of an attached judge. Or, he is reacting to the changes of the detached judges of the Supreme Court.

The nation has not seen any judicial activism of the Supreme Court although one or two public interest cases had been entertained without disturbing the beneficiaries of the present system.

Obviously, what the above learned judge means by judicial activism is FREEDOM of Indians. According to him any action in favour of FREEDOM would go against rule of law.

Though many leaders are latently working against FREEDOM, no leader has talked anything openly against FREEDOM. Yet a learned judge is openly talking against FREEDOM! But, the lowest among men alone would rob the people of their FREEDOM.

The attached judges are partners and owners of many companies. Now they are becoming too strongly attached to the companies. They are giving about $220 billion to a few individuals every year.

The beneficiaries multiply their wealth every minute depending upon the availability of the ores. They convert public assets into private assets through various ways. The public offices like the Post Offices remain at their disposal for their business activity. They gradually buy the entire world. Thus they are the richest men in the world. They are always surrounded by aristocratic relatives, wealthy political leaders and powerful judges. They perform sacrifices and thus they rejoice.

The extent of FREEDOM necessary to the people to survive is determined by their media wing.

As an alternative, the present writer has been croaking for the last ten years to persuade the Government to use public assets for public welfare.

The above two radically different views would not live peacefully together. In the past, this demanded blood. Now, it may not be a remedy.

It must be reiterated that FREEDOM would solve this problem. Now, some leaders talk. But they deny the same right to the people. In this way, the State overshadows the man. As a result, man becomes less than man. The people in no other country lose their identity as in India.

It is said that the lowest among the men are demons.

The facts from 1 May 2010 to 5 May 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 6 May 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 137

137

EARTHLY PLANETS

A private company recorded a net profit of $3.6 billion for the year ending 31 March 2010. The profit before tax was $ 4.5 billion. The turnover was $ 44.5billion. It is equivalent to 20 per cent of the revenue of the Union Government.

An advocate had submitted to the Supreme Court that the brother of his client was getting a profit of $ 16.6 billion per year from a gas field. The above disclosure indicates that his assertion was a correct one. The company might have spread the profit among the sister companies.

The Constitution of India does not allow anyone to enjoy any profit - above a small amount - from a natural resource. If, however, the advocate had submitted a wrong statement, the Supreme Court should have brought this to the notice of the people.

Now, the Supreme Court is dithering to pronounce anything in this matter. The court believes that it could allow a few individuals to gain more and more by exploiting black gold, liquid gold and gas gold. This is a cause for the strife in India.

The Prime Minister of India on 24 April 2010 exhorted the local bodies to put an end to militancy. As in the previous chapter, this must be interpreted in the light of his decision to give $66.6 billion from the Provident Fund (PF) account to two or three boys. Any one would agree that this is his way of giving agony to Indians.

In online news, an internet service provider (ISP) – rediff. com - on 27 April 2010 described India as a vassal of China. It talked about the tactical naval base of China in Sri Lanka. It mentioned the growth and reach of Chinese naval power.

It must be noted that this writer was the first to use the word vassal in the above context. The media is now attributing the credit to some others.

The same ISP narrated the reasons why the Government would not win the war against the militant people. The moment the Government takes a decision to give FREEDOM to the people; the natural resources would come in the hands of the Government. Then, the militant people would throw away their gun. In this way, the Government could win the war very easily.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 23 April 2010 arrested the President of the Indian Medical Council (IMC) for receiving a bribe. There were reports that the CBI found $0.4 billion in cash and 1500 kg of gold from his house and lockers. According to one report, a giant portion of his money had gone into foreign banks.

The mediators might have escaped with equal amount. A massive amount might have been invested in movable and immovable properties. A big amount might have been donated for charity. A colossal amount might have escaped the eye of the CBI.

Had the CBI been FREE, it would not have allowed a doctor to hoard money like this for such a long period of time.

Immediately, after affecting the arrest, the Director of the CBI said that his agency was not acting at the behest of the Government. But, a Union Minister, on the next day, said that the action of the CBI was due to the intervention of the Government. This gives the impression that the CBI acted only after getting specific information from him. The obvious conclusion is that the Minister - not the CBI - “lighted fire”.

Apparently, the applicants for Medical Colleges must get the approval of the Ministry of Human Resource Development (HRD) before going to the President of the IMC. Therefore, the President of the IMC must be the mediator of the mediators and the real greedy creature is the Union Government or the present and past Union Ministers. In fact, he might have received money on behalf of many ministers. Therefore, the CBI must release the names of the donors and acceptors of money immediately after interrogation.

The logical extension of the first letter dated 1-6-2001 is that the power to grant Medical Colleges would go into the hands of the State Governments and the MCI would play a supervisory role. Had that letter been considered in the proper perspective, such incidents would not have occurred at all.

The Union Government now decided to start 1000 more model schools all over India. It must be noted that the Union Budget for 2010-2011 did not mention this.

A Union Minister on 26 April 2010 asserted that the Government was not involved in phone tapping.

The telephone services are largely in the hands of some private individuals. All messages of the people roll in their hands. It is said that no one knows when a fish drinks water. Whenever they want, they take whatever they want.

The Speaker of Parliament on 28 April 2010 allowed a cut motion. In this matter the Speaker - a woman - released the woman in her and said that constitutional rights over-ridded practices. The Speaker did her duty considering this as her routine work. However, the Government expected her to disallow it based on certain conventions. After a shadow fighting, the motion was defeated.

The Speaker would lead the country upward. But, unless a metamorphosis occurs in the present system, the manipulators would not elevate the Speaker to the post of the Prime Minister of India or the President of India. All women leaders would be helpless in this matter. This is because the manipulators abhor the word ‘constitutional’ in the tenor of the Speaker.

The Prime Minister of India attended the South Asian Association for Regional Co-operation (SAARC) summit on 28 April 2010 at Thimpu, Bhutan. He allotted 50 seats in the premier educational institutions to the students of the SAARC nations. He wanted freer movement of ideas between the people of the SAARC countries. The fact that he does not allow freer movement of ideas within his country does not deter him from talking like this.

Bangladesh and Sri Lanka have given tactical naval bases to China. As such, India should not have attended the summit unconditionally. But, the Prime Minister of India sat in the summit flanked by the President of Sri Lanka and the President of Bangladesh. Now the people fear that the Union Government consciously rewards the countries that undermine the interests of India.

Now, the Chief Justice of Madras High Court was elevated to the Supreme Court. At the same time, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court was promoted as the Chief Justice of India. The latter would take charge on 12 May 2010. Both judges own the shares of many companies. Therefore they are attached judges. Naturally, the media had a few words about them.

The promotions show that the Supreme Court is biased in favour of the attached judges. The desire or ignorance of some women leaders also contributed to it.

The above promotions would make the nationalization of the natural resources more difficult. Besides, the Supreme Court would become more obstinate in denying FREEDOM. Naturally, it would continue to remain as a cause for the strife until a force acts on it.

On 30 April 2010 the Government said that 74 per cent shares of the ICICI bank and the HDFC bank were owned by foreign institutional investors and foreign banks. It must be noted that unless otherwise denied a giant portion of the PF money is going to the ICICI bank for safe keeping.

Some Members of Parliament (MPs) are seeking the resignation of a Union Minister alleging corruption in the 2G spectrum auction. The Minister, however, is rejecting the allegation.

In this connection, it must be noted that the reasoning of the Supreme Court, apparently, is that no one shall talk or write anything that would hurt the feelings of anyone. If the reasoning were a correct one, no one shall level such corruption charges against any Union Minister or any other responsible person. But everyone says that a Union Minister amassed a huge amount of money. One political party even says that he looted over $22 billion. The media is publishing all allegations. This naturally affects his reputation.

The inference is that such allegations are part and parcel of politics. This work contains nothing serious than the above one. Yet, the Supreme Court is concealing this work. This is another reason for the strife in India. Therefore, the Chief Justice –before his retirement - must tell the reason why the Supreme Court denies FREEDOM of speech.

It is said that a man situated in a mode of passion and desire creates strife and lives on the earthly planets.

The facts from 23 April 2010 to 30 April 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 1May, 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU