Monday, November 14, 2011

188. Why do the elections in India null and void?

188

THE REAL EXECUTIONERS

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 28 October 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          On 28 October 2011, The New Indian Express – through its editorial –said that the political parties looked after corporate interests in return for the money they received from them.
          The above statement is not a correct one. The truth is that the political leaders give public money to the corporate houses for name.
          All political leaders are the recipients of this favour. If this work comes out as headline news for some days, the political leaders will be ashamed of looking at the face of the people.
          It is true that some corporate houses give money to the friends and relatives of the political leaders. But they do this many years after the receipt of the public assets.
          It is again true that they have been giving money to all political parties before elections. But they had taken a decision to save this money long ago. The euphemism for this is elimination of money power in elections.
         Hereafter, they will not give money to political parties.
          Instead, they will give political power to the individuals like Mr. L.K. Advani, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, Mr. Ragul Gandhi, Anna Hazare or to their other confidants.
          They execute the plan like this. If a man gives 100 sq feet of space for advertisement during elections, someone says that he should not give this without giving permission in writing. Then the Village Officer asks the owner to erase it or get police permission. When the owner ignores this, a revenue official comes to the house. After that, two or three police personnel come to the house at night and ask the owner to either erase it or go to the police station on the next day. The owner chooses to erase it rather than going to the police station.   
       From the other end, they effectively monitor the number of vehicles, loud speakers and others. They even prevent the people from taking money to certain selected areas.
          Above all, they do not allow vehicles to ply voters.
          They do everything latently through the aid of the Election Commission of India.
          Pointing out the limit for spending money, they drastically cut down political funding. Thus, even the black money refuses to descend to the bottom. The usual economic activity during elections is now practically vanishing due to this.
          The repercussion is that the voters do not know the number of candidates, their nature or even their names. Even educated people go to the polling booth like blind men. They cannot but vote for a symbol present in the voting machine.
          The corporate houses release positive/negative news about one political party or other to ensure its success/defeat. In the next election, they reverse this - if necessary - in favour of another set of political parties or leaders.
          It is true that the people of India are poor.  But even 1 per cent of the people cannot be influenced by money power. But, 99 per cent of the people can be influenced by the media. The people are not corrupted but cheated. Thus, the act of conducting elections - as at present is - constitutionally null and void.
          As the media remains in the hand of less than ten corporate houses, even the Supreme Court of India is afraid of it. This is the reason why the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India are not the real executioners of India. The real executioners are about ten individuals who remove the public assets. Naturally, the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Election Commission of India, CBI and all other organs of the Government are afraid of them.
       
          India helped defeat a Canadian move to deny Sri Lanka the right to hold the next Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (Chogm) in 2013 because of the human rights violations of Sri Lanka. The newspapers revealed this on 28 October 2011
          India cannot but do this because India –and not Sri Lanka –committed the crimes against humanity in Sri Lanka.

        On 30 October 20011, Mrs. Niira Radia – an underground mole- decided to quit communication consultancy business. She said that some vested interests had been trying to cause harm to her and she- instead of fighting back – wanted to give them their victory. She requested the victors to savour it.
          It may be noted that all constitutional authorities continue to remain in their respective positions because of the underground moles. Therefore, the meaning of the word “victory” is not a clear one. However, she knows everything better.

          The CBI, on 5 November 2011, arrested a Tamil Nadu state based Railway contractor for a fraud of Re. 110 crore. This shows that the executioners have decided to check corruption in the lower level. After giving Re. 3 lakh crore from the Provident Fund (PF) to private parties, the Supreme Court of India is checking corruption in the order of Re. 100 crore. It is a human rights problem.

       President of India Pratibha Devisingh Patil said that corruption eroded rule of law and hurt the common man most. It is not customary for the media to report the views of the President of India with any continuity. Very rarely, the public sector TV channels recognize her speech. Therefore, she publishes her views through her website.

    According to an internet report, there was sombre mood at the rally venue of Mr. L.K. Advani in Banglore on 30 October 2011. He cancelled two of his scheduled meetings with the press. This shows that the copies of the letters submitted to Her Excellency the President of India reach the hand of the political leaders without any delay. However, the executioners persuaded him to continue with the work detailed to him. 

          The Government, on 2 November 2011, said that one lakh soldiers would be recruited for the Indian Army in view of the growing military presence of China along the border.
        In this connection, it must be stated that a part of the Provident Fund (PF) money secretly went to a bank in Hong Kong. This is equivalent to giving the money to China. It is a treasonable offence.
      Further, Indian market has been secretly opened to China just for commission. With which money India would pay to the soldiers is not clear. The present Government would procrastinate to recruit soldiers is a different matter. 
         
          The CBI, on 2 November 2011, summoned YSR Congress Party Chief Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy in an illegal mining case.
          The executioners are ready to place a political leader in any responsible position. They would allow them to earn money. They would even part with one or two small pieces of their land at the appropriate time.
         But the political leaders should not take the natural assets beyond a certain limit. They shall not remove the money from the banks and the LIC also beyond a certain limit. Thus, the executioners would allow the POSCO to remove natural assets and not any Indians.        

          Jindal of Jindal Aluminium had donated Re. 25 lakh to Anna Hazare. This confirms the fact that Anna Hazare is a representative of the executioners. He is the Gandhiji of the present day.
          In this connection, it must be noted that a Mr. Jindal had collected over Re.10,000 crore through the stock market in the pretext of a steel plant in the Andra Pradesh state long ago. The Supreme Court of India alone could say whether it was the same Jindal or not.
          Further, the revelation that former Law Minister Shanti Bhushan donated Re. 4 lakh to him shows that an enquiry should have been conducted for the Re. 4 crore issue.  

         Business Line, on 3 November 2011, disclosed that the SAIL and the POSCO would sign a joint venture to establish a 1.5 million steel plant at Bokaro.
          In this connection, it must be reiterated that the POSCO was granted permission to explore Indian ores only to enable some private parties to buy assets in South Korea. The present writer had described this as unconstitutional adjustments of interests. Constitutionally, it is null and void. In this matter, the executioners are executing the Supreme Court of India and the people.
          However, the Government has a right to do anything after allowing the people to know the above view. Until then, it shall not go ahead with this plan.

          Mr. Kejriwal –a member of the Anna Hazare team–returned Re.9 lakh in dues to settle the issue of his resignation from the IRS. The Supreme Court of India alone knows its meaning.

       Congress party president Sonia Gandhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh were ranked 11th and 19th respectively in the Forbes list of world’s 70 most powerful people in 2011. They give public money to some private parties in a carefully planned manner - for name and fame- with no right to do it. It is more heinous than the act of accepting Re. 2 lakh crore as bribe. But the executioners describe them as honest people and Raja as a dishonest man.

           Rejecting the bail applications of the accused in the 2G spectrum case, CBI Special Court Judge O.P. Saini, on 3 November 2011, said:
“1.The charges against the accused are very serious in nature because they ruined the economy of the state.
2. Their ultimate objective was to use public money in a carefully planned manner for personal benefit with no right to do it.
3. Providing a safe and secure environment for witnesses to testify truthfully is possible only by keeping the accused in custody.
4. There are possibilities that the accused may tamper with evidence.
5. “A murder may be committed in the heat of moment upon passion being aroused. An economic offence is committed with cool calculation and deliberate design with an eye on personal profit regardless of consequence to community”. He quoted this from an order of the Supreme Court of India.
6. If the witnesses do not gather courage to tell the truth before the court, the tripod (of accused, victim and witness) would break down and truth will not come out.
          In this connection, it must be stated that the Constitution of India does not allow the Government to auction the natural assets or to sell the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) against public money.
          Therefore, the above charges are against the Supreme Court of India, political leaders, executioners and the CBI. They are the accused bodies and the charge-sheet must be read accordingly.
          Now, all right thinking people would say that the Supreme Court of India transferred public assets to private parties in a carefully planned way with cool calculation and deliberate design regardless of consequence to community.
        

          The Supreme Court of India, on 5 November 2011, granted bail to former Satyam Chief Ramalinga Raju. He had been in jail for 32 months.
          All economic offenders must be released on bail pending the prosecution of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for the Re. 3 lakh crore in the PF money
     
          Mr. Prasant Bhushan, a member of the Anna Hazare team, said that he would contact the retired judges of the Supreme Court of India to function as the so-called “ombudsman” for the “Core Committee of India Against Corruption”.
          His statement shows his proximity to judges. This must be interpreted in the light of the allegations against him.

      Justice C.S. Karnan of the Madras High Court, 7 November 2011, submitted a written complaint before the “National Commission for Scheduled Caste” alleging caste discrimination by his “brother judges”.

          The Supreme Court of India has not given answers to 187 letters before it. It is not taking any action over at least 3 letters of the President of India.
          All authorities must take action over the letters. The Chief Justices of the High Courts have a duty to inform the action taken by them to the people. Even the Chiefs of the India Army and the Indian Air Force must take necessary action over the letters.
          The Supreme Court of India must recognize the charges against it. It could even now transform itself into the real executioner and restore the vanquished assets without fear or favour. This is to establish justice only.
       
           The facts from 28 October 2011 to 7 November 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 8 November 2011.
             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.
8 November 2011

 V.Sabarimuthu.
26-3 Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167
Kanyakumari District


           



       

Friday, November 4, 2011

187 Advani - Raja - Supreme Court

187

A WHIPPING BOY

        The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 7 October 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          The new Chief of Indian Air Force, Air Chief Marshal Norman Anil Kumar Browne, on 9 October 2011, said that an Air Force Station each would be started in all metro cities. A Station might be established at Trivandrum also.

          The militant people killed 6 soldiers in the Chhattisgarh State on 9 October 2011. The print media did not publish this news.

          Army killed two militant people in the Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State on 9 October 2011.

          The CBI, on 9 October 2011, said that Home Minister Chithambaram could not be implicated in the 2G spectrum case. As the Supreme Court of India did not bother to find out the money given by the “cash rich” Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to the Unit Trust of India (UTI), the CBI is waiting for a green signal from the court.


          Appearing for the Reliance Telecom, Senior Counsel Mukul Rohatgi told the Supreme Court of India that the proceedings of the 2G Special Court adversely affected the companies of Mr. Anil Ambani. In this connection, he requested the court to restrain the media from publishing anything. The bench asked the counsel to seek appropriate remedy from the Special Court. The court might surrender to his demand. If this happens, the people will no longer see the different facets of the case.

          Mr. L.K. Advani, the leader of the BJP, started a 40-day nationwide anti corruption journey called “Rath Yathra” on 11 October 2011.
          In this connection, it must be stated that the NDA Government had given public money to the executioners of India- as mentioned by this writer on 3 February 2002 in Chapter 8. Some public assets were given to charge – sheeted companies.
          The people do not know this. In fact, at least 1% of the people knew what Muammar Gaddafi did to Libya. Even this people do not know what the NDA Government did to the nation.
          The crucial point is that the NDA Government gave the public assets to them on behalf of all political leaders –ruling and opposition. This is to make their position secure in India.
      Thus the political power of all political leaders is the gratis given by the recipients of this money.     
          There is no difference between leader Advani or Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Therefore, they can make him - or anyone of their choice – the Prime Minister of India. They will create the necessary public opinion through their media wing. The Rath Yathra and voting are formalities only.
          This condition exists because the Supreme Court of India conceals this work from the eye of the people with an “ulterior motive”.       

          On 12 October 2011, the CBI- in its First Information Report (FIR) – said that former Union Minister Dayanidhi Maran benefited – indirectly - Re.549.96 crore as quid pro quo for various favours to Aircel of Maxis - a Malaysia-based company. According to the FIR, the amount was given to the SUN TV owned by his brother Kalanidhi Maran, through the overvaluation of its shares. However, the people still believe that there exists a truce between the SUN TV, and the ND TV. Otherwise, he would have been arrested.

       A group of leading luminaries – Mr. Jamshyd Godrej, Mr. Deepak Parekh, Mr. Keshub Mahindra, Mr. N. Vaghul, Mr. Nachiker Mor, Mr. Yezdi Malegan, Ms. Anu Aga, Mr. Justice  Sam Variava, Mr. Justice B.N. Krishna, Prof. S. Narasimham, Dr.A. Vaidyanathan, Mr. Azim Premji, Dr. Vimal Jalan, Dr. Ashok Ganguly- in their second open letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh recommended: 1. A new Anti-corruption Bill 2. Online auction for the allocation of natural resources  and 3. Increase  of judges to fight against corruption. The first letter was sent in January 2011.
          In this connection, it must be reiterated that the judges from Mumbai are, as a rule, representatives of the manipulators. Justice B.N.Krishna and Justice Sam Variava hail from Mumbai. They had been receiving letters from this writer for over four years before their retirement from the Supreme Court of India. Yet, they conceal the salient points of this work from the people. In fact, if Justice Variava goes one step ahead of the manipulators, Justice B.N. Krishna would go two steps.
           Mr.Vimal Jalan had to resign from the post of the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) presumably because of the Bank of India (BoI) matter presented in Chapter 8.
       Therefore, their proposals are to promote bribery and slavery.
          Evidently, the proposal of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to start 74 CBI courts all over India is an idea distilled by them.


          Excise Collection dipped by over 8 per cent in September 2011. This happens because India is illegally importing Chinese products just to enable some boys to get commission. Even the bicycles for children come from China either through an illegal route or under negligible import duty thereby jeopardizing the interests of Indian industry.

        Former Karnataka Chief Minister Yeddyurappa was, on 15 October 2011, remanded to judicial custody in the so-called illegal de-notification of lands in and around Bangalore.
          In this connection, it must be stated that the friends and relatives of the leaders buy assets in certain localities before according sanction to new roads, bus stands or airports.
          Further, compared to the crime committed by the judges of the Supreme Court of India, the crime committed by him is a negligible one.
          Therefore, there is no justification for sending him to jail. It is a human rights problem.

          On 16 October 2011, The New Indian Express –through its writer a Mr. Balbir Punj –  said that a massive collapse of Indian System was visible. This could be prevented by initiating prosecution proceedings against the learned judges of the Supreme Court for secretly facilitating the conversion of public assets into private assets.
         
        A Mr. Lal Sharma alleged that Anna Hazare and his group had played a fraud by receiving a cheque for Re.45 lakh for his trust on 31 March 1995 from the Consolidated Fund of India before its registration on 6 April 1995.  He levelled a few more similar charges against him. A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, on 17 October 2011, admitted this as Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

          Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia, on 19 October 2011, requested the judges to face constructive criticism of their actions for the development of law. Apparently, he is losing his grip over the judges. Otherwise, he would not have talked to the judges through the media as if they were “fallen angels” of Milton.

          Though it is a digression, it must be stated that the revolutionary fighters in Libya, on 20 October 2011, killed Gaddafi. He was dragged from hiding in a drainage pipe and shot dead. According to reports, he had begged for mercy from the captors.
          The allegation was that he had turned the oil rich Libya into his own personal fiefdom.
          Did Gaddafi transfer anything equivalent to Re. 3 lakh crore to anyone?
          The Constitution of India permits the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Parliament, media and even the people to control the Prime Minister of India. Yet, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh managed everyone and transferred Re. 3 lakh crore in Provident Fund (PF) to two or three people.
          Some people would say that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh did not use his power for terrorist attack. But the killings of the Sri Lankan Tamils are more heinous than the terrorist attacks of Gaddafi. The difference is that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had given food to them before killing.
  
      Markandey Katjiu, Chairman of the Press Council of India (PCI) and former judge of the Supreme Court of India, said that if the media proved incorrigible, harsh measures might be taken to correct it. The Hindu published his words as a centre page article on 22 October 2011. He must abide by the Constitution of India before talking like this.

       A Mr. Lal Sharma alleged that Anna Hazare and his group had played a fraud by receiving a cheque for Re.45 lakh on 31 March 1995 from the Consolidated Fund of India before its registration on 6 April 1995.  He levelled a few more similar charges against him. A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, on 17 October 2011, admitted this as Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

          The Supreme Court of India, on 22 October 2011, denied bail to former Satyam Chief Ramalinga Raju.
          In this connection, it must be stated that the Supreme Court of India is even now secretly allowing the public sector Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to buy the shares of private companies. Further, it is allowing tax exemption to investments in the hands of private parties. These are acts of corruption. Therefore, there is no justification for keeping him in prison.

          The CBI, on 22 October 2011, said that former Minister Raja committed an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means while allocating 2G spectrum. In order to justify its stand, the CBI said that Raja had dominion over the spectrum.          The CBI - in order to shield Prime Minister Manmohan Singh – argues that Raja functioned as a super prime minister.
          In this connection, it must be stated that none in India has dominion over the lives of the people or their assets. Even the Chief Justice of India has no absolute power. This is the demand of the Constitution of India.
  
  The Special CBI Court, on 22 October 2011, framed charges against A. Raja and 16 others under section 420 (cheating), section 120B (criminal conspiracy and some other sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Special Judge O.P. Saini in his order said:1. The allegation of bribery for Re.200 crore is not an imaginary one.2. There is no merit in the submission that none would pay a bribe 16 months after obtaining the alleged favour. 3. The supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law cannot be compromised in the grab of affordability of mobile phones at cheaper prices or in the name of fresh investments –domestic or foreign. 4.  The private players should not be allowed to violate constitutional norms and 5. The Government is at liberty to follow any laudable policy as long as the same is not in violation of the Constitution of India.
It is obvious that the above orders are against the avowed anti-constitutional doctrine of the Supreme Court of India.
The hard words used against Raja are against the Supreme Court of India. If someone points out this to Judge O.P. Saini, he would say that Raja is being used as a whipping- boy for the crime committed by the Supreme Court of India.

The Union Cabinet, on 25 October 2011, approved a proposal to provide interest-free loans to the tune of Re.108.77 crore to benefit 56 co-operative textile mills in the Maharastra state.
Evidently, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh brings to the notice of the Union Cabinet small issues involving Re. hundreds of crore only. He gives dominion over money matters of Re. one lakh or more to individuals or Group of Minister (GoM). Thus the decisions for the allocations of spectrum and the method of utilization of the PF money were, apparently, taken without the knowledge of the Union Cabinet and the people at large.

The Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India, sent another letter – No.L.15012/1/2011-Jus-  on 4 October 2011 to the Registrar (Judicial) Supreme Court of India. In that letter, the Union Government asked the Supreme Court of India to establish justice to the letters received through the President of India under intimation to this writer.
If the Supreme Court had directed the Government to submit an action report over this work, the Government would not have sent these letters.
Now, the above letter is like a presidential reference to the Supreme Court of India. Therefore, it should not hesitate to do justice to the letters before it.
In this connection, it must be noted that the Chief Justice of India needs the pleasure of the President of India to continue in office.
 
             The facts from 7 October 2011 to 27 October 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 28 October 2011.
             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.
28 -10- 2011
 V.Sabarimuthu.
26-3 Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167
Kanyakumari District