469: THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA: DISRESPECTFUL AND UNREASONABLE?

469

THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

DISRESPECTFUL AND UNREASONABLE?

          President of India Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, on 28 January 2016, said that he never aspired for the post of the Prime Minister of India.

          A person must occupy the highest elected position in an atmosphere of Freedom. This does not happen in India.

The ruling class distributes the positions of great responsibility to their men.

Therefore, any Mr. Modi like person can become the prime minister.

In fact, at no time did, Mr. Mukherjee or any other persons –other than the present writer- present himself as a representative of the people to claim the post of prime minister.

          Even now, he does not deserve his present position for various reasons mentioned earlier.

          He simply sits as a humble servant of the ruling class.

          Naturally, he does not concentrate his attention on the Freedom of the people.

          He is not going to refute this, lest the act of acknowledging this work would amount to giving Freedom to Indians.

          Union Coal Secretary Mr. Anil Swarup, on 29 January 2016, said that no special consideration would be given to the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) of the various state governments in coal block allotments.

          The government shall not sell anything through one hand, and buy the same through another hand. If it does, it is arbitrage trading.

Therefore, the government could hand over all public assets to the promoters of the prime minister.

          The Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, Mr. Raghuram Rajan, on 29 January 2016, said that there must be a public discussion to know whether India needs fiscal consolidation or not.

          There was no discussion to know whether his appointment was a legally valid one or not.

Further, the people do not know how everything happens in India.

 Therefore, he can do anything without any discussion.

It will be sufficient if he acts in good faith.

The Union Government, on 29 January 2016, sold 10 percent shares of the public sector Engineers India Limited for about Re.600 crore.

Now, the government has unlimited money as mentioned earlier in this work. It has not denied it. Therefore, the government did not sell it to manage the so called fiscal deficit.

The prime minister says that he is working for the downtrodden.  The sale is not consistent with his aim also.

The government could have thought of selling the shares after giving Freedom to the people to know the salient features of this work.  It did not do so.

10 days ago, on 19 January 2016, a bench of the Supreme Court of India headed by the chief justice asked the reason for selling the residual shares of the Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL). Not satisfied with the reply, the court stayed the sale.

It is too early for the court to forget its judgment.

At one time, the court induces the government to alienate the public assets.

Therefore, the government thinks that the court cannot question it.

At another time, the court thinks it is illegal

But the government has not the slightest regard for the state of mind of the court. It does not simply want to know how the sale would affect the court.

Now, the court must either follow the government or remain silent. Even if it wants to do justice to the arduous task entrusted to it; the media would not allow the people to know it.

Therefore, all that the present writer can say is that the sale is out and out disrespectful and unreasonable.

This is a consequence of the denial freedom of expression.

This is letter No. 469

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 1-2-2016.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

1-2-2016.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

468. PRESIDENT OF FRANCE Mr. FRANCOIS HOLLANDE

Notice: The esteemed viewers are requested to sign a google account to read this blog as it cannot be assessed through others like Facebook.  
   

         

         

          

468

PRESIDENT OF FRANCE Mr. FRANCOIS HOLLANDE:

A UNIVERSAL PROBLEM?

          India and France, on 25 January 2016, signed 14 agreements.

One of the agreements provided for the purchase of 36 Rafale jets for the Indian Air Force (IAF).

India is in need of stealth jets.

The chief of the IAF must tell the reasons for not seeking them.

His silence has ominous portents for the nation.

          The New Indian Express, on 25 January 2016, said that Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi does not support privatization.

          The place that determines the destiny of the nation is the Supreme Court of India.

          He told the court that his government wants to privatize the Public Sector Undertakings (PSU). He, further, unequivocally said that his government does not want to do business.

          He said this not to abandon any business but to transmit the public resources to private parties.

          If he has no courage to tell this to the people, he should not have told this to the court.

          The people are seldom aware that the somersault is due to this work.

          The above paper, in the same article, reiterated that the net worth of two private banks is more than that of a dozen public sector banks.

          Similarly, it said that the market capitalization of a private company is more than that of the public sector IOC, BPCL, GAIL and the HPCL put together.

          The assets of the above so-called private entities are nothing but public assets. The reasons were given earlier in this work. Even the Supreme Court has not refuted it.

          A Judicial Commission questioned Chief Minister of Kerala Mr.Oommen Chandy for 14 hours on 26 January 2016 in a corruption case. The Commission wanted to do a lie detector (polygraph) test.

          However, a Ms. Saritha S. Nair said that she had handed over a bag containing Re.1.1crore to Mr. Thomas Kuruvila, a close aide of the chief minister, at a mall in Delhi and, later, Re.80 lakh to the same person at her house. She added that she did everything as directed by Mr. Jikkumon Jacob, the then additional private secretary to the chief minister.

The chief minister could have cited this work to prevent the questioning.

         

          A prominent leader of the BJP, Mr. L.K. Advani, on 26 January 2016, said that there is no question mark on the freedom of expression in the country.

          A point becomes clear. Even if the government wants to give Freedom, he would not allow it to happen.

          He knows that the Indians would get Freedom as gratis only and not as a matter of right based on specific laws. 

          Indeed, the Constitution of India mentions the phrase freedom of expression. But it does not mention the ways to enforce it.

          The government also did not enact any law to enforce it.

          Similarly, the Constitution mentions the appointment of judges. But it does not mention the ways to select the judges.

          When both the basic features are clubbed, there is nothing other than the inexorable laws for slavery.

          This cannot be the constitution framed by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.

          The ruling class removes the public resources. They report the words of the people prone to perpetrate this condition. 

          It is pertinent to recall, that the Union Cabinet under him, one day, decided to hand over the public sector VSNL to a private individual although no law permitted it.

          Within a few days, the Bank of India (BoI) gave a huge amount to a private company as loan.

          The owner of that company later bought the VSNL.

          He did not receive any money as bribe.

          But, in anticipation of this, the ruling class had made him a national leader.          

          The complaint was sent to the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India severally and collectively. But the court did not act.

          This is the biggest act of corruption.

          The court serves those in power.    

          Thus, might passes on as right,

          Naturally, this anxious question remains unanswered.

          Yet, the people hear his words.

          He did not earn the right to be heard in any good way.

          Further, he said, “I do not know who the people are saying that there is no freedom of expression in India”.

          The present man says that there is no freedom of expression in India. This work is the proof.

          The people have pre-existent constitutional rights to know this work and its consequences. The Constitution of India has taken away such rights because there are no laws for enforcing freedom of expression.

          This work rolled in his hand during his stint in the Union Cabinet. It continues to roll in his hand even after that.

          So he tells a lie.

          If a leader talks like this, he deceives the people in bad faith.

          Now, the government keeps the people as limited animals because they have no way to know the salient points of this work.

          The moment they get a chance to know this, the prime minister would resign. So, it is a catch – 22 to him.

          President of France Mr. Francois Hollande was the chief guest at the 67th Republic Day parade. For the first time, an Infantry Regiment of France took part in the parade.

          Thus France imparted legitimacy to the Indian despotism.

          There are certain desirable essentials in any constitution. If a constitution lacks these, the nation will become a veritable hell for the people. The most important of these is the laws for freedom of expression. If it lacks these essentials, parade is not needed.

          The people of France are not aware of this work. As the freedom of expression comprises the right to know, the French too have no freedom of expression. Apparently, it is a universal problem.

          It must be noted that different letters had been sent to different newspapers all over the world.

          After the parade, the President of France left India.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the President of France must have landed at New Delhi. The Prime Minister of India must have welcomed him at the airport. If the prime minister cannot do this, the heads of other nations need not be invited as the chief guest for the Republic Day.

This is letter No. 468

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 28-1-2016.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

28-1-2016.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

         

         

         

          

467. PRESIDENT OF FRANCE Mr. FRANCOIS HOLLANDE: THE RESPOSIBILITY

467

PRESIDENT OF FRANCE Mr. FRANCOIS HOLLANDE

THE RESPONSIBILITY

          The Union Government, on 22 January 2016, postponed the auction of the spectrum to May 2016.

          When this work weakens, the government would auction it.

          Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, on 22 January 2016, said that he is working for the downtrodden.

          Just 72 hours ago, the Attorney General (AG) of India told the Supreme Court of India that the government does not want to do business. His message was that the government decided to alienate the natural assets to the private parties based on this principle.

          The people, in general, did not notice it.

          Some people noticed it but they did not do anything.

          The words of the AG are a reflection of the views of the prime minister.

          As soon as assuming power, the prime minister transmitted as much public assets as possible to about ten men. He will do it again if the present writer sleeps.

          Thanks to the last letter, the AG- therefore the prime minister- will not pick up courage to reinforce his arguments in the court.

          This is the power of this work.

The people must know it.

But they have no way to know it.

          Tomorrow- again due to this work- it may become an impossible task for the prime minister to hand over the minerals to the private parties. Then, he would proclaim this as his virtue.  

          It must be emphasized that he argues in favour of the ten men in the court and talks in favour of 1000 million people in the public forums.

          In this connection, it must be stated that some people are called upon to sit in a responsible position. Such people must act in public interest. It is their responsibility.

          He, either alone or in company with his colleagues, should have demanded the court to restore the vanquished assets.

He did not do this.

Instead, he promotes bad things in the court.

Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi, on the same day, distributed three-wheel chairs to the handicapped. He described them as the children of the Almighty.

          He must have opened the eyes of the blind.

He did not do this.

Instead he warps his opponents, particularly the present man.

Thus, he cripples 1000 million people in very bad faith.

          He talks one thing and does the diametrically opposite things.

He has brains to rule over 1000 million people.

It is not very important.

How he rules is important.

He must discharge his onerous responsibilities.

The President of France, Mr. Francois Hollande, arrived in Chandigarh in India on 24 January 2016. Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi went there to welcome him.

Mr. Hollande could have made known the salient features of this work to the people of France before coming to India.

He could not do this.

Apparently, France does not want to interfere in a matter that does not directly concern it.

However, it is now the responsibility of the leaders all over the world to give freedom to Indians in particular and the people all over the world in general.

This is letter No. 467

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 25-1-2016.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

25-1-2016.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

           

466. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: THE TRUTH WOULD RISE AGAIN?

466

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

THE TRUTH WOULD RISE AGAIN?

A student belonging to a Scheduled Caste had been expelled by the University of Hyderabad. He, on 17 January 2016, committed suicide. Some reports conveyed the impression that caste politics was the cause.

The learned judges do not allow any members of the Scheduled Caste to go anywhere near the Supreme Court of India. In fact, there is not even one judge in the Supreme Court to represent them.

There are one or two exceptional cases in one or two top places. They are reluctant to change the status quo.

Two judges of the Madras High Court, Justices P.R. Sivakumar and D. Hariparathaman, on 18 January 2017, demanded reservation in the higher judiciary. They revealed that just 18 candidates represent the Scheduled Caste in the High Courts. They put the sanctioned strength at 1200.

They described this as ‘elite untouchability’.

They condemned a judge of Gujarat High Court for clubbing corruption with reservation.

Their present statement might undermine their promotion.

It must be noted that the media rarely report such views of judges

The New Indian Express, on 18 January 2016, narrated the history of India since 1991.

It said that the ruling class saved India from bankruptcy by forcing the government to embrace economic freedom.

However, it deplored that the Ministry of Steel still exists.

Keeping the public sector IDBI bank and the Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) mind,  it said that the total market capitalization of PSU banks is less than that of 2 private sector banks.

It insinuated that the government even now does some businesses.

It added that only the ‘vanquished’ remember history.

The article shows that if the present man sleeps for one day, all the remaining public resources would go into the hand of ten men.

India has been remaining in the hand of these men since independence. Even Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel became a big leader because of them.

They do not allow the government to do anything.

When the government tried to open the licenses among a larger spectrum of people, the Supreme Court of India, on 2 February 2012, said that “the government virtually gifted away important national assets”. Accordingly, it cancelled hundreds of Telecom and –later- mining licenses and induced the government to transmit them to ten men.

The people believe that the court did it.

Actually, the ruling class did it.

Such acts of corruption will go on in one way or other until the people get freedom.

The Reliance Industries, on 19 January 2016, put its third quarter profit at Re.7290 crore.

The Supreme Court of India alone knows whether this profit is due to the higher domestic prices of petroleum products or not.

On a petition filed by the National Confederation of Officers Association, the Supreme Court of India, on 19 January 2016, restrained the government from alienating the residual shares of the Hindustan Zinc Ltd (HZL) for want of necessary laws. The court considered the earlier sale of majority shares to the Vedanta Limited as a circumvention of law. The court gave four weeks to give its reply.

A bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur heard the case. The names of other judges were not revealed.

The court could have secretly allowed the government to alienate the shares. Then, none might have noticed it.

It did not do that.

However, the present judgment is a half-hearted one.

The circumvention of law to the disadvantage of the people is illegal.

There is no law to alienate the public assets. Therefore, the court should have restored the ‘vanquished’ assets.

At one stage the court asked the Attorney General (AG), Mr. Mukel Rohatgi,  the reason for the sale.

The New Indian Express yesterday said that the government still does business. It is a surprise that the court has not noticed it. This was the latent meaning of the reply.

It may be recalled that former Prime Minister Mr. A. B. Vajpayee proclaimed in the floor of the Indian Parliament that his government decided to sell the PSUs to manage the fiscal deficit.

In this connection, it must be stated that the government must do business in key sectors to save the people.

Now it sells rice, wheat, pulses, kerosene, liquor and even mineral water. It does banking, transport, petroleum, postal and many other businesses. No court restrained it from doing this. After doing businesses like this, it cannot alienate the natural assets.

The AG should not have picked up courage to talk like this in the open court.

On the same day, the media reported that the court had ordered a probe to fix the illegalities associated with the sale of the HZL.

The people come to know about the probe only now.  What happened to the sale of other assets also is not known. The court should not have kept this as a secret matter.

So long as there is no freedom, the Supreme Court of India would not give a reply to this work. The probe, naturally, would not reach its logical conclusion.

However, the revelation is consistent with the saying that ‘the truth crushed to earth would rise again’.

This is letter No. 466

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 22-1-2016.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

22-1-2016.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851