561. BALCO

561

BALCO

The Union Cabinet, on 19 April 2017, cleared Re. 3174 crore to buy 16,15000 Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) machines. The price of the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) was not mentioned.

If a country cannot make EVMs and the VVPATs, why should it go for them? Why should India forego the foreign exchange?

 Is it not for huge commission?

What is the real cause for substituting the ballot paper with the EVMs?

Will not the ballot paper method give more employment to the people?

In what way does the nation dispose of the electronic cum plastic wastes?

Will not the money mitigate the sufferings of the farmers and others?

The Supreme Court of India could have prevented it at least to protect the environment.

Surely, these wastes would be more polluting than all the vehicles in New Delhi put together.

The Union Government, on 19 April 2017, decided to put an end to the use of red beacons from May 1 in their vehicles. After announcing this, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi said that every Indian is a VIP.

This is not something that must be announced by the Prime Minister of India. There are many other serious things. He simply converts small things into big things and big things into small things.

Everyone knows that his desire for power precludes that of others. But he is not holding the real power. Experience shows that he is not capable of exercising power.

Prime Minister Mr. Modi must see the light and allow others to see the light so that the people would see the real world, ‘the world of Ideas’. Now the people believe what they see is the real world.

         A Supreme Court of India bench comprising Jutice P.C. Ghose and Justice Rohinton Nariman, on 19 April 2017, revived the criminal conspiracy case against Mr. L. K. Advani and others, in the Babri Masjid demolition case. The bench directed a Lucknow court to hold day to day trial and pronounce the judgement in two years. The bench forbade the transfer of the judge at Lucknow and asked the CBI to produce at least one witness every day.

The bench said that crimes that shook the secular fabric of the Constitution of India were committed on December 6, 1992.

 The Allahabad High Court, 16 years ago, dropped the case on technical grounds –like jurisdiction.

In this connection, it must be noted that Justice Karnan of the Culcutta High Court has not exonerated Justice P.C. Ghose from the Atrocities against SC/STs case.

Further, the democratic fabric is as important as the secular fabric of the Constitution of India

The ruling class of India keep all the natural resources of India. They either give unlimited money to the media houses or use threat to deny freedom to Indians.

It has been conclusively proved that the people have not seen this work due to any one of the above factors or due to the combination of the above factors.

Due to this, the judges of the Supreme Court of India are unable to listen to the voice of others. The judges do not recognize others at all.

Therefore, they form surprisingly unsound opinion about freedom and democracy.

This has disastrous consequences.

In this connection it must be stated that in deference to the first letter dated 1-6-2001, the Union Cabinet that met in 4 July 2001 under Prime Minister Mr. A.B. Vajpayee devised some guidelines for selling the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

Accordingly, the PSUs should not be sold to: 1.Those who remain as a threat to the security of India, 2.Those who keep ill-gotten wealth and 3.Those who committed “grave offences”.

The grave offence was defined as one, which outraged the moral sense of the community. The Government, further, clarified that for matters other than security, any conviction by a court or an indictment by a regulatory authority for a ‘grave offence’ would be sufficient.

Based on the above guidelines, the Cabinet Committee on Disinvestments (CCD) disqualified the bid of Hindujas for buying the AI because of its involvement in the Bofors case. Sterlite and Videcorn were disqualified because they were indicted by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Here, the Sterlite was disqualified from buying the Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) and not the Bharat Aluminium Company Limited (BALCO)

As the Sterlite was disqualified from bidding for the HZL, the Government should not have handed over the BALCO to the Sterlite.

But some Union Ministers contacted the judges of the Supreme Court of India and enlisted their support. Then they said that the sale of the BALCO would not be affected because the guidelines would be effective prospectively than retrospectively. This appeared as an opinion given in bad faith because a petition that challenged the privatization of the BALCO was pending in the Supreme Court of India.

Finally, the court said that it would not interfere in the economic policy. After that, the BALCO went into the hand of the Sterlite. It happened not due to the fault of the government alone. It happened because of the encouragement the government received from secret influences emanating from the Supreme Court of India.

Thus, the BALCO was handed over to a private party merely on a technical ground. Later, even the HZL was, in bad faith, given to the Sterlite.

Does any law allow this? If any law allows this, why did the court ask Miss. Jayalalithaa to surrender the TANSI land?

The decision not to give the PSUs to the entities that remain as a threat to the security has far reaching consequences. Actually, the decision to sell the PSUs to private parties is a threat to the security of India. The decision would affect the stability of the nation.

Now, the Chief Justice of India would not dare to say in public that the court would not interfere in the economic policy of the government.

The reason is that the Supreme Court of India created a system of government based on exploitation and this is affecting the security and the stability of the nation.

The money from the BALCO alone would have been sufficient to prevent the starvation of the farmers and others.

The farmer’s agitation at New Delhi would not have occurred at all.

The police, on 19 April 2017, chased away the striking farmers at New Delhi. Their plight is not known. They had been under strike for more than a month.

Ten men take the public resources and keep the prime minister and judges as slaves. They cannot listen to the voice of the farmers and others because they are not trained for it.

The burden of loan repayment is killing the people. The Prime Minister could have noticed the functioning of banks in other countries because no bank in any other country extracts as much interest as in India.

 Ten people remove unlimited public money without paying any interest. They lend the money for 10 to 16 per cent interest. Whose money is this? The farmers are not aware of it.

When Prime Minister Mr.A.B. Vajpayee wanted to use public money for public investments; the court did not allow it in the name of reform. 16 years have passed. Anyone can see the effect of the reforms.

The government can solve the problem of the farmers and others in so many ways. Due to ignorance, it does not see any way.

The court can solve the problem by giving freedom to the people. But it is not ready for it.

If the public resources cannot be used for public welfare, why should the Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi continue in power with the support of 1000 million people?

This letter No.561

   The facts that happened from 15 April 2017 to 20 April 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 21-4-2017.

21-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

560-Mrs. Sonia Gandhi – All Party Delegation.

560

Mrs. Sonia Gandhi – All Party Delegation.

          The Election Commission of India (ECI), on 12 April 2017, cancelled the by-election to the R.K. Nagar Constituency in the Tamil Nadu State. The ECI alleged that the voters were given money for voting by different political parties.

          Ten men remove the sand, iron, zinc and other natural assets, project their representatives as political leaders and rule India through them.

          Now there exists a similar group in the Tamil Nadu State. They part with a part of their income. If the Supreme Court of India is not ready to prevent the generation of this money, why does the ECI stand on the way?

       It is not necessary to go to the constituency to give the money is a different matter.

         

          Justice Karnan of the Calcutta High Court asked seven judges of the Supreme Court of India- CJI Khehar, Justices Dipak Misra, J Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur, Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Kurian Joseph —  to appear before him for insulting him “wantonly and deliberately and with malafide intention” in the open court. He asked them to defend themselves against the charge of violating the prevention of SC/STs atrocities Act levelled by him. He said that the Chief Justice of India, on 31 March 2017, raised a question as to how his mental health was. The question was “endorsed” by the six other judges of the bench, Justice Karnan, said, adding it amounted to insulting him in the open court.

          The Supreme Court of India did not deny the allegation.

The Supreme Court, on March 10, 2017, issued a bailable warrant against Justice Karnan to ensure his presence before it after he levelled accusations against some judges.

Justice Karnan said that the seven judges comprising the bench that heard the contempt proceedings against him should not seek remedy from any judge under the Chief Justice of India, but should approach the Parliament, the competent authority.

Earlier, the seven judges had withdrawn the judicial and administrative powers of Justice Karnan. They should not have done this.

Further, no judge would ever dare to repeat the words used by the Chief Justice against Justice Karnan.

We are all thief-like people. Why do you expose us to the people? The Chief Justice might have used the words with this meaning.

It must be noted that these judges rejoice over the fact that they did not allow anyone from the SC/STs to enter the Supreme Court of India as a judge.

Now, if the seven judges respect the Constitution of India, they shall not hear any case.

The seven judges, even otherwise, forfeited their right to hear any case because they had not enforced freedom of expression.

          Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, the leader of the Congress Party, on 12 April 2017, met the President of India, Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, along with the leaders of the opposition parties. The All Party Delegation, apparently, wanted rule of law and democracy consistent with the Constitution of India.

          Ten men remove the sand, iron, zinc and other natural assets. They project their representatives as political leaders.  Apparently, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi has fallen from their grace. Therefore, the newspapers and the TV channels did not disclose the text of the memorandum submitted to the President.

          In this connection, it must be noted that Indian politics is all a question of plundering the public resources. Therefore, the ruling and opposition parties always fight over trivial matters and carefully avoid serious matters like freedom.

If Mrs. Sonia Gandhi is capable of taking the memorandum to its logical conclusion, Mr. Narendra Modi Government will have fallen before the next budget. It must be noted that she has already been sent to oblivion.

Even the intellectuals are drifting into the disorder of barbarism under the rule of Mr. Narendra Modi is a different matter.

This letter No.560

   The facts that happened from 8 April 2017 to 14 April 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 15-4-2017.

15-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

559: TATA-VSNL

      559

             Justice J.S. Khehar -TATA-VSNL    

        The Chief Justice of India, on 17 April 2017, said that the election manifestoes of political parties do not ensure economic-social justice to the marginalized sections. He added that the political parties must be held accountable for it.

           In this connection, it must be noted that, in 2001, the NDA Government under Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, decided to sell the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

          When Mr. A.B. Vajpayee was on a visit to the USA, the Union Cabinet that met under Mr. L.K. Advani decided to sell the public sector VSNL. This prompted Mr. Vajpayee to compare the PSUs to pillars.

Within a few days, the public sector Bank of India (BoI) gave about Re. 850 crore as loan to Mr. Tata. No reason was given for the same.

After that, the Union Ministers approached the then Chief Justice of India. The latter asked them to sell anything based on the BALCO judgement. He then requested them to manage the media. They assured them that no TV channel or newspaper would disclose anything against the judges

After six months, the then the Chief Justice of India – without any cause or provocation- openly proclaimed that the Supreme Court would not interfere in the policy decisions of the Government.

There was a wicked cause at the bottom of his statement. It was comparable to the statement issued by the present Chief Justice of India before the amalgamation of the associate banks of the State Bank of India.

Consistent with the portent,  Mr. Tata bought the VSNL. Thus the public property was indirectly converted into private property using public funds.

The day light robbery was brought to the notice of Mr.A.B. Vajpayee. Simultaneously, letters were sent to the judges of the Supreme Court of India, chief justices of the High Courts and the important chief ministers.

Prime Minister Mr. A.B. Vajpayee got angry with his colleagues. He wanted to resign. But his colleagues urged him not to ditch them.

The media assured him that they would not allow any mud to stick to him.

The judges of the Supreme Court of India also, apparently, told him that the letters against him would not go into the public domain.  

The Supreme Court of India is even now committed to this secrecy. Therefore, it has not accepted or denied the allegations.

This weakness enabled ten men to convert the judges into slaves.

Gandhiji said that any nation that exploits any single individual would not be deserving freedom.

Now, the Supreme Court of India exploits 1000 million people without the slightest compunction.

This offence is one thousand times more heinous than the offence committed by former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Miss. Jayalalithaa.

These are facts. The judges cannot ignore these facts just because the facts are unpleasant.

The present Chief Justice of India is aware of it. But he has not taken any step to restore the VSNL.

This cannot be the end of the VSNL. For what purpose did the youthful VSNL snatched away so suddenly from the 1000 million people? The VSNL would not have merited this end through any action of the Government.

However, there is no necessity to probe the veil of mystery. He must unconditionally surrender the public resources stolen by the Supreme Court of India before talking like this.

This letter No.559

   The facts that happened from 8 April 2017 to 9 April 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 10-4-2017.

10-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

558: A Predatory Method

558

A Predatory Method

Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, on 6 April 2017, said that the efforts of his government to serve the poor and the marginalized would continue with great vigour.

On the same day, he said that the time had come for the corrupt to surrender the corrupt assets.

Apparently, he wants to protect his promoters after causing minimum damage.

According to some reports, the High Court, Chennai, on 6 April 2017, banned the monazite rich beach sand mining in the Tamil Nadu State.

The beach sand mining takes place because of the policy of the Union Government to hand over the natural resources to the private parties. 

Such orders of the courts serve the purpose of showing to the world that everything happens based on certain laws.

The danger is that the mining would reach the hand of the national exploiters from the state level exploiters.

Further, the sand must be removed from the beach. The sand will not be depleted due to mining. The sand will be replenished by the waves.

Therefore, the Union Government must take over all mining works all over India before touching the Tamil Nadu State.

The Department of Income Tax, on 7 April 2017, raided the houses of Tamil Nadu Minister Mr.Vijayabasker, Mr. Sarath Kumar and Vice Chancellor of MGR Medical University Dr. Geethalakshmi in connection with cash distribution to the voters of the RK Nagar Constituency.

The media said that Re.5 crore in cash and documents for cash disbursement for about Re.89 crore were seized. The media added that a political party alone wanted to spend Re.400 crore for about 2 lakh voters. Other parties also do not lag behind it.

This is the money of the state level exploiters.

Anyone would tell that this is part of the proceeds from the minerals, contract works and bulk buyings.

After starving the farmers and others, the ministers and some others amass wealth.

Every susceptible union minister gets 1000 times more money than a susceptible state minister.

The state level ministers use a part of their wealth to buy vote.

The union ministers buy the vote by denying freedom of expression.

Evidently, if everyone gets his share in the wealth of the nation, no one need starve.

This work shows that the symbol of the nation level exploiters is Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi.

But the media depict the Prime Minister as the symbol of goodness and all the rest as the symbol of evil.

However, everything happens because the Supreme Court of India conceals the works like this one from the eye of the people and keeps the people as mere slaves..

In fact, the judges beseech the newspapers and the TV channels to save them.

Thus the state level exploiters get a bad name and the nation level exploiters get a good name.

This is a predatory method of enforcing law.

This letter No.558

   The facts that happened from 5 April 2017 to 7 April 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 8-4-2017.

8-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

557. Farmer's Agitation

557

Farmer’s Agitation

            There are reports that Singapore blocks the entry of Indian IT professionals. There are similar visa problems with the USA and England.

          Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi, at the instance of his promoters, visited many countries mainly to deflect the attention of the people from the coal and the spectrum allocations. This had the effect of reminding others that their countries were filled with Indians. This happens to every man, if he is not alert to his job at hand. Therefore, the present man requested him not to stir the world and endanger the position of the unemployed youth. He did not listen because he could not hear the words. Now, India suffers!

          If he wants to continue as the Prime Minister of India, he must curtail his foreign visits for the sake of the youth of the nation.

Over one hundred farmers belonging to the Cauvery Delta Farmer’s Welfare Association of the Tamil Nadu State are under an agitation for the last 22 days at New Delhi. According to its leader, Mr. Ayyakkannu, the farmers are demanding farm loan waiver, drought relief package and remunerative prices.

          The farmers all over India have been experiencing untold suffering. The situation is becoming worse year after year. They are facing an unprecedented situation due to the drought in this year. Many farmers suffer in silence. Some starve. Some die of starvation. Some commit suicide. Some steal. Some resort to novel agitations like this one.

          The farmers can sell their properties and escape. This also is not possible because their properties are classified as agricultural land. Such properties do not fetch even 10 per cent of the normal market value.

When the farmers or others lose their regular income or  the expected income, how will they survive? Where will they go? Is it not the duty of the government to alleviate their sufferings? It is said that if a country cannot be run without starving the farmers or its citizens, the so-called intermediaries must go; the government must go.

The farmers do not tell the factors that affect their existence. They do not tell that the system deprives them of their share in the national wealth. They do not tell how the Chief Justice of India alienates their share in the natural resources. They do not tell how the Chief Justice of India helps remove the public money through bulk buying and others.

The present man, hundreds of times, mentioned the factors that affect their development and gave concrete solutions to solve their problems.

But the system has not seen anything. The Prime Minister of India and the Chief Justice of India have not seen the farmers for the last 22 days. Or  they have not solved their problems without going there..

If our masters show anything through their TV channels and newspapers we will see. If our masters tell anything we will listen. Our masters have not shown the farmers to us. So we don’t see their problem. We unconditionally surrendered to the Marina Uprising because our masters showed the pent up feelings of the people. We will surrender to the farmer’s agitation only if our masters show it to us. Otherwise, we will break their strength. We will try to break their spirit. This, apparently, is the reply of the Prime Minister of India and the Chief Justice of India.

This letter No.557

   The facts that happened from 2 April 2017 to 4 April 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 5-4-2017.

5-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

          

556;Roseneft- Essar Oil

556

Roseneft- Essar Oil

          An Indian student was attacked in Poland. However, he survived the attack. The media reported it on 1 April 2017.

         

          The associate banks of the State Bank of India merged with the State Bank of India on 1 April, 2017.

          The Chief Justice of India, J.S. Khehar, on the penultimate day, said that the court would not interfere in the policy decision of the Government.

          Apparently, the Prime Minister of India secretly obtained the concurrence of the Chief Justice India for the merger.

          The painful consequences of the merger would outweigh the happy consequences of the merger.

          This bank extracts money from all over India and siphons off to Mumbai. There, ten men remove the money in the pretext of selling shares. The loss, if any, is extracted from the people in the form higher interest rates. This leads to economic deprivation.

          Now the State Bank of India blocks the saving bank accounts of the farmers and others for any delay in paying the interests to the jewel loans. The merger would add more and more oppression. Therefore, the merger would throw the people from the fry pan into the fire.

          Keeping this in mind, Chairman of the SBI Ms. Bhattacharya said that the infant is more at risk than the grown up. 

The Government of India tried its level best to hand over this bank to one of the top ten men. One must go through the 555 letters sent by the present man to know the reason why the bank still remains in the hand of the government.

However, ten men succeeded in buying certain shares of this bank. The merger adds value to their shares. This is the private interest of the Government in the merger.

The Chief Justice of India says that the court would not interfere in the policy decisions. If he repeats this statement, the Government would sell this bank to the private parties. This is because what he says is law.

The Government gave petrol outlets to the handicapped, widows and the ex- service men. It was a policy decision. Yet the court removed the petrol outlets from the handicapped and asked the private parties to distribute the same all over India.

Similarly, the Government apportioned the 2G spectrum among hundreds of players. It was a policy decision of the Government. The court cancelled all licences and gave it to about ten men. Further, it sent to jail the minister responsible for it.

The government gave the licences for the coal to hundreds of people. It was a policy decision. The court cancelled them and gave them to about ten men.

Above all, the court pre-empted the former Prime Minister of India, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, from using the public money for public investments.

Thus they negated the benefits of all positive policy decisions.

Why does this happen.

This happens because the ten men converted the judges into their slaves.

If our masters show something we will see it. If they tell something we will listen to their words. The words of others are not familiar to us. The judges talk like this.

Naturally, the judges do not see anyone other their masters. Therefore, 555 letters have gone in vain in this matter.

However, they derive a stealthy perverted satisfaction in this condition.

The Roseneft- Essar deal would take 19 more days. The Hindu reported it on 1April 2017. According to the deal, the Rosenet would pay $12.9 billion to buy the Essar Oil, an Indian Company.

          The assets of the top ten men in India belong to the government. The reason is that they converted the judges of the Supreme Court of India into their slaves to amass the wealth.

          Apparently, the Essar Oil comes under the top ten.

          Even otherwise, the Constitution of India does not empower the ten men and the judges of the Supreme Court of India to apportion the assets of the nation among themselves.

          Anyone buying such assets would forfeit them. Roseneft-would, therefore, forfeit it if the people of India get freedom

This letter No.556

   The facts that happened from 31 March 2017 to 1 April 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 2-4-2017.

2-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.