CHAPTER 171

171

TREACHERY

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 30 January 2011. The same mail was sent to the Chief Justice of India, Director of the Central Bureau of investigation (CBI), Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) and the Chiefs of the Indian Army (IA) and the Indian Air Force (IAF). It was put in the blog: www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and was linked to www: thattan.com.

Dalai Lama said that he was thankful to the Indian people for giving shelter to the Tibetans. This must be construed as his reply to the last mail submitted to Her Excellency the President of India.

The people all over the world are hearing the words of the Tibetan leaders in India. At the same time, even the people of India are not hearing the words of the present writer. This shows that the Indians have no FREEDOM. The moles in India are projecting his FREEDOM as the FREEDOM of Indians. In this way, the moles successfully deceive the entire world. Therefore, Dalai Lama must give shelter to Indians in India.

The CVC – in a hurry - informed the Supreme Court that he had all the qualifications for the post of the CVC. He added that he would be neither proactive nor combative. He assured the court –consistent with the oath – that he would act without fear or favour. He promised that the CVC as an institution would remain as an honest one. The last mail might have prompted him to submit this.

The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) on 1 February 2011 decided to disclose the assets of its office bearers and the Members of Parliament (MPs). The beneficiaries of the NDA rule would give suitable rewards to the donors for a long time.

China said that Karmapa was not its spy. The police had discovered a huge amount of Chinese currency from him.

Outlook- an English magazine - on 2 February 2011 submitted before the Supreme Court that the Article 19(1)a of the Constitution of India became meaningful only when the taped conversations were disclosed to the public.

After noticing this, the present writer emailed a copy of the Letter No.169 dated 23-1-2011 to the Outlook, Junior Vekidan – a Tamil weekly- and the Tehelka -a TV channel. The present writer got the following electronically generated letter from the Junior Vekidan. A reply was immediately given. The letter and the reply are given below.

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:31 PM, jv Vikatan wrote:

Thank you for your mail. We value your feedback and look forward to regular interactions with you. Please remember to provide your name, mobile number and place of residence to customerinfo@vikatan.com. This would help us respond to you in more ways than one.

Best regards
CRM team

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To

customerinfo@vikatan.com

Dear Sir,

Name : V.SABARIMUTHU

26-3 THATTANKONAM

VELLICODE

MULAGUMOODU P.O.

PIN: 629167

Mobile :9486214851

Residence:04651 275520

For more details visit: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

Best regards

V.SABARIMUTHU

However, none disclosed the existence of this work to the people. This is the proof to establish that the media deliberately conceal this work. They thus make the elections an unconstitutional one. They want transparency only to deny transparency.

The CBI on 2 February 2011 arrested the former Minister for Communication for the violation of certain guidelines during the allocation of the 2G spectrum. Two bureaucrats were also arrested.

But the CBI has not arrested anyone for the criminal act of transmitting some public assets to some charge-sheeted private companies in violation some guidelines. In contrast, vigilance cases are going on in many places even for two cent of land. The Supreme Court and the CBI know this.

The US Exim Bank signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with an Indian private company to make available $5 billion to support the purchase of the US goods and services including turbines and generators. There were reports that the Indian orders would create 7 lakh jobs in the US in the next ten years.

The one man - Justice Shivaraj V.Patil - Committee, that probed the 2G spectrum scandal, found that about 20 public servants- including the Union Ministers- were involved in the manipulations. The Committee found that the decisions of the Union Cabinet had been ignored by the Department of Telecom since 2001.

The finding shows that 90 per cent of the bureaucrats in Delhi are getting a huge amount of money through the underground moles. Therefore, it is imperative that the assets of the bureaucrats in Delhi must be thoroughly investigated. A special emphasis must be given to the Department of External Affairs because of the money power of China.

Demanding remunerative prices, twelve farmers on 4 February 2011 attempted suicide in the Karnataka State and the condition of six of them was serious. The moles had earlier said that the Union Cabinet met three times to control the prices of onion.

The Union Government on 4 February 2011 informed its decision to sell the closed Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). Had there been no Supreme Court, one High Court or other might have stopped the sale.

The public sector National Metal and Minerals Development Corporation would buy coal and iron ore assets in Australia, Mozambique and Albania. There are reports that the public sector Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) would invest about $12 billion abroad.

The moles are arranging the iron ores in India to some individuals in foreign countries free of cost. At the same time, the PSUs are buying the same in other countries. The latter entities would end up as private companies through joint ventures and others.

In the above matter, the ruler would strike ignorance. The Prime Minister would say that many ex-ante things did not turn out to be ex-post. The Supreme Court knows this.

In the so-called Sri Padmanabhaswamy Temple Jewel Case the Kerala High Court on 31 January 2011 held that by virtue of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of 1971 and Article 366 (22) the present King of Travancore could not acquire the status of a ruler. Therefore, the assets of the temple would go to the Government. As the Government is secular, the court directed the Government to run the affairs of the temple through a trust. The trust so formed must open all vaults of the former kings and make an inventory of all the articles before exhibiting them.

The High Court might have interpreted the Constitution of India correctly. But, some private individuals are removing public assets in violation of all provisions of the Constitution of India. They rule the country through the underground moles.

The nation gave some solemn pledges to the former kings immediately after independence. Therefore, an enlightened Government would repeal the Twenty-Sixth Amendment.

In this connection it must be noted that a research is going on to identify the descendants of the former kings. Therefore, the existing kings may be considered as an endangered tribe. The Government, consistent with Chapter-71, must either keep its words or allow the people to see this work.

The Union Government on 31 January 2011 cleared the POSCO Steel Plant in Orissa. Does the Government seek to circumvent the December 6, 2010 order of the Supreme Court on POSCO license cancellation?

The ruler of India would strike ignorance. The Prime Minister would say that he accepted the view of a Minister in the Union Cabinet. All other Union Ministers would say that they did not apply their mind. This is one facet of the December 10, 2001 order of the Supreme Court.

The Union Government on 6 February 2011 wanted the people to look at growth, not mistakes.

A report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) said that an agreement between the public sector Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) and Devas Multimedia Private Limited - if implemented – would result in a loss of over $ 45 billion to the exchequer. A former Scientific Secretary, Dr. M.G. Chandrasekar, is the founder of the Devas Multimedia Private Limited. The Union Government cancelled the agreement after the above revelation.

The above scandal is, apparently, related to an out of turn promotion affected in the ISRO during 1991-1995.

A former Union Minister for Communication in the NDA Government on 8 February 2011 said that he did not violate the words of the then Prime Minister of India. He added that the UPA Government was bringing disrepute to the judiciary by appointing hand picked judges for various committees.

In this connection, it must be noted that the people believed that the BALCO judgment of December 10, 2001 was obtained through the aid of his judges. Now, he says that some others are doing the same job. Within four days, the above former Minister disclosed that there was no difference between the price of licenses in 2001 and 2004. The message was that if the spectrum could be sold for the same price after four years, it could be sold for the same price after eight years. This is the reason why the Supreme Court is giving importance to procedures rather than to the violation of the Constitution of India.

A few days later, the above Union Minister said that the CBI knew the identities of the companies. He added that the CBI was guilty of inaction. The CBI wanted to interrogate him on 21 February 2011. The moles finally chose not to mention anything about the interrogation.

Vedanta- a private company- on 8 February 2011 promised to reinvest the profit obtained from natural assets in India provided the Government permitted it to buy Cairan India.

In this connection, it must be stated that the natural assets belong to the people of India and they cannot be alienated by the Government. Further, it must surrender all the conquered natural assets. It need not wait for an order from the Supreme Court.

Mumbai High Court on 8 February 2011 said that a land scandal in Pune was bigger than the 2G spectrum scandal. A private company immediately announced the cancellation of a secret Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in the Maharastra State.

The 17th Commonwealth Law Conference held at Hyderabad on 9 February 2011 wanted the member countries to confiscate the assets of the corrupt after a fair trial.

The CBI on 9 February 2001 arrested one Mr. Balwa in connection with the 2G spectrum scandal. His firm - named Swan Telecom - got 13 circles for Re. 1537. It made a killing by selling 45 percent of its shares to the UAE based firm called Etisalat for Re.4200 crore soon after getting the spectrum.

Similarly a company called Unitech got 22 circles for Re.1658 crore and sold 60 per cent of shares for Re.6100 crore to a telephone company of Norway. The CBI is yet to take action against some other companies.

It may be recalled that a person bought a public sector hotel during the period of the NDA Government. Within days he sold it for a huge profit. No vigilance case. No case from the Crime Branch. The Supreme Court knows everything.

The CBI said that certain public servants of the Department of Telecommunication hatched a criminal conspiracy to grab licenses causing a wrongful loss to the Government and corresponding wrongful gain to the private persons.

The Supreme Court and the CBI did not see any loss or conspiracy when some PSUs were sold for a token payment.

A private company on 9 February 2011 wanted gas for its 2400 megawatt power project in the Andra Pradesh State. Gas based power projects shall be started only after ensuring prompt gas supply. Here, the company demands gas after the completion of the power project.

Previously, some companies started petrol outlets without obtaining permission from the Government. In this matter, the underground moles simply sold the Supreme Court.

Similarly, China sold various commodities in India without getting permission from the Government. In this matter the moles sold the Union Government for money.

Recently, the Supreme Court observed in the open court that some telephone companies were allowed to use dual technology even before the decision was made public in October 2007. The underground moles suppressed the effect of this observation also.

The army in Egypt took over the administration of the country to meet the legitimate aspirations of its people. The future of India also, apparently, rests in the hands of the armed forces of India.

On 10 February 2011 the wholesale onion prices crashed to Re.5/- per kilogram.

THE HINDU newspaper on 10 February 2011 published the photographs of Justice A.K. Ganguly and G.S. Singvi. After a long time, the paper published the photographs of judges. The reason is not known. Now, the Supreme Court could direct the Government to start a new TV channel exclusively for the live telecast of its day-to day proceedings.

The Telephone Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on 11 February 2011 recommended that the price of the 2G spectrum must be higher than the price fixed in 2001. The TRAI said this under the assumption that the Government realized the true price in 2001. Further, the TRAI was silent about the relative price of the 2G spectrum allotted in 2004.

The Supreme Court Bench of Justice G.S. Singhuvi and A.K. Ganguly on 12 February 2011 asked the Union Government to tell the reason why the licenses granted to Reliance Infocom should not be cancelled. The court should have stayed the allocations before proceeding with the case.

Further, the above Bench should have directed the CBI to impound the assets of the beneficiaries. The Bench did not do so. In contrast, the Company Law Board had confiscated the assets of a private company in a week.

An article published in a Chinese newspaper on 12 February 2011 warned a war against the neighbouring countries. The paper wanted China to use its foreign exchange reserves to rein in the neighbouring countries.

An MP from the Kerala State on 12 February 2011 alleged that a learned judge of the Supreme Court received Re.21 lakh in 1990s to quash a verdict of the Kerala High Court. The police immediately filed a case against him for concealing a crime.

Needless to say that over hundred cases could be filed against many competent authorities including the Chief Justice of India and the CVC for concealing the crimes mentioned in this work.

A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justice P.Sathasivam and B.S. Chauhan sentenced a former Minister of Kerala State for corruption in the Idamalayar Hyro-electricity project during 1980-1985. He is the first Minister to be convicted in a graft charge.

The media had pursued a leak in a tunnel partly to cripple a small construction company and partly to divert the attention of the people. The punishment could be compared to sentences awarded to some public servants for a corruption Re.50/-

A Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice B.Sudershan Reddy asked the Government not to allow a foreign bank account holder – Mr. Ali Khan- to leave the country. The other judges in the Bench are not known.

A Supreme Court Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India wanted the Attorney General to tell the status of the complaint sent by a Delhi based journalist on 5 May 2010 to the Vice President of India. The journalist had sought a probe into the assets of the former Chief Justice of India. The moles did not disclose the other judges in the Bench.

A letter submitted to the Vice President of India invites attention of the Supreme Court. But 170 letters submitted to the President of India failed to catch its attention.

The Prime Minister of India on 16 February 2011 said that:

1. He had accepted the view of the former Minister for Communication that the 2G spectrum should not be auctioned.

2. Some telephone companies had approached him and mentioned certain things.

3. He had no role in the allocation of the 2G spectrum.

4. Nothing related to the 2G spectrum allocation was placed in the Union Cabinet.

5. 2G spectrum allocations were the decisions of the then Union Minister for Communication.

6. Many ex-ante things did not turn out to be ex-post.

7. The people must be objective while reporting the facts.

8. He would not quit office because he had a job.

A learned judge hearing the 2G spectrum case had uttered a few words in favour of the Prime Minister of India. In this way the court indirectly asked the CBI not to proceed against him. This is the reason why the CBI did not even choose to know the names of the companies that approached him. For the same reason, the CBI is hesitating to take many others into custody. Thus the case does not inspire public confidence. The Supreme Court knows this.

If a minister in the Union Cabinet had committed a crime without the knowledge of the Prime Minister, the latter should have preferred a complaint. The Prime Minister did not do so. The act of arresting a Union Minister is not different from the act of arresting the Prime Minister. Thus the Prime Minister has lost his moral and constitutional right to remain in office.

Now the media disclosed that Indian fishermen were entering Sri Lankan waters deliberately. India must prevent this.

The Prime Minister of India announced a Joint Parliamentary Committee probe in the 2G spectrum scandal. This must be interpreted in the light of Chapter -165.

Eleven asset management companies, including the HSBC, UTI, ICICI Securities, were in the fray to manage the Provident Fund (PF) corpus of about $70 billion for three years starting from April 2011. The underground moles informed this to the people through one or two English newspapers on 19 February 2011.

A decision had been taken to hand over the PF money to two or three boys. But the moles never informed the actual transfer of money. There was a feeling that the President, Supreme Court and the Union Ministers prevented this calamity. Now, it is clear that the Government returned the benefaction of the people with hidden malefaction. This is the job the Prime Minister is doing. He would say that a Union Minister did everything without his knowledge.

Listening to the underground moles, the former Prime Minister of India affected the wholesale transfer of public assets. The present Prime Minister transferred public money in wholesale. The action of the present Prime Minister is as treacherous as that of his predecessor. The President and the Supreme Court know this.

An Indian private company -Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) –on 20 February 2011 sold 30 per cent of its oil reserves in the Andra Pradesh State to the British Petroleum (BP) for $7.2 billion. After signing the agreement, the Chairman of the RIL said that he would reinvest the proceeds from the oil reserves in India. He expressed the hope that the Union Government would approve the deal.

Just as the jewels in the Sri Padmanabhaswamy temple - mentioned above- belong to the people, so as the oil and gas reserves of Andra Pradesh belong to the people of India. The sale is unconstitutional. All natural assets must be taken over forthwith.

About ten individuals enjoy the natural resources of India due to the BALCO judgment. Since then the nation has lost over $1 trillion. They have taken the entire amount to the foreign countries. For the smooth acquisition of foreign assets they arranged some Indian assets to foreigners. Now, they promise to invest this in India. It is a false pledge.

In the above matter also the treachery committed by the present Prime Minister is comparable to the treachery committed by his predecessor. The Prime Minister survives in office only because of this money. The President and the Supreme Court know this.

In this matter, the Union Ministers from Andra Pradesh State –just like the Union Ministers from the Jammu & Kashmir State - are doing a great disservice to their own people.

A Secretary in the Union Government and a Union Minister applauded the above deal. The underground moles would give suitable rewards to them.

The students in Andra Pradesh State have started an agitation for a separate state called Telangana. The oil and gas reserves – apparently- are not in the Telangana region. Therefore, the knowledge about this work would have solved the problem. Now, they are not aware that the oil and gas reserves are more important than a separate state.

About ten people remove about $1 billion everyday from natural assets mainly due to the BALCO judgment. The President of India and the Supreme Court must take a firm stand in this matter. For this they need not do any ex-ordinary duty. Now the people discern a rejection of their normal duty.

Schopenhauer says that every normal function of a body holds some delight.

The facts from 30 January 2011 to 22 February 2011 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 23 February 2011.

V.SABARIMUTHU

THATTANKONAM

VELLICODE

MULAGUMOODU P.O. PIN:629167

INDIA.

Phone :04651 275520. Mobile: 9486214851