Wednesday, November 27, 2013

238. Supreme Court of India - MORAL CORRUPTION

238

        The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 3 November 2013. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was sent through post to the President of India, Madras High Court and the Chief Justice of India; and posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

        The Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV-C25) of Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) put the Mars Orbiter into its earth orbit on 5 November 2013.
     It is a great achievement. Every Indian is proud of it.

   An intern at the Supreme Court of India, on 7 November 2013, alleged that a recently retired judge sexually harassed her. She added that four others faced similar harassment from the sitting judges.
    Curiously, the media that concealed 237 letters gave great publicity.
    The Chief Justice constituted a committee comprising three judges to find a solution.
   Internship should not be permitted at the Supreme Court because it gives undue advantage to the students at Delhi.
   In this connection, it must be stated that the act of concealing 237 letters is the real moral corruption.  

    On 7 November 2013, Prince Charles of Britain and his wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, arrived at Rishikesh on a 9-day tour of India.

      A two judge Bench of the Gauhati High Court comprising Justices I.A Ansari and Dr. (Mrs) Indira Shah, on 6 November 2013, said, “While we decline to hold and declare that the DSPE Act- 1946 not a valid piece of legislation, we do hold that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is neither an organ nor part of the DSPE Act 1946” 
   The High Court, further, said that the CBI could not be treated as a police force and quashed the Union Home Ministry resolution by which the CBI was constituted in 1963.
    The judgement, apparently, is the logical extension of the last letter - Letter No.237.  
        It must be noted that Mrs. Indira Shaw is a doctorate in law. The judgement shows that she did not receive a fake degree.
    In the judgement, she fully understood her responsibilities as a judge. No doubt that she is endowed with remarkable judgement.
    If the people make this writer the Prime Minister of India, 50 per cent of all judicial posts, would be recommended for females.
    Justice I.A Ansari had been a constitutional lawyer.
    There exists a belief that the Supreme Court has a monopoly on what is right or just. By convention, the judges of the High Court refrain from expressing their opinion so as not to upset it. Therefore, Justice Ansari must be commended for his “outside the box” judgement.
       The Union Government immediately moved the Supreme Court of India for a stay.
   The latter, on 10 November 2013, stayed the judgement.
       The CBI had been functioning as an un-constitutional body and the “stay” would not make it a constitutional one.
      It is even afraid of this work. That is why it concealed 237 letters. On one or two occasions it even refused to accept the letters.
    Such a body has no constitutional right to exist.
    It must be disbanded in a suitable way.

   Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 11 November 2013, said that the legitimacy of the CBI would be protected. He added:
1. Some decisions which appear sensible ex-ante might turn out to be faulty ex-post.
2. A police agency should not sit in judgement over policy formulation.
3. It should not question the wisdom of the political leaders.
4. Errors of judgement were not crimes.
5. The CBI should not leak information.
      In this connection, it is pertinent to recall that the Bank of India (BoI) gave a loan to a private company as mentioned in Chapter 1. After six months the public sector VSNL was sold to its sister company.
   The present writer clubbed the both as mentioned in Chapter 8 to canvass against privatization and achieved partial success.
     Therefore, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh did not give Freedom to anyone to look at his activities even through the crevice of his door and apportioned public resources worth about Re.500 lakh crore in various ways.
    But a State should exist for the good of the people – should depend on their consent –should be constitutional and limited in its authority.
    The moment it denies Freedom, it loses its sovereignty; for the General Will alone will be Sovereign.
     Even in the absence of a constitution, the Natural Law gives men a right to their property. It is said that this right is in existence before political institutions.
   By invading the property of the subject, the legislative acted against the trust reposed in them.
    Such a system must be legitimately overthrown.
    Now Prime Minister Manmohan Singh says that he listened to the chief ministers and others.
   Evidently his world is different from that of others.
   He believes that politics must be adjusted to his nature.
    Thus he publicly admits that he committed illegality and ruled the nation in the face of moral corruption.
    If the above contention is a correct one, the Supreme Court must ask the government to explain its right to continue in office.
     If not, it must give a good certificate before protecting it.  
   
          Union Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram,  on 12 November 2013, said that he was proud of the CBI. However, he said “If there is no prescribed rule, or if there is no violation of prescribed rule, there is no offence.  
      He further said, “Even where a rule has been prescribed, if there is a policy behind that rule, it is not the business of the investigating agency to question the wisdom of that policy or to suggest a different policy that would be better in the view of the investigating agency”.
       It is pertinent to recall that responding to the suggestions of this writer; former Prime Minister Mr. A.B. Vajpayee devised a guideline for selling the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) as mentioned in Chapter 1.
    Then he started selling the PSUs like the Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL), Indian Petrochemical Corporation Limited (IPCL) in violation of the guidelines. The present writer pointed out this and the privatization became a cognizable offence.
   If there are no such guidelines or laws, the question of violating the same would not arise. This is his contention.
   But the act of remaining under the rule of any individual or group is nothing but slavery.
     A man must be as free as before the formation of the government. This is possible, Rousseau says, where law leads and men do not obey other men but they obey the law.
   Therefore, he should have used his wisdom under one law or other. He did not do so. Therefore, he ruled the nation exploiting the ignorance of the people. This is moral corruption.
   Now, the Supreme Court remains silent because it is responsible for it.

       Essar Oil, on 11 November 2013, submitted in the Supreme Court that the government did not extend tax benefits unlike other refineries.
   It must be noted that the Provident Fund (PF) and the other public assets went in the hand of a group of people only. The Essar Oil had been a member of this “elite group”.
   Now, it says that others got the benefits.

    Mr.Prakash Javadekar, spokes person of the BJP, on 12 November 2013, said that the UPA government arbitrarily allocated 17 billion tonne of coal reserves worth Re. 50 lakh crore to over 140 private companies.
    This shows that the BJP did not get the lion’s share.

   The Union Government, on 12 November 2013, began “road show” in the USA and the UK to sell 10 percent shares of the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) to garner about Re.3900 crore.
    Thus it says that it is not concealing anything.
   Even the advertisements in newspapers would not make the sale a constitutional one. It must show this work to the people and then sell. If it cannot do, it cannot – constitutionally - even exist.
  
     The Prime Minister of Britain, Mr. David Cameron, paid a six-hour visit to Kolkata and met the Chief Minister of West Bengal, Miss. Mamata Banerjee, on 13 November 2013. On his arrival, he said that India and England must forget the past and look to the future.
      Prince Charles and the Prime Minister of England have visited India simultaneously. This shows that they love India.
    Mr. Cameron, apparently, wants Prime Minister Mamohan Singh to look at the stand taken by Queen Elizabeth in the Delhi Commonwealth Games episode in the proper perspective.
      Prime Minister Manmohan Singh can now pay a visit to England although his instinct would dissuade him from doing this.

       In a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh,  BJP leader and former Union Minister Yashwant Sinha alleged that the reduction in the spectrum reserve price could cost the exchequer up to Re. 35,000 crore.
 
       In the meantime, the CBI Director said, “If something is inevitable, lie down and enjoy” Women bodies considered his remark as a disgusting one. They wanted his prosecution.
     He, apparently, wanted this writer – a man- to lie down and enjoy the denial of Freedom.

   
     A bench of the Supreme Court of India under G.S. Singhvi, on 13 November 2013, rescued itself from hearing the Niira Radia tape case. The senior counsel Rajiv Dhavan had said that the adjournment of the hearing was arbitrary and unfortunate.
     Justice Singhvi wanted the people to forget the case. He kept the case under his feet for about three years. In fact, the people have forgotten the case.

   The government, on 16 November 2013, announced Bharat Retna – the highest civilian award for the public service of the highest order- for cricketer Sachin Tendukar and the scientist, CNR Rao.
     Had there been Freedom, the present writer would have got it long time ago for this work.

       To a contempt notice sent by the Supreme Court, former Army Chief Gen V.K. Singh tendered an unconditional apology.  He mentioned the learned judges as ‘demigods’. Satisfied by the reply, the court pardoned him.

     India decided to cancel the Re.3600 crore deal with the UK based Agusta Westland helicopters. It had paid Re.1300 crore and received 3 helicopters. A CBI probe is underway because Italian investigators alleged that the firm had bribed former air chief Tyagi.
   The above report came out on 19 November 2013.
     Now India is planning to buy the new VVIP fleet from Russia.
    India lost a large number of Russian made MIG planes in accidents. Yet it is turning towards Russia for aircraft. Does someone in some place receive commission for it?
     It must be probed.
  
     The Supreme Court bench comprising RM. Loda, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph, on 20 November 2013, told advocate  Prasant Bhusan that they were hearing the cases fearlessly and favourlessly and fingers should not be raised questioning their conduct.
     The bench is actually afraid of this work. This is the reason why it does not let the people to know the truth.
     The above bench, further, said, “It is not our task to keep everybody happy”.
   Obviously, the bench does not want to make this writer happy.
   It does not believe in the theory that everyone must strive for the greatest happiness of the greatest number.

   Supreme Court, on 21 November 2013, barred Sahara chief Subrata Roy from leaving the country because he had not given the original title deeds of assets worth Re. 20,000 crore.
    Whether the bench expects the people to forget this case or not is not clear.
    Therefore, the progression must be watched for some more time.

     It must be mentioned that the police, on 22 November 2013, rescued three women from three decades of fear and enslavement within an ordinary house in an ordinary street in London.
    The Chief Justice of India must rescue 1000 million people from six decades of enslavement.

    A bench of the Supreme Court, on 19 November 2013, said that the jailed politicians could conduct elections because the Parliament amended the law. Justices A.K. Patnaik and S.J.Mukhopadhyay delivered the judgement.

      The CBI, on 26 November 2013, requested the Supreme Court to free the agency from being a “caged parrot”.
      Earlier, the government had told the court that autonomous status could not be granted to the CBI.
    Police power is always associated with autonomy and impartiality.
    If the Supreme Court wants, the police would find out the nature of remittances of the miners tomorrow. However, it has converted it into slaves through the aid of the CBI.
   Now they refuse to look at the illegal remittances of the miners. They do not know their real duty.

      Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam, on 26 November 2013, said, “The judges never faulted while interpreting the constitution.
  There may be an error. But we should not point fingers.
   There are two billion opinions in the social media.
   There will be aberrations in every institution and we cannot castigate them with one brush, either the judiciary or Parliament”.
    The Chief Justice gave the above reply presumably because this writer sent the last letter to the Chief Justice, Madras High Court.
          “Self preservation is the prime Law of Nature.” Naturally, he is expected to defend the Supreme Court.
    However, it must be stated that it conspired to convert public assets into private assets through the aid the BALCO judgement and some other judgements.
   There are over 2 billion opinions.
     But this work contains several non public pieces of information that are vital for the well being of the people. With a sinister motive, the Supreme Court conceals this from the people. The Chief Justice would never deny this allegation.
    The Chief Justice must know that the end of law is to enlarge Freedom and aberrations shall not be blindly permitted.
   If he is not capable of understanding this, he is an enemy of Freedom.
    He is committed to the theory that the nation must be ruled in the face of moral corruption only.
      Now the people cannot but wait for a lover of Freedom as the Chief Justice of India.
     The facts from 3 November 2013 to 26 November 2013 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 27 November 2013.
       The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, High Courts and the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force for necessary action.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
27 November 2013
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851


For further reading visit:
1.www. vajpayee.blogspot.com
2.www. primeministervajpayee.blogspot.com
3.www.primeministerdevegowda.blogspot.com
4.www. storyofananthapadmanabhan.blogspot.com
6. www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
Other blogs of this writer are:
1.  www. effectiveinorganicchemistry.blogspot.com
4.  www. mylife-sabarimuthu.blogspot.com



   

   
   

  

Sunday, November 3, 2013

237. Supreme Court of India - Civil Service Board

237

A GREAT POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGE

        The former coal secretary, Mr. Parakh, on 25 October 2013, said that he had obeyed illegal orders that were against his advice.
    “It is the law of the world to serve those in power”.    
     The miners and the recipients of the Provident Fund (PF) are the most powerful people in India. They eclipse even the Supreme Court of India. In fact, the entire system obeys this “elite group”.  However, it is disappointing to note that there are no exceptional cases.
    The NDA Government under Mr. A.B. Vajpayee succeeded in giving the BALCO, VSNL, IPCL, HZL and a few other Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) in private interest to the private parties. But, it gave a small degree of Freedom to this writer to anticipate its actions.  This was sufficient to point out the violation of the sacred laws of the land. Thus the present writer could cripple the process of privatization through suitable letters.
    But the present government disposed of the public assets without making the slightest noise- not for one or two years but for about ten years!
   This is nothing but robbing the dead.
   There is no other meaner crime than this.

    The Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices R. M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kuria Joseph, on 29 October 2013, dismissed a petition that sought direction to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to file an affidavit in the coal case. The Bench said, “We are hearing the matter and you are reaching the conclusion”.
   If the Union Government had not done anything illegal, it must have openly approached the Supreme Court of India and restrained the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) from seeking the documents from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMOs).
   The government could not do so. Therefore, the government under Prime Minister Manmohan Singh should have resigned.
   Now he cannot take any action to recover even the revenue taken by the miners. He cannot do anything for the happiness of the people. He is virtually sitting in a jail.
    This is the actual position of the Constitution of India.
   The Bench then appointed an amicus curie. He might advise the judges to grant Freedom to Indians because this writer is still unknown to them. This alone would impart legality to the coal case and all other cases against the economic offenders.
    The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), on the same day, submitted the status report in the coal case to the Supreme Court.
    The contents of the report were not published. This is a bad portent for the nation.
     On the same day, four state governments submitted the guidelines followed by them for the allocation of coal. The Bench kept their reports away from the eye of the people. This shows that the court does not want to produce any serious economic change.
   A perusal of the website: www. primeministerdevegowda.blogspot.com shows that the United Front (UF) government led by Mr. H.D. Deve Gowda had delegated the power to grant mining licences to the state governments. Coal also comes under this class. However, the people have no “Freedom” to know the status of that decision.
    The Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) might have found out the destination of the ores and the nature of the remittances. The state police and the other anti-corruption agencies would have – at least partially- detected the deployment of the proceeds.
   If asked, the miners would have revealed the names of the political leaders and the other victors enjoying the spoils.
   Thus, the people would have got a chance to know the real nature of hundreds of political leaders, bureaucrats and miners all over India. This, in fact, would have led to a great political and economic change.
    Unable to bear the weight of the above changes, the Supreme Court of India selected Mr. Birla and Mr. Parakh alone for a First Information Report (FIR). This is against equality present in the Constitution of India.

        Bowing to the demand of former Cabinet Secretary TSR Subramonium, former Chief Election Commissioner N. Gopalaswamy,  former Election Commissioner T.S. Krisna Murthy, former CBI Directors Jogindar Singh and D.R. Kaarthekeyen and 77 other retired bureaucrats, a Supreme Court Bench comprising Jutices K.S. Radhakrishnan and PC Ghose, on 31 October 2013, directed the government to enact a law to  set up a Civil Service Board within three months.
      The Bench said that the Board must ensure a fixed tenure to the bureaucrats. It must regulate postings, transfers and disciplinary action against the bureaucrats.
   It felt that its order would curtail political interference and prevent the deterioration of the functioning of the bureaucracy.
    Actually, these are due to the denial of Freedom by the Supreme Court.
    The IAS and the IPS officer’s associations welcomed the judgement. The TV channels hailed it. The newspapers described this as a landmark judgement.
    According to some reports, the Bench asked the bureaucrats not to obey oral orders.
   In this connection, it must be stated that the bureaucrats must obey the oral and written orders of the competent authorities provided they are for the happiness of the people.  
     Usually, the Supreme Court takes months, and even years to deliver a judgement.
   In contrast, it heard the case secretly and delivered the judgement instantly.
  It did not even ask the petitioners to submit the list of the public servants shifted in bad faith in the last ten years.
       There is a story behind the extra-ordinary interest taken by the court.
     The “elite group” had placed suitable bureaucrats in key positions during the period of the NDA under Mr. A.B. Vajpayee.
    When the UPA under Dr. Mammohan Singh came to power, the coalition partners - some in supreme public interest- started to transfer them.
   Obeying the elite group, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh asked the ministers not to shift any bureaucrats in the Secretariat.
    This enabled them to misuse their position with the government. Thus they secretly   furthered the private interests of the elite group for the last nine years.
    A new grouping will come to power after the impending election. The coalition partners would shift some bureaucrats in public interest. In order to maintain the status quo, the elite group approached the Supreme Court in the guise of public interest.
  The court did not understand the devilish plan of the elite group or the sinister motive of the petitioners.
      The judgement seeks to take away the happiness of the people. It must be withdrawn immediately.
    It shall not disobey this writer because it is non-public information.

   Mr. L.K. Advani and Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi, on 31 October 2013, laid the foundation stone for a 182 metre high statue of Sardar Vallabai Patel – called Unity Statue- at Gujarat.
    Freedom is more important than unification.

   The New Indian Express, on 28 October 2013, reported that 5, 300 out of 17,987 textile factories in India remained non-operational during 2000-2010. Is the Supreme Court not responsible for this?

   President of India’s Secretariat sent three letters to three different departments- Ministry of Defence included – based on the letters. The present writer received their copies on 30 October 2013.

      The Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), on 31 October 2013, gave an interview to the NDTV. He attributed the slow growth rate of India to democracy.  
   This is an indication that he had advised the Union Government to reinvest the Re. 3 lakh crore in the PF in the hand of the private parties. This must be verified in public interest.

     This is letter No. 237.
     The writer alone says that there is no Freedom to Indians. It is non-public information.
    The Supreme Court does not understand this. Therefore, this writer is unknown to 1000 million people.
     His Excellency the President of India could allow this condition to continue only if it is for the happiness of the people.
    It must be noted that two former Presidents – Mr. K.R. Narayanan and Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam- had gone to the Supreme Court to fulfil the demands of this writer. 

    The facts from 25 October 2013 to 2 November 2013 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, Chief of Indian Army, Chief of Indian Air Force, Human Rights Commission and the Chief Vigilance Commission  on 3 November 2013 through email for necessary action.
       V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
3 November 2013
For further reading visit:
1.www. vajpayee.blogspot.com
2.www. primeministervajpayee.blogspot.com
3.www.primeministerdevegowda.blogspot.com
4.www. storyofananthapadmanabhan.blogspot.com
6. www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
Other blogs of this writer are:
1.  www. effectiveinorganicchemistry.blogspot.com

4.  www. mylife-sabarimuthu.blogspot.com

Friday, October 25, 2013

236: The Duty of Public Servants

236

ABOUT NON PUBLIC INFORMATION

         The Prime Minister of India, Dr. Manmohan Singh, on 19 October 2013, said that he granted a coal licence to Mr. Birla on the merits of the case placed before him. He added that his judgement was entirely appropriate.
     He is free to function as the Chief Justice of India or to do the work of the Cabinet Secretary while holding the office of the Prime Minister of India.
   Thus he could have handed over the “fruit” even to his own “son”.
    But he should have given Freedom to this writer to know this as and when it happened.
    He did not do so.
   Thus, he treats 1000 million people as mere animals.
      The people consider this as the biggest criminal offence.
       In contrast, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) does not consider this as an offence at all.
    Therefore, this condition would continue as long as it believes in the theory that the political leaders must be “positively willing to act immorally and illegally at the right times”.

       The Government of Karnataka State initiated a CBI probe on the illegal export of iron ore through seven ports. At the same time, it constituted a Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising police officers from the state.
       Thus, the above State has gone up to the ports.  
   It should have probed the destination of the ores and the method of remittances.
    Further, the miners have deployed the revenue of the nation in various entities under fictitious names as in Sahara Company. The status of these assets also must be known.
   Notwithstanding the above, the people would commend the decision if the SIT produces results within a few days.
         
       A Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and V. Gopala Gowda, on 19 October 2013, ordered a CBI probe into 14 issues relating to criminal dimensions arising out of the so-called Radia tapes. The issues raised in the first report are: supply of low floor buses by Tata Motors to the Government of Tamil Nadu, appointment of Mr.  Pradip Baijal as Chairman of the Pipeline Advisory Committee, allotment of coal blocks to Mr. Anil Ambani , allotment of iron ore mines at Ankua to Tata Steel, favours shown by Mr. V. K. Sibal, then Director General of Hydrocarbons to the Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), fudging of numbers in the subscriber base by Reliance Communications and submission of the same to the Mumbai Stock Exchange (BSE) to save the money, working of touts and  middle men and kickbacks in the aviation sector, market manipulation of the stocks of the Unitech Company and matters related to corruption/malpractice in judiciary.
     The issues are consistent with the predictions of this writer.
    The Bench used hard words – unscrupulous elements, corrupt means and extraneous considerations – and asked the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct an enquiry and submit a report within two months.
     In all small criminal cases, the FIRs are filed as and when they surface. Here, the Supreme Court kept these illegalities away from the eye of the people for years. Thus, it gave life to many culprits.  

    The CBI, on 19 October 2013, said that former coal secretary, Mr. P.C. Parakh, had joined three private firms – Navbharat Power Private Limited, Visa Power Limited and Tata Sponge Iron - after retirement. However, it saw no quid pro quo against him.
     The CBI buries many complaints in the expectation that they will be forgotten.  Does it want to bury this case also?

   On 19 October 2013, Mr. M. Veerappa Moily, Union Minister, said, “When rule of law is concerned it applies to government, it applies to Supreme Court, it applies to everybody”.
     Actually, his words apply to the Supreme Court.
    Apparently, the judges now do not secretly liaise with the union ministers.

    Justice RV Raveendran, a former judge of the Supreme Court of India, in an interview to the NDTV on 20 October 2013, resented that retirement came by the time he matured as a competent judge.
          A public servant must seize the opportunity the nature gives to him. He must give secondary importance to his wife and children to make use of the opportunity.
   Above all, he must prove his worth while in service.

       Cabinet Secretary Agit Seth, on 20 October 2013, expressed dismay over the action of the CBI against the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers.
      The Central IAS Officer’s Association, on the same day, sought safeguard for the bureaucrats. It said that no honest officers must be harassed.
    The bureaucrats are public servants. They shall not implement the non public orders of their superiors in private interest.
    They shall not withhold any non- public information that might protect a superior from making a poor decision. This is the important duty of the bureaucrats.
       It may be recalled that the present writer sent the first letter to the Prime Minister of India, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, on June 1, 2001. At that time, he was taking rest at a hospital in Mumbai.
     A bureaucrat received the letter. He immediately transmitted it to the Cabinet Secretary, apparently, with a note.
       The latter did not wait for the Prime Minister to return to the capital. Instead, he flew to Mumbai with the letter and things happened as mentioned in Chapter 1.  
    The bureaucrats must assess their own present performance in the light of the above.  

     The employees of the Airport Authority of India, on 22 October 2013, started a relay strike protesting the proposed privatization of six airports.
   The report is a reflection of the nature of the Supreme Court.

   RJD chief Mr. Lalu Prasad Yadav and JD (U) leader Jagdish Sharma were, on 22 October 2013, disqualified as Members of Parliament (MPs) following their convictions.
    The big offenders take the revenue of the government. They send the small offenders to jail.

     Union Minister Narayanaswamy, on 22 October 2013, said that the government had nothing to hide.  Describing the government as an open book, he added that the state governments were the competent authorities for the allocations.
    The government hid everything from the people.
    Even now this writer does not know whether Prime Minister Manmohan Singh disposed of the resources of the public based on the decision of the Union Cabinet or not. In fact, the degree of involvement of various Cabinet Ministers remains as a mystery.
     Perhaps, the Supreme Court alone knows the answer.

       After his two day visit to Russia, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh paid a three day visit to China. At China, on 2 October 2013, he said that the USA was fading and China and Russia were best for India.
    India depends upon the USA for employment and foreign exchange. He should have avoided the above discourteous opinion from the Chinese soil.
        It is clear that the people are paying a heavy price for keeping him as the Prime Minister of India.
      Prime Minister Manmohan Singh then said that when India and China shake hands the world notices.
    The world notices the pitiable condition of India.
    India and China, on 23 October 2013, signed a Border Defence Co-operation Agreement (BDCA) aimed at maintaining peace and tranquillity along their 4058 km Line of Actual Control (LAC).
   Now China enters India through the southern side. The moment India tends to annul the trade deficit with China, the latter would enter India through the northern side.
    Thus India sows seeds for a conflict with China.

    Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 24 October 2013,  said that he was not above law. He added that the CBI could question him at any time.
     He has been sitting in a cave to issue non public orders. Now, he says that he would remain in a jail to issue public orders.
   His only demand is that he must be allowed to function as the Prime Minister of India.

    The facts from 19 October 2013 to 24 October 2013 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, Chief of Indian Army, Chief of Indian Air Force, Human Rights Commission and the Chief Vigilance Commission  on 25 October 2013 through email for necessary action.
       V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
25 October 2013