Friday, October 31, 2014

302. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: ABSOLUTELY INCONSISTENT WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE?

302

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:
ABSOLUTELY INCONSISTENT WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE?

          A special court at Delhi, on 29 October 2014, summoned former Telecom Minister Dayanidhi Maran, his brother Kalanidhi Maran and six others for criminal conspiracy in the so-called Aircel-Maxis deal case. The accused were asked to appear before the court on March 2, 2015.
          The case, apparently, is that Mr. Dayanidhi Maran as a Union Minister did not allocate spectrum to a Mr. Sivasakaran. This forced the latter to sell his Telecom Company, Aircel, to the Maxis. Later spectrum was given to the Maxis.The Maxis, in turn, bought shares worth Re. 3600 crore of the SUN TV of Mr. Kalanidhi Maran.
          The government says that the money is equivalent to bribe.  
It is clear that the act of buying shares using public money under one pretext or other is an act of corruption. Thus, if the public sector Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) buys shares worth Re. 5000 crore of a company, it is an act of corruption.
But the system depicts this as a holy act and selects one or two cases for punishment. The Chief Justice of India must note that this is not justice but injustice.
Further, it is clear that a Union Minister can make or mar the fortune any entrepreneur through his action or inaction.
One day, a charge-sheeted private company wanted to possess a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU), Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL). The government forsook it although rules for selling the PSUs were against the sale.
Furthermore, all the PSUs were sold against the money taken from the banks, LIC or stock market. Some people might have used the profit from the minerals. Thus all assets went against public money.
However, the system does not see any criminal conspiracy in the above deals.
Hundreds of letters pertaining to these deals remain useless.
Is not the justice system in India absolutely inconsistent with the principles of justice?
The new Chief Justice of India alone can give an answer.

This is letter No. 302.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 31 October 2014.
31-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India.


Wednesday, October 29, 2014

301. INDIA: THE TRANSFORMATION OF DEMOCRACY INTO TYRANNY.

301
INDIA:
THE TRANSFORMATION OF DEMOCRACY INTO TYRANNY.

       The media, on 28 October 2014, said that a small miner at Goa had given Re.1.18 crore to the ruling BJP in nine installments within a span of seven years. During the same period, the same miner gave Re. 65 lakhs to the Congress Party in three installments. Besides, the miner had spread her money in her sister companies and foreign banks.
          The above revelation is consistent with the views of this writer.
          The ideas of a citizen – if they strike the mind of the system- must reach the mind of the people through the TV channels and the newspapers. Then, no party would require any money for election work. This does not happen now.
          Therefore, the miners impose their man on the people as the prime minister.
          If the prime minister thus chosen chooses to deny Freedom and spend about 25 per cent of the income to the workers of his party, the power of the people would pass into his hand. Then the Supreme Court of India cannot take any action against him for his any acts of corruption.
          The people would welcome his corrupt actions because of their ignorance.
This is how tyranny arises from democracy.

This is letter No. 301.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 29 October 2014.
29-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

300. THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA: A THOROUGH INVESTGATION

300

THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA:
A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION.

          Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, on 26 October 2014, requested the Members of Parliament (MPs) to think big.
          His statement gives the impression that he does think big.

          On the same day, he lauded the media for its support to the Clean India Movement.
          He impaired the reason of the people to seize power. Now he asks the media to impair the reason to remain in power. He thinks that it is justice, and not injustice.

          Again, on the same day, he flew to Mumbai to declare open a hospital -Reliance Foundation Hospital – of Mr. Mukesh Ambani.
          Action of the prime minister is equivalent to giving Re.100 crore to the promoters of the college. Now no competent authority would place any hurdle for its up gradation as Medical College.
          Many other promoters would invite the prime minister. But he would not get time.
          Unlike the leaders of other political parties, prime minister did not shake hand with Mr. Ambani under the table.
Many people do think that he went to Mumbai out of friendship and that he would remain above corrupt influences.
          It is pertinent to recall that Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel had slept at Birla House in Bombay and paved the way for the unlimited accumulation of public money in the hand of a few people. Yet the prime minister wants a Re. 3000 crore statue for him!
          Is the prime minister a big Vallabhbhai Patel?
 Does he distinguish between public money and private money?
          A thorough investigation is needed to talk anything about him.

          The Union Government, on 27 October 2014, disclosed three names of individuals holding black money in foreign countries. The details were not disclosed. Names that could be prosecuted alone would be disclosed, it added.

          This is letter No. 300.
This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 28 October 2014.
28-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode
Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India


Saturday, October 25, 2014

299. THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA: EXERCISING POWER WITHOUT RIGHT?

299
THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA:
EXERCISING POWER WITHOUT RIGHT?

A copy of the last letter was sent to livetvchnnels@gmx.com on 23 October 2014. But the server rejected it.

          The Union Government, on 24 October 2014, decided to auction the spectrum through the aid of an agency.
          As in the case of ores, the act of auctioning the spectrum is biased in favour of the stronger class. This is not justice, but injustice. Therefore, it is an unconstitutional act.
          Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi carefully strengthens the monopoly of a few people over the Indian economy by auctioning the spectrum. But he does not take any step to increase the liberty of the people.
          Thus he exercises power without right. The act of exercising power without right is called tyranny.
          The new Chief Justice of India must know that the end of law is to enlarge freedom. If he gives freedom, the monopoly of a few people over the Indian economy would come to an end.

This is letter No. 299.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 25 October 2014.
25-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode

Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

298: THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA: SO KIND AND GOOD TO EVERYONE?

298

THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA:
SO KIND AND GOOD TO EVERYONE?

          The President of India, on 21 October 2014, promulgated an ordinance to e-auction the coal blocks cancelled by the Supreme Court of India.
          Auction is in the interest of the stronger class. Anything in the interest of the stronger class is not justice, but injustice.
          An act of injustice is unconstitutional.
          The President of India must give justice – social, economic and political.
          Therefore, the ordinance must be annulled.
          The new Chief Justice of India must go through the letters, review its anti-constitutional judgements and direct the government to take decisions consistent with the Constitution of India.
          His duty is to do justice; and not injustice.

          Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, on the same day, said that he would go to Jammu and Kashmir State and spend Diwali at Sri Nagar with “our brothers and sisters affected by the unfortunate floods”.
          The prime minister is in the early days of his power. He wants to be so kind and good to everyone.
          However, despite many letters he has not retracted from his decision to spend Re.200 crore for the Statue of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.
          He has taken away the right of the people to become the judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India.
He has not touched the public money.
He has done a great injustice in coal allocation.
He has been doing everything by blocking the flow of knowledge to the people.

                   This is letter No. 298.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 22 October 2014.
22-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode
Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India








297: THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA: JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE?

297

THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA:
JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE?

          The Government of India, on 20 October 2014, decided to e-auction the coal mines on two important conditions. The conditions are: 1. The interests of the public sector coal companies like the Coal India Limited (CIL) would be fully protected and 2. The Indian companies alone would be allowed to participate in auction.
          In this connection, it must be stated that every child must have a chance to enjoy the public resources and the public money.
          In order to ensure this, a miner should not be allowed to enter any other sectors. At the same time, the entrepreneurs in other areas should be forbidden from entering the mining sector.
          What will a miner do with his huge profit?
 Either he must utilize it in the mining sector or  deposit it in the banks.
Similarly, an entrepreneur in other areas must use his surplus money for innovation or deposit it in the banks.
Then another child would realize his dream using this money.
Further, auction is in the interest of the stronger class.
Anything in the interest of the stronger class is not justice; but injustice.
The prime minister can seek a clarification from the Supreme Court in this matter.
Is the government not free to act in the supreme national interest?
It is free to do anything after giving freedom to the people to know the salient points present in this work.
The people would, then, know whether it acted in the national interest or private interest.

This is letter No. 297.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 21 October 2014.
21-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode
Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India







Sunday, October 19, 2014

296 .INDIA: THE SUPER OFFENDERS OF THE NATION

296
INDIA:
THE SUPER OFFENDERS OF THE NATION

          The Union Government, on 16 October 2014, unveiled, a few new measures to improve ease of doing business.
          Accordingly, the competent authorities would not undertake indiscriminate raids on any business. But a computerized system would select the units for inspection.
          In this connection, it must be stated that the competent authorities had been undertaking raids frequently. The present writer decried them. The government had responded in this way.
          This is a small achievement of this work, for no other person in India had opposed the raids. In fact, the raids had been virtually stayed not by the Supreme Court of India but by this work.  
However, the computerized system is not sufficient.
If the transaction of a unit is above a certain maximum level, the government must directly supervise it.
Then the public servants alone will be responsible for the illegalities.
The unit would grow in a hassle-free atmosphere. The Nokia-like or the Satyam-like situations would never arise.
The government could give an option to all units. Many units would happily accept it.
Further, the companies must be protected from unethical competition.
If a stranger, for instance, enters the cool drinks business, it might bag the contracts from the Indian Railways either because of its connections or because of its ability to spread its profit from other areas into this business. Thus the established parties would perish along with its work force.
In fact, the industrialists have been either destroying the industries of others or buying assets –public or private – in the last 13 years. They have not made any import substitution products.
This is one of the reasons for starting this work. This could be discerned from the letter No.2 dated 20 -11-2001.


 A Supreme Court of India appointed committee found that the Tata Group, Birla Group and a few others had been undertaking illegal mining in the Odisha State. This happened with the active support of the government. The committee put the loss at Re.17,576 crore. The New Indian Express reported this on 18 October 2014.
This is in one State!
The present man has been saying this without looking at any report. Now a committee has vindicated it.
Many political leaders might have received commission. They might have parked the money all over the world.
Now they supply food and water to the people and enjoy their loyalty. As the power of the people is in their hand, even the court cannot punish them.
The mining companies spread their money in their sister companies. Besides they buy assets in India and abroad. They are bigger offenders than former chief minister of Tamil Nadu  Miss.Jayalalithaa.
If her assets could be confiscated, their assets also must be confiscated.
The Supreme Court of India must reveal its stand.

A sum of Re. 2 lakh crore is rotting in the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). This is their profit. The media reported this on 17 October 2014.
The government has been keeping this money secretly. It did not show it in the Union Budget.
The present writer pointed out this to the present prime minister. Usually, this money disappears from India and reappears in other countries as private assets.
If the prime minister wants, he can now easily spend about Re. 10 lakh crore in this year alone.

The prime minister addressed the top commanders of the three services on 17 October 2014.
Almost the entire ruling power rests in the hand of the manipulators.  They conceal the best men of the nation and give the power of the people to a few selected leaders. They manage almost everything through them.
The prime minister of such a nation must be most reluctant to look at the face of the commanders before giving freedom to the people.
However, the prime minister is creating his own vote base. This might weaken the hold of the manipulators on him. He will grow into a tyrant or a democrat.

A Special Court, on 18 October 2014, granted bail to former chief minister Miss. Jayalalithaa. A Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Chief Justice H. L. Dattu and Justices Madan B. Lokur and A.K. Sikri issued the order for the same. The bail was granted to three other accused- Sasikala, Sudhakaran and Ilavarasi.
A former judge of the Madras High Court, Justice Chandru, was shocked to notice the procedure followed by the Supreme Court in this matter. He said that the court should not have allowed Senior Advocate Mr. Nariman to represent the accused because his son is a sitting judge of the Supreme Court.
On her release, the people gave a grand reception to Miss. Jayalalithaa. They now welcome acts if corruption. They do not know the existence of anything better. This is tyranny. What is the reason for this? The Supreme Court must accept responsibility for this and give a reply.

Union Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely, on 18 October 2014, said that the shares of the PSUs would be sold as planned.
In this connection, it must be firmly stated that the act of converting public assets into private assets using public money is vice and not virtue.
Everyone connected with this – the learned judges of the Supreme Court included- is the super offender of the nation.
This is letter No. 296.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 19 October 2014.
19-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode
Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India





Thursday, October 16, 2014

295: INDIA: "RUNNING AWAY LIKE CHILDREN FROM THE LAW".

295

INDIA:
“RUNNING AWAY LIKE CHILDREN FROM THE LAW”

          An economic offences court at Hyderabad issued summonses to Mr. Ramalinga Raju, the founder of Satyam Computer Services, to appear before it on November 13.
          The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had filed two complaints against him for insider trading. The offences carry punishments up to 10 years. The media reported this on 13 October 2013. Earlier, it had imposed a fine of over Re. 3000 crore.
          The manipulators have been defrauding the nation.
          The Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) were sold against public money. Many were sold in violation of the norms devised for privatization.
Mr. Raju noticed that all defrauders are happy. Therefore, he also joined their rank. But some among them were longing for his Satyam.
          At one time, he could not remove money from the stock market as expected. The banks and the financial institutions refused to lend him.
          The government could have helped him by giving one or two projects. But it did not do so.
          All his frantic efforts to mobilize money failed.
          Instead of describing everyone as fraud, he called himself a fraud.         
          It was sufficient for the competent authorities to fall on him. All his companies were confiscated and sold. Moreover, he was jailed.
          This is the conclusion of a man sitting away from the scene of action.
His software company – Satyam Computer Services- had over 50,000 employees.
Had he been a citizen of any other country, he might not have committed such a crime. At the same time, the people would have worshiped him.
When all bigger defrauders “run away like children from the law” why Mr. Raju alone should be fined and summoned again and again?
Is it not a violation of human rights?
Either punish all defrauders or protect everyone.
If Satyam is restored to him based on the ‘each one; take one principle’, it would give a lot of confidence to all businessmen.
Now, some companies simply annihilate other big industries.
For instance, a few companies are specializing in construction. Now an automobile company has entered this field. Naturally, the latter might defeat the former due to its connections. These are disturbing developments.
The construction companies shall not enter the automobile sector and vice versa.
At the same time, both shall not enter the communication sector.
Then every child would get a share in the public money.
Notwithstanding everything, if a company does not use public resources, it is free to do anything. Such companies may be treated as family run companies.

This is letter No. 295.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 16 October 2014.
16-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode
Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India




         


          

Sunday, October 12, 2014

294. THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA: VIRTUE OR VICE?

294

THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA:
VIRTUE OR VICE?

Addressing a public meeting at Haryana, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi requested the people to vote out corruption and “dynastic politics”. He added that he would root out crime. The media reported this on 12 October 20014.
If there is political equality, the people will know the contribution of every important man as a consequence of freedom and democracy.  This does not happen. This is vice. The prime minister is a product of this crime.
Corruption is a form of vice.
By undertaking canvassing like this, he conveys the impression that he asserts lawful authority at New Delhi.

        The prime minister launched a village adoption scheme for the Members of Parliament (MPs).         According to this scheme, 2500 out of 6 lakh villages must be developed by the MPs before 2019. The media reported this on 12 October 2014.
The people expect him to do some big things before doing small things.
Freedom is a big thing. It is a virtue. He can give it without spending money.
It must be noted that, if the prime minister really wants it to happen, it must happen. Otherwise, he loses his authority.


The prime minister, on 12 October 2014, congratulated Satyarthi, saying that the entire nation is proud of his momentous achievement.
Satyarthi fought against the slavery of children at New Delhi.
 Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel gave slavery to Indians. Now all Indians live like animals.
The media should have reported his nomination. It did not do so.
Then the government should have done it. It did not do so.
But the Nobel Peace Prize Committee had known him, long before Indians knew him.
 Therefore, the competent authorities are liable for prosecution.
It is not clear whether the prime minister had been informed about his nomination or not. He must disclose his mind in this matter.
Further, the prime minister, instead of looking at the children before him, must look at all children in India, if not in the world.
It is not simply a question of removing a few children from their work places. It is a question of removing the factors responsible for child labour.
This work aims at this by giving concrete and reasonable solutions.
Every child must have the freedom to use public money. This is his birth right. This is to help realize his destiny.
The economic model suggested by this writer would ensure it.
It must be noted that the model does not take away the freedom of any individual to do multiple businesses. But he is precluded from doing this using public money.
It is said that virtue is one; but that the forms of vice are innumerable.
  
This is letter No. 294.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 13 October 2014.
13-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode
Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India




293. THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA: A KNOWER OF THINGS?

293

THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA:
A KNOWER OF THINGS?

          The Supreme Court of India passed some strictures against the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for not interrogating former Finance Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram in connection with the Aircel- Maxis case. The media reported this on 12 October 2014. The allegation was that the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) under him had no power to give clearance for Re. 3600 crore.
          There were reports that former Union Minister Mr. Dhayanidhi Maran forced the Maxis to give Re. 3600 crore to the Sun TV – a company of his brother, Mr.Kalanidhi Maran, in the pretext of buying its shares.
          The Director of the Central Bureau Investigation (CBI), Mr. Ranjit Sinha, had cited the above discovery as an example for his probity.
          Evidently, if the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) buys shares worth Re. 5000 crore from a company, it is equivalent to paying a bribe of Re. 5000 crore.
Everyone must notice the above crucial point. This is not to say that the Supreme Court must retreat from this case at all. It is only to say that the assets of many companies are nothing but corrupt money.
         
Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, on 12 October 2014, requested the people of poll bound states to change their destiny.
The prime minister is in a position to change the destiny of the people.
In order to change their destiny, it is imperative that he must be a knower of things.
One teacher is not sufficient for this.
He must discuss this work with his colleagues, judges, businessmen and other resource persons to get a clear picture of the future in the clearest manner.
An important idea is ‘each one; take one’.
According to this economic model, a company shall do one business only using public money. When it develops a fascination for another business, it must surrender the first one.
This day shall be the cut off date.

This is letter No. 293.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 12 October 2014.
12-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode
Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India


Saturday, October 11, 2014

292: THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA: A LOVER OF COVERINGS?


292

THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA:
A LOVER OF COVERINGS?

          The Norwegian Nobel committee, on 10 October 2014, awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2014 to 17-year old Malala Yousufzai of Pakistan and Mr. Kailash Satyarthi of India. With regard to Malala, the Nobel Committee said: “Despite her youth, Malala Yousafzai has already fought for several years for the right of girl’s education, and has shown by example that children and young people too can contribute to improving their situations”.
          Malala did her work through her blog.
          Pakistan can be proud of her because she talks in English more fluently than the children in the rural areas of India.
          One must remember England also for giving her asylum.
          With regard to the other winner, the committee said that Satyarthi, based in New Delhi, showed great personal courage and maintaining Gandhiji’s tradition, has headed various forms of protests and demonstrations, all peaceful, focusing on the grave exploitation of children for financial gain”.
          Satyarthi did his work in the micro-level.
It must be noted that the root cause of child labour - and even human sufferings - is economic deprivation.
This work of the preset writer is to prevent economic deprivation of 1000 million people without indulging in any kid of agitations, demonstrations and public meetings. When the people become rich, they start to educate their children.
          It achieved many things.
However, despite invoking several political philosophers, this work failed to achieve its important objective mainly because of the inertia of the system –particularly the Supreme Court of India.
          Former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh, survived for ten years by conveying the following impression. “The leaders make honest mistakes. However, we gave a huge amount of money through the stock market to an automobile company. It started a sister company for software. The latter grows like anything and gives job for over two lakh educated youth besides earning foreign exchange”.
          Thus this man could not move the Supreme Court beyond the critical level.
          Actually, if that automobile industry had not entered the software industry, the Indian software professionals might have generated not less than ten lakh more jobs. Many might have cornered the projects of the government. A large number of software industries would not have perished.
          All enlightened software engineers, Mr. N. R. Narayana Murthy of Infosys included, would agree with this.
          One day, that automobile industry entered soap industry and generated a few jobs. The result was the destruction of thousands of soap industries all over India along with more than ten lakh jobs.
          On another day, it started salt business thereby taking away the jobs of traditional workers. 
The list goes on like this.
Other companies are similarly related.
          This illustration is necessary to dispel the apprehensions of the learned judges. They must debate this matter among them and reach a reasonable conclusion.
          As a result of 13 years of work, there exists a feeling that the present Chief Justice of India would do justice. Thus, the scene is set for a momentous change.

Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi, on 10 October 2014, said that only a handful of people prospered during the 60 years of Congress rule.
He repeats what the present man said. This shows that he has accepted the views of this man.
However, why does he love to cover up this work? Is not the act of uncovering far better than the act of covering?

This is letter No. 292.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 11 October 2014.
11-10-2014.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode

Mulagumoodu PIN:629167, India