CHAPTER 162

162

KNOWING THE BODY

Former Chief Justice of Delhi High Court, Justice A.P. Shah, on 13 November 2010, said that the judges were chosen based on undisclosed criterion in largely unknown circumstances reflecting an increasing democratic deficit. The present learned judges of the Supreme Court could devise a transparent method of selection without thinking about the fruits of their action.

The L&T Company, a big private company in India, on 14 November 2010, decided to close down its generator, turbine and boiler factories. The company said that its demand to impose import duty on Chinese boilers was turned down by the Government.

Thus the above company was constrained to close down the generator factories in India in total disgust.

In this connection, it must be noted that China wanted to convert India into its vassal state. It is even giving bribe to some Indian industrialists to achieve its goal. In fact, several industries in India have been closed down due to the Chinese onslaught.

The present writer has been pointing out the above matter through this work. In fact, the present writer is the only person in India to consistently point out this. The present writer has been doing this only to save India and the Indian industries. Yet the ruler refuses to listen. This shows that the ruler is wrecking vengeance upon India.

Therefore, Her Excellency the President of India, the armed forces and the learned judges of the Supreme Court must contribute their share to rescue India from the ruler. They must contribute their share –without expecting any fruits for their action - to stop similar imports from China and help revive the closed factories in India.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), on 15-11-2010, arrested two former officials in connection with the corruption in the Delhi Commonwealth Games (DCG).

The 2G spectrum scandal forced the Union Minister for Communication to resign from the Union Cabinet on 15 November 2010.

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) in his report said that the 2G spectrum was allocated arbitrarily in 2008 to benefit a few players thereby causing a loss of over $39 billion to the exchequer.

Now the Prime Minister of India said that everyone must respect the views of the CAG.

It may be recalled that the Prime Minister had submitted in the Supreme Court that the CAG had no power to question the policy decision of the Government. Now, he is not ready to reiterate it. This is the repercussion of the last mail submitted to Her Excellency the President of India.

A two- judge Bench of the Supreme Court - hearing the 2G spectrum scandal - on 16 November 2010 - questioned the inaction of the Prime Minister over a letter of a former Union Law Minister that sought sanction for the prosecution of the now resigned Union Minister for Communication. Now the Solicitor General (SG) did not want to infuriate the judges by uttering the words policy decision before them. This is also the effect of the last mail submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 13 November 2010.

The above former Law Minister, in an interview to a TV channel on 14 November 2010 disclosed that about $13 billion was given as bribe for 2G spectrum allocation. He said that the money was electronically transferred to some countries. He mentioned the names of the countries also. He added that the USA had agreed to furnish all electronic transactions.

The former Law Minister would not have said this for cheap publicity. If he had said anything to tarnish the image of any political leader during the pendency of his case, the Supreme Court would have taken his revelations seriously.

However, though the above former Law Minister mentioned the names of the recipients of money in Chennai, he did not disclose the names of the recipients of money in Delhi. He should have revealed the names of all recipients. But he did not do so. So he might think of withdrawing the case if the people in Delhi were affected.

An industrialist, on 15 November 2010, revealed that the then Union Minister for Civil Aviation demanded Indian Rupee 15 crore to grant him permission to enter airline business in India 12 years ago. He added that he chose not to give bribe to start a business.

The Hindu, on 16 November 2010, disclosed that a joint venture between the Indian industrialist and Singapore Airlines withdrew a bid to buy Air India (AI) in 2001. The paper said that the reason was political opposition. This shows that the letter dated 1-6-2001 given in Chapter 1 of this work saved the AI in 2001.

The New Indian Express, on 16 November 2010, through a centre page article wanted India to embrace China and not the USA. The paper said that this would enable India and China to control world market and to manipulate the dollar.

China is so rich that its armed forces are besieging India. Yet, the media mafias say that India must embrace China. This shows that the ruler is following the path shown by the media mafias.

Further, the USA entered China in the hope of amassing wealth. But China converted the USA into its vassal. Now China could give $100 billion to any country through a cheque. But the USA is not in a position to give even $10 billion to any country.

India lost $ 462 billion from 1948 to 2008 due to illegal financial outflows. Washington based Global Financial Integrity (GFI) found this. According to the GFI the flight of capital was faster since the so-called economic reforms in 1991. The GFI said that over $125 billion of that was lost during 2000-2008. This revelation is consistent with this work.

In this connection, it may be recalled that some people in India seized power saying that they would bring back truck loads of money siphoned off from India. Now, it is clear that they allowed some people to remove shiploads of money from India. The world would not have seen such a treachery.

The two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court, on 18 November 2010, described the 2G scandal as an extremely serious one and asked the Prime Minister of India to file an affidavit mainly for the following two reasons.

1. The Prime Minister should not say that an opportunity was not given to him to present his case and

2. There were some hidden facts.

The stand of the Bench in this case is similar to the stand taken by the two-judge Bench that heard the BPCL-HPCL appeal case. In the latter case, the two judges circumvented the BALCO judgment saying that the permission of the Parliament was needed to privatize the BPCL and the HPCL.

Now the Bench is circumventing the BALCO judgment through the angle of corruption.

The BALCO judgment allowed the Government to commit acts of corruption through arbitrary decisions. In fact, the Supreme Court has been encouraging the Union Government to commit acts of corruption since the BALCO judgment, all in the name of economic policy. It had gone to the extent of imposing a fine - as in Chapter 63 - for dragging the privatization of the Mumbai and Delhi airports case before it. The court –after allowing the Government to commit acts of corruption - is catching the Union Ministers red-handed.

Anyhow, the developments show that the learned judges of the Supreme Court are realizing the nature of their body. The case is in their hands and they would have to monitor it on a day-to-day basis.

The case would affect all Union Ministers because they are bound by a collective responsibility. In fact, the court should have asked all Union Cabinet Ministers to file affidavits severally and collectively to meet the ends of justice.

The ruler also should have been asked to explain her role in this matter. Without this, it is difficult to unravel the hidden facts.

The Government, on 18 November 2010, revealed that some private telephone companies did not submit the badly needed documents to the CAG to verify their gross revenues during the last three years.

In this connection, it must be noted that the former Chief of the Satyam Company was in jail for about two years for the mere act of boosting his income. Now, some companies are not showing their documents to the CAG. This is not to say that any industrialists should be arrested at all. This is only to say that about ten men in India are stronger than laws.

However, the developments show that the Supreme Court might have asked the competent authorities to ascertain the real income of the companies that exploit the natural assets. This gives the impression that the Supreme Court - as an institution - has started knowing the nature of its body.

In fact, India could be created by the Supreme Court alone; by its reason, image, will and love. For this, the learned judges must be lovers of knowledge.

The Government now said that the initial public offer (IPO) of the public sector Manganese Ore India Limited (MOIL) would start on 26 November 2010.

In this connection, the following letter is submitted to Her Excellency the President of India.

From

V. SABARIMUTHU

26-3 THATTANKONAM

VELLICODE

MULAGUMOODU P.O.

PIN: 629167

To

HER EXCELLENCY THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA

RASTRAPATHI BHAVAN

NEW DELHI

Your Excellency

The Government is selling public assets after transmitting the revenue from natural assets to some private individuals. The arbitrary nature of this arbitrage trading has been explained in various chapters. The Government is repeating this in bad faith because it could deny FREEDOM of expression. It is a plunder and an act of corruption. Therefore, Her Excellency the President of India is requested to sanction permission to this writer to prosecute the Union Cabinet Ministers, including the Prime Minister of India under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The President is requested to consider this as a formal letter from this writer.

THANKING YOUR EXCELLENCY

VELLICODE Yours faithfully

20-11-2010 V. SABARIMUTHU

The ruler now talked about “graft and greed” while keeping the Prime Minister beside her. This is not the voice of a healthy body because everything happened with her knowledge. The policy of the Government could not have been contrary to the policy of the ruler.

However, the son of the ruler supported the Prime Minister. Why does he support the Prime Minister? This shows that all recipients of money must be exposed.

Some newspapers, on 20 November 2010, published the taped conversations of some back room players during the formation of the present Union Government in May, 2009. The papers alleged that money was given to the relatives of political leaders for berths in the Union Cabinet.

Why do the media reveal this now? The reason is that the TV channel of the above leader revealed that the CAG had used the word “fraud” for the spectrum allocation in 2001. Obviously, the spectrum allocation in 2001 was –in the eye of the CAG – more serious than the spectrum allocation in 2008.

Thus the case boils down to a fight between a group of ten families and one family.

Now the Union Government is working on a formula to recover the $39 billion lost in the 2G allocation.

$39 billion is a small amount. The Government would have to recover the money lost in 2001 spectrum allocation.

The minerals- just like spectrum - are natural resources. Therefore, the Government would have to recover the money lost in the exploitation of minerals. About $500 billion to $ 1 trillion would have to be recovered.

The CBI, on 20 November 2010, raided the $ 2 billion 4,00,000 square feet house of Mr. Mukesh Ambani, one of the richest men in the world. He is producing 2 per cent of the global out put of oil.

The CBI had earlier charge-sheeted his company under the Official Secret Act. The CBI had ample evidence before it. Yet the case went into oblivion. What happened to the incriminating materials seized from his office then is not known to anyone.

Therefore, the purpose of the present raid is not immediately known.

A Tamil TV channel from Chennai alone reported the raid today. Even the public sector TV channel did not report the raid. Even in this matter, it appears that there exists a fight between one house and a group of ten houses.

It is said that the act of knowing the nature of the body is knowledge.

The facts from 13 November 2010 to 20 November 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 20 November 2010 at 10 PM.

V. SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 161

161

RENUNCIATION

          The President of the USA came to India on 6 November 2010. In a meeting in Mumbai many importers shared the dais with him. All importers must be directed to obtain No Objection Certificate (NOC) from Indian industries.

          Further, the State Governments do not maintain any foreign exchange account. But a few industrialists do. This shows that the rulers are not the true representatives of the people.

The Union Government on 9 November 2010 arbitrarily sold 20 per cent shares of the public sector Power Grid Corporation of India. This time, the Government did not give much publicity to this. However, the Government reiterated its decision to sell the shares of other Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) one by one at a regular interval of 16 days. The political leaders and the leaders of the Trade Unions did not talk anything. In fact, there was no public opinion for or against this. This shows that the ruler of India is acting harmfully without the consent of the people.

          A political leader on 9 November 2010 predicted in the Indian Parliament that China might attack India at any time. He added that China was occupying an inch of Indian Territory every day.

          The ruler of India should have openly asked the neighbouring countries not to give any naval bases to China. She should have done this without expecting any result. They might have defied her is a different matter.  In this matter, she did not do her duty.

          Similarly, the ruler should have openly asked China not to establish naval bases around India. China might have ignored this is a different matter. She should have done her duty without being attached to the fruits of her activities. However, in this matter also, she did not do her duty.

          Thus, the silence of the ruler had the effect of deploying the Chinese forces against the Indian forces. In fact, while China was fast establishing naval bases, the ruler asked the Indian forces to conduct joint military exercises with China.

The above odd behavior cannot be noticed in the leaders of other countries. This happens in India because the manipulators dragged her to politics for achieving their objectives.

  

          577 civilians, 260 security force personnel and 137 militant people were killed from 1 January 2010 to 8 November 2010. The Union Government informed this in Parliament on 9 November 2010.  If the armed forces had not lighted fire as in Chapter 135, not less than 10000 people would have died in this year alone.        

In this connection, it must be reiterated that about 10 people remove the public assets. This is against all provisions of the Constitution of India. Yet, the Supreme Court (SC) allows this because it does not recognize the Constitution of India as the supreme authority. However, the militant people use force to prevent this. This is the inference of the people sitting away from the jungles.

Who is standing for justice? Is it the Supreme Court or the militant people? All right thinking people would tell that the militant people -and not the Supreme Court – want to establish justice in India.

          The Indian Air Force (IAF) did not kill any militant people although helicopters were being used to help the paramilitary forces. The IAF disclosed this on 9 November 2010. The nation does not realize the significance of the action of the armed forces is a different matter.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the moment the armed forces lighted fire the Union Government should have resigned.

          Now the media is giving vent to its pent up anger against the armed forces. Thus, The New Indian Express - in a centre page article – on 7 November 2010 said:

1.     Unlike in Pakistan and Bangladesh, no Indian General wanted to access political power.

2.     No Indian General wanted to become the military dictator of India.

3.     The army officers –under the influence of whiskey- view the political leaders with contempt.

4.     However, even during the period of Emergency the Army did not take any interest in running the country.

5.     This is due to an unspoken social contract between the Indian Army and the people.

6.     The people give respect to the Indian Army. The Army, in turn, guarantees   the security and integrity of India.

7.     The army had been used for fighting insurrections in Nagaland, Mizoram, Punjab and Kashmir.

8.     When the Army demands pay revision, it usually gets its own way.

9.     In 1962, China thrashed India.  The people believed that the politicians had lost the war but the brave Indian soldiers had done their best.

10.               The army sometimes appears to live in a state within a state.

11.               Corruption has spread in India. Even the civil servants and lower judiciary are tainted.

12.               The people could tolerate kickbacks in arms deals and scandals in canteen purchases because it is restricted to Army itself.

13.               In the Adarsh Housing Society scandal the Army is encroaching into the civilian space.

14.               Senior Army officers are seen conniving with politicians, bureaucrats and contractors to make millions.

15.               Now there is a cynical abuse of the social contract because senior officers grabbed flats in the name of Kargil martyrs.

16.               The Army Chief spoke about his resolve to cleanse his force but he is not grasping the seriousness of the situation.

17.               It is not a question of ‘a few bad apples’.

18.               Army Generals are exploiting the regard the people have for their heroism.

19.               Hereafter, the press will begin looking critically at the Army as and when such instances come to light.

20.               The politicians will have an excuse to delve deep into the workings of the officer corps.

21.               The people also would support them.

22.               The social contract would not survive.

23.               The image of the Army will not recover.

24.               The perfect balance built between the Army and the Indian people will topple over.

25.               So the Army must urgently crack down on corruption, identify the guilty men and act swiftly against them.

26.               It must do so now. Tomorrow will be too late.

In this connection, it must be stated: 1.The media is attacking the armed forces only because they lighted fire.

2. But for this work, the media would have gone beyond this.

3. The media exposed the Housing Society scandal only to curtail the role of the armed forces to prevent the manipulations.  This is the reason why the media considers the acts of corruption in canteen purchases more dangerous than the removal of the public assets by about ten people.

4. The media must have some more scandals to fix the Army Officers.

5. Unlike the armed forces of Pakistan and Bangladesh, the Indian armed forces are a heterogeneous one. Therefore, no Army General could easily become the military dictator of India.

6. However, the armed forces could force the Government to take over public assets for the welfare of 1000 million people.

7. After lighting fire the armed forces should have taken the first step badly needed to establish justice in India. Then the 1000 million people would have noticed the armed forces with curiosity.

8. For this, the armed forces could have forwarded the letters of this writer to Her Excellency the President of India, the learned judges of the SC, senior military officers and the Government. Now, it is all a question of getting ten men in the SC, armed forces and Government put together.

9. Alternatively, the armed forces could have requested the SC to tell the reason why the public assets should not be taken over for public welfare.

10. The armed forces could have taken any other step to establish justice in India.

Renouncing the fruits of action, the armed forces must contribute their share to establish justice in India. The media would try to implicate the Army Officers in one case or other. They must have many other weapons in their armory.

The Union Government now decided to borrow $2.96 billion from the World Bank (WB) for road projects. The Government hands over the revenue from the natural assets to ten people. At the same time, it borrows money from the WB. This shows that the representatives of the people are not ruling the country. 

The arbitrary nature of the 2G spectrum allocation resulted in loss of over $39 billion to the exchequer.   The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) said this in a report submitted to the Government on 10 November 2010.

On the next day, the Union Government submitted in the SC that the CAG had no authority to question the policy decision of the Government.

The Government, further, said that the 2G spectrum was allocated based on the norms devised by the NDA Government in 1999. The CAG had said that the NDA Government had committed fraud in spectrum allocation. The media at that time concealed this because the guidelines were to their advantage.

The SC should have cancelled the spectrum allocation in 1999. Instead, the SC perpetrated the so called fraud through the BALCO judgment. Thus the SC built a system under unconstitutional principles.

Instead of pointing out the BALCO judgment, the Union Government and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had been seeking more time to probe the 2G spectrum allocation. The SC, in turn, had been giving time to the CBI to come out with a plan to protect the Prime Minister.

 Now, the Government says that that the CAG has no power to question the policy decision. Thus the Government indirectly says that the SC has no power to question the policy decision of the Government.

The message of the stand taken by the Government is that it was the SC that perpetrated fraud on the Constitution of India through the BALCO judgment and not the Government.

Evidently, the Government refuses to give even one square inch of space to the people.

Why did the present Government follow the 1999 norms?

If the Government had not followed the 1999 guidelines, about ten people alone would have been benefitted. Now - conceding the demands of various pressure groups - the Government added three or four more manipulators. The existing de-facto rulers hesitate to admit them in their club.

As the Prime Minister of India is involved, the SC would try to wriggle out from this case. However, it has two options before it. 1. Allowing the Government –consistent with the BALCO judgment - to apportion the public assets among ten people. 2. Cancel the 2G spectrum allocation consistent with the 7 May 2010 judgment.

The people expect the SC to obey the Constitution of India –without ill will or good will - in this matter and take over all natural assets.

For this the SC must act by renouncing the fruits of action. The learned judges might have to sacrifice post retirement positions.   

It is said that there is nothing better than the renunciation of the fruits of action.

The facts from 3 November 2010 to 12 November 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 13 November 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

 

          

CHAPTER 160

160

THE IMPERMANENT

          An industrialist on 31 October 2010 disclosed that his company was in possession of over $ 3 billion as on 30 September 2010. This was part of the profit from a gas reserve. Another industrialist also said that he was getting a huge profit from an oil well.

The Government has not quantified their real income. The nature of their investments in other countries also is not known.

          Despite this work, the ruler of India gives this much money to about ten people. She gives Right to Information Act, Right to Education Act, and Right to Employment Act besides gratis like food grains and houses to all others.  She proclaims that due to her ability the Upper House had passed a Bill for the reservation of seats for women in Parliament.

          In the economic front, the Government has no money to give a decent salary even to the President of India.  It has no money to fill up regular vacancies in the Government or for public investments. In fact, it is borrowing money for day to day expenses. At times, it is borrowing money from the World Bank.

In the past, a Union Government had pledged even the gold reserves in England.

The Government does not possess even $1 billion as surplus money. The various State Governments do not possess even $1 million as surplus money.

Now, it is selling Government properties or its shares. The Government would fall, if it could not sell the shares of a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) on 8 November 2010.

But a boy is in possession of over $ 3 billion as liquid cash. He possesses this even after buying many assets in India and abroad. In fact, he does not know where to invest his money.

This shows that the submission of a boy in the Supreme Court that his brother was getting a profit of over $16 billion per year must be a correct one. If he had inflated the amount to win the case, the Supreme Court would have punished him.  

How does this happen?

About ten people in India have been instituting the Union Government with the help of their media wing. Naturally, they secured the right to exploit the natural assets, including the spectrum, through auction or licenses. They did not reveal the real potential of these assets.

In order to exploit these assets, they needed money. For this, they directed the Government to invest the money - in the public sector financial institutions - in the shares of their companies. The public also invested a small amount in shares. Thus for investments, they got money without any interest payments. They could ensure adequate return to the money because they knew that there were unlimited natural assets. As a result, their revenue started increasing.

  In order to invest their profit, they dissuaded the Government from exploiting natural assets. For this, they propounded the theory that the Government should not do business. The Government gradually shelved many public investment plans. The Government withdrew from some others.

Then they wanted the Government to part with the assets in its hands. Thus they cornered some mines.

On 1 June 2001 the present writer gave 10 suggestions to the then Prime Minister of India. The action taken by him disturbed them. They quickly extracted a judgment from the Supreme Court. This judgment placed economic policy beyond judicial review. As a result, some more assets went into their hands.

Naturally, their revenue increased by leaps and bounds.  As they did not get sufficient assets within India mainly due to this work, they invested their surplus money all over the world and in numbered accounts.

They then asked the Government to scrap the pension scheme and put the money in their companies. 

Their strength increased to such an extent that China achieved its economic and strategic objectives through them. China even gave a loan of $12 billion to a boy in India.

They are ready to do anything to enjoy this. They are ready even to kill thousands of people.

However, their ability to manipulate the system got a blow when the armed forces lighted fire as in Chapter-135. This saved thousands of human lives. At the same time, this unnerved the ruler.

 The people should not know everything mentioned above. Therefore, they deny FREEDOM to Indians. This is the real reason behind the denial of FREEDOM to Indians. This writer began to realize this only gradually and now it is clear. This must be the emerald mentioned in Chapter 56.

     Evidently, they deny FREEDOM not because of the thinking that this writer would become the Prime Minister of India tomorrow but because of the thinking that this work would inhibit their ability to remove public assets.

     The political leaders willing to expose this are very rare because the media is keeping their weak points –public and private. They are even shadowing the army officers. Anyone exposing the real nature of the system would lose one thing or other.

However, the former Prime Minister of India, Sri. A.B. Vajpayee, must be an exceptional political leader. The moment he realized that he was heading a Government instituted by about ten men, he decided to quit politics. He proclaimed –Chapter 50- that he would embrace death rather than allowing his name to be maligned. He simply refused to be attracted by the impermanent and quit politics for good.

Some people would question the above conclusion. They could meet the former Prime Minister to accept or reject the conclusion.

The ruler on 31 October 2010 paid floral tribute to her mother-in-law and former Prime Minister of India. The people all over India watched it. The ruler had been living in the house of her grand-mother since her marriage. If she had uttered one or two appropriate words on one or two appropriate occasions, her life would have been saved.

The standing Committee Member of the Communist Party of China, Mr. Zhou Yong Kang, called on the ruler and the General Secretaries/Presidents of several political parties on 1 October 2010. He told them that development was the sole core interest of China. He requested them to consider the development of China as an opportunity rather than a threat to India. The media did not publish the reaction of the political leaders.

In this connection it must be noted that China has been achieving its economic and strategic objectives through the ruler and through some back room players. Now it is contacting even the leaders of small political parties.

After penetrating deep into the Indian system, China moved its armed forces inch by inch without taking even a gun. This is like the ruler deploying the Chinese forces around the neck of the Indians forces. As the ruler did not utter any word against this, she committed a treasonable offence. She has successfully converted India into a vassal of China is another matter.

Nepal said that it would not allow anti -China activities. This shows that all the peripheral countries of India are now loyal to China rather than to India.

The ruler on 2 November 2010 addressed the All India Congress Committee (AICC) meeting. She did not utter any word in favour of the FREEDOM of the people. The dominant theme of her speech was abuse of religion. In which way it is relevant today is known to her only. However, it must be noted that Mussolini had captured power only by attacking the clergy.

A van driver abducted two school going children for money. Then he panicked. There was no one to give him good advice. He pushed them into a canal when they were washing their hands after taking lunch. The police later recovered their body.

The children, perhaps, did not suspect the van driver. They did not commit any offence. Yet they did not get FREEDOM even to cry.

When arrested, the van driver wanted to see his 11 month old child.

Within two days another boy was abducted for money. The boy was rescued and the abductors captured. Both incidents occurred in the Tamil Nadu State in this week. The people are endlessly discussing the gravity of the crime committed by the abductors.

The present writer had compared the removal public assets to abduction of children – Chapter 48.

The ruler and the learned judges of the Supreme Court have the FREEDOM to go through 159 letters in a span of nine years. In fact, no ruler or court in any country would have gained this much knowledge from a citizen. Yet, 1000 million people are not getting FREEDOM even to cry under the present Supreme Court and the ruler. 

Now there are three options before the learned judges of the Supreme Court and the ruler. They are:

 1. Ruling the country by enforcing FREEDOM of expression.

2. Ruling the country without giving FREEDOM and removing the public assets.

3. Ruling the country without giving FREEDOM but by recovering all public assets.

It is said that the demons are attracted by the impermanent.

     The facts from 31 October 2010 to 2 October 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 3 November 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU