459: THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: A LAW TO HANDLE INCAPACITY?

459

THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

A  LAW TO HANDLE INCAPACITY?

          The UC Berkeley-Hass School of Business in California, USA,  bestowed President of India Mr. Pranab Mukherjee with its Global Leader Award for Innovation. The citation said that he promoted transparency. The New Indian Express reported this on 18 December 2015.

          He, in bad faith, hid 458 letters of a citizen from the eye of the people. Yet, the citation says that he promoted transparency. It is an irony.

          Chief Minister of Delhi Mr. Aravind Kajriwal alleged that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) removed some incriminating evidences against the Union Finance Minister, Mr.Arun Jaitely. He added that the assets of Mr. Jaitely increased from Re.23.86 crore in 2011 to Re.113.02 crore in 2014. The New Indian Express reported this on 18 December 2015.

          The Government of Delhi, illegally, gave over Re.1000 crore to a private company as a reward for making Mr. Kajriwal an all India figure.

          The CBI concealed this.

          Now it, apparently, wants to protect Mr. Jaitely

          President of Russia Mr. Vladimir Putin described the US Republican presidential hopeful, Mr. Donald Trump, as a talented man. The New Indian Express reported this on 18 December 2015.

          There are reports that Mr. Trump is reluctant to treat all people equally due to security reasons. Could a leader like Mr. Putin support  him?

          The present man predicted that the concept of European Union would lead to flight of capital. None noticed it.

          The people of North Korea know the nature of their system. But the UN condemned the President of North Korea, Mr. Kim Jong-un, for human rights violations.

         In contrast, even the Indians do not know the nature of their system. The present man said this long ago. But, none considers this as a crime against humanity.

          The tragedy is that the Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, stands flanked on either side by the world leaders.

          This is the kind of world the leaders mould!

The Union Law Minister, Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad, said that a law would be passed to handle the incapacity of the judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court. The media reported this on 18 December 2015.

          The Constitution of India mentions the question of appointing judges besides equality, socialism, liberty and democracy.

          But the judges say that there are no specific laws to support them.

          Freedom of expression is the only important fundamental right of the people.

          If someone writes something, there are many laws to prosecute him.

          If the media block the flow of knowledge to the people, there are no laws to prosecute anyone.

          Had the judges been capable of doing justice, they might have given a series of interpretations on the above points.

          Then the shadow of a single expression of a judge might have made the media to report news and views according to degree.     

           Now, the present man knows his contribution to nation building. But he is oblivious of the works of others.

          Thus, the system converts the people into animals.

           The judges may not allow the government to take the proposed law to its logical conclusion is a different matter.

This is letter No.459.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 19-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

19- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

          

458: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: ADMINISTERING IMPARTIAL JUSTICE?

458

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

ADMINISTERING IMPARTIAL JUSTICE?

          The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), on 16 December 2015, raided the premises of a company of Mr. Karti Chithambaram, a son of former Union Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram.

          Mr. P. Chithambaram immediately expressed the hope that ‘the foolish government would stop harassing his son’.

          The UPA government alienated the public resources like the Provident Fund. Mr. P. Chithambaram  was a part of that government. Is it the reason for the raids?

          The ED has not mentioned the real motive behind the raids.

          It has no moral or constitutional right to undertake raids like this. The reasons were given earlier,

An action of this sort is insulting and provocative in the highest degree.

Just as Mr. P. Chithambaram did, so as his successors do.

Defense Minister Mr. Manohar Parikar, on 16 December 2015, said that India would fight the Islamic State (IS), provided the operations are carried out under the UN flag.

The stand taken by India, in this matter, is a well thought out one.

Five judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Justices J.S.Khehar, J. Chelameswar, Madan B. Lokur, Kurian Joseph and A.K. Goel, on 16 December 2015,  directed the government to prepare a new Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) on appointment of judges. Among other things, the Bench specifically asked the government to define transparency and to fix the eligibility criteria.

Apparently, the judges used their talents to find an escape route.

The question of transparency might lead to the enactment of laws for freedom of expression.

This would enable the judges to administer impartial justice according to the laws.

This must precede the MoP. Then only it will be a legally valid one.

This is letter No.458.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 17-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

17- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

457. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: A MENACE

457

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

A MENACE.

          The Supreme Court of India, on 15 December 2015, expressed its unhappiness over the time taken by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to complete the investigation of coal related cases. The court posted the case to January 11, 2016. Justices Madan B. Lokur,Kurian Joseph and A.K.Sikri were in the bench.

          A great illegality occurred and the court wants to put right that public wrong. This is the pretended stand of the Supreme Court of India in the coal  and spectrum cases.

          A constitution must deal with common cause.  It cannot function with private interest.

          The Constitution of India also must deal with public interest.

          It does not allow the court to alienate the public resources.

          The government of India also did not - in public interest- enact any law to alienate any coal blocks or any other natural resources.

          The Supreme Court of India induced the government to alienate the public resources with out following any law.

          Accordingly, the government apportioned them.

          It was an induced action.

          If the government had violated any law, the court should have pointed out the law- violated by the government-  before proceeding with the case.

          It did not do so.

          This is an act of corruption.

           It is nothing but ‘a national economic terror’ perpetrated by the court.

          Upholding the Bihar and Odisha anti corruption laws, a Supreme Court of India bench comprising Justices Anil R. Dave and Dipak Misra, on 15 December 2015, described corruption as ‘a national economic terror’.

          The laws allow the court to attach the disproportionate assets of public servants.

          These laws are redundant. The disproportionate assets of small offenders are selectively being attached even now.

          What is required is laws for Freedom.

          The bench, further, said,"Corruption, a `noun` when assumes all the characteristics of a `verb`, becomes self-infective and also develops resistance to antibiotics."

          Anyone going going through the judgement would say that the court wants to prevent acts of corruption.

          The people possessing power alienate the public resources, amass wealth and park them in foreign countries.

          They spend part of the money to run newspapers and TV channels.

          The same people enact laws to attach disproportionate assets.

          The court allows this.

Therefore, it has no moral or constitutional right to talk about corruption.

Actually, when corruption changes into verb, it acquires an immunity to public cries for Freedom.  The immune verb does not reveal what is happening.

Thus, 456 letters failed to change the court.

The court that denies Freedom is far more dangerous than the corrupt.

An unscrupulous court is a greater menace than a corrupt public servant.

Any judge possessing a straight heart would agree with this.

This is letter No.457.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 16-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

16- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

456THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: PURSUE THE RIGHT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH

456

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

PURSUE THE RIGHT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH

The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi and the Prime Minister of Japan, Mr.Shinzo Abe, on 12 December 2015, signed 16 agreements that included bullet-trains, defense, security, infrastructure, education and civil nuclear energy.

The agreements are consistent with this work.

This is one of the most important bilateral agreements ever signed by India with any other country.

This can be considered as a small step to rescue India from China.

Japan must be commended for its conscious decision to open its doors for India. It is not clear whether the decision was inspired by the Emperor of Japan or not.

Due to this agreement,  India becomes one of the most favoured nations of Japan.

However, a reference to China, as reported by the media, could have been avoided.

The bullet-train should have connected Delhi with Mumbai, Calcutta and Chennai. One might see a tinge of private interest in the proposed Mumbai –Ahmadabad corridor.

It is the paramount duty of the government to increase the speed of all trains all over India without sacrificing  the basic parameters of safety.

India hiked the import duty on steel to 57.4 percent. The media reported this on 12 December 2015.

Simultaneously, at least 100 percent duty could have been imposed on natural rubber.

Indian rupee also could have been devalued a little.

The Bharathiya Janata Party, (BJP), accused the the leader of the Congress Party, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi and her son, Mr. Raghul Gandhi, of blackmail.  The basis for the allegation was the so called National Herald case.

          The law enforcing agencies book the leaders for their small offences.

          The biggest allegation is that the miners run the media and deny freedom of expression to remove the public resources.

          There is not even one TV channel for all the rest all over India.

          The Supreme Court of India knows this.

          This- in the past- resulted in the alienation of the public sector BALCO, IPCL and others.

          Due to this, the court suffers a kind of dishonour.

          Therefore, the court must develop an uncompromising antagonism to the political and economic blackmail.

          Further, it must take a decision to pursue the right and speak the truth.

          The present Chief Justice of India shall not hesitate to withdraw his statement regarding  the rule of law.

          This is letter No.456.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 13-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

13- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

THE NEW CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA: TREACHERY?

455

THE NEW CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA:

TREACHERY?

          The Prime Minister of Japan, Mr. Shinzo Abe, arrived in Delhi, on 11 December 2015. He is expected to sign some important agreements during his three day visit.

The  auction for nine coal mines is slated for January 18-22, 2015. The newspapers reported this on 11 January 2015.

          This is out and out unconstitutional. The fundamental laws that shape the Constitution of India do not allow this.

There is no specific  law to support it either.

          The miners - directly and indirectly - run the TV channels and the newspapers. In this way, they block the flow of knowledge to the people; and remove the public resources.

          The new Chief Justice of India, setting aside all other things, should have gone into the heart of the above  allegation.

          He failed to do so.

But he proclaims that there is rule of law in India.

          These are not simply acts of corruption but an organized crime against the nation.

Now, he must show the law that permits the government to part with the public resources.

Otherwise, the people might justly accuse him of treachery.

This is letter No.455.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 12-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

12- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

454: THE ARMED FORCES OF INDIA: LIBERATION OR SLAVERY?

454

THE ARMED FORCES:

LIBERATION OR SLAVERY?

The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, on 10 December 2015, said that there cannot be a better forum than Parliament for discussion.

The Indian Parliament never discusses any vital matters.

It did not enact any laws to alienate the public resources.

It did not discuss the method of utilization of the Provident Fund.

It did not want to  make the statue of Vallabhhai Patel  in China.

It never debates other vital matters like the freedom of expression?

The ruling class simply show certain things to the Parliament. The role played by the Members of Parliament (MPs) to determine the priorities of the land is a very limited one.

The Indian Air Force (IAF), for the first time, acknowledged the receipt of the last letter.

It was an automated reply.

Nevertheless, it is very important because the IAF might ask the Supreme Court of India to tell the law that allowed it to alienate the public resources.

The court, in turn, might ask the government to point out the law.

If the armed forces had given an action taken report to every letter, this work might have liberated the people - from this slave nation - long ago.

The armed forces now stand between liberation and slavery.

This is letter No.454.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 11-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

11- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

453. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: OPEN THE GATES OF JUSTICE

453

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA;

‘OPEN THE GATES OF JUSTICE’

Opening a door called Holy Door, Pope Francis, on 9 December 2015,  said, “ Open to me the gates of justice”.

The Union Government, on 9 December 2015, said that that the investments of the Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) in the stock market are not backed by any guarantee by the government.

The Supreme Court of India induced the government to siphon off the money in this organization to other countries. Later, it indirectly, asked the government to divert the money to the stock market. Now, the court talks like this!

A court in Delhi summoned Congress leader Mr. Sonia Gandhi and her son, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, in the so-called National Herald case. Unless otherwise stayed, they must appear before the court on 19 December 2015.

According to the prosecution, they indirectly usurped the National Herald Trust.

The Acts governing the trusts and societies need drastic changes.

No member shall be allowed to hold more than certain percentage of shares, say, 0.1 per cent.

If someone wants to hold more than this, he must start his venture under the Company Act.

But, the government may not get time to debate such matters.

The Congress Party – indirectly - levelled some allegations against the Supreme Court of India in connection with the National Herald case.

It said:

1.      The court plays a dirty game.

2.      It foists false and irrelevant cases.

3.      It has different set of rules- one for the ruling party and another for the opposition.

4.      This inhibits the ability of the apposition parties to question the government.

The Supreme Court of India alone can give an answer to the charges.

The above Party, apparently, does not want to reveal the truth because these are small cases involving small amount of money.

It wants the Supreme Court to conceal this work so that the big cases would not come to the notice of the people.

Global Financial Integrity (GFI), on 9 December 2015, put the black money siphoned off from India at USD 51 billion per year.

The GFI considered this as the most damaging economic problem faced by the developing countries.

It wanted the governments to force the private companies to publicly disclose their revenues, profits, losses and other things.

Though India ranks fourth in black money outflows, everyone  must know where it is generated.

This work shows that it is generated within the four walls of the Supreme Court of India.

How is it generated?

It is generated through the denial of freedom of expression.

The income from the public resources is the main source of black money.

Just as this work remains as a dark secret within the Supreme Court, the black money remains as a dark secret within it.

The people holding black money run the TV channels and newspapers. Therefore, the people hear their views only. The court keeps this as a dark secret.

If the court is ready to enforce freedom of expression, they will hear news and views according to degree.

Then all public resources will come under the government.

Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must ‘open to the people the gates of justice’.

Will it?

This is letter No.453.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 10-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

10- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851