Friday, November 3, 2017

I. My publications through Amazon.com



I have published the following books through the Amazon.com

1.    Atomic structure

2.    The Chemistry of the Transition Elements.

3.    ENGLISH GRAMMAR. This book demolishes the core area of English Grammar and supplies a new one.

4.    A NEW ENGLISH GRAMMAR FOR THE BEGINNERS. This book enables the readers to get a wonderful idea about English Grammar. It is a new grammar unknown to the English language. English grammar cannot be explained without this book.

5.    ANANTHAPADMANABHAN

6.    MOMEMTOUS MONTHS: The rule of Mr. H.D. Deve Gowda, Prime Minister of India.

7.    13 MONTHS IN OFFICE: INDIA UNDER Mr. A.B. VAJPAYEE MARCH 1998 to APRIL 1999.

8.    PRIME MINISTER Mr. A.B. VAJPAYEE AND THE ABDICATION OF POWER

9.    THE WARRINGS AMONG Dr. A.P.J. ABDUL KALAM, Dr. MANMOHAN SINGH and Mrs. SONIA GANDHI.

Note:
Paper backs are available for books Nos. 3, 8 and 9
Other books are available in the kindle version. 
All books will be converted into paper backs very soon.



Friday, October 13, 2017

CHAPTER 151

CHAPTER 143

143
SUCCESS
The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 24 May 2010. A meeting of the Union Cabinet ensued on the next day.
The Prime Minister of India, before receipt of the above mail, informed that the Union Cabinet had been meeting every week. The media had been suppressing this fact.
He answered many questions detailed to the press persons.
To one question he said that he welcomed freedom of expression!
To another question he said that the son of the Congress president would be an appropriate addition to the Union Cabinet.
To yet another question he said that the task given to him had been remaining unfinished.
If this work forced the Prime Minister to take over the natural assets, he would say that he achieved his goal. In contrast, if he succeeded in transmitting $1 trillion more to his supporters in the next four years, he would attribute it to his New Economic Policy.
The Union Minister for Communication said that he was being targeted because he succeeded in breaking the telecom cartel. He added that any probe must go into the root cause. But the militant people in Delhi would be hesitant about opening this matter.
The Defense Minister said that he was not against the act of debating various issues. This is his reply to the last mail.
The Home Minister invited the militant people for talks.
In this connection, it must be noted that there are many former Chief Ministers in the Union Cabinet. They should have at least- consistent with the letter No.1 dated 1-6-2001- split the telephone services and given it to the States. This would have put an end to militancy in many parts of India. Now, anyone going through this work would tell that they silently kill their own people for money.
According to some reports, preparations are going on to merge the private sector Bank of Rajastan with the ICICI bank.
The Government says that the ICICI bank is a foreign bank. Therefore, the Government must merge it with a Public Sector Bank.
The Prime Minister of India on 26 May 2010 met the representatives of the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII). He might have discussed the 7 May 2010 Supreme Court judgment and his political constraints.
The Prime Minister of India on 27 May 2010 exhorted the big industrialists to help the Small and Medium Scale Enterprises.
The present writer - in the last mail – requested the Government to save the cottage industries. The Prime Minister is saying the same thing.
In this connection, it must be noted that when a small industry perishes, the entrepreneur becomes a pauper. He becomes speechless with despair. The people now hear the low moan of the tyre industries because the Government has started rescuing India from China. Now, the Government must cancel the marketing rights, if any, granted to the friends and relatives of the Union Minister for Finance to sell Chinese products. Simultaneously, financial assistance must be given to revive the sick industries.
Her Excellency the President of India paid a visit to China on 26 May 2010. The President discussed all vital issues with the top leaders of China. The discussion lasted for two days.
India mentioned the decision of China to build two nuclear reactors in Pakistan. Apparently, China said that the reactors were subjected to international safeguards.
Chinese leaders mentioned the ban on Chinese products. The Indian delegation politely pointed out the huge trade imbalance - $16 billion during 2008 – of India with China. It cited the policy of China to flood Indian markets with Chinese products and the act of buying raw materials like iron ore only from India. The President requested China to give market access to Indian Information Technology, engineering and pharmaceutical companies to address this problem.
India further wanted the help of China to secure United Nation’s Security Council (UNSC) seat.
The President of India impressed upon the leaders that understanding the sensitivities of two countries was the key to deeper and sturdier friendship.
China said that negative reporting by the media could damage Indo-China ties.
The discussions were fully consistent with the last few letters of this writer. The influence of the back room players was conspicuously absent. The Government had not placed any constraint over the President and for this act the Union Cabinet must be commended. Apparently, the Congress president is also striving to rise to a higher level.
China would supply even uranium to India. But, an India that does not depend upon China for anything other than mutually beneficial activities is very important for world peace.
China, as usual, pointed out the activities of Tibetan leaders in India. India must appreciate this.
India is not disclosing the name of the present writer to the people. But, India never fails to report the activities of the Tibetan leaders. India must tell in which way the Tibetan leaders are dearer to it than the present writer.
Finally, the Chinese leaders told the President that they were ready for a new starting point. China started penetrating into India from 1988, exploiting the visit of the then Prime Minister of India. Therefore, the starting point shall be the year 1988. China must retreat from the sphere of influence of India and take up the pre-1988 position. This is for true friendship.
Evidently, the last few letters saved India from an impending disaster. Naturally, India would no longer remain as a vassal of China. The only condition is that the future rulers should not become the slaves of the manipulators again.
The Indian delegation pursued the talks with great diligence. However, it must be stated that the President has some very specific natural gifts to handle very delicate diplomacies. The President has a thirst for the good. She utilized all her talents to achieve a significant success for Indian diplomacy. In fact, the officials would not have seen more successful diplomatic engagements in a trying situation. The President might have experienced glimpses of transcendental happiness in this matter. She could talk about this throughout her life. There is no FREEDOM to the people to know even this is a different matter.
On 27 May 2010 some reports said that that the USA had elevated the level of dialogue with India, recognizing India as a great and emerging global power.
Air India (AI) on 27 May 2010 dismissed 58 employees. The employees immediately gave a notice to go on strike from 12 June 2010. The Union Government decided not to interfere with the decision of the management of the AI.
Now, there are three following options before the president of the Congress Party.
1. The AI could be asked to dismiss any number of employees for their offences.
2. The AI could be asked to reinstate all employees and settle the matter through talks.
3. Ignoring the matter.
The management could be correct. Or the employees could be correct. The people are not interested in knowing this. They expect the Government to run the AI successfully. They would welcome any one of the above options provided the strike is averted. This is the cardinal rule of business management.
In order to consider the second option, the Congress leader would have to change the Prime Minister. One or two leaders would oppose it.
However, the Prime Minister is not implementing the 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court. As a result, India is incurring a loss of over $220 billion per year. He is not taking over the privatized Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) including the airports. He is not giving FREEDOM. Considering everything, he could be substituted by another suitable person.
148 people died in a train accident. This might have been due to the sabotage of the militant people.
The Congress president shall not wait for another accident like this. She must concede the demands that are consistent with the Supreme Court order.
The Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation ( CBI) said that the cases involving the political leaders were being monitored by the High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Tamil TV channels alone telecast it. He had been concealing this matter. His present statement shows that the Supreme Court directed him to dilute the recent $400 million plus 1500kg gold case to $ 4.4 million case. He must narrate the circumstances that led to the dilution of the case.
The Supreme Court on 29 May 2010 permitted the Utter Pradesh (UP) State to take necessary steps to privatize 11 sugar mills subject to the final verdict of the court. This order is against the spirit of its 7 May 2010 judgment.
The Supreme Court should have directed the Union Government to take over all natural assets. This would have yielded $ 220 billion per year. Then no State Government would have thought of selling any PSUs.
However, the learned judges of the Supreme Court must fight - in fact wage a war - to implement its orders, suggestions and even thoughts. For this they must be like warriors, brave and without consideration for the feelings of others. Then, the probability of achieving success will be great.
The Chief Justice of India is not opening his eyes to enforce the fundamental rights of the people. He must note that the coverage given to an individual by the media – particularly public sector TV channels– must be proportional to his contribution to nation building. No one, including cricket commentators, with lesser contribution to the nation shall get greater coverage than this writer. Therefore, the Chief Justice of India must - even in his sleep - strive to weigh an individual and a minister without any partiality. Then only he could think of achieving success in the act of enforcing FREEDOM of expression.
It is said that a man striving by appropriate means is assured of success.
The facts from 24 May 2010 to 30 May 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 31 May 2010.
V.SABARIMUTHU

Thursday, April 20, 2017

561. BALCO

561


BALCO

The Union Cabinet, on 19 April 2017, cleared Re. 3174 crore to buy 16,15000 Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) machines. The price of the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) was not mentioned.
If a country cannot make EVMs and the VVPATs, why should it go for them? Why should India forego the foreign exchange?
 Is it not for huge commission?
What is the real cause for substituting the ballot paper with the EVMs?
Will not the ballot paper method give more employment to the people?
In what way does the nation dispose of the electronic cum plastic wastes?
Will not the money mitigate the sufferings of the farmers and others?
The Supreme Court of India could have prevented it at least to protect the environment.
Surely, these wastes would be more polluting than all the vehicles in New Delhi put together.

The Union Government, on 19 April 2017, decided to put an end to the use of red beacons from May 1 in their vehicles. After announcing this, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi said that every Indian is a VIP.
This is not something that must be announced by the Prime Minister of India. There are many other serious things. He simply converts small things into big things and big things into small things.
Everyone knows that his desire for power precludes that of others. But he is not holding the real power. Experience shows that he is not capable of exercising power.
Prime Minister Mr. Modi must see the light and allow others to see the light so that the people would see the real world, ‘the world of Ideas’. Now the people believe what they see is the real world.

         A Supreme Court of India bench comprising Jutice P.C. Ghose and Justice Rohinton Nariman, on 19 April 2017, revived the criminal conspiracy case against Mr. L. K. Advani and others, in the Babri Masjid demolition case. The bench directed a Lucknow court to hold day to day trial and pronounce the judgement in two years. The bench forbade the transfer of the judge at Lucknow and asked the CBI to produce at least one witness every day.
The bench said that crimes that shook the secular fabric of the Constitution of India were committed on December 6, 1992.
 The Allahabad High Court, 16 years ago, dropped the case on technical grounds –like jurisdiction.
In this connection, it must be noted that Justice Karnan of the Culcutta High Court has not exonerated Justice P.C. Ghose from the Atrocities against SC/STs case.
Further, the democratic fabric is as important as the secular fabric of the Constitution of India
The ruling class of India keep all the natural resources of India. They either give unlimited money to the media houses or use threat to deny freedom to Indians.
It has been conclusively proved that the people have not seen this work due to any one of the above factors or due to the combination of the above factors.
Due to this, the judges of the Supreme Court of India are unable to listen to the voice of others. The judges do not recognize others at all.
Therefore, they form surprisingly unsound opinion about freedom and democracy.
This has disastrous consequences.
In this connection it must be stated that in deference to the first letter dated 1-6-2001, the Union Cabinet that met in 4 July 2001 under Prime Minister Mr. A.B. Vajpayee devised some guidelines for selling the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).
Accordingly, the PSUs should not be sold to: 1.Those who remain as a threat to the security of India, 2.Those who keep ill-gotten wealth and 3.Those who committed “grave offences”.
The grave offence was defined as one, which outraged the moral sense of the community. The Government, further, clarified that for matters other than security, any conviction by a court or an indictment by a regulatory authority for a ‘grave offence’ would be sufficient.
Based on the above guidelines, the Cabinet Committee on Disinvestments (CCD) disqualified the bid of Hindujas for buying the AI because of its involvement in the Bofors case. Sterlite and Videcorn were disqualified because they were indicted by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Here, the Sterlite was disqualified from buying the Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) and not the Bharat Aluminium Company Limited (BALCO)
As the Sterlite was disqualified from bidding for the HZL, the Government should not have handed over the BALCO to the Sterlite.
But some Union Ministers contacted the judges of the Supreme Court of India and enlisted their support. Then they said that the sale of the BALCO would not be affected because the guidelines would be effective prospectively than retrospectively. This appeared as an opinion given in bad faith because a petition that challenged the privatization of the BALCO was pending in the Supreme Court of India.
Finally, the court said that it would not interfere in the economic policy. After that, the BALCO went into the hand of the Sterlite. It happened not due to the fault of the government alone. It happened because of the encouragement the government received from secret influences emanating from the Supreme Court of India.
Thus, the BALCO was handed over to a private party merely on a technical ground. Later, even the HZL was, in bad faith, given to the Sterlite.
Does any law allow this? If any law allows this, why did the court ask Miss. Jayalalithaa to surrender the TANSI land?
The decision not to give the PSUs to the entities that remain as a threat to the security has far reaching consequences. Actually, the decision to sell the PSUs to private parties is a threat to the security of India. The decision would affect the stability of the nation.
Now, the Chief Justice of India would not dare to say in public that the court would not interfere in the economic policy of the government.
The reason is that the Supreme Court of India created a system of government based on exploitation and this is affecting the security and the stability of the nation.
The money from the BALCO alone would have been sufficient to prevent the starvation of the farmers and others.
The farmer’s agitation at New Delhi would not have occurred at all.

The police, on 19 April 2017, chased away the striking farmers at New Delhi. Their plight is not known. They had been under strike for more than a month.
Ten men take the public resources and keep the prime minister and judges as slaves. They cannot listen to the voice of the farmers and others because they are not trained for it.
The burden of loan repayment is killing the people. The Prime Minister could have noticed the functioning of banks in other countries because no bank in any other country extracts as much interest as in India.
 Ten people remove unlimited public money without paying any interest. They lend the money for 10 to 16 per cent interest. Whose money is this? The farmers are not aware of it.
When Prime Minister Mr.A.B. Vajpayee wanted to use public money for public investments; the court did not allow it in the name of reform. 16 years have passed. Anyone can see the effect of the reforms.
The government can solve the problem of the farmers and others in so many ways. Due to ignorance, it does not see any way.
The court can solve the problem by giving freedom to the people. But it is not ready for it.
If the public resources cannot be used for public welfare, why should the Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi continue in power with the support of 1000 million people?

This letter No.561

   The facts that happened from 15 April 2017 to 20 April 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 21-4-2017.

21-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 






Saturday, April 15, 2017

560-Mrs. Sonia Gandhi – All Party Delegation.

560

Mrs. Sonia Gandhi – All Party Delegation.

          The Election Commission of India (ECI), on 12 April 2017, cancelled the by-election to the R.K. Nagar Constituency in the Tamil Nadu State. The ECI alleged that the voters were given money for voting by different political parties.
          Ten men remove the sand, iron, zinc and other natural assets, project their representatives as political leaders and rule India through them.
          Now there exists a similar group in the Tamil Nadu State. They part with a part of their income. If the Supreme Court of India is not ready to prevent the generation of this money, why does the ECI stand on the way?
       It is not necessary to go to the constituency to give the money is a different matter.
         
          Justice Karnan of the Calcutta High Court asked seven judges of the Supreme Court of India- CJI Khehar, Justices Dipak Misra, J Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur, Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Kurian Joseph  to appear before him for insulting him “wantonly and deliberately and with malafide intention” in the open court. He asked them to defend themselves against the charge of violating the prevention of SC/STs atrocities Act levelled by him. He said that the Chief Justice of India, on 31 March 2017, raised a question as to how his mental health was. The question was “endorsed” by the six other judges of the bench, Justice Karnan, said, adding it amounted to insulting him in the open court.
          The Supreme Court of India did not deny the allegation.
The Supreme Court, on March 10, 2017, issued a bailable warrant against Justice Karnan to ensure his presence before it after he levelled accusations against some judges.
Justice Karnan said that the seven judges comprising the bench that heard the contempt proceedings against him should not seek remedy from any judge under the Chief Justice of India, but should approach the Parliament, the competent authority.
Earlier, the seven judges had withdrawn the judicial and administrative powers of Justice Karnan. They should not have done this.
Further, no judge would ever dare to repeat the words used by the Chief Justice against Justice Karnan.
We are all thief-like people. Why do you expose us to the people? The Chief Justice might have used the words with this meaning.
It must be noted that these judges rejoice over the fact that they did not allow anyone from the SC/STs to enter the Supreme Court of India as a judge.
Now, if the seven judges respect the Constitution of India, they shall not hear any case.
The seven judges, even otherwise, forfeited their right to hear any case because they had not enforced freedom of expression.

          Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, the leader of the Congress Party, on 12 April 2017, met the President of India, Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, along with the leaders of the opposition parties. The All Party Delegation, apparently, wanted rule of law and democracy consistent with the Constitution of India.
          Ten men remove the sand, iron, zinc and other natural assets. They project their representatives as political leaders.  Apparently, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi has fallen from their grace. Therefore, the newspapers and the TV channels did not disclose the text of the memorandum submitted to the President.
          In this connection, it must be noted that Indian politics is all a question of plundering the public resources. Therefore, the ruling and opposition parties always fight over trivial matters and carefully avoid serious matters like freedom.
If Mrs. Sonia Gandhi is capable of taking the memorandum to its logical conclusion, Mr. Narendra Modi Government will have fallen before the next budget. It must be noted that she has already been sent to oblivion.
Even the intellectuals are drifting into the disorder of barbarism under the rule of Mr. Narendra Modi is a different matter.

This letter No.560

   The facts that happened from 8 April 2017 to 14 April 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 15-4-2017.

15-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 




Monday, April 10, 2017

559: TATA-VSNL

      559
             Justice J.S. Khehar -TATA-VSNL    

        The Chief Justice of India, on 17 April 2017, said that the election manifestoes of political parties do not ensure economic-social justice to the marginalized sections. He added that the political parties must be held accountable for it.
           In this connection, it must be noted that, in 2001, the NDA Government under Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, decided to sell the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).
          When Mr. A.B. Vajpayee was on a visit to the USA, the Union Cabinet that met under Mr. L.K. Advani decided to sell the public sector VSNL. This prompted Mr. Vajpayee to compare the PSUs to pillars.
Within a few days, the public sector Bank of India (BoI) gave about Re. 850 crore as loan to Mr. Tata. No reason was given for the same.
After that, the Union Ministers approached the then Chief Justice of India. The latter asked them to sell anything based on the BALCO judgement. He then requested them to manage the media. They assured them that no TV channel or newspaper would disclose anything against the judges
After six months, the then the Chief Justice of India – without any cause or provocation- openly proclaimed that the Supreme Court would not interfere in the policy decisions of the Government.
There was a wicked cause at the bottom of his statement. It was comparable to the statement issued by the present Chief Justice of India before the amalgamation of the associate banks of the State Bank of India.
Consistent with the portent,  Mr. Tata bought the VSNL. Thus the public property was indirectly converted into private property using public funds.
The day light robbery was brought to the notice of Mr.A.B. Vajpayee. Simultaneously, letters were sent to the judges of the Supreme Court of India, chief justices of the High Courts and the important chief ministers.
Prime Minister Mr. A.B. Vajpayee got angry with his colleagues. He wanted to resign. But his colleagues urged him not to ditch them.
The media assured him that they would not allow any mud to stick to him.
The judges of the Supreme Court of India also, apparently, told him that the letters against him would not go into the public domain.  
The Supreme Court of India is even now committed to this secrecy. Therefore, it has not accepted or denied the allegations.
This weakness enabled ten men to convert the judges into slaves.
Gandhiji said that any nation that exploits any single individual would not be deserving freedom.
Now, the Supreme Court of India exploits 1000 million people without the slightest compunction.
This offence is one thousand times more heinous than the offence committed by former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Miss. Jayalalithaa.
These are facts. The judges cannot ignore these facts just because the facts are unpleasant.
The present Chief Justice of India is aware of it. But he has not taken any step to restore the VSNL.
This cannot be the end of the VSNL. For what purpose did the youthful VSNL snatched away so suddenly from the 1000 million people? The VSNL would not have merited this end through any action of the Government.
However, there is no necessity to probe the veil of mystery. He must unconditionally surrender the public resources stolen by the Supreme Court of India before talking like this.

This letter No.559

   The facts that happened from 8 April 2017 to 9 April 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 10-4-2017.

10-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 




Saturday, April 8, 2017

558: A Predatory Method


558

A Predatory Method

Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, on 6 April 2017, said that the efforts of his government to serve the poor and the marginalized would continue with great vigour.
On the same day, he said that the time had come for the corrupt to surrender the corrupt assets.
Apparently, he wants to protect his promoters after causing minimum damage.

According to some reports, the High Court, Chennai, on 6 April 2017, banned the monazite rich beach sand mining in the Tamil Nadu State.
The beach sand mining takes place because of the policy of the Union Government to hand over the natural resources to the private parties. 
Such orders of the courts serve the purpose of showing to the world that everything happens based on certain laws.
The danger is that the mining would reach the hand of the national exploiters from the state level exploiters.
Further, the sand must be removed from the beach. The sand will not be depleted due to mining. The sand will be replenished by the waves.
Therefore, the Union Government must take over all mining works all over India before touching the Tamil Nadu State.

The Department of Income Tax, on 7 April 2017, raided the houses of Tamil Nadu Minister Mr.Vijayabasker, Mr. Sarath Kumar and Vice Chancellor of MGR Medical University Dr. Geethalakshmi in connection with cash distribution to the voters of the RK Nagar Constituency.
The media said that Re.5 crore in cash and documents for cash disbursement for about Re.89 crore were seized. The media added that a political party alone wanted to spend Re.400 crore for about 2 lakh voters. Other parties also do not lag behind it.
This is the money of the state level exploiters.
Anyone would tell that this is part of the proceeds from the minerals, contract works and bulk buyings.
After starving the farmers and others, the ministers and some others amass wealth.
Every susceptible union minister gets 1000 times more money than a susceptible state minister.
The state level ministers use a part of their wealth to buy vote.
The union ministers buy the vote by denying freedom of expression.
Evidently, if everyone gets his share in the wealth of the nation, no one need starve.
This work shows that the symbol of the nation level exploiters is Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi.
But the media depict the Prime Minister as the symbol of goodness and all the rest as the symbol of evil.
However, everything happens because the Supreme Court of India conceals the works like this one from the eye of the people and keeps the people as mere slaves..
In fact, the judges beseech the newspapers and the TV channels to save them.
Thus the state level exploiters get a bad name and the nation level exploiters get a good name.
This is a predatory method of enforcing law.

This letter No.558

   The facts that happened from 5 April 2017 to 7 April 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 8-4-2017.

8-4-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.