194
“BRING DOWN THE TREE”
The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 23 January 2011 . The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com
In her 63 rd Republic Day address to the nation on 25 January 2012 , President Pratibha Devisingh Patil, said that the future of India
In her speech, she admitted that the system was not without flaws.
At one point she said that the aspirations of the people were growing and they wanted immediate solution.
However, at another point she praised the role played by the media and the courts.
She cautioned that in order to remove a bad fruit one should not bring down the tree itself.
This work dominated her speech.
However, the President praises the courts –meaning the Supreme Court of India- and the media in front of 1000 million people. In this way, she risks her honour for evil. This may be to practice loyalty. But, it conveys the impression that the Supreme Court of India gave Re.3 lakh crore to private parties with her latent support. The denial of freedom of expression is similarly related.
In this connection, it may be noted that her speech in Hindi lasted for 30 minutes. But the same speech translated into English lasted for 20 minutes only. Did anyone censor her English version?
Her English version is not seen in her website. Does she want to conceal her own speech?
The Union Government on 24 January 2012 gave final approval for the acquisition of Cairan India for 8.48 billion by Vedanta.
The private parties cannot buy or sell public assets. The Constitution of India forbids this. But such sales take place even without the payment of stamp duty because of the support of the Supreme Court of India.
If the President had allowed the people to see this work, then also the people would have prevented the above sale.
The promoters of the Essar and the Loop telecom did not appear before the 2G special court on 27 January 2012 . Therefore, it issued fresh summons for 22 February 2012 .
Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar on 28 January 2012 said that he would not fight the 2014 polls. He might have amassed Re. thousands of crore. He is a man of practical wisdom.
A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices GS Singhvi and AK Ganguly on 1 February 2012 said that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh did not take appropriate action over the letter of Mr. Subramonia Swamy that sought the prosecution of public servants because the people responsible for giving proper advice to him failed in their duty. The Supreme Court had not obtained a statement from him before coming to this conclusion.
However, the Supreme Court is coming to the nucleus. No leader in India
All leaders in India India
Evidently, if someone asks the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh or the Union Ministers the reason for giving Re.3 lakh crore to private parties, everyone would strike ignorance.
A three judge bench of the Supreme Court of India on 2 February 2012 said that the Government should grant permission for the prosecution of public servants within three or four months of receipt of application.
The media did not disclose the names of the judges in the above bench. In fact, the media now suppresses the names of judges in various benches.
However, The New Indian Express said that the judgment had put an end to many malpractices. Actually, the Supreme Court directs the manipulators to resume their manipulations with renewed vigor.
The Supreme Court of India knows that ordinary citizens cannot stand before it through an advocate. It also knows that no big manipulators would be sent to jail even for genuine reasons. So any public servant could be prosecuted with permission, or without permission. It is a human rights problem.
The trade deficit of India China 31 January 2012 .
President Pratibha Devising Patil forwarded the letter dated 21-11-2011 to the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on 21- 12 – 2011, requesting it to take appropriate action. The MoD acknowledged it to this writer through a letter dated 23 January 2012 . But, the MoD described it as a letter received from the Secretariat of the President. This is the style of functioning of the MoD.
However, President Devisingh Patil transmits the letters to the Prime Minister of India, Union Ministers, Chief Ministers and even political leaders. If she had actually facilitated the removal of Re. 3 lakh crore, she would not have done this. However, her future actions alone will prove or disprove this conclusion.
A two judge bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Justices GS Singhvi and AK Ganguly on 2 February 2012 revoked 122 telecom licenses issued after 2008. This is presumably because about 1 per cent of the spectrum went in the hands of the manipulators known to former Union Minister for Communication Raja.
In this judgment, the Supreme Court of India proclaimed that it could review policy decisions either in public interest or because of its unconstitutional nature. The present writer said this hundreds of times. The Supreme Court of India rejected the contentions of the writer hundreds of times. In this way, it allowed its clients to amass over $100 billion in the last ten years. Now, it says that the policy decisions could be reviewed. Should a Union Minister go to jail to annul an unconstitutional judgment?
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court might cancel the present judgment is a different matter.
The judgment says that the actions of Raja in this matter were wholly arbitrary, capricious and contrary to public interest.
The above qualities are the attributes of the Supreme Court of India. Otherwise, it would have removed “the rubies and diamonds in the ears and on the fingers” of the predecessors of Raja. In fact, those are the real rubies and diamonds mentioned in the last chapter.
The bench, further, said that Raja gifted away important national assets. The fact is that the Supreme Court of India gifted away important national assets. In order to escape, the court and the media cite Raja.
Furthermore, the bench said that everything was stage managed to favour a few companies. The truth is that the Supreme Court of India stage manages everything.
The above bench directed the Union Government to auction the cancelled spectrum based on a new set of norms. Unless this judgment is annulled, auction is the only route for future licenses. The media promptly lauded the judgment.
The BALCO judgment – better the BALCO law that put the policy decisions beyond judicial review - lasted for 10 years. The present law would not last for even 10 months. This is because the Supreme Court of India is not a law making body. It cannot make a law in private interest at all.
Now, the Supreme Court wants the Union Government to give public money to about ten people. This is to corner public assets. In the past it said, “See, they bought the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). So they belong to them” Now it says, “See, they got them in an auction. They burnt their midnight oil. So they belong to them”
It may be recalled that the above licenses were distributed after the Supreme Court had secretly given Re.3 lakh crore to a few people.
It is a wonder that Raja resisted the private interests of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the Supreme Court of India. However, his murmurs in the Union Cabinet infuriated the Supreme Court and sent him to jail. It did not want a man like him in the Union Cabinet. It was a coup.
Raja had functioned as an advocate before his stint in the Union Cabinet. Usually, advocates behave like inducted judges. Why did Raja function differently? Centuries of oppression might have changed his traits!
Citing the above judgment, The New Indian Express on 5 February 2012 said that the “Day of Reckoning” had arrived for the “Wild Animals of Politics”.
The truth is that the Day of Reckoning” has arrived for the same species in the Supreme Court of India. For this, it is imperative that all political leaders must stand up and say that the Supreme Court of India wants the conversion of public assets into private assets using public money.
The above paper said that political class is collectively corrupt. This actually refers to the inducted judges.
The paper described Anna Hazare as a beacon of hope. He is a buoy to divert the attention of the people from the above facts.
Evidently, when this writer requested President Pratibha Devisingh Patil to give compulsory retirement to the inducted judges, she should have dismissed them. If the President could ensure freedom of expression, they need not be dismissed at all. They would simply quit. Does the President compare the act of giving freedom to the act of bringing down a tree?
In this connection, it is pertinent to state that this is not the work of an individual. This is the struggle of the 1000 million people for freedom. This struggle must reach them.
Every news item in the newspapers must generate money for the owners of the newspapers. Therefore, they will not publish this work unless a force acts on it.
However, the President must prove that the manipulators alone are not the owners of the public sector TV channels.
The facts from 23 January 2012 to 6 February 2012 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 6 February 2012 .
The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India
V.Sabarimuthu.26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167INDIA
