216. The Top Private Companies and Caretakers

216

THE SUBVERSION OF THE CONSTITUTION

              The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 8 February 2013. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was sent through post to the President of India and the Chief Justice of India; and posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

               The European Union (EU) lifted the diplomatic ban on Gujarat Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi on 8 February 2013. Just like Mrs. Sonia Gandhi and Mr. Rajiv Gandhi – one would say- he follows Mahatma Gandhi.

      The EU, further, said that it respected the election results in India and trusted the Indian judicial process.

       Mr. Mukesh Ambani, Chairman, Reliance Industries, on 11 February 2013, said, “I am bullish on India because it is the aspiration of a billion people, and in India all the billion count”.

       Thus, he, indirectly, says that the views of this writer also count.

   He, further, lamented that he created wealth for India. He said this because the present writer pointed out the public character of the so-called private companies.

      The Government infused unlimited public money and public assets into his companies for the growth of India.

      Thus the government cancelled about 450 petrol outlets granted by the Members of Parliament (MP), and allowed him to open the same all over India. It gave the public sector Indian Petrochemical Corporation Limited (IPCL) after suppressing the guidelines devised for privatization.

    In an extra-ordinary move, it even allowed him to open shops all over India to sell vegetables. Even in the USA the big companies are forbidden from doing the activities of small businessmen.

     It is natural that the above economic structure demands the denial of freedom. Therefore, the government sacrificed freedom of information to 1000 million people.

          The meaning is obvious.

  

       Union Finance Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram started Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Scheme (RGESS). It exempts 50% of the investment from any kind of tax obligation. Assets of all entities that use this public money would go to the government.

         Ex- Indian Air Force (IAF) chief Mr. Tyagi indirectly got about Re. 370 crore from Italian business conglomerate Finmeccanica while placing orders for 12 Agusta Westland helicopters. His brothers- Julie Tyagi, Docsa Tyagi and Sandeep Tyagi- President Pranab Mukherjee, former SPG chief Bharat Vir Wanchooand former National Security Adviser M. K.Narayanan and some Italians were also involved.

     Italian prosecutors revealed this on 12 February 2013.

     The charges may be true or false. But the soldiers recruited after 2003 have no government pension.

     As the soldiers have no pension, the police personnel all over India have no pension.

    As the soldiers and police personnel have no pension, the other government servants and the employees in the private sector have no pension.

    The boys join the armed forces due to their poor economic background. After joining, they cannot form an association to fight for their rights. How will they live after retirement? What is the reason for their plight?

          This happened because the mind of Air Chief Mr. Tyagi was in another place.

     The present chiefs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force must make amends for the lapses of their predecessors without delay. Then, everyone would directly get pension from the government.

                 Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) public prosecutor, Mr. A.K. Singh, was caught in a camera while talking to an accused in the 2G case - Uniteck MD Sanjay Chandra- to dilute the 2G spectrum case. The CBI director, Mr. Ranjit Sinha, confirmed this but chose not to arrest anyone.

                  Recently, the CBI had submitted before the court that former Union Minister A. Raja had used a different pen to correct a paragraph as if he had no power to do that. This and the present discovery show that the recipients of the Provident Fund (PF) money are the real government in India. They  achieved what they had wanted.

       In fact, the CBI conceals this work from the eye of the people because it still takes orders from the recipients of the PF money.

   

    Nokia India Limited, on 12 February 2013, said that the tax probe was not in tune with fair play. It added that the action of the tax authorities was not consistent with even Indian standards.

    Whether there are irregularities or not the authorities could undertake raids. However, the present raid shows that the government failed to super-wise the company. Therefore, any raid against any company, in future, would be construed as the failure of the government to supervise it effectively.

   

   The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), on 13 February 2013, seized the properties of two companies of Sahara group. The SEBI, further, decided to freeze the bank accounts of its promoter Subrata Roy and three directors.

            There were reports that his properties had been pledged. This shows that he had collected money from the public to buy assets, and availed himself of loans against such assets. Thus the public character of his companies is over 200 per cent.

          Considering everything, the Supreme Court of India should have appointed a caretaker to run the Sahara group. If the court has the power to seize companies, it has the power to run them.

          A Supreme Court bench, on 13 February 2013, directed the CBI, IT Department and Enforcement Directorate to set up a team to inquire into the so-called Radia Tape. As the CBI conceals this work from the eye of the people, the integrity of the CBI cannot be trusted.

           Former Union Minister Arun Nehru, on 17 February 2013, said that chaos and anarchy had arrived. He disclosed that India was going through a system of change. He warned that unless the saner elements within the system speak, India would become a banana republic.

     Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 18 February 2013, said that he had nothing to hide. He said this after keeping this work away from the eye of the people.

   

     Prime Minister of England David Cameron, on 18 February 2913, sought a special relationship between India and England- a relationship about the future, not the past. He was on a three day visit to India.

     The Queen of England did not visit India to declare open the Commonwealth Games presumably because India refused to inform the existence of this work to the people. Apparently, the economic condition of England is changing its nature. Alternatively, the so-called underground moles have achieved this.

     Culcutta High Court, on 18 February 2013, ordered the liquidation of Dunlop India Limited. It declined the prayer for a stay order on liquidation.

    This is a sad day for India.

     The court should have appointed a caretaker to run the company or directed the Government to run it. The workers are the worst affected. The Supreme Court of India should have intervened in this matter.

    The Enforcement Directorate (ED) informed its decision to attach properties worth Re.122 crore of YSR Congress chief Jagan Mohan Reddy. The ED should inform the salient points of this work to the people before doing anything. It shall not do anything under the cover of darkness.

      The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), on 22 February 2013, issued new guidelines for giving licences for new banks.

       If the RBI grants license to someone to run a bank, it must supervise it effectively so that it would not become bankrupt. All other institutions are similarly related.

     Two blasts killed 16 people at a crowded area in Hyderabad in India on 21 February 2013.

       This is Letter No.216
 The Chief Justice of India must note that this writer is working within the framework of law. This is a potent political work that turned the so-called private sector companies into public sector companies. To realize it, he must grant freedom of information to the people.

     In fact, the suppression of this work from the eye of the people is subversion of the Constitution of India.

           The facts from 8 February 2013 to 23 February 2013 are being submitted to Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, His Excellency the President of India, on 24 February 2013.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India and the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force for necessary action.

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu

629167

Tamil Nadu State

INDIA

Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851

24 February 2013.

V. Sabarimuthu

215. The Top Newspapers of India

215

"NOT FULLY HUMAN"

        The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 20 January 2013. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was sent through post to the President of India and the Chief Justice of India; and posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

     A Supreme Court of India Bench comprising justices R.M. Lodha and S.J. Mukhopadaya, on 20 January 2013, observed that the economic policy of the Government must be within the constitutional parameters.

        The above observation shows that some learned judges of the Supreme Court are receptive to the views of this writer.

      However, at one time the court talks like this. At another time, it says that the economic policy is above judicial review. The former view is consistent with the Constitution of India. But the latter view now prevails. Therefore, the court must take an unequivocal stand.

    The Government, on 21 January 2013, hiked the import duty on gold from 4 percent to 6 percent.

     The Government had given Re.3 lakh crore from the Provident Fund (PF) account to three or four parties. They converted part of it into gold. Therefore, the Government would strive to increase the price of gold.

     BJP leader Mr. Arun Jaitly described the promotion of Mr. Rahul Gandhi in his party as a move to convert democracy into a dynastic one. The Hindu reported this on 21 January 2013. Many other newspapers and TV channels gave great importance to his appointment as the Vice President of his party.

     Mr. Arun Jaitly, actually, wants to make him the Prime Minister of India. This is the reason why he talks about him rather than about freedom.

     Had there been freedom, Mr. Arun Jaitly and Mr. Rahul Gandhi would not have got ten votes each. To prove this conclusion wrong, they must grant freedom to the people.

         The Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), on 22 January 2013, said that the telephone traffic between India and Maldives must be handled by equipment installed by India and not China. It warned that the Huawei and the Zhongxing Telecommunication Equipment Limited – two Chinese companies- had close ties with the Chinese army.

      India buys telecommunication equipment mainly from China. The RAW says that Maldives should not do the same.

     In this connection, it must be stated that China would quit Maldives if India wants.

       Now, India is not ready to ban   even the cancer causing toys manufactured in China. The influence of China is such that the Government is not ready to even protect the children.

        Mr. Azim Premji, Chairman of Wipro Limited, on 23 January 2013, said that they were working without a leader in India.

     So long as there is denial of freedom of information, no Prime Minister of India could be the true leader of India. Realizing this, former Prime Minister of India Mr. A.B. Vajpayee chose to remain as a citizen of India rather than as a Prime Minister of India.

     Mr. Premji, further, said that the “super rich” could not treat extreme wealth as personal wealth. This work prompted him to say this.

     The Government infused all the savings of people in some companies. They lost their money. But, it multiplied in the hand of the companies. Such assets belong to the Government. The promoters would get the market value of their shares, only if the Supreme Court feels that their contribution to the denial of freedom had been not a substantial one.

       Furthermore, Mr.Premji, suggested that the super - rich could be taxed. Otherwise, he warned that the forces of socialism would take over everything. He said this in the light of this work.

     In the eye of the Constitution of India, this work – and not the forces of socialism - has taken over everything! If the Supreme Court grants freedom today, the people would realize this good fortune tomorrow.

        Now, instead of imposing new taxes, a team of, say, three IAS officers could be detailed to supervise the functioning of every private company that removed substantial amount of public money. Incidentally, this would obviate the necessity to undertake surprise raids as in the Nokia India Limited, Chennai.

       

      Union Finance Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram, on 23 January 2013, said that the opposition parties – behind the noise – were supporting the Government.

     Actually, the opposition parties are the insiders. The statement of Mr. P. Chithambaram confirms this.

     In his Republic Day eve address to the nation, on 25 January 2013, President of India Mr. Pranab Mukherjee said that India did not win freedom to deny freedom to Indians. He had concealed 214 letters under his coat before saying this. Everyone cannot do this.

   In a gruff voice, he, further, said that if effective actions were not taken, Naxalite violence would acquire more dangerous dimensions.

        Had there been freedom, the people would have chosen this writer as the Prime Minister of India long ago. The President knows this. Therefore, he should have considered this writer as the undisputed leader of India rather than as a Naxalite or militant man.

    The USA, on 29 January 2013, wanted strong rules on investor protection and a high level of openness for resolving investment disputes under the proposed Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT). The Government survives by denying freedom of information. Therefore, openness cannot be expected.

        Information and Broadcasting Minister Mr. Manish Tewari, on 29 February 2013, said that “Freedom of Speech” must not extend to right to offend.

    Mr. Manish Tewari has to deny freedom of information. Ordinarily, no minister for information would agree to do this. His statement now indicates that the Government would hand over the nation to the armed forces rather than giving freedom.

    It must be noted that the present writer states the facts only. This does not offend anyone. The judges, political leaders, industrial houses and the media houses would agree that this writer wanted to save them.

      Mr. N.R. Narayana Murthy, Chairman of Infosys Company, on 30 January 2013, told the entrepreneurs that one need not be successful at every attempt. Success would come gradually. He wanted them to live with peace and smile. He advised them to gather information and analyse it. He added that there must be quality in performance.

     Infosys Company, on 30 January 2013, substituted Head of Human Resources Ms. Nandita Gurfar by a new person, Mr. Srikanthan Moorthy. The company said that his main job was to lift the morale among 1.5 lakh employees.

     The statement indicates that the Infosys has dropped its plan to dismiss 5000 so-called under-performers. So everyone is happy.

     Who pulled the shot here? Is it the President of India? Is it the Supreme Court? Is it the Chief of Indian Army? Is it the Chief of Indian Air Force?  The writer knows his last letter and the present development. The people involved in taking the above decision are not known.

        Evidently, someone - in a position of high responsibility - is receptive to the views of this writer.

      Whatever happened, Mr. N.R. Narayana Murthy also must be thanked for listening to the voice of REASON.

    One small sentence in the last letter achieved this. In one way the sentence saved the system from a collapse. This is one of the greatest achievements of this work. The media should have reported this –if not the entire work- to the people in bold letters. But they say the people cannot understand this.

     Former Union Minister Mr. Arun Nehru, on 3 February 2013, said that the Indians were living in uncertain times. He, apparently, thinks of the possible transition of private sector companies into public sector companies.

     The Hindu, on 4 February 2013, said that the foreign investors were leaving the country lock, stock and barrel, taking their money with them. It attributed this to the incidents of rape in India. This shows that the underground moles of the media started to highlight the “incidents of rape” only to divert the attention of the people.

    Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) appointed former Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia as a public interest director of Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).

     It is pertinent to note that S.H. Kapadia, as the Chief Justice of India, had been saying that the courts were not the competent bodies to review the economic policy of the Government. No wonder that he denied freedom to Indians till his retirement.

    Mr. N.R. Narayana Murthy, on 4 February 2013, said that he would start a political party in the Karnataka state to root out corruption.

    It is better to start a political party rather than giving money to the people like Mr. Aravind Kejriwal. However, he should have granted freedom before starting the party.

        Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 5 February 2013, said that the Government would give “over-riding importance on quality” of education. He further wanted “to attract good faculty to raise teaching standards”.

      In the last letter this writer said that the Government had no money for the direct payment of salary to the teachers of self-financing educational institutions. When this writer says something, Prime Minister says the same thing in another way. The people have to live with it.

   A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar, on 6 February 2013, directed the SEBI to seize the properties of two companies of Sahara Group to refund Re.27,000 crore to the investors.

         Courts all over India appoint a Receiver to settle such issues pertaining to every small institution. The depositors get about 10 to 50 percent of the deposited amount after a long time; and the employees become orphans.

    As the Government is the competent authority to deal with public money, the court could have directed the Government to take over the company rather than crippling it. It must be noted that the SEBI cannot return the money to fictitious investors.

    Union Finance Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram, on 5 February 2013, said that he would cut some defence expenditure in the budget for 2013-2014. He thus wants to test the patience of the armed forces first.

     He attributed his difficulties to provide money to various sectors to the “disdainful attitude” to growth.

    His chief contribution to the nation was that he managed everyone to hand over Re.3 lakh crore in the PF account to private parties. If he had used this money, other public money and the income from natural resources for large scale public investments, the nation would have grown, and he would have got not less than Re.25 lakh crore for the budget for 2013- 2014.

        Former Prime Minister Mr. A.B. Vajpayee had been receptive to the views of this writer. But he was not allowed to use public money for public investments. Therefore, he decided to quit office.

        Mr. P.Chithambaram projects the views of this writer as the views of someone and passes comments. If a bread winner hands over the income from land and others to some others for safe keeping, where will the family go for money?

        It is a wonder that he looks at the face of the people with ease. He must pick up courage to open this work for a rational discussion.

     The Union Government, on 7 February 2013, sold 9.5 percent shares of the public sector National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) for Re.11,500 crore. As usual some people bought the shares using public money. 

     The Government believes that the action is essential for development.

     The Government is free to do anything in good faith. But it  is not free to do anything in bad faith.

    The Government sold the shares in bad faith because it concealed this work from the investors and the people at large.

        If the media has any respect for the people, at least the top newspapers should have informed  the salient points of this work –if not the entire work- to the people. This is the birth right of the people. But, they stand to plunder public assets by diverting the attention of the people to other issues. In order to justify their actions they say that the Indians are "not fully human".

    Therefore, the assets of all top newspapers - that have substantial contribution to the denial of freedom of information - are the proceeds from crime. They are liable to be attached.

    This is Letter No.215. The Chief Justice of India must note that freedom of information is the corner stone of the Constitution of India. It is his duty to grant this. He should not waste his precious time thinking about his post retirement position.

           The facts from 20 January 2013 to 7 February 2013 are being submitted to Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, His Excellency the President of India, on 8 February 2013.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India and the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force for necessary action.

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu

629167

Tamil Nadu State

INDIA

Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851

8 February 2013.

Sabarimuthu and his wife, Stella Bai.