215
"NOT FULLY HUMAN"
The
last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 20 January
2013. The same mail was sent to the
Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Later, it was
sent through post to the President of India and the Chief Justice of India; and
posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
A Supreme Court of India Bench comprising
justices R.M. Lodha and S.J. Mukhopadaya, on 20 January 2013,
observed that the economic policy of the Government must be within the
constitutional parameters.
The above observation shows that some learned judges of the
Supreme Court are receptive to the views of this writer.
However, at one time the court talks like
this. At another time, it says that the economic policy is above judicial
review. The former view is consistent with the Constitution of India. But the
latter view now prevails. Therefore, the court must take an unequivocal stand.
The Government, on 21 January 2013, hiked
the import duty on gold from 4 percent to 6 percent.
The Government had given Re.3 lakh crore
from the Provident Fund (PF) account to three or four parties. They converted
part of it into gold. Therefore, the Government would strive to increase the
price of gold.
BJP leader Mr. Arun Jaitly described the promotion of Mr. Rahul Gandhi in his party as a move to convert democracy into a
dynastic one. The Hindu reported this
on 21 January 2013. Many other newspapers and TV channels gave great importance
to his appointment as the Vice President of his party.
Mr.
Arun Jaitly, actually, wants to make him the Prime Minister of India. This
is the reason why he talks about him rather than about freedom.
Had there been freedom, Mr. Arun Jaitly and Mr. Rahul Gandhi would not have got ten votes each. To prove this
conclusion wrong, they must grant freedom to the people.
The Research and Analysis Wing (RAW),
on 22 January 2013, said that the telephone traffic between India and Maldives
must be handled by equipment installed by India and not China. It warned that
the Huawei and the Zhongxing Telecommunication Equipment
Limited – two Chinese companies- had close ties with the Chinese army.
India buys telecommunication equipment
mainly from China. The RAW says that Maldives should not do the same.
In this connection, it must be stated that
China would quit Maldives if India wants.
Now, India is not ready to ban even
the cancer causing toys manufactured in China. The influence of China is such
that the Government is not ready to even protect the children.
Mr. Azim Premji, Chairman of Wipro Limited, on 23 January
2013, said that they were working without a leader in India.
So long as there is denial of freedom of
information, no Prime Minister of India could be the true leader of India.
Realizing this, former Prime Minister of India Mr. A.B. Vajpayee chose to remain as a citizen of India rather than
as a Prime Minister of India.
Mr.
Premji, further, said that the “super rich” could not treat extreme wealth
as personal wealth. This work prompted him to say this.
The Government infused all the savings of
people in some companies. They lost their money. But, it multiplied in the hand
of the companies. Such assets belong to the Government. The promoters would get
the market value of their shares, only if the Supreme Court feels that their
contribution to the denial of freedom had been not a substantial one.
Furthermore, Mr.Premji, suggested that the super - rich could be taxed.
Otherwise, he warned that the forces of socialism would take over everything.
He said this in the light of this work.
In the eye of the Constitution of India, this
work – and not the forces of socialism - has taken over everything! If the
Supreme Court grants freedom today, the people would realize this good fortune
tomorrow.
Now, instead of imposing new taxes, a team of, say, three IAS
officers could be detailed to supervise the functioning of every private
company that removed substantial amount of public money. Incidentally, this
would obviate the necessity to undertake surprise raids as in the Nokia India Limited, Chennai.
Union
Finance Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram,
on 23 January 2013, said that the opposition parties – behind the noise – were
supporting the Government.
Actually, the opposition parties are the
insiders. The statement of Mr. P.
Chithambaram confirms this.
In his Republic
Day eve address to the nation, on 25 January 2013, President of India Mr. Pranab Mukherjee said that India did not win
freedom to deny freedom to Indians. He had concealed 214 letters under his coat
before saying this. Everyone cannot do this.
In a gruff voice, he, further, said that if
effective actions were not taken, Naxalite
violence would acquire more dangerous dimensions.
Had there been freedom, the people would have chosen this
writer as the Prime Minister of India long ago. The President knows this. Therefore,
he should have considered this writer as the undisputed leader of India rather
than as a Naxalite or militant man.
The USA, on 29 January 2013, wanted strong
rules on investor protection and a high level of openness for resolving
investment disputes under the proposed Bilateral
Investment Treaty (BIT). The Government survives by denying freedom of
information. Therefore, openness cannot be expected.
Information and Broadcasting Minister Mr. Manish Tewari, on 29 February 2013,
said that “Freedom of Speech” must not extend to right to offend.
Mr.
Manish Tewari has to deny freedom of information. Ordinarily, no minister
for information would agree to do this. His statement now indicates that the
Government would hand over the nation to the armed forces rather than giving
freedom.
It must be noted that the present writer states
the facts only. This does not offend anyone. The judges, political leaders,
industrial houses and the media houses would agree that this writer wanted to
save them.
Mr. N.R. Narayana Murthy, Chairman of
Infosys Company, on 30 January 2013, told the
entrepreneurs that one need not be
successful at every attempt. Success would come gradually. He wanted them to
live with peace and smile. He advised them to gather information and analyse
it. He added that there must be quality in performance.
Infosys
Company, on 30 January 2013, substituted Head of Human Resources Ms. Nandita Gurfar by a new person, Mr. Srikanthan
Moorthy. The company said that his main job was to lift the morale among
1.5 lakh employees.
The statement indicates that the Infosys has dropped its plan to dismiss
5000 so-called under-performers. So everyone is happy.
Who pulled the shot here? Is it the
President of India? Is it the Supreme Court? Is it the Chief of Indian Army? Is
it the Chief of Indian Air Force? The
writer knows his last letter and the present development. The people involved
in taking the above decision are not known.
Evidently, someone - in a position of high responsibility - is
receptive to the views of this writer.
Whatever happened, Mr. N.R. Narayana Murthy also must be thanked for listening to the
voice of REASON.
One small sentence in the last letter
achieved this. In one way the sentence saved the system from a collapse. This
is one of the greatest achievements of this work. The media should have reported
this –if not the entire work- to the people in bold letters. But they say the people cannot understand this.
Former Union Minister Mr. Arun Nehru, on 3 February 2013, said that the Indians were
living in uncertain times. He, apparently, thinks of the possible transition of
private sector companies into public sector companies.
The
Hindu, on 4 February 2013, said that the foreign investors were leaving the
country lock, stock and barrel, taking their money with them. It attributed
this to the incidents of rape in India. This shows that the underground moles
of the media started to highlight the “incidents of rape” only to divert the
attention of the people.
Securities
and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) appointed former Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia as a public interest
director of Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).
It is pertinent to note that S.H. Kapadia, as the Chief Justice of
India, had been saying that the courts were not the competent bodies to review the
economic policy of the Government. No wonder that he denied freedom to Indians
till his retirement.
Mr. N.R.
Narayana Murthy, on 4 February 2013, said that he would start a political
party in the Karnataka state to root out corruption.
It is better to start a political party
rather than giving money to the people like Mr.
Aravind Kejriwal. However, he should have granted freedom before starting
the party.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on
5 February 2013, said that the Government would give “over-riding importance on
quality” of education. He further wanted “to attract good faculty to raise
teaching standards”.
In the last letter this writer said that
the Government had no money for the direct payment of salary to the teachers of
self-financing educational institutions. When this writer says something, Prime
Minister says the same thing in another way. The people have to live with it.
A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar, on 6 February 2013,
directed the SEBI to seize the properties of two companies of Sahara Group to refund Re.27,000 crore
to the investors.
Courts
all over India appoint a Receiver to settle such issues pertaining to every small
institution. The depositors get about 10 to 50 percent of the deposited amount
after a long time; and the employees become orphans.
As the Government is the competent
authority to deal with public money, the court could have directed the
Government to take over the company rather than crippling it. It must be noted
that the SEBI cannot return the money to fictitious investors.
Union Finance Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram, on 5 February 2013, said that he would cut
some defence expenditure in the budget for 2013-2014. He thus wants to test the
patience of the armed forces first.
He attributed
his difficulties to provide money to various sectors to the “disdainful
attitude” to growth.
His chief contribution to the nation was
that he managed everyone to hand over Re.3 lakh crore in the PF account to
private parties. If he had used this money, other public money and the income
from natural resources for large scale public investments, the nation would
have grown, and he would have got not less than Re.25 lakh crore for the budget
for 2013- 2014.
Former Prime Minister Mr.
A.B. Vajpayee had been receptive to the views of this writer. But he was
not allowed to use public money for public investments. Therefore, he decided
to quit office.
Mr. P.Chithambaram
projects the views of this writer as the views of someone and passes comments.
If a bread winner hands over the income from land and others to some others for
safe keeping, where will the family go for money?
It is a wonder that he looks at the face of the people with
ease. He must pick up courage to open this work for a rational discussion.
The Union Government, on 7 February 2013,
sold 9.5 percent shares of the public sector National Thermal Power Corporation
(NTPC) for Re.11,500 crore. As usual some people bought the shares using public
money.
The
Government believes that the action is essential for development.
The Government is free to do anything in good
faith. But it is not free to do anything in bad faith.
The Government sold the shares in bad faith
because it concealed this work from the investors and the people at large.
If the media has any respect for the people, at least the top
newspapers should have informed the
salient points of this work –if not the entire work- to the people. This is the
birth right of the people. But, they stand to plunder public assets by
diverting the attention of the people to other issues. In order to justify
their actions they say that the Indians are "not fully human".
Therefore, the assets of all top newspapers
- that have substantial contribution to the denial of freedom of information -
are the proceeds from crime. They are liable to be attached.
This is Letter No.215. The Chief Justice of
India must note that freedom of information is the corner stone of the
Constitution of India. It is his duty to grant this. He should not waste his
precious time thinking about his post retirement position.
The
facts from 20 January 2013 to 7 February 2013 are being submitted to Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, His Excellency the
President of India, on 8 February 2013.
The same letter is being sent to
the Chief Justice of India and the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air
Force for necessary action.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu
629167
Tamil Nadu State
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520.
Mobile: 9486214851
8 February 2013.
 |
| Sabarimuthu and his wife, Stella Bai. |
No comments:
Post a Comment