Wednesday, January 25, 2012

193. A Mystery

193

A MYSTERY

       The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 27 December 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC),  Chief Election Commissioner, Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, Allahabad and Calcutta High Courts.  Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com
             The momentous developments that followed the above letter must be noticed.
       The letter was sent on 27 December 2011 at noon. Mrs. Pratibha Devesingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, transmitted it to the Prime Minister of India, Dr. Manmohan Singh, within minutes. Immediately, the leaders listening to the debate on the new Anti-corruption Bill deserted the Lower House. They agreed that the new law was to bite the unfamiliar leaders and, therefore, decided to retract.
         Accordingly, though the confused House passed the new Anti-corruption Bill, the Government wriggled out by allowing the Bill to die in the Upper House.
       Thus, the Upper House was adjourned sine die without voting on 30 December 2011.
      The great revulsion occurred not because of the indomitable vision of President Pratibha Devi Singh Patil over the forces of evil but because of a small step taken by her. It is true that the office of the President had been waiting for the email from this writer. It is the power of the President of India!
        This is the conclusion of the present writer.
        However, the present writer knows his email and the final result. What happened in between is known to the President only.
          Obviously, had the people been aware of this work, they would have realized the importance of this work. In fact, the people must know the reason for such changes. But, the Supreme Court of India and other competent authorities treat them as animals unworthy to know the value of this work.
       Thus, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh rules India not because of democracy but because of its denial.

        Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 1 January 2012, said that poverty was the greatest problem of India.
       In the context of this work, his statement conveys the impression that some forces in India removed the Re. 3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) because he had no power to prevent it. He indirectly puts the blame on the system.
       The truth is that he could have used the money for public welfare.
      The present danger is that he is scheming to hand over the money to the same people for another three years following the same path.

           Chief Election Commissioner of India (CEC) S.Y. Quraishi said that the absence of job security to two Election Commissioners was inhibiting his ability to conduct free and fair elections. This is his reply to this work – particularly Chapter 189. Thus he admits that he does not conduct elections in India in a free and fair atmosphere.
        The CEC knew that due political recognition had been denied to this work.  He could have asked the newspapers and the TV channels to tell the reason for this. At least, he could have published the salient points of this work. A Tamil Daily – Thina Thanthi – published his reply on 2 January 2012. Thus he gave the reply to this writer only. Does anyone – other than this writer – understand the reason for his utterances?
       By talking like this, the CEC consciously undermines his own authority to enforce freedom of speech.  This may be due to his realization that he has no freedom. Thus, if he talks something to ensure freedom, the media - and therefore the manipulators - would strange his words.
      Despite the constraints, the CEC could ensure freedom of speech.

      Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said that the media should not be controlled from outside. The Hindu published this in its front page on 3 January 2012. The New Indian Express on 8 January 2012 complemented his opinion by describing him as a good man and all others as power wielders.  
            Manmohan Singh could become the Prime Minister of India because there was no freedom of speech. He continues in his position because there is no freedom of speech. The moment he enforces freedom of speech, the people will send him out.
       As ambition is a keynote of Life, he denies freedom of speech to 1000 million people and clings to his post.
        In contrast, this writer has been working for the last 11 years only to rescue India from the people like him. Had the people been aware of this, they would have not only prevented him from giving Re. 3 lakh crore to private parties but also chosen this writer as the Prime Minister of India long ago.
       Naturally, the newspapers describe him as a good man and all others as power wielders.

        Chief Justice of India S.H.Kapadia in his Law Day address said, “1. The court came down heavily on the Centre in the black money issue. 2. The court decided not to undertake a review of the policy decision relating to the safety of nuclear plants. 3. The judiciary stands on public trust.  4. The Supreme Court has taken a decision to constitute a larger bench to review the system of appointment of judges.  5. The Supreme Court stayed the release of Pune based racehorse owner Hasan Ali.  6. The court ordered the suspension of mining operations in the Bellary region to prevent pollution. 7. The court did not entertain Public Interest Petition (PIL) pertaining to the removal of Justice P.D. Dinakaran and Justice Soumitra Sen.
       Everyone knows that there will be some white spots even in a bad man. Similarly there will be some black spots in every good man. However, anyone going though this work would consider the arguments as a hollow one because the Supreme Court is not ready to enforce freedom of speech.
           S.H. Kapadia should have picked up courage to publish the questions of this writer before giving their reply. Now, his reply looks like one way traffic.
         However, with reference to his reply, it must be stated that the Supreme Court of India generated black money of about Re. 6 lakh crore in the last three years alone. Whereabouts of this money is known to it. The other points are similarly related.

         The leaders of the principal opposition party – BJP - on 6 January 2012 met Her Excellency the President of India on 5 January 2012 and urged her to advise the Union Government to reconvene Parliament to put the Lokpal Bill –a new Anti-corruption Bill - to vote.
         In this connection, it must be stated that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh tabled the new Anti-corruption Bill in the Lower House saying that the nation was waiting with bated breath for the Lokpal Bill. Many representatives of the manipulators had supported him before passing the Bill. The BJP had stoutly opposed it.
       Later, the ruling parties abandoned the Bill in the Upper House.
        Now, the BJP wants the Bill. This shows that the Bill actually belonged to the BJP and their manipulators.  However, only very few people understand this.   

      The CEC directed the police to cover the statues of candidates and the statues mainly similar to the symbols of the political party of Miss. Mayavathi on public property.  The CEC did it just for a show.
       The national flag of India closely resembles the flag of the Congress Party. Therefore, he should have covered all national flags on public property before taking this decision.
        Miss. Mayavathi chose not to seek the intervention of the court for remedy. This shows that even some political leaders are losing their faith in the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India.

    Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi on 6 January 2012 said the key officials of the UP were biased in favour of the ruling party. Actions of Quraishi show that he is biased against freedom.

          The Chief Electoral Officer of the UP State issued strict orders to the police to nab people for black money. Accordingly, the police recovered 1.37 crore from an abandoned car in the UP state on 9 January 2012. Later it recovered Re. 41 crore from one place.
       The above order shows that the above officer is implementing the orders of the manipulators.
     Alternatively, the CEC consciously deceives 1000 million people - as mentioned in Chapter 189 - in the pretext of preventing corruption.

A case pertaining to former Union Minister for Communication Sukh Ram came before a Supreme Court bench comprising Justice B.S. Chauhan and T.S. Takur on 9 January 2012. The latter rescued himself from the case due to reasons known to him only. Actually, all inducted judges must rescue themselves from all cases.
    
      Highlighting that 42 per cent children in India were under weight Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on 10 January 2012 described the condition as national shame. After giving Re. 3 lakh crore to the manipulators, he talks like this. This is his real nature. This could be called Manmohanism.

      The High Court, Delhi on 11 January 2012 told the internet providers that the court could block their websites.
        After all, the important internet providers are not enlarging freedom at all. They are not ready to report the salient points of this work. Why do the judges fear them?

     The Enforcement Directorate, on 10 January 2012, decided to attach property worth Re. 223 crore of five companies involved in the 2G case.
            This is to show that the Supreme Court of India and the CBI are doing their duty impartially in the 2G spectrum case.
      The truth is that they cover up their guilt through these actions.
      If the Supreme Court of India punishes former Union Minister Raja for his acts of corruption, it would have removed “those rubies and diamonds on his ears and on his finger” –those 2G licenses granted by him – before sending him to Tihar jail. Now this work alone is the only voice in India to continuously raise this cruelty.
 
          Indian Army Chief Gen. V.K. Singh on 16 January 2012 filed a petition in the Supreme Court for the correction of his date of birth. The infuriated media said that he deceived the Government by going to court. It said, “One of the principles of war is deception” It directed the Supreme Court of India to refer the matter to a tribunal or to any other authority.
          Why does the Government rake up this matter just before his retirement? Does Prime Minister Manmohan Singh depend upon the strength of a section of the armed forces to rule India? Her Excellency the President of India alone knows the answer.
    
         Chinese state banks decided to lend $1.18 billion to Reliance Communications of Anil Ambani. Some newspapers reported this on 18 January 2012.
         According to some reports, China had earlier given him about $7 billion. In fact, China would not have given money like this even to its own citizens. Is this the commission for opening Indian market for the Chinese goods?  An enquiry is necessary to know this.
         Apparently, about ten top industrialists gave a promise to China to convert India into its vassal state against such favours. Freedom is necessary to know this. But, they prevail upon the Supreme Court of India to ignore the freedom of Indians.
           In this connection, it is disturbing to note that India connives at even the safety standards. Thus, the Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) imported from China explode while in use. As they contain mercury vapours, there are health hazards. But the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is ignoring hundreds of letters in this matter.
                                                                                                                  
       With reference to the writ petition filed in the Supreme by Gen V.K. Singh, Defense Minister A.K. Antony on 20 January 2012 said that he had been silent to the extent of being misunderstood. However, consistent with the words of the manipulators, he added that the General should have sought any other constitutional remedy except going to the Supreme Court of India.
        It is true that there exists a misunderstanding about him. He is not a natural leader of India. The media – particularly the Malayalam news paper, Malayala Manorama- had created him for nothing. Otherwise, he would not have given Re. 3 lakh crore PF money after concealing this work. Even now, the media is behind him.

       Militant people killed 13 police personnel in the Jharkhand state on 22 January 2012. It must be condemned by everyone. But, it must be related to the denial of freedom by the Supreme Court of India. Surely, its actions are more heinous.
          Mrs. Sonia Gandhi – a woman- knows that the name obtained by the denial of freedom is worthless. Yet she denies freedom.
           Mrs. Mamata  Banerjee – a woman Chief Minister- knows that the people touch her feet without knowing her real nature. Yet she is not ready to give freedom.
     Miss. Jayalalitha – another woman Chief Minister- also chooses to enjoy the denial of freedom.
     Mrs. Sushma Swaraj, the leader of the opposition in the Parliament, also is a woman. She too abhors freedom.           
       Mrs. Meira Kumar – a Woman Speaker - knows that she is doing a disservice to the neglected section of the people. Yet, she is not ready to utter a word for the freedom of Indians.
     There are many other women leaders in the Government.
     Above all, the President of India is a woman. Her power to establish justice, and therefore freedom, is an absolute one. She could have compulsorily retired all inducted judges to take appropriate action over this work. But she considers her own letter to establish justice as a formality.
       Surely, the women may not get a chance to give freedom to Indians again.  Yet, they are not doing their duty.
       Women – consistent with the words of Professor Stephen  Hawking – are really a mystery.
                    The facts from 27 December 2011 to 22 January 2012 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 23 January 2012.
             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.
23 December 2012

 V.Sabarimuthu.26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode,  Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167INDIA