185
THE NUCLEUS
The present writer submitted his last mail to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 29 August 2011 . The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta High Courts. It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com
The CD - that mentioned the bribe of Re 4 crore - was a genuine one. The CBI, on 30 August 2011 , officially revealed this.
In this connection, it must be noted that Justice Singvi and Justice Ganguly together had sent Union Minister Raja to jail. The advocate of the petitioners in that case was Mr. Prasant Bhusion.
The CD shows that former Telecom Minister Raja had to go to jail presumably because of the nexus between the judges, and some manipulators. This is the reason why the Supreme Court should have probed the nexus between Prasant Bhusion, and Justice Singhvi.
An MP, on 30 August 2011 , alleged that the supporters of Anna Hazare had attacked his house, and he wanted protection to his family. Many others might have encountered similar problem. This shows that the media had been concealing many things that had been happening during the fasting of Anna Hazare.
The Indian Navy, on 30 August 2011 , said China Bay of Bengal using a fishing vessel equipped with 22 laboratories. The vessel finally entered the Sri Lankan waters.
This shows that Sri Lanka India India
Even now, the Union Government is encouraging imports from China China
The Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) and the British Petroleum (BP) announced the completion of the BP’s acquisition of 30 per cent shares in 21 oil and gas sharing contracts. Anna Hazare and his adherents did not utter a word against this. But, this is an act of corruption.
After freezing the bank accounts, the Enforcement Directorate, (ED), attached the properties of five companies in connection with the bribe of Re.200 crore paid to Kalainger TV for the 2G spectrum.
A preliminary enquiry indicated that some private companies violated the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) in this issue.
The ED had identified the properties of Kalaignar TV worth Re.215 crore located in different parts of Tamil Nadu. Apparently, they were not attached till date.
The ED disclosed the above on 31 August 2011 .
It must be noted that if the Government had given Re.3 lakh crore – in the Provident Fund (PF) - to an imbecile, he would have bought gold and kept it in a dark chamber. The money would have grown into Re. 7.5 lakh crore. In this way also, the recipients of the PF money keep Re.4.5 lakh crore as black money. The Government is not ready to recover this huge amount but runs after Re. 3 crore, Re.30 crore and Re. 300 crore in the pretext of preventing money laundering.
In order to break the cartel of the existing players, Raja might have expected some small entrepreneurs to enter the Telecom Sector. The new entrants might have wanted the Government to allot the spectrum based on the precedent. As a result, some of them might have got the spectrum. As it is a gold mine, the beneficiaries might have given some money to some people.
If Raja had allotted the spectrum in any other illegal way, the existing players would have cornered the entire spectrum with their unlimited money. They, in turn, would have kept him as a Cabinet Minister. Besides, they would have given him Re. hundreds of thousands of crore directly or indirectly.
When the Prime Minister latently expects a minister under him to do an illegal favour, the natural tendency of the young ministers would be to fulfill his wishes. This would strengthen their position in the Cabinet. It is incredible that Raja resisted this and acted fully consistent with the Constitution of India.
Further, as a member of the Union Cabinet, Raja might have stoutly opposed the conversion of public assets into private assets.
If this conclusion comes near to the true picture, the sacrifice of Raja will go down as a great one.
Whatever happened, the developments show that India
In this connection, it must be noted that the CBI is slowly coming near to the nucleus of the Indian system. It says – it is the most important point - that some people paid money to Raja and his associates as quid pro quo for the favours in the allotment of spectrum.
Obviously, the present Union Ministers got their present post – again it is the crucial point – as quid pro quo for converting public assets into private assets. Even President Pratibha Devisingh Patil is not an exception to this. Anyone would agree that this act is more heinous than the act of receiving money for various favours. Raja would not have received money from anyone is a different matter.
The CBI, on 1 September 2011, told the Supreme Court that the alleged element of coercion by former Telecom Minister Dayanidhi Maran in the sale of Sivasankaran’s Aircel to Malasian based Maxis company had not been established.
If Sivasankaran had demanded five licenses besides his existing licenses, Minister Dayanidhi Maran should have granted 10 licenses to him within a span of ten minutes. The CBI had been talking like this to bring him down from the Union Cabinet.
Dayanidhi Maran might be the prodigal son of Mr. Murasoli Maran. He might have overtaken many other senior leaders in his party to become a Union Minister. He might have assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. He might have wanted to buy the assets of others. There may be an underground tunnel – for cables- between the BSNL office and the SUN TV.
Notwithstanding the above, the fact that he was forced to quit the Union Cabinet makes him a great man.
In what way he would act in future cannot be predicted. But, anyone could be proud of him because he acquitted himself well in the Union Cabinet.
The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) decided to hand over the money to seven private parties. They would keep the money as gold or utilize the money for lending purposes.
The Government does not give money to any citizen of India
Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukergee, on 2 September 2011 , described Anna Hazare as a popular leader. The latter couldn’t have been a popular leader if the former had not been committing the acts of corruption given below. The unlimited money produced headline news after headline news in the newspapers and in the TV channels.
The newspapers and TV channels function for money. Even to publish local news, the local TV channels demand money. Naturally, every word about Anna Hazare was to conserve the illegally amassed assets of the manipulators. This is how Anna Hazare became popular.
In contrast, the popularity of the present writer will have the effect of curbing the acts of corruption. Therefore, without the interference of the Supreme Court, the points present in this work would not reach the mind of the people through headline news.
Further, the comment of Minister Pranab Mukergee indicates that he – just like Prime Minister Manmohan Singh - was a party to the agitation launched by Anna Hazare.
Anna Hazare, on 2 September 2011 , said that the Government was looting money. He predicted that another 15 years would be required to root out corruption.
Obviously, his words come from his masters.
It must be noted that he did not say how the Government was looting the nation.
Everyone in India
Thus, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh helped thieve more than Re.100 lakh crore in the last seven years. He also wants a strict law against corruption!
Having received hundreds of letters from this writer, former Judge of Supreme Court Santhosh Hegde, knew that the act of: 1.Buying the shares of private companies using public money. 2. Selling the public assets against public money. 3. Granting tax exemption to investments in the hands of private parties. 5. Giving the public money to private parties for safe keeping and 6. Giving the natural assets like spectrum, oil to private parties - are the acts of corruption.
Santosh Hedge could have taken action over the letters of the present writer during his stint in the Supreme Court. If he had any new suggestions, he could have written to the President of India, Supreme Court and the CBI.
Further, he did not tell even an act of corruption. Therefore, exploiting the ignorance of the people, he wanted to perpetrate corruption. History has not seen a judge joining a crowd to negate the benefits of his own judgment.
The recent judgment on the Uniform System of Education clearly said that the legislature should not negate the benefits of a judgment.
Therefore, the participation of Santhosh Hedge in the movement of Anna Hazare was a counter revolution that threatened the life of the President of India, learned judges of the Supreme Court, MPs and the people.
Therefore, it is imperative that he must be taken into custody under the National Security Act or any other relevant sections after telling the people the acts of corruption, and his silence over them. This would unearth the truth behind his participation.
If Anna Hazare and his other adherents had consciously concealed the acts of corruption, the same action will have to be taken against them also.
The Government would not mention the acts of corruption because it is a question of unlimited money and power. This is the reason why the Government is not taking action.
Therefore, the Supreme Court must enforce freedom of expression for the exchange of truth.
A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and R.M. Lodha on 2 September 2011 directed the Delhi Police to find out the donor of money in the cash –for- vote scandal within four weeks. The Delhi Police has not expressed its inability to find the donor. Therefore, it knew the donor.
In the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple case, the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice A.K. Patnaik observed that the change of stand by the royal family was not a right one.
There are reports that the valuation of the treasure would take about 8 to 12 months. This would exhaust the energy of all responsible observers.
The method of valuation depends on the knowledge of the experts. This varies from person to person. There will be always an uncertainty in the absolute value of the treasure.
Therefore, the treasure may be divided into 50 or 100 equivalent parts, and the value of one part ascertained. In this way, the valuation could be completed in one or two weeks.
Now, the people fear that one half of the treasure would disappear in eight months.
The Supreme Court must be ingenious at solving this problem.
The Union Ministers put their assets in a website on 3 September 2011 . Accordingly, Minister A.K.Antony is the poorest and Minister Kamal Nath --with Re.276 crore - the richest. The ministers have done this to tell the people that they are not guilty of corruption. But they remain as the leaders of the people as quid pro quo for committing the above mentioned acts of corruption. No learned judge of the Supreme Court would deny this.
Mr. Janardhan Reddy and his brother-in-law B.V. Srinivas Reddy were arrested in the Karnataka State, 5 September 2001, for illegal iron ore mining.
They grew because of the help of state level leaders. But their competitors in the national level did not relish it. Therefore, they may be divested of their properties as in the case of Mr. Ramalinga Raju of Satyam.
In this connection, it may be reiterated that the natural assets of India
Her Excellency the President of India had forwarded some letters of this writer to the Union Government. The Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India, in turn, on 12 August 2001, forwarded a letter dated 04 -06- 2011 to the Registrar (Judicial), Supreme Court of India, New Delhi, to look into the grievances. This was in continuation of another letter forwarded to it on 29- 12 -2010. The present writer received the copy of the letter today.
The present writer sent 184 letters each to the President of India, Chief Justice of India and the CBI by ordinary post since 1 -6-2001. Until now, they washed their hand although many actions consistent with the letters were noticed.
Now, the Union Government has firmly said - in black and white - that “the subject matter of the letter pertains to the Supreme Court of India”. Thus the Government – in writing - says that it is not a policy decision pertaining to the economy but a question of rendering justice to Indians through the act of curbing corruption.
Now, the Supreme Court could at any moment give a list of the acts of corruption, and put an end to them.
The learned judges of the Supreme Court must cogitate over it and elevate their life to the highest platform.
Anyone would tell 1000 million people now stand between emancipation, and total slavery.
Everything remains in the hand of the Supreme Court.
The facts from 29 August 2011 to 5 September 2011 are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 6 September 2011 .
The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.
V.Sabarimuthu.
26-3 Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167
Kanyakumari District
