CHAPTER 154. NOT INTELLIGENT

154

NOT INTELLIGENT

          The Supreme Court (SC) on 7 September 2010 dismissed a petition seeking the substitution of Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) by ballot papers. However, the SC asked the petitioner to approach the Election Commission of India. The fact that the votes did not tally in most of the constituencies might have prompted the SC to give this direction. The Election Commission might not reject the prayer of the petitioner. The ruler of India also must consider this as a matter of 1000 million people.

          The ruler on 8 September 2010 said that her husband was concerned about the education of children of weaker sections of the society.

          In this connection, it must be noted that there are many schools without sufficient teachers. Class rooms of many schools have no partition walls. Many teachers work without salary for years. Many private school teachers get only a fraction of the salary of their counterparts in aided schools. The condition of the self financing colleges is worse than this. The managements receive huge amount of money – over $10,000 – from every lecturer for appointment and disburse about $100 per month as salary. Some colleges pay this once in three months. Some others pay this during festivals only. This happens because the ruler transmits public assets to private parties.

              The SC on 8 September 2010 upheld the land acquisition policy of the Utter Pradesh (UP) State Government. The SC thus pretends that it has the power to review the economic policy.

                In this connection, it must be pointed out that as per the BALCO judgment mentioned in Chapter 3; the court has no power to review the economic policy of the Government. Therefore, the SC must annul the BALCO judgment before writing such judgments. It must be bound by its judgments. Now, neither the BALCO judgment nor the 7 May 2010 judgement is respected by it. It is not explaining the reason for its anomalous behavior. The Government is projecting some judgements as a seal to transmit public assets to private parties.

              The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 7 September 2010 arrested an Army Officer for selling the diesel allotted to the army. This, perhaps, indicates the poor pay of the Army Officers. This work is present in the hands of the CBI. It must take necessary action for all complaints present in this work before proceeding against the new offenders.

                 The present Union Ministers now disclosed their assets. Some Union Ministers are very poor. They have some movable properties only. Why do they follow the ways of thieves? Why do they give public assets to some private parties?  They are afraid of losing their meager movable properties!

                   The Bombay High Court on 8 September 2010 asked Vodafone Telephone Company to pay about $2billion as tax and penalty as demanded by the Department of Income Tax for buying another Indian telephone company for $11billion. Thus, the court reduced the unconstitutional nature of the sale to a matter of tax.

          The spectrum, just like any other natural resource, is the life blood of 1000 million people. No private party has any right to buy or sell it. The Government must restore all natural resources forthwith.

          The Government elected for five years has sufficient powers to do many things. But, it has no power to carry out the duties of the Governments of the next 500 years or more. Now, the ruler –instead of transmitting the natural resources to the next Government- is transmitting them to the private parties. This is out and out unconstitutional. The present writer pointed out this in different chapters in different ways. But the ruler refuses to listen.

          It is said that any ruler without any FREEDOM to act as per the dictates of his reason forfeits his moral and constitutional right to sell or even pledge the assets of the nation. Now, in order to exploit the natural assets, a few people are projecting the son of the ruler as the only hope of India. The ruler simply enjoys this. Thus the ruler has surrendered her FREEDOM to them. She has no FREEDOM to use public assets for public welfare. She is not intelligent enough to understand this.

              India on 13 September 2010 said through The New Indian Express that China was playing an ancient game of encirclement called Wei Chi.   In this game, the opponent is first encircled. The next step is gradual strangulation by inward movement from all directions. India said that the moves of China were imperceptible. India informed the people that China was developing not only a naval base but also a military base in Sri Lanka.

          Complementing the above, the Defense Minister of India said that the assertiveness of China around India was increasing. He disclosed that there were multiplicities of threats.

             While the Defense Minister was talking like this in India, the Union Minister for Surface Transport was conducting road shows in China soliciting not only Chinese investments in India but also the participation of the public sector construction companies of China in infrastructure development programme of India. Thus, he was inviting China not to the peripheral countries of India but to the heart of India.      Evidently, a Government of China coexists with the Government of India. Thus good thinking and bad thinking originate from the ruler of India. In fact, she has no firm stand in this matter.

          In this connection, it must be noted that China is subjugating even the African countries in the pretext of developing their infrastructure.  China takes their natural resources and destroys their industries.

          China is giving the above medicine to India. It removes the natural resources of India. At the same time, it is destroys the Indian industry. In fact, the Chinese Government that exists within the mind of the ruler of India allows some private parties to distribute Chinese products in India. As the people should not know the mind of the ruler, the imported items do not contain the country of make. The ruler does not allow the people to hear the voice of the affected Indian industries or this voice.     

       Why does India want Chinese investments? This is because India allows a few people to take away the natural assets. They invest their profit in foreign countries. Therefore, the Government has no money to invest in India. In contrast, China exploits its natural assets and uses the money to establish construction corporations under public sector.

          Another Union Minister went to China to inform the decision of India to introduce Chinese language in Indian Schools.

          In this connection, it must be noted that India introduced not only English but other languages including French, Spanish and German. India did not send any Cabinet Ministers to France, Spain or Germany to inform this. Therefore, India need not have sent a Union Minister to China to inform the above decision.

             The UP State wanted 63,000 paramilitary personnel to face a crucial judgment on 24 September 2010. But the Union Government offered 5000 only. As the Government gave $1 trillion to a few people in the last six years, it has no money to maintain law and order.

          The net worth of an Indian industrialist would increase from the present $29 billion to $62 billion in 2014. Thus he would move from the present fourth position to the first position in the rich list of Forbes.

          The above piece of information shows that the submission of an industrialist in the SC that his brother was getting a profit of over $16 billion per year from one gas field alone is a correct one. This affects the all round development of India. This cripples the ability of the Government to make import substitution products. This is another reason why the attention of the paramilitary forces must be diverted to recover the $1 trillion given to the private parties in the last six years.

          The SC on13 September 2010 issued notices to the Union Government, Department of Telecommunication, CBI, Director of Enforcement, Director General of Income Tax and the Union Minister for Communication on a Special Leave Petition filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation. The petition alleged that the national exchequer had incurred a loss of over $15 billion in the 2G spectrum allocation.

          The above step of the SC shows that even now good exists and hence there is a way to escape from the present predicament.

          The SC should have issued notice to the Prime Minister of India also partly because there is a collective responsibility and partly because no Union Minister could amass wealth without the concurrence of the Prime Minister. No law could give any immunity to him.

          It follows that all authorities must take necessary action over the complaints of the people. Even the SC must be bound by this judgment. Therefore, some momentous changes –based on this work- could be anticipated.

                  A former Union Law Minister submitted in the SC that one half of the last 16 Chief Justices of India were patently corrupt. The SC did not give direction over this matter.

          It is the duty of the ruler or her Government to inform the existence of this work to the people. But she does not do so. But she informed the above statement of the former Union Minister to the people. The notice issued by the SC on 13 September 2010 might have prompted her to do so.

          The militant people gunned down five people in the West Bengal State on 13 September 2010. They killed two police men in the Chhattisgarh State and another person in the Jharkhand State. None in India condemned the killings.

              The Union Government now announced 10 per cent Dearness Allowance (DA) to its employees.

          In the last mail, among other things, the present writer pointed out:

1. Some constables tried to crush a Superintendent of Police (SP) due to economic deprivation.

2. The Bihar State did not supply decent uniform to the policemen due to its poor financial condition.

Evidently, the hike in DA is a reflection of this work.

However, the value of the Indian Currency vis-à-vis other currencies is not falling down consistent with its internal value. This encourages the importers and discourages the exporters. China is one of the beneficiaries.

 Some people convert the profit from the natural assets into foreign exchange. They are also benefitted.

       An all party meeting resolved to send a delegation to Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State. The ruler must have given her views. But she was bereft of any idea to solve the problem of the J&K. The principal opposition party could have pointed out the suggestions in Chapter 1 and some other suggestions present in other chapters. But it did not do so. This shows that it is poised to “fix” the next election also. There is no difference between “fixing” and “rigging”.

          The SC on 15 September 2010 asked the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to tell the reason why it did not take any action on the complaint of its former president. The court said that the BCCI should have done its duty based on its own rule. It said that the BCCI shall not claim any immunity just because of its private character. It directed the BCCI to answer the complaint. The wife of the Union Home Minister was the counsel of the petitioner.

          The above judgment also shows that all authorities, including the SC and the CBI, must answer the allegations present in this work. They cannot ignore this work simply because it comes from a common man.

              In this connection, it is pertinent to recall that the Union Government had devised a guideline for privatization. It is present in Chapter 1. Accordingly, the Government is forbidden from selling the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to charge-sheeted private companies.  But the Union Government sold the public sector Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) to Sterlite- a charge sheeted private company. It was duly pointed out to the President of India, Chief Justice of India, CBI and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). It is present in Point No.7 of Chapter 9. But no action has been taken by anyone.

          When the wife of a Union Minister submitted in a court that the BCCI should do its duty based on its rule, the court agreed. When a common man pointed out that the Union Government sold a PSU to a charge-sheeted company violating its rule, the court did not agree. This happens because a former director of this company functions as a Union Minister. The learned judges of the SC must be intelligent enough to understand this.

          Now, the SC could take necessary action to restore the HZL. This is not to obey this writer at all. It is only to obey its rule.

          It is said that the demons are not intelligent.

            The facts from 7 September 2010 to 18 September 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 19 September 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

         

               

CHAPTER 153. PRIDE AND FALSE PRESTIGE

153

PRIDE AND FALSE PRESTIGE

          The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 31 August 2010.

The Union Government allocated the 3G spectrum to the private operators on 1 September 2010. The Government amended the terms and conditions slightly in deference to Chapter 151. Accordingly, the private operators could use the spectrum for the next 20 years only. Therefore, the Government now wants to convince this writer that it is not a sale or auction but a tenancy only.

 The tenancy of the Government is for five years only. Naturally, the tenancy for 20 years is out and out unconstitutional. In this matter, there is no difference between 20 years and 200 years.

The 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court (SC) clearly says that all natural resources must remain under the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). The Government is construing this as a suggestion only. As the Government did not file an appeal, it is now an order of the SC. The Government must be bound it.

In the recent Rotting Grain case mentioned in the previous Chapter, the Government first chose to ignore the suggestion of the SC. The SC then asked the Government to consider the suggestion as an order. Obeying this, the Government on 2 September 2010 decided to release the rotting food grains to the Below Poverty Line (BPL) families within six months.  The order is a small routine duty of the learned judges of the SC. But it is 2.5 million tonne of food grains for the BPL families. As the 7 May 2010 judgment is far more important than this judgment, the SC must order the Government to take over all natural assets, including the spectrum, forthwith. By doing this, the SC is not obeying this writer at all. It is paying respect to its own judgment only.

None need point out the meaning of the judgment to Her Excellency the President of India. In 1788 Tippu Sultan invaded Malabar. The noble families of Malabar took refuge in Travancore. The incensed Sultan demanded the surrender of the fugitives. The King of Travancore said that the principles of hospitality did not permit him to give up those helpless persons. Thus the King risked not only a war but also his freedom.

 Now, the Constitution of India is taking refuge under the President. The ruler –through her facial expressions- demands the President to surrender the Constitution of India. The people are helpless in this matter. They could seek the protection of the President only. The President should not give up 1000 million people - seeking protection under her - by surrendering the Constitution of India to the ruler.

The Militant people on 1 September 2010 kidnapped four policemen in the Bihar State. They wanted the Government to release 8 militant people in jail in exchange for the release of the hostages. On the next day, they killed one of the hostages in cold blood and extended the deadline for the next day. At the same time, the militant people killed a teacher in the West Bengal State. Three employees were killed in the Chhattisgarh State. The ruler of India did not respond to anything. The Prime Minister also did not express his view. This gave the impression that the Government was waiting for the slightest pretext to destroy the militant people through cluster bombing. Finally, the militant people released the three remaining hostages.

In this connection, it must be stated that the ruler kidnapped 1000 million people. Otherwise, she would not have transmitted about $1 trillion to private parties after denying FREEDOM.

The present situation must come to an end. For this, the ruler could consider the question of making the leader of the militant people the Prime Minister of India. The people have seen one extreme type of rule. Let them see the other. After all, the directors of the charge-sheeted private companies adorn the Union Cabinet now.

India, on 2 September 2010, said that about $8 billion had been disbursed as educational loan to 20 lakh students across India. This must be interpreted in the light of the Point No.9 of Chapter 36 of this work. Now, the Government could consider the question of introducing direct payment of salary to the teachers of “willing” colleges in India based on a sound criterion. Alternatively, teachers of one or two courses in every college could be brought under the ambit of direct payment. This would partially obviate the necessity to give loans. At the same time, it will help the Government to check the quality of the institutions. Entrepreneurship also would not be affected. The Government must be always dynamic in this matter.

India, on 2 September 2010, expressed its concern over the presence and activities of Chinese troops in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK). China said that some people were fabricating stories to weaken Indo-China relations.

India raised the question of so -called stapled visa also. With which passport India allows the Tibetan refugees to travel to other countries? India must enlighten the people to know this.

Justice P. Sathasivam, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court, on 2 September 2010 said that the people were unable to hold the decision makers accountable or to challenge economic deprivation because justice is inaccessible to them. The message is not a clear one. Does the learned judge expect the people to appear in the Supreme Court for vital public matters?

A woman Superintendent of Police (SP) in the UP State noticed that some constables were demanding bribe from the truckers.  There were reports that the constables tried to crush her under their vehicle.

It must be noted that economic deprivation drives the people to do the unthinkable. For instance, a highway robber attaches no value to a man because he believes that the latter has no significance to him.

In this connection, everyone might have noticed the gun salute given to the slain policeman. The uniform of the police personnel indicates that the Government has no money to supply even a decent uniform to them. What would they do without money? In fact, constables all over India demand bribe from the truckers. It is their way of life.

Fearing the newspapers - THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS and THE HINDU - if the present writer had stopped this work, someone studying in the Engineering College might have confronted this writer with a chopper. In fact, but for this work, anyone would have killed anyone. Now, some people are killing others.

Obviously, everyone must do his duty.

The ruler of India was re-elected as the President of the Congress Party. On this occasion, the ruler sat on a chair flanked by the Prime Minister of India and the Finance Minister of India. The ruler arranged some people of a tribal community to stand near her. The media was quick to describe her as an icon for the poor. Truly, the poor people adulate her. The ruler believes that this would add to her prestige.

In order to give a political ladder to her, the principal opposition party –the BJP- criticized her for opting for the record fourth term. The BJP takes trivial matters only. By concealing this work, it - in bad faith - “fixed” the last two general elections. It has been playing to lose again.

India and South Korea signed a MoU for co-operation in defence including research and development.  In this way, India seeks to nullify the effect of the naval base of China in Sri Lanka. Naturally, this might disturb China. The activities of Chinese troops in the PoK might be linked to this.

The Chief of the Air Staff awarded the honorary rank of Group Captain to Mr. Sachin Tendukar, the famous cricketer of India. The criterion for the selection is not known. The Olympic medalists could have been honored in a similar way. Anyhow, the first step has been taken. This might drive the Air Force to some unexpected places.

The Foreign Secretary of India, Mrs. Nirupama Rao, paid a visit to Sri Lanka for the firsthand assessment of the situation of the resettled Tamils. Tamils, in large numbers, attended her meetings. They forgot the simple fact that India was mainly responsible for the death of their bread winners.

The Foreign Secretary noticed the de-mining work of Indian soldiers. The number of land mines supplied to the freedom fighters by India could be envisaged.

On the eve of the Teachers Day, the Prime Minister, in his characteristic style, described the teachers as the most precious national resource.

The Army Chief, Gen. V.K. Singh, arrived in Sri Lanka on 5 September 2010 on a five day visit.

Referring to the Rotten Food Grain case mentioned in the previous chapter, the Prime Minister of India on 6 September 2010 said that the order of the SC to give free food grains to so many people - 37 per cent of the population - was not possible and, therefore, could not be implemented.

He tactfully clubbed the above with the remunerative price to farmers. He simply forgot that some State Governments are supplying quality food grains -practically free of cost - to all their citizens.  He also forgot that he reduced the import duty on rubber, palm oil and others to break the backbone of the farmers. Further, the SC does not stand in the way of giving remunerative price during procurement.

 The Prime Minister, further, advised the SC not to play any policy role. He added that the SC should not have interfered in the policy decisions of the Government. This writer pointed out this in the last letter.

 However, it must be noted that the Prime Minister was unnerved by the 7 May 2010 judgment and not by the Rotten Food Grain judgment at all. He has no courage to criticize the former judgment and therefore he chose the latter to attack the SC. Finally, he would implement the Rotten Food Grain judgment and try to ignore the 7 May 2010 judgment.

Notwithstanding the above, the SC should annul the judgment given in Chapter 3 to restore constitutionalism in India.

  

Further, the Prime Minister said that the Home Minister is enjoying his full confidence. This is his reply to the charge that some Union Ministers had received money from the private companies for various favours.

It must be noted that the Home Minister had been a director of a charge sheeted private company. The leader of the principal opposition party is not raking up this matter because they are also shareholders, directors and owners of private companies. The SC is not ready to touch this matter because many learned judges are attached to these companies. Thus, there is practically none to prevent them from taking the natural resources. In this situation, the President alone could prevent this organized plunder.

In this connection, it must be stated that owners of the charge sheeted companies have forfeited their moral and constitutional right to enter the Presidential Palace. Their presence in the Union Cabinet also is injurious to the administration of justice in India. The ruler, however, believes that any decision to drop them from the Union Cabinet would affect her reputation.

It is said that pride and false prestige govern the mind of the demons.

The facts from 1 September 2010 to 6 September 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 7 September 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

   

CHAPTER 152. HORRIBLE WORKS

152

                                      HORRIBLE WORKS

          A Member of Parliament (MP) on 17 August 2010 said that the Government was giving bullets to farmers. The newspapers did not report it. However, this was reminiscent of Chapter 41.

          The officials of the Department of Excise on 20 August 2010 seized several big bars of silver, gold, platinum and palladium illegally sent by a private company called Sterlite  -  one of the companies of the UK based Vedanta -  to the Chennai port. Does this company import the ores of these metals? Does this company extract platinum and palladium using Indian ores? Does this company export these metals to convert Indian currency into foreign exchange?

Some present members of the Union Cabinet are the representatives or the share holders of this company. This company was a client of a present Union Minister in a case in the Bombay High Court. The ruler of India and her son are aware of this. Therefore, the gold might become copper. Platinum and palladium might become silver of different purities as in the Medical Council of India (MCI) case.   

Presenting the outstanding parliamentarian award, Her Excellency the President of India on 18 August 2010 - among other things - said that the MPs must:

11.     Take the nation forward in the direction of growth, equity and stability.

  2.     Not loose their way forward in the sound and fury.

 .3.     Respond to issues that impact public welfare.

 .4.     Meet the expectations of the people.

  5.     Not remain static.

     6Meet the challenges that require fresh thinking and innovative ideas.

  7.     Respond to serious national problems that require serious study, research and preparation.

 .8.     Meet exacting standards to set an example to the rest of the world.

 .9.     Find a solution by discussing differing views and interests.

.   10. Find an outcome through constructive and cooperative approach.

1   11.                        Be guided by a vision of progress for the nation

1 12.                         Be governed by integrity and tolerance in their conduct and

  13.                        Dare to do the right at all cost.

The above speech has no parallel in history. India, as usual, suppressed it. The present writer noticed it in the presidentofindiawebsite.

6 August -19 August 2010 issue of the BUSINESS & ECONOMY MAGAZINE disclosed that the Indian private companies bought assets worth US $ 50 billion in 2010 alone.

With which money the Indian companies buy assets abroad?  They buy using the profit from natural assets. Whose money is this? This is the money of the people.

Evidently, if India had used the paramilitary forces to take over natural assets; militancy would have disappeared from India long ago.

The former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh was arrested on 24 August 2010 for a corruption of about $220 million.

The Union Government on 24 August 2010 scrapped the environment clearance granted to the Vedanta for its aluminium refinery in the Orissa State. Further, the Government asked the company to give reason why its application to mine bauxite in Orissa should not be rejected.

India did not disclose the way followed by the Vedanta to enter India. The local people and some others have been, perhaps, pursuing this matter. However, being a charge sheeted company mentioned in Chapter 1, Vedanta would not have so silently began the mining work without the involvement of the present ruler of India and her son. Earlier, Sterlite had conquered the public sector BALCO in a swift action after breaking all defences of the Constitution of India.   

Obviously, a number of political leaders must be share holders of the above company although the exact figure for the Prime Minister and others is not disclosed. The key portfolios in the Union Cabinet went to the representatives of this company and one or two other companies only.  The ruler is even now fielding these ministers alone to answer the questions of the MPs in Parliament. A present minister had been a non executive director in the Vedanta with an annual disclosed salary of the US $ 70,000. The present Minister for Environment had been an adviser to him for some time. This is the reason why India wanted to destroy all suspected militant people using the military. Every death would produce some profit to the rulers.

The present ruler and her son might be ignorant of many things. But they inducted the above experts in the Union Cabinet for their above qualifications only. In fact, the Vedanta, Sterlite and the present ruler are one. Otherwise, their resignation would have preceded the above decision and the MPs sitting in the back benches would have taken charge. Now, the people associate the above ministers with the above decision.

Immediately after the above decision, the son of the ruler of India paid a visit to the mining site of Vedanta. He went there to celebrate the day as Tribal Rights Day! The girls of a tribal community in their traditional attire welcomed him and were seen walking with him. Ironically, they –as a group - appeared like a garland made for him. In fact, they were similar to the girl mentioned in Chapter 147. He, later, shared the dais with a leader of a militant organization.

The tribal people presented him with a bow and arrow presumably to fight the paramilitary forces. Accepting this, the leader congratulated the tribal people for successfully fighting the Vedanta. In this way, he condemned his mother for ruling India by repression. He was glad that the Union Government finally heard their voice. He rejected the view that the decision of the Government was against development. He added that his work as their soldier in New Delhi had just begun.

He, further, told them that the voice of the poor was rarely heard in India, while the voice of the rich was heard at various levels. Therefore, he expressed his view that the suppression of the voice of the poor must end.

In order to give a political ladder to him, the main opposition party questioned his wisdom of sharing the dais with a leader of the militant organization while the paramilitary personnel were sacrificing their lives in another place.

It is not easy to comprehend the subtleties of human behavior. According to Aristotle, a political leader might choose to be angry with the right person, in the right way, at the right time, and for the right reason. Therefore, due to some intuition, the son is angry with his mother for denying FREEDOM to Indians. In this case, India would strange him. Then, the people of India – as a body- will not hear anything about him.  No news or articles would come for or against him. This must be the end of his political career under the present manipulators.

Alternatively, India is projecting him as the savior of the tribal people only to deny FREEDOM to Indians. In this case, he is doing a horrible work.

On the next day, India executed a militant leader and suspect in a train sabotage case in the West Bengal State.

Now the Cairan Energy of the UK wanted to sell 62.37 percent shares of Cairan India to Vedanta for 9.6 billion. Cairan India is one of the private companies that exploit the oil and gas reserves of India.

In this connection, it must be reiterated that the 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court forbids even the Government to sell natural assets to any private parties. Cairan India cannot sell or inherit the natural assets of India. The Government must restore all natural assets to its owner –the people- without any delay.  The ruler of India would rush to all oil fields and mining sites to claim credit for it is a different matter.

Addressing a Conference of police officers, the Prime Minister of India on 26 August 2010 wanted to use non lethal weapons to deal with various agitations of the public. Chapter 147 chastened him to this extent.

In this connection, it must be pointed out that India has been consistently mentioning the following two points in the last six years.

1.     9 percent growth rate and

2.     The militant people are the only threat to the stability India.

      In fact, India wanted to extirpate the militant people through cluster bombing. Now, India is talking about non - lethal weapons!

          The Union Government on 27 August 2010 sent a four-member team to the POSCO steel plant in the Orissa State. This must be interpreted in the light of the 14 July 2010 judgment of the Orissa High Court mentioned in Chapter 149 and the reasoning presented in the Chapter 151.

The Prime Minister of India addressed the Conference of Heads of Missions on 27 August 2010. On this occasion, he said that India was engaging its neighbouring countries without looking for reciprocal actions.

On the same day, China denied visa to an Indian army officer to join a military delegation  because he was controlling the military operations in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State. This decision reinforced over the policy of China to give a different kind of visa called stapled visa to the people of the J&K State. India retaliated by cancelling high level military exchanges. Accordingly, India refused to allow two Chinese army officers to attend a defense course and another officer to address the officers of another defense course. India hinted that it would cancel the third “Hand-in-Hand” military exercise in October 2010.

China immediately rejected the above statement of India as the latter did not notify the decision to the former. China believes that India – as its slave- is not free to take the above decision.

Talks would solve many problems - not solved by even wars and joint military exercises. The Prime Minister could solve the problems pertaining to the border, stapled visa, naval bases and nuclear reactors by talking to his counterpart in China. A hot line has been created only to solve such problems and not to take orders from China.

The Prime Minister –instead of taking a firm stand - is pointing out the back room players at one time and the people of India at another time. This conclusion is based on the fact that India is even now exporting iron ore to China in the pretext of selling iron ore “fine”.

Now China would do anything for the following.

1.     The natural resources of India and

2.     Indian market.

China would even retreat from Sri Lanka for the above.     

In the mean time, Sri Lanka cancelled the visa on arrival policy granted to Indians. Fearing that India would try to substitute the Chinese labourers by the refugees after granting independence to the Tamils, Sri Lanka withdrew the order within 24 hours.

The militant people murdered ten paramilitary personnel in the Chhattisgarh and Bihar States on 28 August 2010. None in India reacted to this. India must tell the reason for this murder.

A Union Minister on 31 August 2010 declared in Parliament that India was monitoring the Chinese movements in Indian Ocean.

In this connection, it must be reiterated that India had invited China to Sri Lanka. In fact, India has been inculcating in the mind of the armed forces the view that the target of the armed forces must be the militant people in India and not the military bases of China around India.

The Supreme Court (SC) on 31 August 2010 directed the Union Government to distribute the rotting food grains to the poor.  The Supreme Court is forcing the Government to change its policy. Instead, the SC must impart knowledge to the people by giving FREEDOM. Then they would change their way of thinking. As a result they would change the rulers. Now the SC indirectly makes the people to believe that there are no people apart from them.

It is said that the demons engage in horrible works meant to destroy the world.

The facts from 16 August 2010 to 31 August 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 31 August 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU