CHAPTER 154. NOT INTELLIGENT

154

NOT INTELLIGENT

          The Supreme Court (SC) on 7 September 2010 dismissed a petition seeking the substitution of Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) by ballot papers. However, the SC asked the petitioner to approach the Election Commission of India. The fact that the votes did not tally in most of the constituencies might have prompted the SC to give this direction. The Election Commission might not reject the prayer of the petitioner. The ruler of India also must consider this as a matter of 1000 million people.

          The ruler on 8 September 2010 said that her husband was concerned about the education of children of weaker sections of the society.

          In this connection, it must be noted that there are many schools without sufficient teachers. Class rooms of many schools have no partition walls. Many teachers work without salary for years. Many private school teachers get only a fraction of the salary of their counterparts in aided schools. The condition of the self financing colleges is worse than this. The managements receive huge amount of money – over $10,000 – from every lecturer for appointment and disburse about $100 per month as salary. Some colleges pay this once in three months. Some others pay this during festivals only. This happens because the ruler transmits public assets to private parties.

              The SC on 8 September 2010 upheld the land acquisition policy of the Utter Pradesh (UP) State Government. The SC thus pretends that it has the power to review the economic policy.

                In this connection, it must be pointed out that as per the BALCO judgment mentioned in Chapter 3; the court has no power to review the economic policy of the Government. Therefore, the SC must annul the BALCO judgment before writing such judgments. It must be bound by its judgments. Now, neither the BALCO judgment nor the 7 May 2010 judgement is respected by it. It is not explaining the reason for its anomalous behavior. The Government is projecting some judgements as a seal to transmit public assets to private parties.

              The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 7 September 2010 arrested an Army Officer for selling the diesel allotted to the army. This, perhaps, indicates the poor pay of the Army Officers. This work is present in the hands of the CBI. It must take necessary action for all complaints present in this work before proceeding against the new offenders.

                 The present Union Ministers now disclosed their assets. Some Union Ministers are very poor. They have some movable properties only. Why do they follow the ways of thieves? Why do they give public assets to some private parties?  They are afraid of losing their meager movable properties!

                   The Bombay High Court on 8 September 2010 asked Vodafone Telephone Company to pay about $2billion as tax and penalty as demanded by the Department of Income Tax for buying another Indian telephone company for $11billion. Thus, the court reduced the unconstitutional nature of the sale to a matter of tax.

          The spectrum, just like any other natural resource, is the life blood of 1000 million people. No private party has any right to buy or sell it. The Government must restore all natural resources forthwith.

          The Government elected for five years has sufficient powers to do many things. But, it has no power to carry out the duties of the Governments of the next 500 years or more. Now, the ruler –instead of transmitting the natural resources to the next Government- is transmitting them to the private parties. This is out and out unconstitutional. The present writer pointed out this in different chapters in different ways. But the ruler refuses to listen.

          It is said that any ruler without any FREEDOM to act as per the dictates of his reason forfeits his moral and constitutional right to sell or even pledge the assets of the nation. Now, in order to exploit the natural assets, a few people are projecting the son of the ruler as the only hope of India. The ruler simply enjoys this. Thus the ruler has surrendered her FREEDOM to them. She has no FREEDOM to use public assets for public welfare. She is not intelligent enough to understand this.

              India on 13 September 2010 said through The New Indian Express that China was playing an ancient game of encirclement called Wei Chi.   In this game, the opponent is first encircled. The next step is gradual strangulation by inward movement from all directions. India said that the moves of China were imperceptible. India informed the people that China was developing not only a naval base but also a military base in Sri Lanka.

          Complementing the above, the Defense Minister of India said that the assertiveness of China around India was increasing. He disclosed that there were multiplicities of threats.

             While the Defense Minister was talking like this in India, the Union Minister for Surface Transport was conducting road shows in China soliciting not only Chinese investments in India but also the participation of the public sector construction companies of China in infrastructure development programme of India. Thus, he was inviting China not to the peripheral countries of India but to the heart of India.      Evidently, a Government of China coexists with the Government of India. Thus good thinking and bad thinking originate from the ruler of India. In fact, she has no firm stand in this matter.

          In this connection, it must be noted that China is subjugating even the African countries in the pretext of developing their infrastructure.  China takes their natural resources and destroys their industries.

          China is giving the above medicine to India. It removes the natural resources of India. At the same time, it is destroys the Indian industry. In fact, the Chinese Government that exists within the mind of the ruler of India allows some private parties to distribute Chinese products in India. As the people should not know the mind of the ruler, the imported items do not contain the country of make. The ruler does not allow the people to hear the voice of the affected Indian industries or this voice.     

       Why does India want Chinese investments? This is because India allows a few people to take away the natural assets. They invest their profit in foreign countries. Therefore, the Government has no money to invest in India. In contrast, China exploits its natural assets and uses the money to establish construction corporations under public sector.

          Another Union Minister went to China to inform the decision of India to introduce Chinese language in Indian Schools.

          In this connection, it must be noted that India introduced not only English but other languages including French, Spanish and German. India did not send any Cabinet Ministers to France, Spain or Germany to inform this. Therefore, India need not have sent a Union Minister to China to inform the above decision.

             The UP State wanted 63,000 paramilitary personnel to face a crucial judgment on 24 September 2010. But the Union Government offered 5000 only. As the Government gave $1 trillion to a few people in the last six years, it has no money to maintain law and order.

          The net worth of an Indian industrialist would increase from the present $29 billion to $62 billion in 2014. Thus he would move from the present fourth position to the first position in the rich list of Forbes.

          The above piece of information shows that the submission of an industrialist in the SC that his brother was getting a profit of over $16 billion per year from one gas field alone is a correct one. This affects the all round development of India. This cripples the ability of the Government to make import substitution products. This is another reason why the attention of the paramilitary forces must be diverted to recover the $1 trillion given to the private parties in the last six years.

          The SC on13 September 2010 issued notices to the Union Government, Department of Telecommunication, CBI, Director of Enforcement, Director General of Income Tax and the Union Minister for Communication on a Special Leave Petition filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation. The petition alleged that the national exchequer had incurred a loss of over $15 billion in the 2G spectrum allocation.

          The above step of the SC shows that even now good exists and hence there is a way to escape from the present predicament.

          The SC should have issued notice to the Prime Minister of India also partly because there is a collective responsibility and partly because no Union Minister could amass wealth without the concurrence of the Prime Minister. No law could give any immunity to him.

          It follows that all authorities must take necessary action over the complaints of the people. Even the SC must be bound by this judgment. Therefore, some momentous changes –based on this work- could be anticipated.

                  A former Union Law Minister submitted in the SC that one half of the last 16 Chief Justices of India were patently corrupt. The SC did not give direction over this matter.

          It is the duty of the ruler or her Government to inform the existence of this work to the people. But she does not do so. But she informed the above statement of the former Union Minister to the people. The notice issued by the SC on 13 September 2010 might have prompted her to do so.

          The militant people gunned down five people in the West Bengal State on 13 September 2010. They killed two police men in the Chhattisgarh State and another person in the Jharkhand State. None in India condemned the killings.

              The Union Government now announced 10 per cent Dearness Allowance (DA) to its employees.

          In the last mail, among other things, the present writer pointed out:

1. Some constables tried to crush a Superintendent of Police (SP) due to economic deprivation.

2. The Bihar State did not supply decent uniform to the policemen due to its poor financial condition.

Evidently, the hike in DA is a reflection of this work.

However, the value of the Indian Currency vis-à-vis other currencies is not falling down consistent with its internal value. This encourages the importers and discourages the exporters. China is one of the beneficiaries.

 Some people convert the profit from the natural assets into foreign exchange. They are also benefitted.

       An all party meeting resolved to send a delegation to Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State. The ruler must have given her views. But she was bereft of any idea to solve the problem of the J&K. The principal opposition party could have pointed out the suggestions in Chapter 1 and some other suggestions present in other chapters. But it did not do so. This shows that it is poised to “fix” the next election also. There is no difference between “fixing” and “rigging”.

          The SC on 15 September 2010 asked the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to tell the reason why it did not take any action on the complaint of its former president. The court said that the BCCI should have done its duty based on its own rule. It said that the BCCI shall not claim any immunity just because of its private character. It directed the BCCI to answer the complaint. The wife of the Union Home Minister was the counsel of the petitioner.

          The above judgment also shows that all authorities, including the SC and the CBI, must answer the allegations present in this work. They cannot ignore this work simply because it comes from a common man.

              In this connection, it is pertinent to recall that the Union Government had devised a guideline for privatization. It is present in Chapter 1. Accordingly, the Government is forbidden from selling the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to charge-sheeted private companies.  But the Union Government sold the public sector Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) to Sterlite- a charge sheeted private company. It was duly pointed out to the President of India, Chief Justice of India, CBI and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). It is present in Point No.7 of Chapter 9. But no action has been taken by anyone.

          When the wife of a Union Minister submitted in a court that the BCCI should do its duty based on its rule, the court agreed. When a common man pointed out that the Union Government sold a PSU to a charge-sheeted company violating its rule, the court did not agree. This happens because a former director of this company functions as a Union Minister. The learned judges of the SC must be intelligent enough to understand this.

          Now, the SC could take necessary action to restore the HZL. This is not to obey this writer at all. It is only to obey its rule.

          It is said that the demons are not intelligent.

            The facts from 7 September 2010 to 18 September 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 19 September 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU