152
HORRIBLE WORKS
A Member of Parliament (MP) on 17 August 2010 said that the Government was giving bullets to farmers. The newspapers did not report it. However, this was reminiscent of Chapter 41.
The officials of the Department of Excise on 20 August 2010 seized several big bars of silver, gold, platinum and palladium illegally sent by a private company called Sterlite - one of the companies of the UK based Vedanta - to the Chennai port. Does this company import the ores of these metals? Does this company extract platinum and palladium using Indian ores? Does this company export these metals to convert Indian currency into foreign exchange?
Some present members of the Union Cabinet are the representatives or the share holders of this company. This company was a client of a present Union Minister in a case in the Bombay High Court. The ruler of India and her son are aware of this. Therefore, the gold might become copper. Platinum and palladium might become silver of different purities as in the Medical Council of India (MCI) case.
Presenting the outstanding parliamentarian award, Her Excellency the President of India on 18 August 2010 - among other things - said that the MPs must:
11. Take the nation forward in the direction of growth, equity and stability.
2. Not loose their way forward in the sound and fury.
.3. Respond to issues that impact public welfare.
.4. Meet the expectations of the people.
5. Not remain static.
6Meet the challenges that require fresh thinking and innovative ideas.
7. Respond to serious national problems that require serious study, research and preparation.
.8. Meet exacting standards to set an example to the rest of the world.
.9. Find a solution by discussing differing views and interests.
. 10. Find an outcome through constructive and cooperative approach.
1 11. Be guided by a vision of progress for the nation
1 12. Be governed by integrity and tolerance in their conduct and
13. Dare to do the right at all cost.
The above speech has no parallel in history. India, as usual, suppressed it. The present writer noticed it in the presidentofindiawebsite.
6 August -19 August 2010 issue of the BUSINESS & ECONOMY MAGAZINE disclosed that the Indian private companies bought assets worth US $ 50 billion in 2010 alone.
With which money the Indian companies buy assets abroad? They buy using the profit from natural assets. Whose money is this? This is the money of the people.
Evidently, if India had used the paramilitary forces to take over natural assets; militancy would have disappeared from India long ago.
The former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh was arrested on 24 August 2010 for a corruption of about $220 million.
The Union Government on 24 August 2010 scrapped the environment clearance granted to the Vedanta for its aluminium refinery in the Orissa State. Further, the Government asked the company to give reason why its application to mine bauxite in Orissa should not be rejected.
India did not disclose the way followed by the Vedanta to enter India. The local people and some others have been, perhaps, pursuing this matter. However, being a charge sheeted company mentioned in Chapter 1, Vedanta would not have so silently began the mining work without the involvement of the present ruler of India and her son. Earlier, Sterlite had conquered the public sector BALCO in a swift action after breaking all defences of the Constitution of India.
Obviously, a number of political leaders must be share holders of the above company although the exact figure for the Prime Minister and others is not disclosed. The key portfolios in the Union Cabinet went to the representatives of this company and one or two other companies only. The ruler is even now fielding these ministers alone to answer the questions of the MPs in Parliament. A present minister had been a non executive director in the Vedanta with an annual disclosed salary of the US $ 70,000. The present Minister for Environment had been an adviser to him for some time. This is the reason why India wanted to destroy all suspected militant people using the military. Every death would produce some profit to the rulers.
The present ruler and her son might be ignorant of many things. But they inducted the above experts in the Union Cabinet for their above qualifications only. In fact, the Vedanta, Sterlite and the present ruler are one. Otherwise, their resignation would have preceded the above decision and the MPs sitting in the back benches would have taken charge. Now, the people associate the above ministers with the above decision.
Immediately after the above decision, the son of the ruler of India paid a visit to the mining site of Vedanta. He went there to celebrate the day as Tribal Rights Day! The girls of a tribal community in their traditional attire welcomed him and were seen walking with him. Ironically, they –as a group - appeared like a garland made for him. In fact, they were similar to the girl mentioned in Chapter 147. He, later, shared the dais with a leader of a militant organization.
The tribal people presented him with a bow and arrow presumably to fight the paramilitary forces. Accepting this, the leader congratulated the tribal people for successfully fighting the Vedanta. In this way, he condemned his mother for ruling India by repression. He was glad that the Union Government finally heard their voice. He rejected the view that the decision of the Government was against development. He added that his work as their soldier in New Delhi had just begun.
He, further, told them that the voice of the poor was rarely heard in India, while the voice of the rich was heard at various levels. Therefore, he expressed his view that the suppression of the voice of the poor must end.
In order to give a political ladder to him, the main opposition party questioned his wisdom of sharing the dais with a leader of the militant organization while the paramilitary personnel were sacrificing their lives in another place.
It is not easy to comprehend the subtleties of human behavior. According to Aristotle, a political leader might choose to be angry with the right person, in the right way, at the right time, and for the right reason. Therefore, due to some intuition, the son is angry with his mother for denying FREEDOM to Indians. In this case, India would strange him. Then, the people of India – as a body- will not hear anything about him. No news or articles would come for or against him. This must be the end of his political career under the present manipulators.
Alternatively, India is projecting him as the savior of the tribal people only to deny FREEDOM to Indians. In this case, he is doing a horrible work.
On the next day, India executed a militant leader and suspect in a train sabotage case in the West Bengal State.
Now the Cairan Energy of the UK wanted to sell 62.37 percent shares of Cairan India to Vedanta for 9.6 billion. Cairan India is one of the private companies that exploit the oil and gas reserves of India.
In this connection, it must be reiterated that the 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court forbids even the Government to sell natural assets to any private parties. Cairan India cannot sell or inherit the natural assets of India. The Government must restore all natural assets to its owner –the people- without any delay. The ruler of India would rush to all oil fields and mining sites to claim credit for it is a different matter.
Addressing a Conference of police officers, the Prime Minister of India on 26 August 2010 wanted to use non lethal weapons to deal with various agitations of the public. Chapter 147 chastened him to this extent.
In this connection, it must be pointed out that India has been consistently mentioning the following two points in the last six years.
1. 9 percent growth rate and
2. The militant people are the only threat to the stability India.
In fact, India wanted to extirpate the militant people through cluster bombing. Now, India is talking about non - lethal weapons!
The Union Government on 27 August 2010 sent a four-member team to the POSCO steel plant in the Orissa State. This must be interpreted in the light of the 14 July 2010 judgment of the Orissa High Court mentioned in Chapter 149 and the reasoning presented in the Chapter 151.
The Prime Minister of India addressed the Conference of Heads of Missions on 27 August 2010. On this occasion, he said that India was engaging its neighbouring countries without looking for reciprocal actions.
On the same day, China denied visa to an Indian army officer to join a military delegation because he was controlling the military operations in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State. This decision reinforced over the policy of China to give a different kind of visa called stapled visa to the people of the J&K State. India retaliated by cancelling high level military exchanges. Accordingly, India refused to allow two Chinese army officers to attend a defense course and another officer to address the officers of another defense course. India hinted that it would cancel the third “Hand-in-Hand” military exercise in October 2010.
China immediately rejected the above statement of India as the latter did not notify the decision to the former. China believes that India – as its slave- is not free to take the above decision.
Talks would solve many problems - not solved by even wars and joint military exercises. The Prime Minister could solve the problems pertaining to the border, stapled visa, naval bases and nuclear reactors by talking to his counterpart in China. A hot line has been created only to solve such problems and not to take orders from China.
The Prime Minister –instead of taking a firm stand - is pointing out the back room players at one time and the people of India at another time. This conclusion is based on the fact that India is even now exporting iron ore to China in the pretext of selling iron ore “fine”.
Now China would do anything for the following.
1. The natural resources of India and
2. Indian market.
China would even retreat from Sri Lanka for the above.
In the mean time, Sri Lanka cancelled the visa on arrival policy granted to Indians. Fearing that India would try to substitute the Chinese labourers by the refugees after granting independence to the Tamils, Sri Lanka withdrew the order within 24 hours.
The militant people murdered ten paramilitary personnel in the Chhattisgarh and Bihar States on 28 August 2010. None in India reacted to this. India must tell the reason for this murder.
A Union Minister on 31 August 2010 declared in Parliament that India was monitoring the Chinese movements in Indian Ocean.
In this connection, it must be reiterated that India had invited China to Sri Lanka. In fact, India has been inculcating in the mind of the armed forces the view that the target of the armed forces must be the militant people in India and not the military bases of China around India.
The Supreme Court (SC) on 31 August 2010 directed the Union Government to distribute the rotting food grains to the poor. The Supreme Court is forcing the Government to change its policy. Instead, the SC must impart knowledge to the people by giving FREEDOM. Then they would change their way of thinking. As a result they would change the rulers. Now the SC indirectly makes the people to believe that there are no people apart from them.
It is said that the demons engage in horrible works meant to destroy the world.
The facts from 16 August 2010 to 31 August 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 31 August 2010.
V.SABARIMUTHU
No comments:
Post a Comment