192. Freedom and not laws

192

                FREEDOM AND NOT LAWS

           The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 11 December 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC),  Chief Election Commissioner, Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, Allahabad and Calcutta High Courts.  Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          The Economic Times, on 13 December 2011, disclosed that Mr. Mukesh Ambani was sitting on $25 billion. The paper considered this as surplus money and not as disproportionate money. Apparently, he is not keeping this in Indian banks. He runs from pillar to post to keep this.

       Mukesh Ambani might not have received any commission from any country.

      However, the Supreme Court of India allows him to remove the natural resources of India.

     Therefore, it is the money given by the Supreme Court of India.      

The people are not aware of this because the newspapers are not ready to publish these as headline news. The TV channels also do not discuss this.

       Anyone would tell that the Supreme Court of India is drowning the nation in its injustice.

So long as the Supreme Court of India remains in the hand of the inducted judges, he would keep this money and ignorance would continue to govern the mind of the people.

       The CBI, on 12 December 2011, leveled some charges against the promoters of the Essar Group and the Loop Telecom and charge-sheeted them. This was for fraud and conspiracy in the 2G spectrum case. The charge-sheeted included Ruia and Anshuman Essar – the promoters of Essar Group - and IP Kaitan and Kiran Kaitan- the promoters of the Loop.

          The CBI is using hard words against the people responsible for running India. It might put their gate keepers in jail for some time. But the present Supreme Court of India would not treat Ruia and others like former Union Minister Raja, even if they had committed some offences. 

         

           Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 14 December 2011, said that India would achieve 9 per cent growth rate again.

       Several Indian Industries disappear because he encourages illegal imports of Chinese goods. As a result, the revenues are decreasing. Yet, he is, repeatedly charming Indians with 9 per cent growth rate.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the Chinese are selling three tooth brushes in India for Re.10/- through door canvassing. At the same time, every Indian tooth brush costs Re.25/- to Re. 50/-. Does someone import Chinese goods to convert their commission into Indian currency? Is there anything wrong with the Indian prices? The President of India alone could give a satisfactory reply to this anomaly.

       Anil Ambani transferred a huge amount of money to India in the name of a fictitious Foreign Institutional Investor (FII). The Hindu sparingly reported this on 16 December 2011. Is this the commission received by him? The Government would ask the Supreme Court of India to take appropriate action over this and leave the matter there.

          The people are not aware of the above manipulations because the news papers did not give any importance to these revelations. In fact, even 0.1 per cent of the people are not aware of it.

          The CBI would not confiscate the ill-gotten wealth, because Anil Ambani is one of the ten people responsible for running India.

          A court at Thrissur in Kerala on 16 December 2011 issued an arrest warrant against Reliance Industries Chairman Mukesh Ambani based on the complaint of his customer. There was no news about it afterwards.

         

      

       President Pratibha Patil, on 20 December 2011, appointed four new judges for the Madras High Court – two district judges- Mr. Devadhas and Karuppiah, Registrar General of High Court – S. Vimala and one from bar – Mr. K. Ravichandran.

          One would say that that there exists a sense of proportion in the appointments. But, the truth is that the manipulators send some advocates to the High Courts through the back door after   devising some unconstitutional norms. The norms are nothing but a forgery of the Constitution of India.

        Naturally, the manipulators expect the inducted judges to continuously forge the Constitution of India and hand over public assets to them. They want them because others would not be bold enough to forge the Constitution.

           The Economic Times, on 21 December 2011, demanded the mineral producing Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to give a special dividend to the share holders. It said that Re.53,000 crore could be given immediately. This is in addition to the Re. 3.75 lakh crore present in the Provident Fund.

           However, it must be reiterated that all natural assets belong to the people and the profit must be used for the development of the nation.

          The UF Government under Mr. H.D. Deve Gowda had –apparently- handed over the surplus money of the PSUs to the manipulators through the aid of the Unit Trust of India (UTI).

     Recently, the Union Government gave Re.3 lakh crore in the PF to them.

       If the Supreme Court of India had allowed the people to know these manipulations, the people would have prevented the Government from acting like this.

         The Union Government, on 23 December 2011, tabled a new anti-corruption bill called Lokpal bill in the Parliament on 22 December 2011.

            Delhi Metropolitan Magistrate Suresh Kumar, on 23 December 2011, issued summons to 21 social networking sites and directed the Union Government to take appropriate steps.

          The Government, on 24 -12-2011, asked all social networking sites to remove all objectionable contents from their sites.

          In this connection, it must be stated that this writer is posting the letters in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link is being given to www.thattan.com. But only an infinitesimally small number of people follow it. Therefore, this work is not affecting the reputation of any leader. 

      The police, on 23 December 2012, intercepted a van in the Tamil Nadu state and seized Re. 98 lakh in unaccounted money.

          It is the duty of the police to seize unaccounted money.

     However, the police are not attaching the unaccounted money of Mukesh Ambani. This is the reason why this seizure makes it a human rights problem.

 

          Anna Hazare, on 24 December 2011, said that a strong anti-corruption act would send Union Minister Chithambaram to jail.

       Anna Hazare asked the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh- through a letter- that the proposed anti-corruption agency should have the power to probe anyone without any complaint. The news papers and the TV channels published this as   headline news on 26 December 2011.

          This is the instruction given to Anna Hazare by Jindal before giving money. He winds the clocks - Anna Hazare and his team – and they tick. He then wants “the tick-tock to be called virtue” and gives great publicity.

          The people are not aware of this. Therefore, they want to make Anna Hazare the next Prime Minister of India.

          On the other hand, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh knew that even thousands of laws would not inhibit his ability to give public money to private parties in private interest.

          In this connection, it must be stated that this writer sent 191 letters to the CBI. It refused to accept two letters. It threw 189 letters into the dust bin that too secretly. Thus, it had taken a decision to connive at the large scale manipulations before receiving the letters. This is the meaning of the independence of the CBI.

          Any independent investigation agency under the present Supreme Court of India would bite unfamiliar leaders.

      Thus, the CBI did not allow Mr. H.D. Deve Gowda to rule India even for one year.         

          Recently, it said that former Union Minister Raja should have given the spectrum to four or five people instead of spreading it to hundreds of people. Thus, it forged the Constitution of India to enact a coup against a Union Minister.

        If the CBI had not done this, the Supreme Court of India and the Union Government together might have sent some officers of the CBI to jail.  

      Tomorrow, the CBI would not allow any leader - acting in good faith consistent with the Constitution of India – to rule India even for one month.

          Thus the demand of Anna Hazare is an anti-corruption law but at bottom he or his promoters believe that the police are necessary to bite the leaders acting in good faith.

     Actually, police are necessary to restore the public property and not to bite the leaders and others in bad faith.

          President Pratibha Devisingh Patil is capable of understanding the significance of this work. In fact, she understands everything.

       If she grants freedom to the people, all leaders would run for cover. They would realize that virtue is not some kind of gesture.

          Further, all inducted judges would tender their resignation. Hundreds of other judges would enter the Supreme Court and High Courts to establish justice.

        Therefore, the need of the hour is freedom not laws.

             The facts from 11 December 2011 to 26 December 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 27 December 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

27 December 2011

 V.Sabarimuthu.26-3 Thattankonam, Vellicode,  Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167INDIA

191. Dark Destiny - High Court Judges

191

DARK DESTINY

    The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 4 December 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC),  Chief Election Commissioner, Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, Allahabad and Calcutta High Courts.  Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          On 4 December 2011, The New Indian Express, through one of its writers - a Mr. T.J.S. George – said that what should not be “happening” was “happening” in the country.

        A Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice A.K. Patnaik and Justice Swatanter Kumar, on 5 December 2011, declared that the Supreme Court would not undertake any review of the policy decisions. This is the immediate reply to the email – the letter No.190 - sent to the Supreme Court of India on 4 December 2011.

          The Supreme Court of India has been talking like this – intermittently - for the last 10 years. This is the sound of a weird uncultured voice because it has been doing this by keeping a savage weapon – the media- in its hand.

     The above bench, in a gruff voice, added that the Supreme Court of India would continue to remain as Supreme Court of India.

          So long as the Supreme Court of India talks like this, Mr. Vajpayee, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, Mr. Advani, Dr. Manmohan Singh and other leaders will give Re.3 lakh crore or more in cash to private parties. In fact, these words are its order to give money to private parties in private interest. 

          Further, so long as the inducted judges cling to their position, the political leaders, CBI, media and others will pay homage to them; and the Supreme Court of India would continue to exist like this.

          But all judgments of the inducted judges after 4-12-2011 - the crucial date on which the letter No.190 was sent - will continue to remain unconstitutional until it allows the people to see this work.

       The Government of India, on 5 December 2011, asked the Internet Companies – Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Facebook- to remove objectionable user content.

          In the above matter, the Union Government, State Governments, Supreme Court and High Courts, all political leaders, and the media want to delete the entire work of this writer through a click of a mouse. This is to tell the people that they have a natural right to rule the nation by blacking out news and views.     

        As President Pratbha Devisingh Patil does not aspire for one more term, she could take a different stand.

          On 5 December 2011, the Parliament passed a condolence resolution for the 7 soldiers killed in a land mine blast in the Jharkhand state recently.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the newspapers had not reported anything about the blast or the condolences. In this way, the media protects the image of the Supreme Court of India. This is the importance given to the life of the soldiers is a different matter.

          The Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) granted permission to Cairn Energy to sell its Indian unit to Vedanta Company. Some newspapers reported this on 7 December 2011.

          The natural assets belong to the people. However, the Government could do anything after allowing the people to see this work.

         A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Altamas Kabir, Justice Nijjar and Justice J. Chelmeswar on 7 December 2011stayed a high Court order that overrode the bail granted by Special Judge O.P. Saini to Mr. Chandolia, an accused in the 2G spectrum case.

          Now, former Union Minister Raja and another person alone are in the prison.

          At the same time, the real offenders continue to sit in the front row of Parliament.

Former Supreme Court judge Santhosh Hegde says that Mr. Advani is like his father. Therefore, the Supreme Court of India need not send anyone sitting in the front row or the big manipulators to jail. But, it must, at least, recover the lost assets.

Pointing out Voltaire, Rouseau, Thomas Paine and Junius, Chairman of Press Council of India Markandey Katju asked the media to promote rational ideas.

          In this connection, it must be noted that Thomas Paine wrote the Rights of Man (1791) during the French Revolution. In 1802, he returned to the USA and died in 1809. As in the case of Oscar Wilde, only six people attended his funeral as he had been ostracized due to his ridicule of Christianity.

         Junius contributed a series of letters from 21 January 1769 to 26 January 1772. The letters were famous for their political significance and style. Through the letters, he exposed arbitrary appointments, corruption and problems; and attacked Lord Chief Justice of England Mansfield for setting dangerous legal precedents regarding press freedom.

          Evidently, Markandey Katju invoked the above philosophers by keeping the present writer in mind. But, he chose not to mention the name of this writer.

            On the above occasion, Markandey Katju, disclosed that there had been pressure to suppress his report. But he posted that in the website. The Hindu reported this on 6 December 2012.

          In this connection, it must be noted that Markandey Katju had been an inducted judge. There still exists a link between him and the manipulators; and he knew from where the demand to suppress his report came. Therefore, he knew the mechanism of suppressing news and views. However, he does not want to offend his clients. Therefore, the PCI conceals everything. The CBI also does not want to know the mechanism presumably because it knew everything.

    Her Excellency the President of India, on 7 December 2011,   interacted with five minor girls of West Bengal state for resisting marriage.

          In this connection, it must be stated that this work belongs to these children because they bear the badge of darkness. Therefore, the President could have given importance to dispel the darkness from their mind.

      China, on 7 December 2011, sentenced 9 Indian traders for smuggling diamonds - evading $7.3 million in custom duties. Nine traders got seven years imprisonment.

          China has been dumping its goods in India through bribery.  It is giving not less than Re. 5 lakh each to transmit a container from, say, the Chennai port to its agents. Otherwise, a large number of Chinese items would not have reached India. A surveillance of Chennai port from Delhi through remote cameras would confirm this.

      However, the Government is not ready to confiscate even the smuggled Chinese items presumably because one or two boys received a huge commission from another end.

          The Hindu, on 8 December 2011, exposed a corruption of Re.500 crore in the purchase of some software for the Indian Army. In this way, The Hindu wants the armed forces to ignore the denial of freedom by the Supreme Court of India.

         According to some reports, the Union Government had decided not to sell the shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). President Pratibha Devisingh Patil might have pointed out the unconstitutional nature of the sale.

        The police, on 8 December 2011, filed FIR against three former Chief Ministers of Karnataka state. This is the work of the recipients of public assets. They want to send all small offenders to jail.

        The Election Commission of India (ECI), on 8 December 2011, said that an elected legislator would have to face criminal prosecution, if he released any news after paying money.

          The ECI knew that it is not paid news but suppression of news that influences the mind of the people. Yet, it continues to deceive the people by talking about paid news.

          President Pratibha Devisingh Patil, on 8 December 2011, cleared the name of an advocate for appointment as judge of Madras High Court.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the present writer has sent hundreds of letters to the Chief Justices of High Courts. They could have accepted them as a writ petition to establish justice. But, they did not send even an acknowledgement. This happens because the inducted judges in High Courts also cannot establish justice.

          Many advocates of High Courts have link with the manipulators of public money. They give huge amount of money or shares of the private companies to the advocates under one pretext or other before inducting them. Thus a few advocates in the High Courts outdistance thousands judges for the coveted post through acts of corruption.

          President Pratibha Devisingh Patil has added one more to this rank, perhaps to make the appointments a constitutional one.

          Had President President Pratibha Devisingh Patil given freedom to the people to know existence of this work, all inducted judges would have resigned thereby pre-empting the appointment of unethical advocates as judges of High Courts.

     Does the President not lead the young girls in India to their dark destiny?

     

       The facts from 4 December 2011 to 10 December 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 11 December 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

11 December 2011

 V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

INDIA

           

190 The Supreme Court of India - A Dead Body

190

A DEAD BODY

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 21 November 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC),  Chief Election Commissioner, Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, Allahabad and Calcutta High Courts.  Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          The Supreme Court of India, on 23 November 2011, granted bail to five corporate executives involved in the 2G spectrum case. Later, Delhi High Court granted bail to Mrs. Kanimozhi and five others. Shocked by the developments, CBI Special Judge O.P. Saini, granted bail to two persons.

          The courts and the CBI, in tandem, had used the Urea Scam case, Bofors case, JMM case and some other cases to bring down the Deve Gowda government at the centre. After accomplishing the task, they allowed the cases to disappear. O.P. Saini was embarrassed because he did not understand the ways of the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India. 

          Apart from teaching a lesson to former Union Minister Mr. Raja, the underground moles wanted to substitute the DMK   under Dr. Karunanidhi in the Tamil Nadu state by the AIDMK under Mrs. Jayalalitha. This has been accomplished. Next time, they might do this to the AIDMK. Both the parties do not want the people to see this work is a different matter.

           

          The Department of Income Tax, on 23 November 2011, seized about Re. 70 crore in cash from a coal contractor, Lal Babu Singh of Ranchi, on 23 November 2011. This shows that the small offenders cannot escape. This is a human rights problem in India.

         Mr. Digvijaya Singh, on 23 November 2011, said that transparency in governance was a reality. He said this on 23 November 2011 in The Economic Times. He is deliberately telling a lie. The importance given to his words by the media shows that he is one of its prime ministerial candidates.

          There are reports that the private airlines in India are in the red. Apparently, they did not get a share in the money given by the Supreme Court of India to private parties.

          There are reports that the trade deficit of India with China – through the official route - is over $20 billion per year.

          China considers Indians as its slaves. The Supreme Court of India –despite several letters – does not enforce Indian laws against the Chinese. Indians cannot sell any manufactured products without mentioning the maximum retail price (MRP). The Chinese are above this rule. Indians must pay tax. But there is no import duty for the Chinese. Thus the actual trade deficit with China must be over $ 50 billion per year.

          A man slapped Union Minister Sharad Pawar on 25 November 2011. He thought that he was corrupt and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh innocent.

          Madras High Court had been established “to discharge cases with justice, equity and good conscience”.  It celebrated 150th year of its establishment on 26 November 2011. Five learned judges of the Supreme Court of India – Justice Altamas Kabir, Justice Sathasivam, Justice A.K. Ganguly, Justice S.J. Mukhopadhya and Justice H.L. Gokhale - participated in this function.

 On that occasion, Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir said, “1.  Many things did not go astray because of the judiciary”.

 But the Re. 3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund and many other public assets went to private parties only because of the Supreme Court.

“2. Judiciary preserved rule of law in India”.

      The Supreme Court of India, actually, subverted the rule of law in India.

“3. The object of the Constitution is to ensure liberty, equality and fraternity to everyone.

      The people are not getting the above due to the brutally repressive stand taken by the Supreme Court.

“4. There was a need to do introspection”.

      Apparently, it is too late.

“5. There is, to some extent, a loss of faith in the judicial system”.

      No one - going through this work – will have any faith in the Indian judicial system.

        On the above occasion, Justice Gokhale said, “1. The judiciary should expedite economic progress through the aid of democracy”.

       There is not even 1 per cent democracy in India, and the learned judges expedite retardation of the Indian economy.

“2. The people in advantageous position use the system for wrongful gains thereby bringing the Constitution of India and the entire system of governance into disrepute”. 

        The Constitution of India rolls in the hands of the President of India and the learned judges of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the judiciary need not put the blame on former Prime Minister Vajpayee, leader L.K. Advani, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, leader Sonia Gandhi or the industrialists. 

3. “The judiciary must find a way to solve this problem within the constitutional frame work as early as possible”.

      The judiciary would not solve this problem until a new “force” acts on it. 

          The police killed Kishenji – a leader of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) - on 24 November 2011. The Supreme Court of India is the police here.

        It is said that he was the biggest leader of the militant people. He was not aware of the fact that India was being run by some underground moles sitting in remote places. Therefore, one day, he gave an interview to the media.  This was the reason for his death. However, the Supreme Court of India could have killed him after showing this work to the people. 

          The CBI, on 29 November 2011, arrested an IAS officer Mrs. Y. Sri Lakshmi for allegedly granting favours to a mining company abusing her official position. If she had done some favours to a big company, she would have got a promotion.

          At least 25 companies called off their initial public offer (IPO) plans in 2011 due to sluggish trend in the stock market. Some newspapers reported this on 29 November 2011. The Supreme Court of India is even now secretly buying the shares of private companies using public money. Otherwise, it would not have given Re. 3 lakh crore in the PF to private parties secretly.

      Addressing a session on media on 2 December 2011 at a conclave organized by The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), Justice J.S. Verma, said that the media must inform the people of everything of significance.

          In this connection, it must be stated Justice J.S. Verma had been an inducted judge. He might have sneaked around the table of his clients to enter the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Otherwise, the   media would not have published his views.

        Now, he has a great rapport with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and many others. The underground moles have a scheme to make him the next President of India.

          Madras High Court, on 28 November 2011, quashed some proceedings against Justice G. Ramanujam, former judge of Madras High Court. After his retirement, he functioned as a Director of Viswapriya Financial Services Limited. This shows that even some judges of High Courts enter various companies after retirement.

  

        A bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Mrs. Justice Ranjana Prakash,   on 28 November 2011, asked the CBI to tell the reason for questioning the impartiality of the sub-ordinate courts in Gujarat.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the inducted judges of the Supreme Court of India are not aware of the plight of the judges in the sub-ordinate courts.

          The work-load of the sub-ordinate judges is very heavy. The technical procedures prevent them from taking any unconventional decisions. As a result, the documentary facts and even the findings of the Human Rights Commission are not sufficient for them to convict, acquit or dismiss the cases. They are being forced to see innocent people before them for decades.

          The above bench, further, said: “1. There is separation power. 2. Judiciary in India is independent and 3. The judiciary at the lower rank will toe the political line is complete nonsense”.

          In this matter, it must be stated that the judiciary in India is independent to the extent of forging the Constitution of India. It is independent and partial. Therefore, it will produce better results only when it ceases to be independent.

          The Union Government on 1 December 2011 decided to sell three sick Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) - Scooters India – Tyre Corporation of India and Central Inland Water Transport Corporation – to strategic investors.

          The Supreme Court of India gave Re. 3 lakh crore to the strategic investors. Now it wants to give new investment opportunities to them.

          The President of India has transmitted at least three letters of this writer to the Supreme Court of India for appropriate action. But the latter is dithering to establish justice.

          The present learned judges of the Supreme Court of India – with the sole exception of Justice Cyriac Joseph - are inducted judges.  They deceived thousands of judges of the sub-ordinate courts to become the judges of the High Courts. Now they have no compunction to deceive 1000 million people.

Evidently, any request to the Supreme Court of India to take appropriate action over this work is like demanding Mukesh Ambani to surrender the conquered public assets. Naturally, it is now not a diseased body but a dead body.

          Therefore, all inducted judges must be substituted by other judges. The President could grant leave to the present judges with full pay and allowances.

          The power of the President of India to establish justice is a total one. 

            The facts from 21 November 2011 to 3 December 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 4 December 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

4 December 2011

 V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District. India

        

                            

189 The Supreme Court of India - Prime Minister Manmohan Singh -President Pratibha Patil - Media

189

A DISEASED BODY

      The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 8 November 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC),  Chief Election Commissioner, Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, Allahabad and Calcutta High Courts.  Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          Mr. Rahul Gandhi, on 14 November 2011, said that corruption was rampant in the Utter Pradesh (UP) state. His contribution to Indian politics is not even a fraction of the contribution of this writer. But his words reached the nook and corner of India because he gave Re. 3 lakh crore to less than ten individuals through two or three banks.

          Chief of Public Account Committee of Parliament Murali Manohar Joshi had requested Mr. R.B. Singh –an officer in the CAG - to expedite the 2G audit. This shows that the opposition parties are taking more powerful decisions - by sitting in their houses - than the ruling parties. Otherwise, this would have come to the knowledge of the people as and when he made the request.     

           

       

       Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, on 16 November 2011, said:

1. Institutional ignorance, at times, impact the decision making process.

2. Individuals possessing the benefit of hindsight would provide invaluable guidance to improve decision making process.

3. There must be a distinction between malafide intent, and bonafide errors.

          His choicest words could be construed as a reply to the elections in India mentioned in the last mail submitted to Her Excellency the President of India. Apparently, he has indirectly given 100 per cent mark to this writer. However, the Government should have lifted all financial restrictions imposed on elections through an ordinance. 

          Press Council of India Chairman Markandey Katju, on 16 November 2011, said that freedoms were being manipulated by the media companies for their own purposes.

          Justice M. Katju had been a judge of the Supreme Court of India until September 2011. He became the Chairman of the Press Council of India because of his link with the manipulators. His only qualification for the present post was that he concealed hundreds of letters received from this writer.

          Vice President Hamid Ansari, on 16 November 2011, asked the media to come out with a white paper. This may be his reaction to this work.

         

          Delhi District Judge P.S. Tegi, on 17  November 2011 convicted for Mr. D.L. Vaid, 65, former Assistant Director in the Directorate of Enforcement and his wife for owning assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. This is the time of tribulation for the small offenders. However, this is the indication of the mode of functioning of the CBI also.

          A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyya, on 17 -11- 2011, deplored that the State Governments had not acted on the letter of the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to set up 71 new CBI courts. The bench directed the States to set them up within eight weeks.  

          This is the five year plan of about ten people. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh disclosed it first. Then a few industrialists supported it. After that, the Supreme Court wanted the states to implement it. Then the media applauded the judgment. In fact, The New Indian Express came out with an editorial on 19 November 2011. This shows that there exists a strong bond between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Supreme Court, manipulators and the media.

          The Supreme Court of India thieved Re.3 lakh crore. This would keep a hundred rogues in luxury for several years. Now it wants to punish all small offenders. It must be reiterated that it a human rights problem.

                  Mr. Sudheendra Kulkarni and three others arrested in connection with the cash –for –votes scam were granted bail on 17 November 2011.

       It is a big case. The Supreme Court has an interest in masking the real donor of money in the above case. Otherwise, it would have transferred the case from the Delhi police to Kerala police or to the police of any other state.

          The CBI, on 19 November 2011, registered a first information report (FIR) for alleged irregularities of Re. 508 crore for the spectrum allotted in 2002 against Bharti Airtel (then Bharti Cellular) and Vodafone Essar (then Hutchison Max and Sterling Cellular) along with former Telecom Secretary Shyamal Ghosh and other unknown officials.  The CBI said that in a decision that was rushed through in a single day on 31 January 2002, the above companies were favoured with additional spectrum beyond 6.2 MHz at a price lower than the mandated fee.

          In this matter, the Supreme Court of India is contorting the facts. Otherwise, it would not have overlooked the banking transactions involved in the 2G case and in buying the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

          Former Supreme Court Judge (Mrs) Ruma Pal asked her peers to put themselves on self trial to save India from sinking further into the cesspool of even greater corruption. She had used the words like tainted, deviant, cynicism against the judges.

        Further, she pointed out seven sins of the Supreme Court of India.

        They are:1. Their conduct in judicial matters. 2. Complete distortion and secrecy. 3. Plagiarism and prolixity. 4. Long-winded, verbose language and arrogance of the personal nature. 5. Claiming crass superiority and independence to mask their own indiscipline and transgression of norms and procedures. 6. Professional arrogance and 7. Nepotism.

          She said the above on 11 November 2011. But the media did not report her speech in full. The rediffmail.com put her speech in the internet only on 20 November 2011 after many deliberations. 

          Evidently, Justice Ruma Pal considers the learned judges of the Supreme Court as some wildly attired savage animals that have become extinct in the world.

        Her words are sufficient for Her Excellency the President of India to bring the conduct of the learned judges to the notice of the people.

          It must be noted that Justice Ruma Pal   did not get any post retirement position. As such she must be better than Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice M. Katju.

        However, it must be stated that Justice Ruma Pal had received the first 73 letters before her retirement in October 2006. She could have accepted this work as a writ petition to restore the invaded properties.

        Alternatively, she could have informed this to the people for awareness.

       Now, she is a leader of women’s rights. There is no use in leading women after keeping them in utter darkness.

         

          Special CBI Judge O.P. Saini, on 16 November 2011, issued notice to the CBI, for contacting a witness in the 2G spectrum case.

          It is well known that the police give training to the witnesses to achieve their objective in the case. Here, it is not the CBI that contacted the witness but the Supreme Court of India. Otherwise, the Supreme Court would have handed over the case to another set of officers.

          The developments reinforce the impression that Raja was sent to jail because he refused to break the Constitution of India from within to favour the existing companies. For which other reason this poor youth paid the extreme penalty? 

          After imposing taxes for Re. 10,000 crore Chief Minister Jayalalitha, on 17 November 2011, said that her predecessor was responsible for the debt burden of her state. If the Supreme Court of India had not given Re.3 lakh crore to private parties, her state would have got about Re. 30,000 crore more per year. But, she is not ready to tell this because the media would disown her.

          Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 20 November 2011, said that rule of law was a characteristic feature of India and Singapore. As the Supreme Court of India keeps him as a leader of India after subverting the rule of law, he talks like this.

           After completing a 38- day journey, Mr. L.K. Advani, a leader of the opposition, said that his crusade against corruption would continue.

          It is now clear that it was the Supreme Court of India – not L.K. Advani - that gave the public money to private parties to buy the Public Sector Undertakings.  Otherwise, he would not have got a chance to roam all over India in the pretext of preventing corruption.

          Further, he has been a political leader since his childhood. But he is not a natural leader because he depends upon the manipulators for name and fame. Even then his entire contribution to Indian politics is not equivalent to even 1% of this work. Therefore, he has no right for his present popularity.

         

          There are reports that the Union Government would present the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill that provides for investing the money in the stock market during the coming Winter Session of Parliament.

          The above decision had been taken by about ten individuals more than 15 years ago. But, the decision is not only an act of corruption but also an unconstitutional theft.

          When the Union Government thieved public assets during 2001-2002, the people – at least this writer - brought the matter to the notice of Prime Minister Vajpayee. But the thieves had placed him in a strategic position to help the act of thieving. Therefore, the face of the people simply blanched with despair when he finally decided to ignore the letter.

      Then the desperate people turned to the Supreme Court of India to catch the thieves. But, it was also an authority placed by the thieves to protect their theft. Therefore, it forged the Constitution of India and the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to the advantage of the thieves.

     After that,  the desperate people approached President K.R. Naraynan. He stopped further theft based on his limited knowledge and lost one more term.

     President Abdul Kalam applied brake but chose not to catch the thieves.

     The panting people then approached President Pratibha Devi Singh Patil. She could have saved Re. 3 lakh crore.

          It must be firmly stated that this theft will go on so long as a link exists between the media, Prime Minister, Supreme Court and the President. Now the face of the people is assuming the appearance of the setting sun because public money again tends go in the hands of private parties.

          In this connection, it must be noted that the President of India is not a woman sitting in the Presidential Palace to receive tainted judges and political leaders. She must hear the shrieks of the people and establish justice. Then the people will know the nature of their President.

          Her Excellency the President of India forwarded a letter of this writer to The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chenanai on 17 October 2011 through letter No. P2/8/1710100073. She has asked the Government to give an action taken report.

       This shows that the President of India is seeking action taken reports not only from the Union Government but also from the State Governments, Supreme Court, CBI, Election Commission and others.

      She is –apparently - transmitting the letters to the leaders of the political parties also.

          The present writer has received three letters from the President of India within the last 45 days. But the media is not publishing this. The condition is that even if the CBI seeks the permission of the President of India to prosecute the judges of the Supreme Court of India, the people will not know this.

          The Prime Minister of India, State Governments, CBI, Election Commission of India and the Supreme Court of India should have given an action taken report.

       The present writer has proof to establish that the President of India has written three letters to the Supreme Court of India to establish justice. But, it does not respond. This shows it is now a diseased body.

            The facts from 8 November 2011 to 20 November 2011 are being submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 21 November 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

21 November 2011

 V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District