190 The Supreme Court of India - A Dead Body

190

A DEAD BODY

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 21 November 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC),  Chief Election Commissioner, Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, Allahabad and Calcutta High Courts.  Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          The Supreme Court of India, on 23 November 2011, granted bail to five corporate executives involved in the 2G spectrum case. Later, Delhi High Court granted bail to Mrs. Kanimozhi and five others. Shocked by the developments, CBI Special Judge O.P. Saini, granted bail to two persons.

          The courts and the CBI, in tandem, had used the Urea Scam case, Bofors case, JMM case and some other cases to bring down the Deve Gowda government at the centre. After accomplishing the task, they allowed the cases to disappear. O.P. Saini was embarrassed because he did not understand the ways of the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India. 

          Apart from teaching a lesson to former Union Minister Mr. Raja, the underground moles wanted to substitute the DMK   under Dr. Karunanidhi in the Tamil Nadu state by the AIDMK under Mrs. Jayalalitha. This has been accomplished. Next time, they might do this to the AIDMK. Both the parties do not want the people to see this work is a different matter.

           

          The Department of Income Tax, on 23 November 2011, seized about Re. 70 crore in cash from a coal contractor, Lal Babu Singh of Ranchi, on 23 November 2011. This shows that the small offenders cannot escape. This is a human rights problem in India.

         Mr. Digvijaya Singh, on 23 November 2011, said that transparency in governance was a reality. He said this on 23 November 2011 in The Economic Times. He is deliberately telling a lie. The importance given to his words by the media shows that he is one of its prime ministerial candidates.

          There are reports that the private airlines in India are in the red. Apparently, they did not get a share in the money given by the Supreme Court of India to private parties.

          There are reports that the trade deficit of India with China – through the official route - is over $20 billion per year.

          China considers Indians as its slaves. The Supreme Court of India –despite several letters – does not enforce Indian laws against the Chinese. Indians cannot sell any manufactured products without mentioning the maximum retail price (MRP). The Chinese are above this rule. Indians must pay tax. But there is no import duty for the Chinese. Thus the actual trade deficit with China must be over $ 50 billion per year.

          A man slapped Union Minister Sharad Pawar on 25 November 2011. He thought that he was corrupt and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh innocent.

          Madras High Court had been established “to discharge cases with justice, equity and good conscience”.  It celebrated 150th year of its establishment on 26 November 2011. Five learned judges of the Supreme Court of India – Justice Altamas Kabir, Justice Sathasivam, Justice A.K. Ganguly, Justice S.J. Mukhopadhya and Justice H.L. Gokhale - participated in this function.

 On that occasion, Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir said, “1.  Many things did not go astray because of the judiciary”.

 But the Re. 3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund and many other public assets went to private parties only because of the Supreme Court.

“2. Judiciary preserved rule of law in India”.

      The Supreme Court of India, actually, subverted the rule of law in India.

“3. The object of the Constitution is to ensure liberty, equality and fraternity to everyone.

      The people are not getting the above due to the brutally repressive stand taken by the Supreme Court.

“4. There was a need to do introspection”.

      Apparently, it is too late.

“5. There is, to some extent, a loss of faith in the judicial system”.

      No one - going through this work – will have any faith in the Indian judicial system.

        On the above occasion, Justice Gokhale said, “1. The judiciary should expedite economic progress through the aid of democracy”.

       There is not even 1 per cent democracy in India, and the learned judges expedite retardation of the Indian economy.

“2. The people in advantageous position use the system for wrongful gains thereby bringing the Constitution of India and the entire system of governance into disrepute”. 

        The Constitution of India rolls in the hands of the President of India and the learned judges of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the judiciary need not put the blame on former Prime Minister Vajpayee, leader L.K. Advani, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, leader Sonia Gandhi or the industrialists. 

3. “The judiciary must find a way to solve this problem within the constitutional frame work as early as possible”.

      The judiciary would not solve this problem until a new “force” acts on it. 

          The police killed Kishenji – a leader of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) - on 24 November 2011. The Supreme Court of India is the police here.

        It is said that he was the biggest leader of the militant people. He was not aware of the fact that India was being run by some underground moles sitting in remote places. Therefore, one day, he gave an interview to the media.  This was the reason for his death. However, the Supreme Court of India could have killed him after showing this work to the people. 

          The CBI, on 29 November 2011, arrested an IAS officer Mrs. Y. Sri Lakshmi for allegedly granting favours to a mining company abusing her official position. If she had done some favours to a big company, she would have got a promotion.

          At least 25 companies called off their initial public offer (IPO) plans in 2011 due to sluggish trend in the stock market. Some newspapers reported this on 29 November 2011. The Supreme Court of India is even now secretly buying the shares of private companies using public money. Otherwise, it would not have given Re. 3 lakh crore in the PF to private parties secretly.

      Addressing a session on media on 2 December 2011 at a conclave organized by The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), Justice J.S. Verma, said that the media must inform the people of everything of significance.

          In this connection, it must be stated Justice J.S. Verma had been an inducted judge. He might have sneaked around the table of his clients to enter the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Otherwise, the   media would not have published his views.

        Now, he has a great rapport with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and many others. The underground moles have a scheme to make him the next President of India.

          Madras High Court, on 28 November 2011, quashed some proceedings against Justice G. Ramanujam, former judge of Madras High Court. After his retirement, he functioned as a Director of Viswapriya Financial Services Limited. This shows that even some judges of High Courts enter various companies after retirement.

  

        A bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Mrs. Justice Ranjana Prakash,   on 28 November 2011, asked the CBI to tell the reason for questioning the impartiality of the sub-ordinate courts in Gujarat.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the inducted judges of the Supreme Court of India are not aware of the plight of the judges in the sub-ordinate courts.

          The work-load of the sub-ordinate judges is very heavy. The technical procedures prevent them from taking any unconventional decisions. As a result, the documentary facts and even the findings of the Human Rights Commission are not sufficient for them to convict, acquit or dismiss the cases. They are being forced to see innocent people before them for decades.

          The above bench, further, said: “1. There is separation power. 2. Judiciary in India is independent and 3. The judiciary at the lower rank will toe the political line is complete nonsense”.

          In this matter, it must be stated that the judiciary in India is independent to the extent of forging the Constitution of India. It is independent and partial. Therefore, it will produce better results only when it ceases to be independent.

          The Union Government on 1 December 2011 decided to sell three sick Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) - Scooters India – Tyre Corporation of India and Central Inland Water Transport Corporation – to strategic investors.

          The Supreme Court of India gave Re. 3 lakh crore to the strategic investors. Now it wants to give new investment opportunities to them.

          The President of India has transmitted at least three letters of this writer to the Supreme Court of India for appropriate action. But the latter is dithering to establish justice.

          The present learned judges of the Supreme Court of India – with the sole exception of Justice Cyriac Joseph - are inducted judges.  They deceived thousands of judges of the sub-ordinate courts to become the judges of the High Courts. Now they have no compunction to deceive 1000 million people.

Evidently, any request to the Supreme Court of India to take appropriate action over this work is like demanding Mukesh Ambani to surrender the conquered public assets. Naturally, it is now not a diseased body but a dead body.

          Therefore, all inducted judges must be substituted by other judges. The President could grant leave to the present judges with full pay and allowances.

          The power of the President of India to establish justice is a total one. 

            The facts from 21 November 2011 to 3 December 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 4 December 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

4 December 2011

 V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District. India