189
A DISEASED BODY
The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 8 November 2011 . The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Chief Election Commissioner, Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, Allahabad and Calcutta High Courts. Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com
Mr. Rahul Gandhi, on 14 November 2011, said that corruption was rampant in the Utter Pradesh (UP) state. His contribution to Indian politics is not even a fraction of the contribution of this writer. But his words reached the nook and corner of India
Chief of Public Account Committee of Parliament Murali Manohar Joshi had requested Mr. R.B. Singh –an officer in the CAG - to expedite the 2G audit. This shows that the opposition parties are taking more powerful decisions - by sitting in their houses - than the ruling parties. Otherwise, this would have come to the knowledge of the people as and when he made the request.
Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, on 16 November 2011 , said:
1. Institutional ignorance, at times, impact the decision making process.
2. Individuals possessing the benefit of hindsight would provide invaluable guidance to improve decision making process.
3. There must be a distinction between malafide intent, and bonafide errors.
His choicest words could be construed as a reply to the elections in India
Press Council of India 16 November 2011 , said that freedoms were being manipulated by the media companies for their own purposes.
Justice M. Katju had been a judge of the Supreme Court of India until September 2011. He became the Chairman of the Press Council of India because of his link with the manipulators. His only qualification for the present post was that he concealed hundreds of letters received from this writer.
Vice President Hamid Ansari, on 16 November 2011 , asked the media to come out with a white paper. This may be his reaction to this work.
Delhi District Judge P.S. Tegi, on 17 November 2011 convicted for Mr. D.L. Vaid, 65, former Assistant Director in the Directorate of Enforcement and his wife for owning assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. This is the time of tribulation for the small offenders. However, this is the indication of the mode of functioning of the CBI also.
A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyya, on 17 -11- 2011, deplored that the State Governments had not acted on the letter of the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to set up 71 new CBI courts. The bench directed the States to set them up within eight weeks.
This is the five year plan of about ten people. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh disclosed it first. Then a few industrialists supported it. After that, the Supreme Court wanted the states to implement it. Then the media applauded the judgment. In fact, The New Indian Express came out with an editorial on 19 November 2011 . This shows that there exists a strong bond between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Supreme Court, manipulators and the media.
The Supreme Court of India thieved Re.3 lakh crore. This would keep a hundred rogues in luxury for several years. Now it wants to punish all small offenders. It must be reiterated that it a human rights problem.
Mr. Sudheendra Kulkarni and three others arrested in connection with the cash –for –votes scam were granted bail on 17 November 2011 .
It is a big case. The Supreme Court has an interest in masking the real donor of money in the above case. Otherwise, it would have transferred the case from the Delhi
The CBI, on 19 November 2011, registered a first information report (FIR) for alleged irregularities of Re. 508 crore for the spectrum allotted in 2002 against Bharti Airtel (then Bharti Cellular) and Vodafone Essar (then Hutchison Max and Sterling Cellular) along with former Telecom Secretary Shyamal Ghosh and other unknown officials. The CBI said that in a decision that was rushed through in a single day on 31 January 2002 , the above companies were favoured with additional spectrum beyond 6.2 MHz at a price lower than the mandated fee.
In this matter, the Supreme Court of India is contorting the facts. Otherwise, it would not have overlooked the banking transactions involved in the 2G case and in buying the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).
Former Supreme Court Judge (Mrs) Ruma Pal asked her peers to put themselves on self trial to save India
Further, she pointed out seven sins of the Supreme Court of India.
They are:1. Their conduct in judicial matters. 2. Complete distortion and secrecy. 3. Plagiarism and prolixity. 4. Long-winded, verbose language and arrogance of the personal nature. 5. Claiming crass superiority and independence to mask their own indiscipline and transgression of norms and procedures. 6. Professional arrogance and 7. Nepotism.
She said the above on 11 November 2011 . But the media did not report her speech in full. The rediffmail.com put her speech in the internet only on 20 November 2011 after many deliberations.
Evidently, Justice Ruma Pal considers the learned judges of the Supreme Court as some wildly attired savage animals that have become extinct in the world.
Her words are sufficient for Her Excellency the President of India to bring the conduct of the learned judges to the notice of the people.
It must be noted that Justice Ruma Pal did not get any post retirement position. As such she must be better than Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice M. Katju.
However, it must be stated that Justice Ruma Pal had received the first 73 letters before her retirement in October 2006. She could have accepted this work as a writ petition to restore the invaded properties.
Alternatively, she could have informed this to the people for awareness.
Now, she is a leader of women’s rights. There is no use in leading women after keeping them in utter darkness.
Special CBI Judge O.P. Saini, on 16 November 2011, issued notice to the CBI, for contacting a witness in the 2G spectrum case.
It is well known that the police give training to the witnesses to achieve their objective in the case. Here, it is not the CBI that contacted the witness but the Supreme Court of India. Otherwise, the Supreme Court would have handed over the case to another set of officers.
The developments reinforce the impression that Raja was sent to jail because he refused to break the Constitution of India from within to favour the existing companies. For which other reason this poor youth paid the extreme penalty?
After imposing taxes for Re. 10,000 crore Chief Minister Jayalalitha, on 17 November 2011 , said that her predecessor was responsible for the debt burden of her state. If the Supreme Court of India had not given Re.3 lakh crore to private parties, her state would have got about Re. 30,000 crore more per year. But, she is not ready to tell this because the media would disown her.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 20 November 2011 , said that rule of law was a characteristic feature of India Singapore India
After completing a 38- day journey, Mr. L.K. Advani, a leader of the opposition, said that his crusade against corruption would continue.
It is now clear that it was the Supreme Court of India – not L.K. Advani - that gave the public money to private parties to buy the Public Sector Undertakings. Otherwise, he would not have got a chance to roam all over India
Further, he has been a political leader since his childhood. But he is not a natural leader because he depends upon the manipulators for name and fame. Even then his entire contribution to Indian politics is not equivalent to even 1% of this work. Therefore, he has no right for his present popularity.
There are reports that the Union Government would present the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill that provides for investing the money in the stock market during the coming Winter Session of Parliament.
The above decision had been taken by about ten individuals more than 15 years ago. But, the decision is not only an act of corruption but also an unconstitutional theft.
When the Union Government thieved public assets during 2001-2002, the people – at least this writer - brought the matter to the notice of Prime Minister Vajpayee. But the thieves had placed him in a strategic position to help the act of thieving. Therefore, the face of the people simply blanched with despair when he finally decided to ignore the letter.
Then the desperate people turned to the Supreme Court of India to catch the thieves. But, it was also an authority placed by the thieves to protect their theft. Therefore, it forged the Constitution of India and the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to the advantage of the thieves.
After that, the desperate people approached President K.R. Naraynan. He stopped further theft based on his limited knowledge and lost one more term.
President Abdul Kalam applied brake but chose not to catch the thieves.
The panting people then approached President Pratibha Devi Singh Patil. She could have saved Re. 3 lakh crore.
It must be firmly stated that this theft will go on so long as a link exists between the media, Prime Minister, Supreme Court and the President. Now the face of the people is assuming the appearance of the setting sun because public money again tends go in the hands of private parties.
In this connection, it must be noted that the President of India is not a woman sitting in the Presidential Palace to receive tainted judges and political leaders. She must hear the shrieks of the people and establish justice. Then the people will know the nature of their President.
Her Excellency the President of India forwarded a letter of this writer to The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chenanai on 17 October 2011 through letter No. P2/8/1710100073. She has asked the Government to give an action taken report.
This shows that the President of India is seeking action taken reports not only from the Union Government but also from the State Governments, Supreme Court, CBI, Election Commission and others.
She is –apparently - transmitting the letters to the leaders of the political parties also.
The present writer has received three letters from the President of India within the last 45 days. But the media is not publishing this. The condition is that even if the CBI seeks the permission of the President of India to prosecute the judges of the Supreme Court of India, the people will not know this.
The Prime Minister of India, State Governments, CBI, Election Commission of India and the Supreme Court of India should have given an action taken report.
The present writer has proof to establish that the President of India has written three letters to the Supreme Court of India to establish justice. But, it does not respond. This shows it is now a diseased body.
The facts from 8 November 2011 to 20 November 2011 are being submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 21 November 2011.
The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India
V.Sabarimuthu.
26-3 Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167
Kanyakumari District
No comments:
Post a Comment