Padmanabhaswamy Temple - Drowning

181

DROWNING

          The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 14 July 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army, Indian Air Force and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

              A three –judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices Altmas Kabir, Cyriac Joseph and H.L.Dattu on 14 July 2011 said that Mr. Prasant Bhushan, adovocate, Supreme Court, should tender an apology for describing the Chief Justice of India, S.H. Kapadia, as a corrupt person. The bench gave time till September 6, 2011 to find a way to wriggle himself out of the contempt proceedings filed by amicus curiae, Harish Salve. The advocate in 2009 –according to the media- said that Justice Kapadia should not have heard a case relating to Vedanta Company as he held the shares of that company.

          The Radia tape revealed that Justice K.G. Balakrishnan had fixed some crucial judgments. Now, at least a name- sake enquiry is going on regarding his wealth.

The above accusation comes from an advocate involved in a Re.4 crore corruption issue. Besides, S.H.Kapadia is rejecting all acts of corruption as policy decisions. Therefore, the above bench should not have hesitated to order an enquiry into his assets.

Further, Vedanta had been a charge-sheeted company. Yet, it could buy a few Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) in violation of a guideline. The reason was that the learned judges of the Supreme Court were the pillars of this company.

          The Delhi Police on 17 July 2011 arrested Mr. Sanjeev Saxena, a close friend of Mr. Amar Singh- in connection with the 22 July 2008 cash –for-vote scandal. He was arrested because a Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice R.M. Lodha had wanted it to take the case to its logical conclusion within two weeks. The bench added that the police had given a wishy-washy report.

          It may be recalled that on July 22, 2008 three Members of Parliament (MPs) belonging to the BJP party –Ashok Argal, Faggan Singh Kulaste and Mahavir Bhagora- placed Re.1 crore in cash in the Parliament alleging that the money was given to them to withdraw their support to the UPA- I Government at the Centre.

          The people indirectly involved in this case were mentioned in the Chapters 95 and 96.

          The Delhi Police should have disclosed the real donor of the money, or the bank from which the money came before affecting the arrests.

          Had the Supreme Court been alert to environmental changes, its very frame of mind would have prompted the Delhi Police to reveal the identity of the donor long ago.

          Similarly, Re.3 lakh crore from the Provident Fund (PF) would not have gone in the hands of three private parties. None would have been allowed to convert public money into private assets either.

          The Union Government on 14 July 2011 arbitrarily decided to apportion Re. 3.5 lakh crore Provident Fund (PF) money among: 1.State Bank of India (SBI) 2. ICICI Bank  3. Reliance Capital  and 4. HSBC Asset Management for three years from September1, 2011 in the ratio 3.5:2.5:2:2. They will manage this money.

          The Business Line sparingly reported this. All other newspapers blacked out this news.

          Having published it, the above paper – in its editorial on 21 July 2011 - said that the prospects for deploying the PF funds for greater common good have never been as bright as then.

          In return, the eight men persuaded Ragul Gandhi to stay in the farmer’s houses in the Utter Pradesh(UP) State, and gave publicity all over India. Besides, they might have given an assurance to keep his mother, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, and Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, in the present position.  

          The SBI will spend this money for buying the shares of the other three entities. Thus the money would virtually go into the hands of three individuals and a few others close to them.

          Three years ago Re.3 lakh crore was given. Now, it is Re.3.5 lakh crore. After three years, the amount would increase to Re. 5 lakh crore. Therefore, the recipients –for all practical purposes – need not return the money.

          They would spend a portion for lending purposes. No other citizen has this chance.

          Another portion would be spent for buying the shares of the PSUs, and for buying assets all over the world. In this way, the net asset value of the purchased assets would double within three years. No other citizens –the learned judges of the Supreme Court included – get money even for buying 5 cent of land.

          A small amount would go for the exploration of natural assets.

          The SBI deducts processing fee even for jewel loans. There is not even any processing fee for this. Instead, the Government must give a small amount for safe keeping.

          The money could have been used for the railways, bullet trains, exploitation of minerals, poverty alleviation, solar energy and education. There are even now schools without black boards in India.

           Manmohan Singh, could have put off this decision. But he has received Prime Minister Ship as bribe for this amount. He would even say that such things would not come to his attention.

          The members of the Union Cabinet could have disallowed this. But they presumably think that they owe their position to the eight industrialists.

           Sonia Gandhi could have changed the policy. But her son-in-law would be caught for disproportionate assets.

          When the Union Government in January 2005 decided to invest 5 per cent of the PF money in shares, the present writer pointed out the unconstitutional nature of the policy. The then President of India, Abdul Kalam, applied a brake.  Therefore, Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, President of India, could have vetoed this. But she –like Manmohan Singh –had accepted President Ship as a bribe for transferring this amount.

          The Chief of the Indian Army, General Deepak Kapoor, could have brought this to the notice of the Supreme Court. But the people would relate this with his date of birth.

          The Chief Justice of India, Kapadia, could have stayed this. But he is one of the members in the long line of Chief Justices trusted by the eight industrialists. Many other judges might have given legal advice to the eight men. Some others hesitate to sacrifice their post retirement positions in the Government or private companies.

          The decision of the Government will affect the well being of the people and the salaries of the employees.

          This is against the Preamble, Article 14 and all other sections of the Constitution of India.

          This is the biggest act of corruption the world has even seen. This takes place in the level of the Supreme Court.  

        Even if all the contentions were wrong, the Supreme Court should not have allowed the Government to transfer this amount to private parties - three years ago - before enforcing freedom of expression. Then the people would have taken this matter in their hand. The so-called anti-corruption crusaders like Anna Hazare, Ram Dev, Santhosh Hegde, Kiran Bedi and others might have got a point.

          The Supreme Court should not have resisted the Constitution of India like this. But there must be some judges  ever ready to follow their best self.

          A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly on 16 July 211 ruled that the land acquired for public purpose could not be re-allotted to other beneficiaries.

          Thus the court annulled a policy decision because of its unconstitutional nature.  It must be noted that Justice J.S. Singhvi had been involved in a Re.4 crore corruption matter. 

          Whenever, the Government sold the land belonging to the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), the present writer pointed out this. Now the bench says the same in a small case. But the Supreme Court refuses to stand by this point when bigger cases confront it.

          On 21 July 2011, a petition was filed in the High Court, Chennai for restraining the Tamil Nadu State Government from giving wet grinders and mixers to the people. At the same time, the wet grinder manufacturers are protesting against the decision of the Government to import these items from China.

          It must be noted that the above decision is a poverty alleviation measure. Incidentally, it would create several small entrepreneurs and eradicate the unemployment problem.

          But bulk buying always involves big commission. As the Government purchased cycles and colour TVs in bulk, all small traders of these items suffered a silent death. Therefore, the buying process must be delegated to the district level.

          When the DMK Government supplied Colour TVs, none realized that the TV parts could have been from China.

          Now, it has been established that there exists a plot to make India a vassal of China. For this, China has given over $30 billion as bribe to some boys. This is the reason why all houses in India are filled with illegally imported Chinese items. As a result, several small industries in India have perished.

          The recipients of the bribe are, apparently, behind the present Government of Tamil Nadu.

          Therefore, it is imperative that the Government must be restrained from importing any articles from China to the detriment of the Indian Industry.

          A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice Deepak Verma on 22 July 2011 dismissed the appeal of Mr. Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy to stay a CBI enquiry for his wealth.

       High Court, Andra Pradesh (AP) had ordered the enquiry on the receipt of a letter by Mr. P. Shanker Rao, a minister in the AP State.

          One letter was sufficient for the High Court, AP, to order an enquiry. The present writer has sent 180 letters to the Chief Justice of India alone. Yet, the Supreme Court is not ready to address the vital issues present in them.

          The Union Government on 22 July 2011permitted the Reliance Industries to sell 30 per cent of its shares of the KG-D6 gas field for 7.2 billion to London based BP Plc.

          The above gas field belongs to 1000 million people. No private party has any right over it. However, now it is in the hands of the usurpers of public assets.

          The AP state must get about $0.6 billion as document charge. It would not get even this.

          In the above matter -  just like Mr. Venkaiyah Naidu -Mr. Jaipal Reddy, Union Minister from the AP state, has done  a great disservice to his home state.

          Over 100 officers of the Department of Income Tax raided the residences of Mohan Lal and Mamootty- two Malayalam film actors. The officers might have found some black money.

          After giving about Re.30 lakh crore to some boys, the Government is deflecting the attention of the people to such raids.

          The Special Court turned down the request of A. Raja to hear the case after the completion of the investigation. Apparently, the Special Judge listened to a hidden voice.

         The CBI on 23 July 2011 told the Special Court that first-come –first –served policy was not carried out in letter and spirit to the benefit of Swam Telecom, Unitech Wireless and Reliance Communication Ltd.

          The Prime Minister of India, two judges of the Supreme Court, the senor officers of the CBI and the judge of the Special Court knew this. Yet they are not ready to cancel the spectrum granted to them. Who are the corrupt?

          It is pertinent to recall that when the King of Travancore was poisoned to death in 1679, the Queen –Umayamma Rani- was left with her six sons –all minors. The men from eight powerful houses and their confederates waited upon her and gave their assurances of allegiance to her and her children.

         One day, five of the princes were inveigled to go to a bathing tank along with other boys. When the boys were enjoying their swim, a few hired men came to the tank under the pretext of bathing, and seizing the princes drowned them. The confederates then spread a rumour that the princes were accidentally drowned while bathing.

          There was no doubt in the mind of the Queen about the simultaneous drowning of her five sons because the Kings were determined men capable of supervising the funds of the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple and the country. She was entirely helpless. Finding her stay near the temple unsafe, she retired with her only surviving son to a safer place. She gave up the affairs of her government, her whole thought being the safety of her son and heir.

          Now, the money in the hands of the Supreme Court is an unlimited one.

          If Re.3.5 lakh crore in the Provident Fund could be give to three boys for safe keeping, another Re.3.5 lakh crore rotting in the Pension Fund also could be given to them.

          Re. 2.5 lakh crore could be given from the Life Insurance Corporation of India  (LIC) every year.

          About Re.10 lakh crore from the Public Sector banks could be given under the pretext of buying shares.

          The money in the post offices also could be given.

          They would get a profit of about Re.10 lakh crore from the spectrum and minerals.

          Above all, there exists a foreign exchange of over $300 billion.

          The budget of about Re. 13 lakh crore could be managed by: Taxes = Re. 8 lakh crore, Borrowals = Re.4 lakh crore and Selling the shares of the PSUs =Re.1 lakh crore.

          In fine, they are poised to get not less than Re.30 lakh crore during 2011 -2012. Surely, this amount is more alluring than the treasure in the Padmanabhaswamy Temple.

          Realizing this, they inveigled some young members of the DMK party to Delhi. They assured excellent career to them throughout their life.

          The senior leaders like Mr. Sharad Pawar might have advised them to use their practical wisdom in the Union Cabinet and make money like his daughter.

          However, being young, they might have become a danger to some of their secret ambitions connected with the wealth of the nation. Therefore, they drowned them through the aid of the hired men in the Supreme Court. This is the observation of the people sitting away from Delhi.

          The fact from 14 July 2011 to 23 July 2011 are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India on 24 July 2011.

V.Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagummodu PO

PIN 629167.

           

Dr.Manmohan Singh - "A job to do"

  180

A JOB TO DO

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 26 June 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army, Indian Air Force and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

            A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice A.K.Patnaik appointed a seven member committee to prepare an inventory of the jewels in the six cellars of the Sri Padmanabhaswamy Temple at Trivandrum. The committee found priceless treasure – heaps of gold coins besides diamonds, emeralds and gems - on 28 June 2011.

          Some people said that every coin would fetch a huge amount of money depending on its antique value. Some others said that the treasure must be melted, sold and the proceeds deposited in the banks.

          The direction to prepare an inventory is an intelligent decision. The High Court, Cochin, had missed this opportunity.

          However, the people fear that a Supreme Court like the present one would transmit this – just like the spectrum  -to about eight people one day or other after enacting some scenes

      At the instance of the of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi and many others in the Congress Party,  Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, gave a closed door interview to the editors of five carefully selected newspapers on 29-6- 2011.

          In this connection, Mr. Salman Khursheed, Union Minister for Water Resources, said that Dr. Manmohan Singh had been asked not to give frequent interviews to the media following the example of the President of the USA. He said that that policy had changed.

          During the interview, Dr. Manmohan disclosed that he had been meeting Mrs. Sonia Gandhi every week.

However, it is pertinent to point out that the media had been taking notice of these meetings. But it had been concealing this from the eye of the people for about seven years. How the media build India could be discerned.

During the interview he, further,  said,

1. “Miss. Jayalalitha –President of the AIADMK party - is lending good co-operation”. The industrialists might have asked him to tell this. Perhaps, the interview was arranged only to convey this message.

2. “The Higher judiciary should not be included in the proposed anti-corruption law.” It is clear that the proposed act is to dilute the existing anti-corruption laws. He said this in the hope that the Supreme Court would continue to protect him.

3. “The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) should not have commented on a policy issue”.

4. “Mrs. Sonia Gandhi was doing a superlative job”

5.  “I have a job to do” He had uttered these words six or seven times earlier. Besides this, he has been using the words ‘world of uncertainty”, ex-post and post facto” and “honest mistakes”.

Anna Hazare on 29 June 2011 described Dr. Manmohan as “a honest man”. His statement did not appear as headline news.

The people notice headline news only. They have no time to read other matters. The diminished importance -after the last mail - shows that he might not be projected as an alternative leader. Now, the media is systematically projecting Mr. Jairam Ramesh, Union Minister.

Mr. Kabil Sibal, Minister for Communication, said that the new telephone operators would be permitted to lease their radio waves to other operators.

 The act of giving the spectrum or radio waves for a small amount, and allowing them to sell them to others –including the foreigners- for a huge profit is a treacherously anti-constitutional policy. The Union Ministers, President of India and the Supreme Court must accept responsibility for this.

About eight houses have illegally usurped the spectrum by creating so many scenes like first come-first serve, auction, Supreme Court, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI),  2G spectrum case, Mr.A. Raja, Mrs. Kanimozhi, Adharsh Housing Scandal, Anna Hazare, Ram Dev,                 Tihar jail and the CBI.

Now, even the King of Travancore has no spectrum. The states in the south, north and east do not possess any. Yet the above Union Minister says that the existing players would be indirectly given more. Naturally, he will get the protection of the Supreme Court.

The Union Cabinet on 1 July 2011 permitted the Cairn Energy Company to sell its Rajasthan Oil Field to Vedanta – a charge-sheeted company - with certain conditions.

 This will surely help keep Dr. Manmohan Singh in position. However, the act of securing licenses for exploration, and then selling them to others for a huge profit is patently unconstitutional. All public assets must be taken over to restore constitutionalism in India.

The militant people killed 10 people and abducted 12 others in Bihar on 2 July 2011.

The CBI on 1 July 2011 registered the First Information Report (FIR) against the officials of the Director of Hydrocarbons including its former Chairman, Mr. V.K.Sibal under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The FIR said that the officials illegally obtained favours from the representatives of a private company.

Did the Director of Hydrocarbon act without the knowledge of the Minister for Petroleum? Is Mr. Raja, former Minister for Communication, different from him?

Similarly, the CBI said that Mrs. Kanimozhi,  an MP, had acted like the brain behind the Sun TV. Now she is in jail.        In the case of other big companies, the employees are being considered as the brain behind them. Why does the CBI act like this in front of 1000 million people?

Mr. Vinod Rai, CAG, on 3 July 2011 said that the report on the hydrocarbon was revealed to the people as a part of his constitutional duty.

The Economic Times on 4 July 2011 reported that the companies linked to a Mr. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal, former deputy director in the Directorate of Enforcement, cornered the lion’s share of licences for exploring the mineral buried under the ocean floor. The paper added that he was arrested in 1999 and in 2002 for disproportionate wealth. This shows that all the works of the officials of the Directorate of Enforcement and the CBI in Delhi and Mumbai must be transferred to those in Chennai and Calcutta for better results.

The Supreme Court on 4 July 2011 issued orders to set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) under a retired Supreme Court judge to recover black money. The judges like Justice K.G. Balakrishnan are more dangerous that the members of the Union Cabinet.

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and C.K. Prasad on 5 July 2011 rejected the petition of Justice D.P. Dinakaran because his motive was to delay the impeachment proceedings.

It is clear that the bench understood the motive of Justice D.P. Dinakaran. Why do the learned judges of the Supreme Court refuse to enforce freedom of expression? Why do they facilitate the conversion of public assets into private assets using public fund? What is their real motive?

Mr. Shilas Gandhi, Central Information Commissioner (CIC), on 5 July 2011 directed the official of the CBI at Mumbai and Delhi to disclose their assets and the other sources of income in the last 10 years. As the 9 June 2011 order of the Union Government exempted the CBI from disclosure, the CIC asked the agency to respond to all applications filed before the above crucial date.

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice B. Sudershan Reddy and Justice S.S, Nijjar, on 5 July 2011, restrained the Government of Chhattisgarh State and the Centre from arming tribal people as Special Police Officers (SPOs). The court observed that the policy of the Government would perpetrate violence against innocent civilians.

In the above matter the bench had no hesitation to annul a policy decision. This must be extended to all other unconstitutional policy decisions.

A three judge Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Kapadia allowed a French Company – Lafarge - to mine limestone in the Megalaya State. The Supreme Court did not publish the names of other two judges through the media.

As the factory remains in Bangladesh, the Union Government might have fixed the judgment to strengthen Indo-Bangladesh relations. However, the Prime Minister of India shall not pay any visit to Bangladesh until China abandons its naval base in that country.

The Supreme Court on 6 July 2011 upheld an Allahabad High Court order quashing the notification to convert 156 hectare industrial land into residential apartments.

The CBI filed a First Information Report (FIR) against Mr. Dayanidhi Maran, a Union Minister belonging to the DMK party.

It is not known whether the CBI caught him red-handed in any serious offence or not.  However, the charges disclosed were: 1.He forced Mr. Sivasankaran to sell his telephone company -Air Cel- to Maxis Company and 2. The Maxis Company got the permission of the Union Cabinet to invest in India, and accordingly it invested Re.675 crore in the Sun TV Company of Mr. Kalanidhi Maran-his brother.

Mr.Maran, therefore, resigned from the Union Cabinet.

Dr. M. Karunanidhi, leader of the DMK Party, reacted to the above saying that India was under the rule of the media. He added that the media could make anyone a criminal and that Mr. Maran could not be an exception.

The above statement is consistent with this work. It came out in some parts of India because of his influence over one or two TV channels. However, he is the first political leader in India to say this openly.  The other political leaders might take notice of this.

 

Now an enquiry was ordered against 27 officers of the Indian Army for selling non-service weapons.

The Directorate of Enforcement on 10 July 2011 imposed a fine of Re. 7100 crore on the Etisalat – DB group under the Foreign Exchange Management Act for committing a number of illegalities.

There are reports that the Union Government is contemplating to hand over Re. 3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund and another 3 lakh crore in the Pension Fund to private parties.

In this connection, the money is like the treasure found in the Sri Padmanabhapuram Temple at Trivandrum. Her Excellency the President of India – just like the Kings of Travancore –shall not take even a dust from it. The money must be used for public investments, and all the employees must be brought under the Old Pension Scheme.

Three blasts in three places in Mumbai killed 21 people and injured several others on 13 July 2011. Mrs. Pratibhadevisingh Patil, President of India, Mr. Manmohan Singh, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi and many other leaders condemned it.

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly on 12 July 2011 rejected a petition against Mr Kapil Sibal, Union Minister. The petition alleged that he arbitrarily reduced the penalty levied on Reliance Communication of Mr. Anil Ambani from Re. 680 crore to Re.5 crore.

Even after repeated requests, there is no enquiry regarding the Re. 4 crore case against Justice Singhvi. Two advocates are also not ready to clear their names. This shows that this judge must have received money from the advocates for some other cases. Therefore, the judgments of Justice Singhvi do not inspire public confidence.

In fact, the above bench is interpreting legality as illegality and vice versa.

If the judges of the Supreme Court, President of India, Prime Minister of India Union Ministers and the Members of Parliament commit any illegality, the CBI-after due investigation-could seek the permission of the Supreme Court for prosecution. The Supreme Court shall grant permission after examining the legal points. The accused must be arrested, and then released within 24 hours. The charge-sheet must be given immediately. As a rule, all prosecutions must end in conviction.

Now, none knows the real charges against Mr. A. Raja, Mrs. Kanimozhi and two or three others. In the event of their acquittal none could take away the pain experienced by them. Therefore, the CBI must either submit the charge-sheet or release them unconditionally.

Now the people think that the charges are intended to save the big offenders like the Prime Minister and the other real beneficiaries.

In this connection, it must be reiterated that about eight houses - as in the Old History of Travancore- have usurped immense public assets, and they have gradually become very powerful. They wield immense influence in the conduct and administration of the nation through their media wing. The bureaucrats virtually work under them. They are so powerful that even the learned judges of the Supreme Court are afraid of them. The Union Ministers have no control over them, and they are being simply permitted to be present at the intermittent Cabinet meetings. Dr. Manmohan Singh is doing the job dictated by them only. If he defies, he will be sent to Tihar jail.

Thus Dr. Manmohan Singh considers the people as children and makes them to chase butterflies in the back-garden while he does the job of eight men.

The facts from 26 June 2011 to 13 July 2011 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 14 July 2011.

V.SABARIMUTHU

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu

PIN : 629167.