CHAPTER 170

170

A TREASONABLE OFFENCE

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 23 January 2011. The mail was immediately posted on the website: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com. A link was given to www.thattan.com.

Kerosene mafia killed an Additional District Collector because he photographed their illegal activities. The Collector was on his way to control an agitation of the onion farmers for higher prices.

One reason for the above incident was the corruption taking place in the top level.

The people came to know about the agitation of the onion farmers only because of the above incident. Otherwise, the people were hearing about the agitation of the Left parties for lesser onion prices and the consequent meetings of the Union Cabinet.

A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices G.S. Singhi and S.S. Nijjar asked the Government to give its opinion to a plea for disclosing the entire contents of the so-called Radia tape.

Justice A.K.Ganguly has been substituted by Justice S.S. Nijjar in the above Bench. The Chief Justice of India might have affected the above change in deference to this work. However, the late response might be due to the intervention of Her Excellency the President of India. Though Justices S.S.Nijjar and Singhi could be found in many Benches, there is now a greater participation of other judges. Therefore, they could concentrate more on the cases of national importance.

The above developments show that there is still a way to escape from the present predicament. The people must know it.

In this connection, it must be noted that the camera men of various TV channels are masking the judges. They are not approaching them. Therefore, the people sitting away from the Supreme Court do not know the intrinsic nature of the learned judges. A quintessence is the former Chief Justice of India. None understood his real nature until the recent revelations.

The Department of Income Tax sought clarification from the Church of South India (CSI) on the assessment for the year 2008 -2009. It wanted the CSI to give a detailed report on the tsunami fund and the sale of various properties.

On 25 January 2011, a Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices P.Sathasivam and B.S. Chauhan – in a suo motu action –amended its own judgment delivered on 21 January 2011in the Australian missionary Graham Staines murder case.

The Supreme Court has been proclaiming to Indians that it would not act based on the reports in the newspapers. The court has been saying this mainly to inform this writer that it would not accept these letters as a writ petition.

Now, the Supreme Court has corrected its judgment based on the reports in the newspapers. Many people are commending this quick correction. This happened because the opinion of the Supreme Court - as a body - was for amending the judgment.

The present writer has been pointing out the unconstitutional nature of various judgments since December 2001. The recent revelations confirm that all such judgments have been “fixed” by the underground moles.

The Supreme Court must now either deny the allegation or amend such judgments. The Supreme Court should not be an institution that refuses to rectify this mistake.

With regard to the money stashed in foreign banks the Union Minister for Finance on 25 January 2011 said the following.

1. The money in secret accounts is about $500 billion to 1.4 trillion.

2. The Union Government had handed over a list of 18 persons in a ‘sealed cover’ to the Supreme Court.

3. He was not privy to the list. The Department of Income Tax and the other related agencies were aware of it.

4. The list could not be published due to treaty obligations.

5. Black money is generated mainly by the over-invoicing of imports and the under-invoicing of exports.

There were reports that $9.6 billion Vedanta –Cairn deal would get the approval of the Government very soon.

In this connection, it must be stated that the Constitution of India does not permit even the Government to sell the natural assets to anyone.

An industrialist – Mr. Azim Premji - on 26 January 2011 said that there was total break down in governance at centre.

National awards called Padma awards were presented to several eminent persons on the Republic Day. Apparently, no judge got any award.

Such awards must be associated with a decent amount of money.

Some bureaucrats known for their manipulation value were also clubbed with the eminent persons for awards. Prominent among them was the Cabinet Secretary in the NDA Government.

The above bureaucrat was privy to the act of transferring public assets, including the spectrum, to private individuals during the period of the NDA Government. The involvement of the foster-son- in –law of the former Prime Minister of India in the decision making process confirms this. The exchequer lost about $500 billion to $ 1 trillion during his period.

In order to divert the attention of the people, he had supported the former Prime Minister of India to move the Indian Army to the Indo-Pak border. Whether he got monetary benefit or not is known to intelligence agencies. However, if he had wanted, he could have deposited a huge amount of money in foreign banks. In fact, he should have been booked under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Government should have sent a questionnaire to him before conferring this award.

Similarly, the hand of the Deputy Chairperson of the Planning Commission could be discerned in the unconstitutional policies of the present Government. He was instrumental in selling the public assets, including the shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), to the favoured people. A decision had been taken to hand over the money rotting in the Provident Fund (PF) account to two or three boys. Above all, he was partly responsible for converting India into a vassal of China. Many other bureaucrats are also responsible for similar crimes.

The Union Government on 27 January 2011 told a Supreme Court Bench that it was not aware of the charge-sheet pending against the present Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC). The Chief Justice S.H.Kapadia, Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan and Justice Swatanter Kumar were in the Bench.

No case is pending against the former Chief Justice of India or the present Prime Minister of India. But, they are the real tainted persons.

If the present CVC really wanted to do his real duty, he would have to proceed against the former Chief Justice of India and a few learned judges for corruption in delivering judgments. He would have to direct the CBI to question the Prime Minister of India also. Then, the Supreme Court might say that the CVC was waging a personal vendetta against them.

On the other hand, the CVC might have to approach the Supreme Court for relief in the present matter. Then, the present Chief Justice of India might forfeit his right to constitute a Bench to hear his petition.

Another Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices B.Sudershan Reddy and S.S. Nijjar on 27 January 2011 wanted the Government to submit the action taken against the people maintaining secret accounts in foreign countries. They added that they were not on the niceties of various treaties. The court gave one week time to give a reply. The Bench had earlier considered black money as the simple theft of the national money. They had described it as a mind -boggling crime.

In this connection, it must be submitted that the nation lost about $500 billion to $1 trillion due to the BALCO judgment. What would they do with the money?

Similarly, the Supreme Court is giving about $ 17 billion to a boy from one gas field alone. Where would he put his money?

After giving money to some people like this, the Supreme Court is asking the Government to submit an action taken report. Therefore, the Supreme Court must attach the assets unconstitutionally handed over to the manipulators. It must exercise its power in the supreme national interest.

The leader of the AIADMK party from the Tamil Nadu State on 27 January questioned the patriotic credential of the national leaders. The statement is consistent with this work.

The police on 28 January 2011 seized Re. 6.5 crore and other foreign currencies from a Tibetan monastery close to Dharmasala in Himachal Pradesh. This confirms the inference of the present writer in the last mail submitted to her Excellency the President of India. Now, the Government could ask the people from Tibet to go back to their country.

The ruler of India did not attend the Republic Day parade on 26 January 2011. She did not turn up to the “At Home” function hosted by the President of India also. This gave the impression that she had taken a decision not to remain in the company of the people responsible for the death of her husband. But she was seen in their company yesterday.

The hand of the underground moles could be discerned even in the recent annihilation of the Tamils. They did this to satisfy the present ruler. At the same time, the ruler would not have taken keen interest in their destruction.

Similarly, risking the security of India, she would not have promoted the Indo- China trade relationship. But for the recent revelations, the people would have doubted her integrity in this matter also.

Even now the ruler has power. But she does not want to rule. She simply lacks the voice of the lion for commanding. Therefore some moles – sitting in a sweet smelling cave – continue to determine the priorities of the land by ‘killing’ news and views.

The above condition is not a new phenomenon. As early as on 12 December 1917 a leader said, “Do not put forward arguments which are untruthful- that you are the trustees of the masses”

The Indo-China trade exceeded $60 billion target last year. The trade imbalance in last year alone was $20 billion in favour of China. Indian exports consists of raw materials like iron ore. China exports mainly machinery including telecom and power equipment.

In this connection, it must be noted that the manipulators usurped the PSUs by fixing the 10 December 2001 judgment.

Further, some manipulators wanted to run petrol outlets. In order to accomplish this, they approached the Supreme Court saying that the petrol outlets were going in the hands of the kith and kin of the Members of Parliament (MPs). The Supreme Court accordingly cancelled the petrol outlets sanctioned by the MPs.

The manipulators did not wait for the Government to devise a rule to sanction petrol outlets. Instead they started petrol outlets all over India without getting permission from the Government or the court. In deference to this work, they remained closed for some time. Then they re-started them silently.

When they wanted to remove the money from the banks, they secretly approached the former Chief Justice of India for a suitable judgment.

The above pattern could be observed in the Indo- China relationship.

The manipulators approached China for various imports. Alternatively, after studying the Indian system, China approached the manipulators. Whatever happened, the manipulators agreed to convert India into a vassal of China against handsome favours.

Accordingly, they directed the Government to conduct joint military exercises.

China – without the necessary agreements – sent their trade representatives all over India and started exporting plastic toys, utensils, electric and electronic items. In fact, Chinese articles ranging from Re.1/- to Re.10,000/- could be seen in practically all shops.

The manipulators then imported machinery including telecom equipment. The public sector BSNL also was asked to depend heavily on China. Several industries in India perished.

China might have given not less than $30 billion as bribe to reduce India to vassalage. The money would come to India as imported items. A part might go to secret accounts. This is a treasonable offence taking place with the knowledge of the Supreme Court. This is comparable to the breach of trust committed by the former Prime Minister of India.

The ruler of India might be ignorant of the above. However, the Supreme Court is betraying India in this matter. It is deliberately considering big things as small things.

The above conclusion is not due to some sudden revulsion. The present writer pointed out this conspiracy to the President of India, the Chief Justice of India and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) through Chapter 132.

A Union Minister on 29 January 2011 said the spectrum would be awarded in future based on a market pricing mechanism. This shows that the moles rule the nation. The spectrum is a natural asset and it must remain with the Government.

The facts from 23 January 2010 to 29 January 2011 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 30 January 2011.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 169

169

THE GREATEST EVIL

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 11 January 2011. The mail was immediately posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and it was linked to: www.thattan.com

The Union Ministers present in Delhi met again and again for three days from 12 January 2011. But the moles attributed the reason to onion prices.

17,368 farmers committed suicide in 2009 mainly because they did not get remunerative prices. Another reason was damage to their crops. The Union Ministers need not have met again and again to deny remunerative prices to the farmers.

Obviously, the moles dragged the onion price to ‘kill’ the news about this work.

In the past, they forced a former Prime Minister of India to fight with the Tamil boys in Sri Lanka for more than four years. The present ruler might have requested her husband - at least hundred times - to retract from this. But the underground moles persisted with this to divert the mind of the people. This shows that the moles are solely responsible for his death. Now they “kill” democracy ruthlessly.

The Chiefs of the Armed Forces appeared before the Parliamentary Accounts Committee (PAC) on 12 January 2011. The PAC wanted to know why the soldiers were getting sub-standard rations.

The Chiefs of the Armed Forces might have taken necessary action, if the PAC or any other authority had brought the above matter to their notice.

The recommendations of the Parliamentary Committees have no practical meaning. They might acquire some meaning only when they enjoy the approval of the moles.

Thus, when the Government denied salary to the soldiers as in the letter dated 3-1-2002 – Point No.9 in Chapter 5- the then PAC did not notice.

Further, the Sixth Pay Commission denied a reasonable pay scale to the employees. The present writer in Chapter 89 pointed out this. The PAC did not do anything.

A Parliamentary Committee on 29 April 2008 found fault with the present system of selection of judges as given in Chapter 92. None noticed it.

Now, the PAC requested the Chiefs of the Armed Forces to appear before them only because they lighted fire as mentioned in Chapter 135.

The PAC and the other authorities calling for explanation from the Chiefs of the Armed Forces must send the letters through a competent authority.

Similarly, the Chiefs of the Armed Forces must have the freedom to forward the letters they receive from the public to the Government and to the Chief Justice of India through the competent authority. In order to avoid delay, they must have the freedom to send advance copies. This would check the misuse power.

Whenever the Government denies FREEDOM with the intention of plundering public assets, the Supreme Court (SC) must intervene. The SC is not doing this. This is making the SC an evil institution. The Armed Forces would be reduced to an evil institution when it connives at the above.

Now, everything boils down to the question of identifying the greatest evil in India.

China on 12 January 2011 began to give stapled visa to two people from Arunachal Pradesh State. This is, apparently, a problem created by Dalai Lama.

A SC Bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice R.M. Lodha removed the stay on the so-called Palmolein Case. The SC stayed the case in August 2007. The allegation was that the accused caused a Re. 23.2 crore loss to the exchequer while importing palmolein.

The SC should have vacated the stay long ago. The former Chief Minister of Kerala –the first accused in the case- died a few days ago. Now, the SC wants to be brave at a safe distance.

The question of importing Palmolein was a policy decision of the Government of Kerala. Such policy decisions are associated with some commissions. The SC justifies this whenever the amount is very big. The people in villages say that anyone thieving more than $ 10 billion would be considered as a patriotic person.

Now, the SC vacated the stay because the present Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) is an accused in the above case.

In this connection, it must be stated that the post of the CVC was created only to cover up big acts of corruption by clipping the wings of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

The predecessors of the present CVC, in fact, covered up all big acts of corruption. The present CVC also will do this. The SC alone is attaching sanctity to the CVC.

A TV channel of a mole on 13 January 2011 said, “Too much analysis is paralysis”. This is the reply of the manipulators to the letter submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 11 January 2011.

Sri Lankan Navy personnel on 13 January 2011 killed an Indian fisherman by firing. For this, they used the gun and gun boats donated by India. India did not file even a First Information Report (FIR).

A SC Bench comprising Aftab Alam and R.M. Lodha on 14 January 2011 said, “We cannot allow the Republic to kill its own people”. The Bench made the observation on a petition seeking a probe into the alleged fake encounter killings of two militant people. The Bench wanted the Government to give a convincing answer.

In this connection, it must be noted that if the Government had not given public assets to private parties India would have got about $500 billion to $ 1 trillion during the last 10 years. Then – just like China -India could have utilized the entire man power of India for the development of the infrastructure. The militancy also would have disappeared long ago.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on 14 January 2011 barred five members of Reliance Natural Resources Limited (RNRL) from investing in the stock market for violating various norms including fraudulent and unfair trade practices. A specific charge was that the amount raised by external commercial borrowings was invested in the stock market. The investigation was ‘settled’ for Re. 50 crore without admission or denial of guilt.

Apparently, the above industrialists have committed treasonable offences. But the Directorate of Enforcement has no case against them. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also has no case against them.

Evidently, the above five industrialists are the petitioners. They are the defendants and the judges. They are the rulers. The people must repose their faith in their impartiality.

At a time when the State Bank of India (SBI) and the other Public Sector Banks committed huge amount of money to some people to buy assets in India and abroad, the former Chief of the Satyam Company did not get any money to save his company. Therefore, he described himself as a fraud. It was sufficient for the Government to attach –practically - all his assets.

Now, the SEBI describes the above industrialists as frauds. Yet, the Government allows them to import generators from China. This shows that the Government is in the hand of the moles.

The former Union Minister for Disinvestments in the NDA Government on 15 January 2011 described the present Union Minister for Finance as the crisis manager and key to the Government.

The above former Minister proclaimed to all Indians that he contacted a bank as mentioned in Chapter 51.But the law enforcing agencies ignore this. Therefore, he is talking like this from the roof top.

THE HINDU on 17 January 2011 published a photograph of the 1400 houses built for the tsunami victims. The people are curious to see the photograph of the houses built for the victims of the earth quake. This is to find out whether the Government distinguished between tsunami victims and earth quake victims.

A SC Bench comprising Justice B. Sudershan Reddy and Justice S.S. Nijjar wanted the Union Government to reveal the names of the depositors in the Liechtenstein Bank in Germany. The Government would not oblige without an order.

The leader of the principal opposition party - the BJP -said that the SC would earn the lasting gratitude of the people if it could bring back $ 462 billion stashed in foreign countries.

The preliminary investigations by the Vigilance and Anti-corruption Bureau, Government of Kerala State, found disproportionate assets in the name of the son-in-law of the former Chief Justice of India. Now the agency would probe whether he had accepted any bribe with the intension of influencing the former Chief Justice of India.

In this connection, it must be noted that one letter from a citizen was sufficient for the Chief Minister of Kerala State to launch an investigation into the assets of the son-in-law of the former Chief Justice of India. But the Union Government has ignored the allegations present in 168 letters addressed to Her Excellency the President of India.

The recent revelation confirms the fact that the foster son-in-law of the former Prime Minister of India influenced the decisions of the NDA Government.

It follows that the good of India was not the good of the former Prime Minister of India. Thus, the BALCO was given for a token amount in the pretext of a policy.

The guidelines devised for privatization did not allow the Government to sell public assets to charge-sheeted companies. Yet he handed over the public sector IPCL to a charge-sheeted company- again in the name of a policy.

In fact, exchequer suffered a loss of about $ 500 billion due to his patently corrupt acts. The SC collaborated with him. Most of the assets went in the hands of the people close to him - sugar coating everything as a policy.

A son of a former Naval Chief had been arrested for the corruption mentioned in Chapter -91. Some name sake actions were taken against a son of a former Prime Minister of India in the so-called urea case. Similarly, some actions were taken against a relative of another former Prime Minister of India in the Bofors case. Now the assets of a son-in- law of the former Chief Justice of India are also under scrutiny.

But the law enforcing agencies refuse to take action against a former Prime Minister of India alone. The system is distinguishing between citizen and citizen. In this matter the SC – like the scorpion- turns its poisonous sting against itself. The SC owes an answer to this.

An army court on 21 January 2011 found Lt. General P.K.Rath guilty of corruption in giving 70 acre army land in Calcutta.

Now, there are reports that a special court would be created to prosecute the Union Ministers and the learned judges of the SC.

The SC did not allow the High Courts to hear the BALCO case. In fact, the BALCO judgment delivered on 10 December 2001 was a ‘fixed’ one. The former Chief Justice of India - in all his innocence – reinforced it by ‘fixing’ a two judge judgment mentioned in Chapter 91.

The proposed bill would protect the Union Ministers and the learned judges of the Supreme Court from the courts all over India.

This happens because the SC refuses to enforce freedom of expression.

Sri Lankan Navy personnel on 22 January 2011 killed one more Indian fisherman. This time they tied a rope around the neck of the victim and dragged him to death. The USA had dropped a bomb in Libya for a far smaller crime.

Nietzsche says that great things are possible only when great evil is harnessed.

The facts from 11 January 2011 to 22 January 2011 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 23 January 2011.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 168

168

AN ANALYTICAL STUDY

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 3 January 2011. It was put on the blog:www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on the same day. The blog was linked to www.thattan.com on the same day.

Acting on a complaint from one Mr. Shameer, the Chief Minister of Kerala on 3 January 2011 issued orders to the Vigilance and Anti –corruption Bureau to probe the disproportionate assets of the son-in-law of the former Chief Justice of India (CJI).

The fact that the underground moles “fixed” the 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court - mentioned in Chapter 139 - came to the people as a bolt from the blue.

An analytical study of the present system showed that the former CJI got a natural chance to uplift the 1000 million people through the “gas dispute case”. Noticing the importance of the case, the present writer - in Chapter 126 - requested him not to convert 1000 million people into untouchables.

However, there was an inordinate delay in pronouncing the above judgment. This gave the impression that he was involved in bargaining.

Finally, in the above judgment, the court observed that the natural assets must - “ideally” and “constitutionally” - remain with the Government. It appeared as a victory for this work. But the Supreme Court did not act “ideally” to give a meaning to the judgment.

Within a month the former CJI assumed charge as the Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission. This gave the impression that he converted 1000 million people into untouchables through the above judgment. Quoting the words of the sages, the present writer in Chapter 145 said that only developed minds could see what is taking place in front of them.

It is pertinent to recall that as soon as the UPA Government assumed power, it directed the public sector LIC to invest about $2 billion in shares. Moreover, it gave about $10 billion to two boys in the pretext of buying their shares. This was –in Chapter 48 - compared to the act of abducting children. Then the Government sold definite quantities of the shares of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). This was compared to bullets in Chapter 41.

Then, the present President of India, apparently, asked the Government not to buy the shares of private companies or to sell the shares of the PSUs arbitrarily. This prompted the present writer to describe the President as a Madonna in Chapter 89.

Therefore, the Prime Minister, the other Union Ministers and the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) could not take responsibility for giving public money to the manipulators. It became an impossible task for the government to act arbitrarily.

The option before the manipulators was to approach the Supreme Court for its seal. The Government gave green signal to this. They, then, approached the former CJI and some other judges through suitable persons.

The former CJI accordingly constituted a secret three judge Bench and gave clearance to some private companies to extract public money through initial public offers (IPOs).

Perhaps in disgust, a two judge Bench of the SC on 21 December 2007 ruled –Chapter 89 - that the judges were not bound by any judgments.

Whatever happened, the President was silenced.

Thus a private company on 15 January 2008 removed about $3 billion –Chapter 89. Another company escaped with another $3 billion on 5 February 2008 as in Chapter 90. Some other companies also removed various amounts. The Government, further, started selling the shares of the PSUs with renewed vigor.

The former CJI did not own the shares of any private companies. Therefore, he was an unattached judge. Besides, he represented the neglected sections of the people. Therefore, there was a feeling that the other learned judges were imposing their might upon him.

Now, the revelations show that he either asked his son-in- law to collect money for judgments or wrote judgments as per his wishes.

If the former CJI had wanted, he could have amassed not less than $5 billion either notionally or in a Swiss account for the judgments of the Benches constituted by him. Instead, he constituted the Benches for about $5 million. In this way, he tarnished the image of his son-in-law for a small amount.

His unconstitutional judgments emboldened some other learned judges to write equally unconstitutional judgments. Thus, a series of unconstitutional judgments transformed the Supreme Court into an evil institution. He now –just like a murderer - maintains silence.

Therefore, all judgments delivered by the Benches constituted by the former CJI must be reviewed forthwith just to put right the public wrongs. Then the 7 May 2010 judgment would get the badly needed teeth.

Now, the Government of Kerala might think of conducting an impartial probe into the disproportionate assets of the son-in-law of the former CJI. However, the moles would exert great pressure to conduct the probe secretly. The Union Government would even transfer the case to the CBI as in the Wadia murder case. Therefore, it might hesitate to attach his unaccounted wealth.

However, it is disturbing to note that the law is proceeding against the son-in-law of the former CJI and one or two other soft people only.

The recent revelations confirm the direct involvement of the foster son-in-law of the former Prime Minister of India. This is because, the BALCO –a PSU worth more than $10billion - was sold for just $0.1 billion! Therefore, there must be an impartial probe into his assets also.

Similarly, a former Union Minister had a net asset of Re.2.5 crore. He purchased a public sector Mill mentioned in Chapter 54 for Re. 441 crore. The true value of the property was more than Re. 4410 crore! Yet the law fails to proceed against him.

Therefore, the probe must be extended to all Union Ministers since 2001.

An Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 3 January ruled that two men received kickbacks in the Bofor’s Gun deal. The tribunal noted that the payment of commission was against the express terms of contract.

In a one centre page article The New Indian Express on 3 January 2011 said that a woman political leader of India was controlling a secret account in Switzerland with $ 2.2 billion in the name of her minor son. The 19 November 1991 issue of Schweizer Illustrierte was the basis of his allegation. The article ended by saying that the Government buried Swiss accounts of one Mr. Ali from Pune involving 1.5 lakh crore.

The above paper had published similar articles on two or three occasions. The people, as a rule, digest such pieces of information because they do not see any other better leaders. The paper knew this. This is the political activity going on in India.

Acting on a Supreme Court direction, the CBI on 4 January 2011 registered a preliminary enquiry to look into possible criminal aspects in the telecom policy since 2001.

The media did not mention the names of the judges that heard the case. The arguments were also not published. The report shows that the court did not direct the CBI to attach the assets of any beneficiaries.

The Government of Kerala directed the Special Pleader (SP) – the brother of the former CJI - in the Kerala High Court to either demit office or resign. Accordingly, the SP resigned.

What offence did he commit? Is it because of the accident of birth in the family of a former CJI? The Government could have conducted an enquiry and published the findings before issuing the above direction.

The CBI on 6 January 2011 raided 10 premises in connection with the Commonwealth Games.

The CBI had, in vain, raided 24 places mentioned in Chapter 69 for assets worth Re. 1400 crore.

The Union Government on 6 January 2011 said that a definite amount of shares of the public sector ONGC, the SAIL and the Hindustan Copper would be sold in February 2011.

The above decision belongs to the underground moles. The ruler of India is ignorant of this.

The above PSUs had deposited their surplus funds in the Unit Trust of India (UTI). The Chapter 53 shows that surplus fund of the PSUs in 2005 was over $ 5 billion. Therefore, there is no dearth of funds.

The impending sale is out and out unconstitutional. The Supreme Court must prevent it because it is the result of the evil actions of the former CJI.

The above decision shows that the underground moles would not listen to the letters of the present writer. This is not a new phenomenon. On 2 December 1917, a prominent political leader said, “What we want is not that we should be sent there as elected members to advice Government, but we want to have our finger in the pie and very much so”. Anyone going through this work would tell that the same situation prevails now with greater intensity.

The Prime Minister of India on 6 January 2011 said that knowledge, not army, might determine the strength of the nation. The Prime Minister said this after blocking the flow of knowledge to 1000 million people.

A Union Minister now said that India would become a bigger economy than China in 2030. The message is that all public assets must be given to ten boys to achieve this.

The Srikrishna Committee that studied the question of the bifurcation of the Andra Pradesh (AP) State recommended a united AP.

The political leaders utilized this opportunity to give interviews to the TV channels of the moles. The public sector TV channel, as usual, asked some old people to sing songs endlessly.

A public discussion over the method of utilization of the gas and the oil reserves of the AP would have put an end to the strife in the AP. The moles thus divert the attention of the people from the real issues of the people.

The present ruler of India might have requested her husband not to turn against the Tamil boys in Sri Lanka. He did not obey her because he was under the command of the underground moles. This helped them to remove public assets by focusing the attention of the people on Sri Lanka. Now, they are playing the same trick to the AP.

The CBI court on 7 January 2011 said that there were sufficient materials before it to detain the former Union Minister for Communication.

A Supreme Court- appointed committee on 7 May 2011 recommended the cancellation of three mining leases granted to the companies of two ministers in the Karnataka State.

In this connection, it must be noted that the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) had been auditing the revenue generated by the oil and the telecom companies. The results are not revealed due to strange reasons.

A Union Minister – in an interview to a TV channel of a famous mole on 7 January 2011 said that the loss to the exchequer due to the 2G spectrum allocation was “nil”.

Recently, the Supreme Court confirmed a one year imprisonment of a public servant for a bribe of Re.50/-.

Another court awarded 7 year imprisonment for Re.20/- because he took the money after abducting a person.

Obviously, the Union Minister talks like this presumably because of the fear that the Union Ministers would have to go to jail. It must be noted that the CBI has not attached the thieved money from anyone.

The Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) on 10 January 2010 said that he was worried over the money power on elections. This is the reply of the CEC to the last mail submitted to Her Excellency the President of India.

The manipulators get about $10 billion to $20 billion every month from the public assets. They spend about $1 billion to $2 billion every month to kill this work. They would even publish a few bundles of the so-called Radia tape and not this work.

The CEC must see that the people are allowed to choose a man of their own choice to lead the nation.

As this work is a political work, it is his duty to take it to the mind of the people. This is to make the next Government a constitutional one.

Alternatively, he could direct the Government to take over the public assets so that the manipulators would not get money to control the mind of the people.

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of the Parliament directed the chiefs of the Armed Forces to appear before it in connection with the canteen purchases.

It is not customary on the part of the PAC to act like this. Is it because the armed forces lighted fire as in Chapter 135?

Further, the chiefs of the armed forces work under the order and direction of the President of India. It is not clear whether the PAC sent the letter through the President of India or not.

It is said that an analytical study of the material world is better than any other kind of service.

The facts from 3 January 2011 to 10 January 2011 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 11 January 2011.

V.SABARIMUTHU