198. Army Chief V.K. Singh-An illegitimate Government

198

             AN ILLEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT

       The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 5 April 2012. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Election Commission of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

      High Court, Karnataka state, on 7 April 2012, quashed the FIR filed against former Chief Minister Yeddyyurappa on the ground that he had been condemned unheard.

       Army Chief General V.K. Singh, on 6 April 2012, said that the soldiers had taken a pledge to uphold the Constitution of India. He added that none would be more committed to the country, to the Constitution and to the democracy and that the Army was the upholder of the country’s values.

          The total contribution of all leaders - in the last 11 years - to Indian politics will not be equivalent to this work. Therefore, the people have a right to see this work.

       Had the people been given the right to see this work, the present leaders would not have got majority support. Therefore, the Government does not rule India with the consent of the people. It follows that the present Union Government is not a democratically elected one. It is an illegitimate Government.

          No harm would have come to General V.K.Singh, if he had mentioned the above truth.

      When Gen. V.K. Singh exposed the Re.14 crore corruption issue, even the illiterate people condemned Defence Minister A.K. Antony. Many thought that that Gen. V.K. Singh would put right the public wrongs of the Supreme Court of India and the Government.

          Now, a few consequences of the above statement are: 1. The Government would convert public assets into private assets with greater freedom. As a result, even the money in the Pension Fund would tend to go into the hands of the manipulators. 2. The newly recruited soldiers would not get pension and 3. The people would not get freedom.

         

       Allahabad High Court, on 10 April 2012, banned discussion on the army movements that took place in January 2012. The order is consistent with the decision of the manipulators to strange the words of General V.K. Singh. Press Council of India Chairman Markandey Katju, pretended that he would soon challenge the above order in the Supreme Court.

        Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) said that Reliance Communications, R Com, of Anil Ambani obtained over $600 million from the Chinese banks to buy telecom gear alone from the Chinese companies. This is consistent with the statement that China gave money to convert India into its vassal state.

      Based on the advice of the Union Cabinet, the President of India, on 12 April 2012, sought an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court on 14 questions on the 2G spectrum judgment.

     The newspapers reported that the industrial growth dropped from 6.7 per cent in February 2011 to 4.1 per cent in February 2012. This is due the onslaught of China on the Indian industry. The Re. 3 lakh crore given to the private parties also contributed to this.

       The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defense, on 9 April 2012, summoned Army Chief V.K. Singh to clarify the actual state of their readiness in case of a war. However, on 13 April 2012, it cancelled the summons. The latter action must be interpreted in the light of the last letter.

         As the Members of Parliament (MPs) refuse to work for the freedom of the people, they act contrary to the trust reposed in them by the people. As such they have forfeited their right to summon the Army Chief.

     The Election Commission of India (ECI), on 13 April 2012, requested the Union Government to convert its proposals for electoral reform into laws. It must be noted that there was no proposal to give freedom to Indians

       ECI has the power to give freedom of speech to Indians. The letter Nos. 188 and 197 dated 8 -11-2011 and 5- 4- 2012 respectively must have penetrated its mind deeper than what this writer intended. But, it is standing in the way of freedom.  

          The ECI must note that in order to report something about a festival in a place to the people of that small locality, every newspaper demands one full page advertisement. This shows, even Re. 100 crore in the hands of a candidate would not be equivalent to the brainwashing power of the newspapers. But, it prevents the flow of money during elections. It, thus, deceives the people in the pretext of preventing money power.  

         

      On 14 April 2012, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh disclosed that the Indian economy was facing difficulties. He added that he would solve the problem with the co-operation of the people.

          By a master-stroke of treachery, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh gave Re. 3 lakh crore to three private parties. He disregarded the well-meant counsel given to him by a citizen in this matter. Now he seeks the co-operation of the people! What happened to the money? Can’t he recover the money? At least the armed forces must give an answer to these questions.

          In the Delhi civic polls, the BJP defeated the Congress Party. The results were announced on 17 April 2012. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh described this as the result of a democratic process and accepted the verdict. The world also considers this as a triumph of democracy in India.

         Actually, the people had discarded the BJP before electing the Congress Party. Now, they are constrained to elect the discarded party. Thus the BJP captured power not because of democracy but because of the privation of free speech. All other political parties are similarly related. The Election Commission and the Supreme Court of India deceive everyone in this matter.

     According to some reports, an aspirant for the Indian Institute of Technology – Joint Entrance Examination (IIT-JEE) would get 40 per cent weight-age    based on his percentile ranking in the respective Boards of Examination from the next academic year onwards.

          This is consistent with this work. It is justice. A pressure group had been working to thwart it.

        Whatever happened, the Government could consider the question of fixing a quota of seats for every state after studying the effect of the above.

     

     On 21 April 2012, the militant people in the Chhattisgarh state abducted the Collector of Sukma district, Mr. Alex Paul Mohan, after killing his two body guards. At the same time, the militant people in the Odisha state, kidnapped a BJD MLA, Mr. Jhina Hikaka.

          Curiously, the militant people in the Chhattisgarh state, named senior Supreme Court lawyer and Team Anna member Prashant Bhushan as a negotiator.

       The militant people trust Mr. Prashat Bhushan. This is the power of the media. The media could convert anyone into a leader of the nation. This happens because the people are not aware of the factors that affect them.

       With regard to the kidnapping, it must be stated that the militant people kidnap the officials, foreigners and other important leaders mainly to secure the release of their leaders. In contrast, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh kidnaps 1000 million people by concealing this work from them.

       In the inaugural function of the Padmanabhapuram Court Complex at Thuckalay in Tamil Nadu, Judge P. Jothimani of Madras High Court, on 21 April 2012, said that the judges had been receiving many letters from the public. He added that they had been rejecting them as “love letters”. His words are merely characteristic of the actions of the judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts.

          In this connection, it must be noted that the present writer had sent hundreds of letters to the Madras High Court.

         Assume that Prime Minister Vajpayee did not convert public assets into private assets using public money. Again, assume that the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh did not give Re. 3 lakh crore to private parties.

      But, this work exists. It is a truth. The learned judges knew this. The people also must know this. For this, the judges must be “lovers of truth”.

       You Tube showed the proximity of Mr. Abhishek Singhvi, a leader of the Congress Party, to a lady lawyer. According to some reports, he promised her a judicial appointment. Though he denied it, he resigned as the party spoke-person on 23 April 2012. It is not clear whether he was beaten below the belt or not.

 

          The President of India had forwarded the letter  dated 11-12-2011 to the Government of India. The Ministry of Law and Justice, in turn, referred the letter to the Supreme Court of India on 16 March 2012. Thus, the Government calls upon the Supreme Court to establish justice again and again. But, the Supreme Court uses its freedom to reject all letters from the President of India – in the words of Justice P. Jothimani- as “love letters.”

      In contrast, the Indian Air Force used its freedom to send a reply to this writer for the letter dated 28-10-2011 referred by the President. The Indian Air Force is the only institution that responded to the letter of the President of India.

          Incidentally, it shows that the President is referring the letters even to the armed forces. Perhaps, they alone would give an answer  to the unanswered questions.

                 The facts from 5 April 2012 to 25 April 2012 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 26 April 2012.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner for necessary action.

26 April 2012.

 V.Sabarimuthu.26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode,  Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167INDIA

197.The President - Paid News - The Army Chief.

197

ONE VIRTUE

        The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 19 March 2012. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Election Commission of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

             India, on 22 March 2012, voted in favour of a United Nations Human Rights Resolution against Sri Lanka. 47 member states debated the draft. 15 countries – China, Russia and Pakistan included – voted against it. 8 abstained. 24, India included, voted in support.

          Before voting, India had successfully persuaded the USA to dilute the intrusive nature of the draft.

        As India had given military assistance to Sri Lanka during the killings, it was constrained to approach the USA to dilute the draft.

        The Trinamool Congress (TMC) headed by Miss. Mamata Banerjee, on 19 March 2012, substituted its Railway Minister Trivedi by its Mr. Mukul Roy. The reason was that he affected an increase in the second class railway fare.

          Mamata Banerjee knew that the Union Ministers have a collective responsibility over the Railway Budget. Hence, she should not have selected him alone for punishment.

         The people of West Bengal state had been choosing the Communist Party of India, (CPI-M), for a long time. When they found it bad, they chose the TMC. If they find the TMC bad, they will have to again choose the bad CPI (M).

        Evidently, the people cannot escape. They are being forced to elect a leader rejected by them as someone unfit to rule again. One would say that there are new leaders. But they are the representatives of the manipulators alone. This is the limitation of the Indian democracy. The tragedy is that the people do not know this.

          The Indian political leaders should not have inflicted this condition without ensuring freedom of expression.

         Here, in order to come to power, Miss. Mamata Banerjee allowed Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to give Re. 3 lakh crore to three or four private parties. She should have gone to jail long ago for this. But she always pretends as a pro poor leader in her characteristic style.

          The CPI (M) does not talk anything about the Re. 3 lakh crore, mainly because it wants to convert public assets into private assets.

                              

         The Army Chief, General V.K. Singh, in an interview to The Hindu, on 25 March 2012, alleged that a lobbyist   offered him a bribe of Re. 14 crore, in September 2010, in order to give his clearance to buy 600 sub-standard vehicles of a particular make. He said that the Army had 7000 vehicles of the same kind. He disclosed that he had reported the matter to Mr. A.K. Antony, Defense Minister.

          Mr. A.K. Antony confirmed this in the Parliament. He acknowledged that he had not taken action against retired Lt. Gen Teginder Singh- the lobbyist. He simply revealed that he had immediately asked the Army Chief to take action against him.

      Mr. Antony should not have asked the Army Chief to take action because he is not the competent authority to take action against a lobbyist – here a retired Lt. General. The actions taken by Mr. Antony fit so well with the conclusion drawn about his nature in Chapter 193.

      Finally, as the matter came to the notice of the people, he said that the matter would be handed over to the CBI.

          Accordingly, the CBI was asked to investigate the matter.

      The CBI is an agency that concealed 196 letters from the eye of the people. It did not find out the origin of money in the so-called vote for money scandal. It allowed even the Medical Council of India (MCI) case to disappear from the mind of the people. Therefore, the people do not trust it. 

                 However, the CBI should have immediately identified the beneficiaries of all defense deals and confiscated their assets. Instead, it asked Gen. V. K. Singh to give a written complaint.

              It should not have done this. It could have elicited necessary pieces of information through the competent authority only. “The Pioneer”, in fact, used this incident to ridicule him.

         It is now clear that the Union Government decided to send him out one year before his normal retirement date because:

1.    He lighted fire as in Chapter 135.

2.    He was an impediment for manipulations.

3.    The fear that he might give freedom to 1000 million people.

4.    The belief that his successors would deny freedom to Indians under one pretext or other.

          Now, a newspaper leaked one of his letters addressed to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on 12 March 2012. In that letter, he had pointed out the weaknesses of the armed forces. How the newspaper got the letter is not known to anyone.

       If the Government had used a fraction of the Re.3 lakh crore in the PF account for defense research, this situation could have been averted.

       Instead of looking at this matter through this angle, most of the political leaders demanded the Government to dismiss him. A few others wanted to grant him leave till his retirement. The manipulators directed the Government to ignore him and curb his official duties.

     Her Excellency the President of India had forwarded the Letter No.191 to the Election Commission of India (ECI). The present writer received a copy on 27 March 2012. The President had described the letter as a self explanatory one and asked the ECI to take appropriate action. The letter, among other things, discussed the problem of “paid news”. She might have earlier referred the more important Letter No.188 to the ECI.

          When the Supreme Court acts in bad faith, the Constitution has no real meaning. The people alone could give a meaning to it. Therefore, ECI should have treated the people as its master, and given a reply to the letters. But it chose to ignore them. Continuous references by the President of India also go in vain.

        The ECI must know that the money given for advertisements to the newspapers and the TV channels is the money given to control public mind. This is one of the reasons why the media ruthlessly suppresses this work. Therefore, there is no meaning in conducting the elections in India before publishing this work.

          The Chief of the Essar group, on 1 April 2012, appeared before the 2G Special Court and obtained exemption from personal appearance.

       The Hindu, on 31 March 2012, said something - in the front page headline news - with the meaning that the Government agreed to respect freedom of speech and individual opinion provided there were no un-informed comments.

          This, apparently, refers to this work and similar work, if any, of others.

        It must be reiterated that freedom of speech is not the right of an individual to speak to the Government, but the right of the people to hear the views of others. If the Government had allowed this, the present writer would have become the Prime Minister of India long ago. This is the reason why the Government has no right to rule India. A truce between the Army Chief, and the Government, if any, will not make it a constitutional one.

 

          The Government of Myanmar, on 1 April 2012, announced that Aung San Suu Kyi of the National League of Democracy (NLD) party had won a parliamentary seat for the first time.

          It must be noted that even the military rulers allowed the people of Myanmar to see Suu Kyi. But, despite this political work, the so-called democratically elected Government in India refuses to show this writer to the people.

      Former National Security Adviser Brajesh Mishra said that Army Chief Gen. V.K. Singh must be sent on compulsory leave because something might happen if he were dismissed. He added that he had lost his mental balance. The New Indian Express reported this on 2 April 2012.

         Brajesh Mishra had advised former Prime Minister Vajpayee to sell the Public Sector Undertakings, (PSUs), against public money. Therefore, he should have been sent to jail long ago. As this did not happen, he talks like this.

          In this connection, it must be noted that his voice is the voice of the manipulators.

      The beneficiaries of any system would retaliate when they perceive anyone as a constraint to their comforts. Then, they would talk like Brajesh Mishra or fabricate stories against him. After that, they will persecute him through the aid of the courts and the law enforcing agencies as in the case of former Telecom Minister A.Raja.

          The manipulators obtained an article from former External Affairs Minister K.Natwar Singh and published it in The Hindu on 3 April 2012. Through that article, the manipulators asked Army Chief V.K. Singh not to cross the line. In fact, it was a virtual charge-sheet against him.

          It must be stated that politics is all about profit. A public servant has the freedom to expose acts of corruption, and if this brings him name, it is his duty to lead the nation. However, he must have the belief that he alone could save the nation.

      The Supreme Court of India, on 4 April 2012, rejected the review petition of former Minister Raja and some others.

         The Supreme Court, in the past, forged the Constitution of India and allowed Prime Minister Vajpayee to sell the public assets against public money. Now, it forges the Constitution to auction public assets against public money.

         The India Express, on 4 April 2012, disclosed that two army units moved towards Delhi on the night of January 16-17, 2012 forcing the Defence Secretary to cut short his foreign tour by 12 hours. The reports conveyed the impression that the Army carried out a trial run to capture Delhi. Some analysts described this as a mini coup.

         The Government would come forward to correct the date of birth if it thinks that the Army Chief has the backing of the armed forces. Yet, to suggest that a coup took place for it is a preposterous one. At best it was a hallucination of The Indian Express.

       However, the Government rules India without allowing freedom of speech. Therefore, the Government does not deserve the respect of anyone.      The Indian Army cannot be oblivious of this. Nietzsche says that one virtue is more virtue than two, because it is more of a noose on which his catastrophe may hang.

       Her Excellency the President of India may have many virtues. She must also think that one virtue is more virtue than many and declare freedom to Indians, at least, now.

       

         The facts from 19 March 2012 to 4 April 2012 are being submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 5 April 2012.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner for necessary action.

5 April 2012.

 V.Sabarimuthu.26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode,  Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167INDIA