555. Mr. Mukesh Ambani and the SEBI

555

Mr. Mukesh Ambani and the SEBI

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), on 25 March 2017, directed the Mr. Mukesh Ambani led Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) to return the illegally obtained money of nearly Re.447 crore with interest. The SEBI described it as fraudulent trading. It is also called insider trading. It banned the RIL from accessing the stock market for one year. The money must be paid within 45 days. The alleged offence took place in 2007.

The RIL would not return the money lest its entire assets would be classified as ill-gotten wealth. If it, due to some reasons, returns the money, the Supreme Court of India would not allow the people to know the things went behind it.

There are reports that the RIL decided to challenge the order in the Appellate Tribunal.

The case would reach the Supreme Court of India after many years. The Supreme Court would bury it like the Niira Radia case because the RIL is different from others.

There are many reasons for this conclusion.

The insider trading of the RIL occurred when Mr. Mr. Raramalinga Raju of Satyam Computers was accused of insider trading. The Company Law Board and the SEBI were very active in sending Mr. Ramalinga Raju  to jail for a similar crime, a less serious crime.

When Ms. Jayalalithaa bought the TANSI land in violation of a code of conduct, the Supreme Court of India asked her to surrender the land and chose to condone her guilt. The SEBI has not asked the RIL to surrender any assets.

In the disproportionate assets case against Miss. Jayalalithaa, the court imposed a fine Re.100 crore but the jail term was 4 years. The case before the SEBI is a far more serious one. Yet, the fine is Re. 445 crore but there is no jail term.

In the case of Mr. Jagamohan Reddy, his assets were being attached before any judgement. Further, he had been in jail before any judgement. Nothing of this kind happened in the case of Mr. Mukesh Ambani.

In deference to the first letter sent on I June 2001, the NDA government, under Mr. A.B.Vajpayee, devised some guidelines for selling the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). According to a guideline, the PSUs should not be sold to charge-sheeted private companies. The RIL had been charge-sheeted under the Official Secret Act. Yet, the Indian Petro-chemical Corporation Limited (IPCL) was sold to the RIL.  The Supreme Court of India did not show this complaint to the people. Therefore, IPCL still remains in the hand of the RIL.

The Members of Parliament (MPs) distributed the petrol outlets based on certain parameters. Preference was given to handicapped people, widows and ex-service men. Final selection was done by a retired judge of a High Court.

Yet, one day, the Supreme Court of India cancelled the petrol outlets distributed by the Members of Parliament alleging corruption.

On the next day, the court secretly allowed the RIL to start petrol outlets all over India without following any rules, parameters or anything. Many letters were sent to the Supreme Court of India in this matter. The court did not show the letters to the people.

The spectrum case and the coal case verdicts were strikingly similar to the petrol pump outlet case. A large number of licences were cancelled and channelized to less than ten people.

In the natural gas case, Mr. Anil Ambani submitted before the Supreme Court of India that his brother, Mr. Mukesh Ambani, got Re. $ 16 billion per year from a gas field.

It was a startling revelation. The Supreme Court of India merely expressed its view that all natural assets must be taken over by the government. It did not attach any teeth to its observation.

Moreover, the Supreme Court of India has not so far asked any authority to ascertain the veracity his submission.

Does this treasure belong to the RIL? As in the case the Hindustan Zinc Limited, the money must go for the physical and the mental well being of the people of Andra Pradesh.

The Supreme Court of India does not tell these matters to the people. If someone tells, it does not allow the people to listen to him.

The first letter dated June 1, 2001 demanded the Government to ban the financial institutions from buying shares or advancing money to buy shares..

The act of giving public money to about ten men alone in India is out and out unconstitutional. Realizing this, Prime Minister Mr. A.B. Vajpayee obeyed this man and decided to use public money for public investments. He openly asked the private industry to ride on large scale public investments.

The records show that the court forced him to retract. The court did not allow him to go ahead with his decision.

Thus the representatives of the people – in spite of all their private interests – occasionally acted in good faith. But the court did not allow the government to function in good faith. In fact, the court interfered in all economic policies and negated the gains.

Why does the court function like?

 The reason is simple. The learned judges are the slaves of the ten men.

How can the learned judges of the Supreme Court be salves? After all there are no men apart from them.

Again it is simple. They see something only when it is shown to them by the TV channels and the newspapers. They listen only when they hear the sound of the TV channels.

Therefore, they simply function like the slaves.

For the same reason the ten men forfeit all their assets. Anyone buying their assets also would forfeit them.

This letter No.555

   The facts that happened from 26 March 2017 to 30 March 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 26-3-2017.

31- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

554.Rajasthan

554

Rajasthan

          There are reports that the Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) gave an interim dividend of Re.14000 crore. The cumulative dividend or the total dividend for 2016- 2017 would be over Re. 37000 crore. The production increased from 0.1 million tonne in 2003 to 1.2 million tonne in 2016.

          The HZL had been a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) until 2003.There is a story behind the privatization of the HZL.

          Ten men urged the Government of India to sell all its Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). They intensified their demand after the period of Prime Minister Mr. P.V. Narasimha Rao.

At first, they ensured the support of the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India.

They said that the Public Sector Undertakings should not use their profit for their own expansion purposes. The profit should not go to the government either. Instead, they must invest their profit in the stock market. They described the profit making PSUs as cash rich enterprises..

Thus, the public sector Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) should not use its money for its large scale expansion but it must use its money to buy the shares of other companies. The gas fields must be given to the private companies.

According to them, the Government should not do any business. They said that the government has no business to do business.

Further, they said that the fear of stick alone would make the employees to do work. The private parties alone would use stick to make their employees to do work.

The people believed that the Supreme Court of India exerted extra-ordinary pressure over the government to part with the PSUs. As an indication, it cancelled the petrol outlets granted by the Members of Parliament (MPs) and asked the private parties to distribute the same. Thus it proved that India could be ruled under lawlessness.

Realizing the dangers, the present man told the then Prime Minister of India, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, that the PSUs would be bought only by ill-gotten money or public money. This was one of the ten points in my Letter No.1 dated June 1, 2017. Even if they have money, they must use the money to start new ventures rather than for buying the existing industries.

Mr. A. B. Vajpayee, after a series of discussions with Advisory Committee for Trade and Industry and other committees said that the government would utilize the public money in the banks and the LIC for public investments. Thus he embraced the views of the present man. It was the greatest decision ever taken by India.

However, a powerful syndicate started to work against him and forced him to convene the Economic Advisory Council. Then he was forced to retreat..

As there was no way, he came out with some guidelines to sell the PSUs. The most important point in the guidelines was that the PSUs should not be sold to the tainted companies. The tainted company was defined as one that received charge-sheet from any law enforcing agencies.

The Government devised the guidelines only to pretend that everything is being done impersonally ie as per law only

When the government sold the public sector Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) to the Sterlite Company the present man pointed out to the then Prime Minister, Mr. A.B, Vajpayee, that the Sterlite had been a charge-sheeted company.

The prime minister was taken aback by the allegation because it reinforced an earlier allegation.

The Supreme Court of India pledged to stand by the Government. It said that it would treat the allegation as a tight secret. The Left parties pledged to stand by the Supreme Court of India. They decided not to reveal anything to the people and agreed to manage the trade unions. The media openly said that no mud would be allowed to the stick on Mr. Vajpayee.

But Mr. Vajpayee was not convinced. He thought that one day or other such things would come out and, therefore, he wanted to retract. At that time, the Supreme Court of India had asked Miss. Jayalalithaa to surrender the TANSI land purchased in violation of a guideline. In the TANSI case, Jayalalithaa had bought Tamil Nadu Government land while she was a public servant.  She violated a Code of Conduct that forbade the public servants from buying public property. Naturally, the Sterlite should have surrendered the HZL.This was one of the factors that contributed to the abdication of power by the Prime Minister, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee.

The profit of the HZL during 2016 was around Re. 10000 crore.  Now it suddenly says that it would give an interim dividend of Re. 14000 crore. The cumulative dividend for 2016- 2017 would be 37517 crore. It says that even post the dividend; it will have a cash balance of Re.15000 crore. The dividend would be paid before March 30, 2017. Is it due to any special audit or supervision as demanded by the present man? Nothing is clear.

It put the total profit for the December quarter at Re. 2320 crore.

Evidently, the profit does not tally with the dividend.

          The general belief is that no company that takes the natural assets exhibits more than 10 per cent of its income to the authorities. Some say that the income shown to the authorities is as low as 1 per cent. One can envisage the income of the HZL.

          What would the HZL do with the money? It can start more and more industries or buy other companies. It can keep a part in the secret accounts. Even if it pays Re.100 crore each to 100 susceptible men including political leaders, judges, media houses and others, it cannot spend more than Re.10000 crore per year.

This money belongs to the people of Rajasthan and not to the shares holders at all. Even if a man gets 100 old coins, he must surrender it to the Government. Needless to say that all illegally acquired assets must be surrendered to the Government. This money must be used for the physical and mental well being of the people of Rajasthan.

To realize this, the Chief justice of India must be inaccessible to personal interest; and endowed with all virtues. The other judges must co-operate with him.

This letter No.554

   The facts that happened from 24 March 2017 to 25 March 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 26-3-2017.

26- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

         

           

553: State Bank of India

553

State Bank of India

          The legal process for the merger of the State Bank of India (SBI) with its associate banks would start on April 1, 2017.The media reported this on 23 March 2017.

          The merger would adversely affect the employment opportunities of the people of the respective regions of the associate banks.

          Above all, money would be extracted from different regions and siphoned off to Mumbai. There ten men would remove the entire money. This would lead to economic deprivation and painful consequences. This is an unconstitutional action.

          Further, it would undermine the unity and integrity of the nation as it would sow the seeds for resistance like Marina Uprising. The militant people might consider this as a justification for their militancy. They would say that the governments are doing harm to them.

          When the idea for the merger was mooted long ago by former Union Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram, the present man said that the manipulators wanted to remove the public money through one counter rather than through many counters. After listening to this, the NDA government under Mr. A.B. Vajpayee retracted. Mr. P. Chithambaram had been a minister in the UPA Government. When he mooted this idea, the UPA government under Dr. Manmohan Singh heard the voice of the present man and retracted. The manipulators have succeeded in their third attempt. The difference between the three governments could be discerned.

          The present government believes that its promoters would not survive unless one more element of exploitation is added.   As the government is not a free one, it submits India to serfdom. This would lead to greater oppression and exploitation of the masses

          The development shows that a few men would remove everything from the people as and when they get a chance or as and when the people sleep. Until then, they would patiently wait.

          Any government acting in good faith would have gone in the opposite direction. It would have split the State Bank of India and given them to the respective state governments.

          The public sector Life Insurance of India (LIC) also would have been split and handed over to the respective state governments.

          All other public sector undertakings also would have been split and given to the respective state governments.

          The above steps are consistent with the Constitution of India. These steps would have inhibited the ability of some private companies to exploit the masses and ensured growth.

          Is the present government not free to take any decision? The present government is free to take any decision after granting freedom to the people to know the happy and painful consequences of various decisions.

          The people are like our pet animals. Others should not be shown to them. They should not see others. We will not allow them to see others. We will give them food and water and take rest. They will be satisfied.

The Government takes such a stand to plunder the public resources.

          The Prime Minister of India has not talked anything about the merger. If he pretends that he is not aware of the merger and its consequences, one would think that he merges the banks for the livery of office rather than for producing happiness in the mind of the people

.

This letter No.553

   The facts that happened on 23 March 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 24-3-2017.

24- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

         

           

552.Chief Justice of India JS. Khehar’s atonement

552

Chief Justice of India JS. Khehar’s atonement

 Madras High Court granted bail to Mr. Sekher Reddy. The reason cited was that the CBI failed to file the charge-sheet. But he was arrested by the Directorate of Enforcement within two days, on 20 March 2017.

 The CBI had confiscated the new 2000 rupee currency notes worth more than Re. 200 crore from his house. Apparently, everything happens with the knowledge of the Prime Minister of India. This conclusion is based on the perception that no IPS officer in the CBI would accept defeat in this matter.

A minister, Mr. Jayakumar, told the Tamil Nadu Assembly, on 20 March 2017, that no more Indian fishermen would be arrested by Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka would not cause any injury to any Indian fishermen either. The minister said this based on the assurance secretly given by Sri Lanka.

No sooner the minister said this than 10 Indian fishermen were arrested by Sri Lanka.

Any concession granted by Sri Lanka is due to the fear that India would be constrained to cancel the over flight facilities extended to Sri Lanka rather than by all other protests put together.

Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must show the letters to the people to save the fishermen from Sri Lanka.

Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi called on the President of India, Mr. Pranab Mukherjee. It is not customary for media to report such meetings. If the President had asked the Prime Minister to deceive 1000 million people, it would go down as a cold-blooded atrocity committed by him against the people.

Chief Justice of India, JS.Khehar, on 19 March 2017, moaned that the Supreme Court of India failed to protect the rights of the people. He added that the court did not do justice to all people.

Further, he asked the government to telecast the movies of a Mr. Prakash Jha on legal literacy.

What is the reason for the atonement of the Chief Justice of India? The people do not understand the reason for his statement.

In this connection, it must be stated that the present man sent 551 letters to the Supreme Court of India for the freedom of Indians. The early letters were sent by post and the latter letters were sent electronically. The letters prevented many illegalities. Many changes occurred in the economic, political and legal fronts. However, the chief justices- one after another, did not give any chance to the people to see the letters.

If they had shown the letters to the people many more illegalities could have been averted.

Thus, the Public Sector Undertakings such as the VSNL, IPCL, HZL, ITDC hotels, Mumbai and Delhi Airports would not have gone into the private hands.

The Government might have taken over all natural assets.

The money in the Provident Fund and Pension Fund might not have gone to unknown destinations.

The money in the LIC and the banks might have gone for large scale public investments.

The old pension scheme might have been restored with slight modifications.

India might not have come under the domination of China and thousands of small scale industries would not have perished.

Mr. Ramalinga Raju of Satyam Computers might not have gone jail.

The members of the Scheduled caste and other sections of the people might have got adequate representation in the Supreme Court of India.

The Supreme Court of India might have made the selection of the judges an impersonal one.

The gas, spectrum and the coal judgement might have been different.

The farmers might have got remunerative prices for rubber and others.

Every state in India might have got a definite quota of seats in the IITs, IIFT, IIMs, Civil Services and others.

The former Prime Minister of India, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, would not have abdicated power and Dr.Manmohan Singh and Mr. Narendra Modi would not have become the prime ministers.

The militancy due to the militant people like the so-called Maoists and the Naxallites might have abated.

Sri Lanka might not have killed hundreds of Indian fishermen.

Above all the Supreme Court of India might have enforced freedom of expression and the people might have listened to men and matters according to degree.

Now the people hear the runs scored by the cricketers minute by minute. When the cell phone of former cricket captain Mr. M.S. Doni went missing, it was all India news. When he got back the cell phone, that matter also was all India news. But 551letters sent for the freedom of Indians is not news!

The Chief Justice of India demands the government to telecast the movies of Prakash Jha on legal education. But he does not ask the government to publish the letters that he received by virtue of his position!.

We will do anything. But we will not show your letters to our slaves –the people. We will not allow them to listen to your views. This has been the reply of the chief justices.

The present Chief Justice of India atones for taking such a stand. He thinks that the children would question him for keeping the letters away from them.

By enforcing freedom of expression, he is not doing any injustice to anyone but doing justice to all.

  Whatever happened, he should not procrastinate to enforce freedom of expression. Even if the heaven falls, he should not hesitate to grant freedom to Indians.

This letter No.552

   The facts from 19 March 2017 to 22 March 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 23-3-2017.

23- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

551 Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi’s Serfdom

551

Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi’s Serfdom

The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) is to invest 15% of its money in the stock market. A final decision would be taken on March 30, 2017 in its board meeting.

The proposal is an unconstitutional one.

However, the government can give the public money to its promoters in the pretext of buying shares and give loan to some others like Mr. Mallya to make them bankrupt.

After all, the government would not allow the people to listen to the words of the present man.

          Justice Karnan of the Calcutta High Court issued orders to investigate seven judges of the Supreme Court of India for corruption and asked the Speaker of the Parliament to conduct an enquiry under the Judge’s Enquiry Act. He added that he would sue them for Re.14 crore. This happened when about 100 police personnel arrived at his house to serve the arrest warrant issued by the seven judge bench of the Supreme Court of India. The warrant was a suo-motto decision of the court.

          Now, the seven judges of the Supreme Court of India shall not hear any cases before enforcing freedom of expression.

          The Government of Tamil Nadu presented its budget for 2017-2018 on 17 March 2017.

          The budget did not mention the income from the minerals.

However, all other states are similarly related.

          Evidently, the chief ministers – just like the Prime Minister of India – possess the shadow of authority only. They do not possess any real authority. They are simply slaves. It must be noted that no politician talks about this matter in a sustained manner.

As the income from the minerals was not taken into account, the budget did not mention anything about the restoration of the Old Pension Scheme to its employees.

           The Foreign Minister of India, Mrs. Sushma Swaraj, on 17 March 2017, said that the use of force by Sri Lanka against Indian fishermen cannot be justified under any circumstances.

          If the government had shown this work to the people, the killings would not have occurred. Therefore, the government must accept responsibility for the killings.

Further, it must show this work to the people for peaceful fishing in future.

          The President of India, Mr.Pranab Mukherjee, on 17 March 2017, said that the democracy was made ineffective and useless in India.

What is the reason for the anguish of the President of India? What is the reason for his resentment? After all he has only a few months left in office.  

It may be recalled that the present man sent his first letter to Prime Minister Mr. A. B. Vajpayee on 1 June 2001. The Supreme Court of India delivered the BALCO judgement on 10 December 2001. Within two days, the present man sent his third letter to the President of India.

Immediately, the then President of India, Mr. K.R. Narayanan, called at the Supreme Court of India with the three letters. He stood there like a poor man. He could not convince the judges. Actually, the judges asked him to mind his own business. The people could not hear the words he uttered to the judges. His visit to the court was not shown to the people. He was told that he was the President and not the master of the slaves- the people.

President Mr.K.R. Narayanan noticed that the people were not in a position to listen to his words because they were not allowed to hear his words. Therefore, he started to talk indirectly. Thus, he, after unveiling the statue of the common man at Pune in the Maharastra State, ironically predicted that the common man would save India. He said this on 19 December 2001.

Then, the President of India, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, went to the Supreme Court of India with the letters at least three times. He could not move the court.

However, he controlled the privatization of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

His visits were not shown to the people. His words also went unheard. Therefore, he also started to talk indirectly.

After that Mrs.Pratiba Devising Patel- one day- apparently went to the Supreme Court of India. During her period, spectrum and coal were usurped by thousands of people.

The present President of India was aware of everything because he had been in office for a long period of time as a union minister. Therefore, he has, apparently, not gone to the Supreme Court of India to meet the judges.

During his period, the spectrum and the coal given to thousands of players were cancelled and handed over to a few players. This led to the monopoly of the spectrum and the coal. Further, he secretly allowed his government to bring India under the domination of China more than ever before.

However, just like his predecessors, he has been transmitting all letters to the Prime Minister of India without wasting any time.

In all, the Prime Ministers received 550 letters in 16 years. The present Prime Minister of India got maximum number of letters. He got more than what Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh received in 10 years.

All but a few Indians are slaves. The slaves will never see him because we will never show him to them. If we don’t show him to them how will they see him?

Similarly, we will never allow them to listen to his words because we will not allow them to hear his words.

Remember Mahatma Gandhi and Vallababhai Patel brought serfdom and not freedom to Indians. That is why I am here. At least we allowed him to write 550 letters. Referring to the present man, the present Prime Minister of India talks like this.

The President of India is now apparently sorry that he did not do his duty. He has started to talk everything indirectly. He can be effective even today. He can bring freedom to Indians. For this, he must do his duty.

To do his duty, he must distinguish between the right and the wrong. He should not consider big things as small things and vice versa. Above all, he must take the first step. Then the people would banish Mahatma Gandhi and begin to breathe freedom. He knows that freedom is heaven.

Thus he can emancipate one thousand million people from slavery before his retirement.

This is letter No.551

   The facts from 15 March 2017 to 18 March 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 18-3-2017.

18- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

550. A New India?

550

A New India?

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), on 13 March 2017, disclosed that the Indian Army imported locally-available daily use products from China.

The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, said that he would give birth to a new India. He added that the youth could dream about it. He said this after winning the elections to four out of five states in India. The media reported his words on 13 March 2017.

          What does he mean by new India? Does he mean a free India? What is the difference between the present India and the new India envisaged by him?

          He knows that India is a slave nation.

          In a slave nation, all but a few people will be slaves. India is a slave nation because all but a few people are slaves.

          India is a democratic country. The people are free to elect their representatives. Then, how can we call India a slave nation?

          In a slave nation, the people can listen to their masters only. This is because they can hear the words of their masters only. They cannot listen to others according to degree because they cannot hear the words of others.

          Are you not publishing your views? After all, you publish your views in a blog.

          It is true that my views are being published in a blog. But the people cannot listen to it in a sustained manner because they cannot hear it through the newspapers based on the degree of importance.

          Similarly, in a slave nation, the people can see their masters only. They cannot see others according to degree. They cannot see them because they will not be shown to them by the newspapers and the TV channels..

          After all you are seen in the Youtube. How can you talk like this?

          It is true that my views can be seen in the Youtube. But the people don’t see anything that are not shown to them. Everyone knows that a man can see something only if light falls on it and is shown to him.

          Is Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi a free man? No, he is not a freeman. He is only a representative of his masters. Therefore, he is a slave only.

In a slave nation, the masters give the shadow of authority to a handful of people. But they cannot attain the reality of power.

A free man alone would allow the people to breathe freedom. As he is not a free man he could not allow the people to breathe freedom. Further, had he been a free man he would not have submitted India to the domination of China either.

India has a powerful court, the Supreme Court of India. Are not the judges of the Supreme Court of India free to protect the rights of the people?

No. The experience shows that they are not free to protect the rights of the people. They can pretend as the protectors of the rights and privileges of the people. Actually, they exist only to deny the people the very right to freedom. They simply compromise the people’s right to freedom.

Evidently, Prime Minister of Indian Mr. Narendra Modi has not given birth to a new India. He does not appear to be pregnant to give birth to a new India. He can give birth to a new India only at his own risk.

This is letter No.550

   The facts from 12 March 2017 to 14 March 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 15-3-2017.

15- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

V. Sabarimuthu

15-3-2017.