549.The Supreme Court of India. Accept responsibility for Sri Lankan firing, woodcutters, militancy, elections and others..

549

The Supreme Court of India. Accept responsibility for Sri Lankan firing, woodcutters, militancy, elections and others..

          Sri Lankan Navy shot dead a 21 year old Indian fisherman and wounded another on 7 March 2017.

          The fishermen have not received the dead body. An agitation is going on at Thankachimadam in Tamil Nadu.

          The government of Tamil Nadu and the political parties in Tamil Nadu, as usual, condemned the killing.

          There was a 3 minute discussion in the Parliament over this matter. The Government said that the Vice President of India had conveyed the concern of India to Sri Lanka during a scheduled meeting.

          Sri Lanka released 85 Indian fishermen from jail to assuage the feelings of the people.

          The Prime Minister of India chose not to utter a word.

          Sri Lanka killed over 500 Indian fishermen before this incident.

          The present man had wanted the Government of India to deny landing facilities in India to the Sri Lanka bound planes to settle the fishermen problem.

          In Letter No. 151, the present man asked Sri Lanka not to wage a war against India.

          In another letter, the present man said that the USA would have resorted to Libyan type bombing as retaliation.

          After that there was a lull in the firing. In fact, Sri Lanka, on 29 September 2010, gave a solemn assurance that there would not be further incidence of harm to Indian fisherman.

          Despite the assurance, Sri Lanka has added one more murder to its credit.

          Therefore, it is imperative that India must suspend over flight facilities to all Sri Lanka bound aircraft until a permanent solution is found.

          The firing occurred because the suggestions given by the present man did not percolate to the masses.

          We will not solve the problem. We will not take any step to give freedom either. This is the stand of the Supreme Court of India.

          Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must accept full responsibility for the incident. By denying freedom of expression, it simply allowed Sri Lanka to eat Indians.

          Now, it must release this letter to the press to pave the way for a full settlement to the satisfaction of the Indian fishermen.

          The Andra Pradesh police, on 10 March 2017, captured over 200 sandal wood cutters of Tamil Nadu. Among the captured woodcutters were some postgraduates.

          The Government of Andra Pradesh treats the woodcutters like animals.  There are many violations of human rights. It is like man eating man.

          About ten men remove all public resources of the nation. The Supreme Court of India facilitates this illegal theft by denying freedom of expression. This leads to economic deprivation and unemployment. There are 81 lakh unemployed people in Tamil Nadu alone.

          Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must accept full responsibility for such happenings.

          A seven judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Chief Justice J.S.Khekar and Justices Misra, J. Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B. Lokur, P.C. Ghose and Kurian Joseph, on 10 March 2017, issued a warrant against Justice Karnan of the Culcutta High Court for denigrating the judicial institution.

          The decision is like man eating man.

Justice Karnan described the warrant as a motivated and unconstitutional one. He added that he was targeted for being a member of the Scheduled Caste.

The accusations of Justice Karnan were a partial reflection of this work.

He did not even say that the judges deny freedom of expression. All his charges were nothing compared to this.

The development is due to the denial of freedom of expression. The Supreme Court of India must accept responsibility for it.

The militant people, on 11 March 2017, killed 12 soldiers at Bhejji on the Andra Pradesh – Chhattisgarh border.

The Supreme Court of India must accept full responsibility for the incident as it exploits the natural resources of the people.

A three judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India did try to harness the greatest evil. It proclaimed that all natural resources must be taken over by the Government. This happened on 7 May 2010. But the three judges in the Bench settled for plum postings. The ruling class gave a posting to Justice Balakrishnan in the National Human Rights Commission. Some cases were filed against his son.  Justice Sathasivam was given the post of a Governor of Kerala. Justice Sudharshan Reddy might have gone down like Justice Kirpal although nothing is known about him. It must be recalled that Justice Kirpal had landed in the Reliance Industries Ltd.

Then the 2G verdict and the coal verdict virtually buried the  May 7, 2010 judgement.

Now the letters are being submitted to the armed forces. The officers of the armed forces have, in turn, used the letters to secure postings in the Government - like Gen.V.K. Singh - or in other areas. The tragedy is that many do maximum injustice in the areas they occupy.

Ten men remove the entire public resources through the aid of the Supreme Court of India. So long as the exploitation of the people by them continues, there will be attempts to subvert the existing order. The killings, revolts and uprisings and letters are various forms of agitations. The Supreme Court of India must give maximum respect to letters because the letters are the most peaceful method of agitation.. It shall not conceal the letters from the people at all. The act of concealing this work is not its duty.

In the elections to five states, the ruling BJP secured two third majority in Utter Pradesh and Uttarkhand. The Congress Party won Punjab.  Goa and Manipur delivered fractured mandates.

Miss. Mayavathi, the leader of the BSP doubted the credibility of the electronic voting machines. The Election Commission of India (ECI) must complement machine voting by ballot voting also. This would dispel the doubts.

If the Supreme Court of India had not denied freedom to Indians, the nominees of the present man would have won the elections. This conclusion is based on the perception that the people judge men by what they did rather than by what they are likely to do.

Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must accept full responsibility for installing illegitimate governments.

So long as the nation reels in the hand of illegitimate governments, the exploitation of the people by the ten men will continue.

Therefore, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi like people alone would celebrate the results.

This is letter No.548

   The facts from 8 March 2017 to 11 March 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 12-3-2017.

12- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.