257: INDIA :FEAR OF PUNISHMENT- DUTY OF PRIME MINISTER

257

FEAR OF PUNISHMENT- DUTY OF PRIME MINISTER

           The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, Indian Army, Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on 19 April 2014.  Later, it was posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

         Congress President Sonia Gandhi, on 19 April 2014, said that power should not be concentrated in the hand of one person.

        There are over 94000 registered newspapers and periodicals in India. Besides, there are thousands of TV Channels.

        No newspaper or TV channel has reported the existence of this work to the people.

        Evidently, they are under a power centre as sparingly revealed by the so-called Niira Radia Case.

        This power centre impairs the reason and rules the nation.

        The act of impairing the reason of 1000 million people is an offence punishable with life imprisonment. However, as the Supreme Court of India does not want any law for it, there is no fear of punishment. 

         So long as the Supreme Court believes that this condition is advantageous to it and to the nation, the present man would continue to remain as the Sovereign of the Nation.

        It is immaterial whether this man remains at the Presidential Palace in New Delhi or at a house in a remote place.

 

        The media, on 20 April 2014, said that the accounts of the Telephone Companies had been audited by the Department of Telecommunication (DoT) and nothing would come out of the audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).

     This shows that the beneficiaries of the national wealth set at naught the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 16th April 2014 within a span of four days.

      It must be carefully noted that the audit –according to the judgement – “is to examine whether they give proper share of their revenue or not”.

    The auditors would audit the bills and vouchers only. In order to know the actual production and proceeds, there must be supervisors under the control of one or more administrators of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS).

    Pending the enactment of a law, it is the minimum requirement of the above judgement.

       Then, to the astonishment of everyone the revenue of the nation would swell even before the new government is in place.

       The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), on 14 April 2014, said that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh delivered over 1200 speeches after assuming power. It added that the media did not report many of them.

     The power centre that rules India asked him to remain in a cave, and he obliged.

     The duty of the Prime Minister of India is to make laws and guidelines. The officers must carry them out.

    Here, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh carried out everything without any laws. The beneficiaries shielded him without shedding light on his actions.

     This is what one discerns from the disposition of the Supreme Court in the coal, iron ore and bauxite mining cases.

    A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices A.K. Patnaik and S.S. Nijjar, on 21 April 2014, lifted the ban on mining iron ore at Goa, but put an annual cap of 20 million tonne on excavation.

   In order to establish that there is rule of law in India, everyone must be made accountable to laws:

1.                 That are publicly promulgated,

2.                  Equally enforced and

3.                 Independently adjudicated.

       No law has been publicly promulgated to grant mining licences.

       The above judgement ignores the judgement given in Chapter 139.

       It does not provide for any supervision as envisaged by the judgement given in the last letter. Therefore, actual amount excavated and sold cannot be known.

        Evidently, the judgement is an act of corruption that subverts the rule of law.

       Therefore, the Supreme Court must say whether the case has been independently adjudicated or not.

        The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), on 21 April 2014, closed two cases pertaining to the Congress MP, Mr.Vijay Darda, and one Mr. Manoj Jayaswal.

        The CBI is an evil institution because it conceals hundreds of letters from the eye of the people. Therefore, the court shall not depend upon it for anything.

         The designated court hearing the 2G case, on 22 April 2014, said that that would record the statement of former Telecom Minister A. Raga from May 5, 2014 onwards.

       The present man had repeatedly wanted the Supreme Court to disclose the laws violated by Mr. A. Raja.  It did not oblige.

      It must, at least now, make public the promulgated laws under which the spectrum was allocated.

      The court must specifically note that the laws, if any, must be equally enforced.

       The CBI, on 22 April 2014, summoned former coal secretary Mr.P.C. Parakh for questioning. Moreover, it summoned some senior executives of Aditya Birla Group in connection with a case registered against Mr. Kumaramangalam Birla.

         Here also, the CBI must enlighten the public by publishing the laws enacted to allocate coal before going ahead with the case.

      This is letter No. 257.

      The Chief of the Indian Army must note that all citizens willing their best wills for the general good of the nation is the General Will.

     As there is no freedom for Indians to know men and matters, this work represents the General Will of the Nation.

     The advice given to the Supreme Court is consistent with the General Will.

      Therefore, the people alone can displace this man from the present position as and when they get Freedom.

    A reply from the Army Chief will strengthen this conclusion.

             The  facts from 19 April 2014 to 22 April 2014  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, chiefs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, some High Courts, Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 23 April 2014.

       V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167

Tamil Nadu State, INDIA

23 April 2014

256. INDIA: MAKING THE THINGS HAPPEN

256

   

 MAKING THE THINGS HAPPEN

      The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, Indian Army, Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on 14 April 2014.  Later, it was posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

          Mr. P.C. Parakh, former coal secretary, in his book titled Crusader or Conspirator, said that coal allocations were done “on other considerations”. He wondered why Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was not named in the coal case. The media reported this on 14 April 2014.

    The Supreme Court of India must treat all offenders equally.

     However, why do the media report his allegations before reporting this work?

      BJP leader Mr. L.K. Advani, on 14 April 2014, described Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as the weakest prime minister ever.

    The top Indian political leaders could be broadly classified into the following five types.

1.    The weakest leaders. They impair the reason of the people. They have mastery over wickedness.

2.    The weaker leaders. They enjoy the spoils of the act of impairing the reason and work in private interest.

3.    The weak leaders. They enjoy the spoils of the act of impairing the reason but work partly in private interest and partly in public interest. They do not want to carry the interests of their enemies to further democracy.  

4.    The cowards. They are opposed to the act of impairing the reason but live with it.

5.    The guardians. They give freedom to the people. They consider the present election as an invalid one.

          Anyone could now categorize the leaders.

          A Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan and A.K. Sikri, on 15 April 2014, ordered that the transgender people must be treated as the third gender. It directed the government to treat them as a socially and educationally backward class. It, further, asked the government to enact necessary laws within six months.

      The people welcomed the above judgement. Even the UN hailed it.

     However, the judgement should not go down as a passing reference.

    A Supreme Court of India Bench comprising A.K. Patnaik and Ibrahim Kalifulla, on 16 April 2014, said that Mr. N. Srinivasan could not function as the president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) before the completion of the probe into the betting allegations against his son.

     Whether the Supreme Court enforces the above law equally to all or not is the crucial question.

    Many judges own the shares of private companies. Technically, they are the owners of the companies. They are, therefore, not “free” to hear the cases   involving such companies.

   For instance, if the judges hearing the coal case are “free”, they would have listened to the legal points placed before them by this writer.

    This is the reason why the present writer asks the judges to tell whether they are “free” to write judgements are not.

   There cannot be identical treatment.

      But the order should be applied equally to all people- the learned judges included.

          

        On an appeal filed by the private telephone operators, a Supreme Court of India Bench comprising K.S. Radhakrishan and Vikramajit Sen,  on 16 April 2014, said that the private telecom companies utilize national wealth and so their profit- loss account could be looked into by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG). This is to examine whether they give proper share of their revenue to the government or not.

     This is a great judgement that does not talk about economic policy at all. It has far reaching consequences.  

    This must have happened as a natural consequence of governance. But it is happening through the court.

      Everyone must note that it is the consequence of this work- the last letter in particular. Otherwise, the court might have secretly buried the case- just like many other cases- in its backyard.

   Thus, this man persisted with this work against an impervious system to make things happen.

   Some might say that this judgement might have happened even without this work.

   They must understand that the judgement is not to peep into the account books of telecom companies.

        But it is for a systematic verification of the accounts of all companies that exploit the natural wealth like ores.

       For this, necessary number of officials must be deployed to all companies on a permanent basis.

    Then, it must be extended to all other entities that pay tax to the nation.

      If these changes take place automatically, this man need not persist with this work at all.

    But they are not going to take place automatically or through others.

    Therefore, this work is absolutely necessary even now.

       The present Chief Justice of India Sathasivam has shown the judgement mentioned in Chapter 139 in his profile. If it is a passing reference, why does he project it as his greatest achievement?

      Or, why does he constitute the Benches to defeat or dilute the purpose of his judgement?

      What would the people think of him as and when they see this work?

      Does he impair the reason to keep the people away from knowing his real nature?

       These are the questions he must answer before his retirement.

        Addressing a public meeting at Kanyakumari, Congress leader Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, on 16 April 2014, said that an individual was claiming solution for all problems facing the people.

     She might have been keeping Mr. Naredra Modi in mind.

     The present writer claims solution for many problems.

     The NDA government, led by Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, introduced service tax only after the receipt of the first letter.

     The UPA government introduced Transaction Tax only at the instance of this man.

     The 100 days work per year scheme of the UPA government is a reflection of Para 9 of Chapter 5 and some other chapters.

      The judgement –mentioned in this chapter- to audit the accounts of the Telecom Companies also is consistent with the demand of this writer.

    Hundreds of many other things happened or not happened because of this man.

       Addressing a public meeting on the next day from the same venue Mr. Narendra Modi wanted the people of Kanyakumari District to give victory to his candidate. He assured that he would give victory to the people.

    If he acts in good faith, the people might get freedom.

       A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishan and J.S. Khekar, on 16 April 2014, expressed its willingness to defreeze the bank account of Sahara Company.

    There were reports that many accounts are fictitious. How is it going to repay the money?

    The Supreme Court must apply the laws equally to all entities.

    About ten years ago, the SUS bank in the Tamil Nadu State became bankrupt. The depositors have not got the money back till date. The court should have asked the government to pay their money first followed by attaching its assets.

     The government, on 17 April 2014, disclosed its decision to appoint Vice Admiral Rabindra Kumar Dhowan as the next Naval Chief overlooking the senior most Vice Admiral Shekhar Sinha.

   This man did not send any email to the Chief of the Indian Navy. However, the government has taken this decision keeping this work in mind.

This is letter No. 256.

    The judgement that empowers the CAG to audit the Telecom Companies is one of the greatest judgements India has ever seen. It dilutes the judgement mentioned in Chapter 139 is a different matter.

     This is a victory for this work.

     This happened mainly because the present writer approached the Chief of the Indian Army for a reply.

    A reply might force the court and the government to implement the order in its true spirit.  

             The  facts from 14 April 2014 to 18 April 2014  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, chiefs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, some High Courts, Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 19 April 2014.

       V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167

Tamil Nadu State, INDIA

19 April 2014

 

   

   

   

 

    

255: SETTING AT NAUGHT THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

255

SETTING AT NAUGHT THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

   

      The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, Indian Army, Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on 31 March 2014.  Later, it was posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

     West Bengal Chief Minister Miss Mamata Banerjee, on 7 April 2014, said that the political parties, media and the Election Commission of India (ECI) had hatched a conspiracy against her.

      She had been in the Union Cabinet for a long time. She knows how the conspiracy to deny freedom works.

     *The BJP - in its manifesto- said that its aim was to provide a government that would enjoy the respect of the world.

    This indicates that India does not enjoy the respect of the world. However, the people do not know this. For instance, they do not know the reason why Her Highness Queen Elizabeth, sent her son, Price Charles, to declare open the Delhi Commonwealth Games.

    *It promised to bring the eastern part of the country on par with the western part.

  This is reminiscent of the Para 6 of Chapter 41.

  *It proclaimed that the appeasement of one at the cost of the other would not be tolerated.

   The word appeasement, in the past meant the appeasement of the minorities. The present meaning - from the tone of the manifesto- is the appeasement of the manipulators.

   *It assured that its only epic would be the Constitution of India.

   This work grows because of the disrespect shown to the Constitution of India.

  *It ensured justice for all.

   At a time when the Supreme Court of India interprets the act of impairing the reason as justice, the manifesto cannot but talk of justice.

    *It did not use the word “freedom” but it said that everyone would be not only “free” but also encouraged to voice his concerns. It explained this by saying,  “whatever is in the interest of India will be in the interest of all the elements that India is made up of”.

   *The manifesto appears as a reflection of this work.     Whether it a coincidence or not, even the word “accountable’- with the meaning given in the last chapter- is present in it.

   Latently, it said everything as the dispenser of good and evil to the people of India.

        The manifesto was released, on 7 April 2014, on the date of the first phase of polling.

     Had it been released earlier, the manipulators might have made short work of the BJP with the help of the nature-led leaders in the party.

    The fact that a good manifesto would not impart any democratic character to the new government is a different matter.

     BJP leader Mr. Narendra Modi, on 8 April 2014, gave a solemn assurance that he would not act out of ill-will.  He added that he would do things not done by others in the last 60 years.

    Consistent with the demand of this writer he has come out with a sound political principle.

       He must give a promise to do everything in good faith. It will have greater positive character.       

     The Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Mr. Pradeep Kumar, on 7 April 2014, requested the Supreme Court of India Bench hearing the coal case to allow him to withdraw from examining 20 coal cases. He added that he was with the Coal Ministry during 2003-2006.

   This is his reply to the last letter.

   He openly acknowledges the fact that he is not a “free” man.

    The way the Supreme Court beats the bush in many important cases shows that it is also not “free”.

       It ignores all legal and constitutional points.

     Therefore, there exists a fear that it is prone to annul all the sacred things.

   The people have a right for “free” judges.

  Now it must openly say whether its judges are “free” or not to write judgements.

   The Supreme Court Bench later asked the remaining two Vigilance Commissioners to tell whether the coal cases could be closed or not.

    The Chief Vigilance Commission (CVC) continues to remain as an evil institution because it is not ready to make public the secret behind the popularity of nature-led leaders over natural leaders.

      Instead of asking the CVC to give its opinion for the second time, the Supreme Court could have considered the remedy given by this man. The court might have then enjoyed the confidence of the people.

    Now it, at the behest of the money- makers, sets at naught not only this work but also the Constitution of India and its own judgement mentioned in Chapter 139.

   When the present man says this, it should not be depicted as narcissism.

    In fact, if any other citizen of India is ready to represent such vital matters in a more polite way, the present man will cease to write letters.

    

     Mr. Ratan Tata, on 10 April 2014, said that the companies have a life of their own. He said this at Beijing after being inducted as a member of the Board of Boao Forum for Asia (BFA).

     The Congress Party and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) on 10 April 2014, demanded  BJP leader Mr.Narendra Modi to explain why he took 46 years to acknowledge the existence of his wife.

    The media knew this. But it chose to reveal it after looking at the manifesto of the BJP.

    It is strange that the political parties that refuse to acknowledge the existence of this work ask this question. 

    In this connection, it must be noted that Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh – according to a certificate - has been a resident of Assam!

     15 people- six soldiers included- were killed when the militant people blew up an ambulance at Bastar in the Chhattisgarh State on 15 April 2014.

    The solution to this problem is freedom.

This is letter No. 255.  

     The fact that this writer approached the chief of the Indian Army for a reply is causing great changes in the BJP. A reply might have changed India long ago.

             The  facts from 31 March 2014 to 13 April 2014  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, chiefs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, some High Courts, Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 14 April 2014.

       V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167

Tamil Nadu State, INDIA

14 April 2014