257
FEAR
OF PUNISHMENT- DUTY OF PRIME MINISTER
The last mail was submitted to His
Excellency the President of India, Chief
Justice of India, Indian Army, Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) and Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on 19 April
2014. Later, it was posted in the blog
www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
Congress
President Sonia Gandhi, on 19 April 2014, said that power should not be
concentrated in the hand of one person.
There
are over 94000 registered newspapers and periodicals in India. Besides, there
are thousands of TV Channels.
No
newspaper or TV channel has reported the existence of this work to the people.
Evidently,
they are under a power centre as sparingly revealed by the so-called Niira Radia Case.
This power centre impairs the reason and
rules the nation.
The
act of impairing the reason of 1000 million people is an offence punishable
with life imprisonment. However, as the Supreme Court of India does not want
any law for it, there is no fear of punishment.
So
long as the Supreme Court believes that this condition is advantageous to it
and to the nation, the present man would continue to remain as the Sovereign of the Nation.
It
is immaterial whether this man remains at the Presidential Palace in New Delhi
or at a house in a remote place.
The media, on 20 April 2014, said that
the accounts of the Telephone Companies had been audited by the Department of Telecommunication
(DoT) and nothing would come out of the audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).
This shows that the beneficiaries of the
national wealth set at naught the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 16th
April 2014 within a span of four days.
It must be carefully noted that the audit
–according to the judgement – “is to examine whether they give proper share of
their revenue or not”.
The auditors would audit the bills and
vouchers only. In order to know the actual production and proceeds, there must
be supervisors under the control of one or more administrators of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS).
Pending the enactment of a law, it is the
minimum requirement of the above judgement.
Then, to the astonishment of everyone the
revenue of the nation would swell even before the new government is in place.
The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), on 14
April 2014, said that Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh delivered over 1200 speeches after assuming power. It added
that the media did not report many of them.
The power centre that rules India asked
him to remain in a cave, and he obliged.
The duty of the Prime Minister of India is
to make laws and guidelines. The officers must carry them out.
Here, Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh carried out everything without any laws. The
beneficiaries shielded him without shedding light on his actions.
This is what one discerns from the
disposition of the Supreme Court in the coal, iron ore and bauxite mining
cases.
A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices A.K. Patnaik and S.S. Nijjar, on 21 April 2014, lifted
the ban on mining iron ore at Goa, but put an annual cap of 20 million tonne on
excavation.
In order to establish that there is rule of
law in India, everyone must be made accountable to laws:
1.
That
are publicly promulgated,
2.
Equally enforced and
3.
Independently
adjudicated.
No law has been publicly promulgated to
grant mining licences.
The above judgement ignores the
judgement given in Chapter 139.
It does not provide for any supervision
as envisaged by the judgement given in the last letter. Therefore, actual
amount excavated and sold cannot be known.
Evidently, the judgement is an act of
corruption that subverts the rule of law.
Therefore, the Supreme Court must say
whether the case has been independently adjudicated or not.
The
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), on 21 April 2014, closed two cases
pertaining to the Congress MP, Mr.Vijay
Darda, and one Mr. Manoj Jayaswal.
The CBI is an evil institution because
it conceals hundreds of letters from the eye of the people. Therefore, the court
shall not depend upon it for anything.
The designated court hearing the 2G
case, on 22 April 2014, said that that would record the statement of former Telecom Minister A. Raga from May 5,
2014 onwards.
The present man had repeatedly wanted
the Supreme Court to disclose the laws violated by Mr. A. Raja. It did not
oblige.
It must, at least now, make public the
promulgated laws under which the spectrum was allocated.
The court must specifically note that the
laws, if any, must be equally enforced.
The CBI, on 22 April 2014, summoned
former coal secretary Mr.P.C. Parakh for
questioning. Moreover, it summoned
some senior executives of Aditya Birla
Group in connection with a case registered against Mr. Kumaramangalam Birla.
Here also, the CBI must enlighten the
public by publishing the laws enacted to allocate coal before going ahead with
the case.
This is letter No. 257.
The Chief of the Indian Army must note
that all citizens willing their best
wills for the general good of the nation is the General Will.
As there is no freedom for Indians to know
men and matters, this work represents the General Will of the Nation.
The advice given to the Supreme Court is
consistent with the General Will.
Therefore, the people alone can displace
this man from the present position as and when they get Freedom.
A reply from the Army Chief will strengthen
this conclusion.
The facts from 19
April 2014 to 22 April 2014 are being
submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India,
chiefs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, some High Courts, Chief
Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 23
April 2014.
V.
Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:
629167
Tamil Nadu State, INDIA
23 April 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment