CHAPTER 166

166

RETURNING THE GIFTS

On 13 December 2010, a former judge of the Supreme Court formally began to examine the procedure followed to grant telecom licences since 1999.

The above judge had given tacit consent to the act of ‘killing’ FREEDOM of expression during his stint in the Supreme Court. Therefore, he is a tainted judge. None could expect any justice from him.

The Supreme Court may release the so-called Radia tape to see whether the above judge had any link with the underground mole or not. An estimate about his assets also may be taken. For the same reason, the assets of the former Chief Justice of India also may be estimated.

The so-called Radia-tape case came before the Supreme Court Bench Comprising Justice A.K. Ganguly and Justice Singhvi on 13 December 2010.

The court directed the Government to submit - in a sealed cover - the letter sent by someone on 16 November 2008 alleging that the so-called underground mole was indulging in anti-constitutional activities. The court did not disclose the date of the next hearing.

Unlike in the previous hearing, the media reported the judges in the Bench. A brief report of the arguments also could be seen in one or two newspapers. This must be due to the intervention of the court in response to the last mail.

Now, it is clear that the President of India rejected the request of this writer to hand over the above case to a Bench comprising unattached judges.

In this connection, the request of the present writer may be viewed in the proper perspective.

The above case is the most important case of the Supreme Court. The future of the nation depends on this case.

The Government of India has been executing the illegal orders of an underground mole – euphemistically called lobbyist - for the last 100 years. This mole has become so mighty that it could earn about $18 billion to one of its clients simply by killing one news item. Naturally, by ‘killing’ the news about the existence of this work, it has earned about $500 billion to $1trillion to its clients since June 2001. The nation is poorer to this extent.

This underground mole has planted several moles all over India. Alternatively, several moles are running this business in tandem. An example is given below.

It is well known that several TV channels in India telecast discourses on “Bhagavad – Gita”. The public sector Malayalam TV channel also had been telecasting a serial during 2008.

On noticing the close similarity between this work and the above discourse, the present writer sent a chapter from this work to that resource person. On receipt of this, he said that anyone could strive to give a better interpretation.

On the next recording, he might have mentioned the name of the present writer. The public sector TV channel might have asked him to avoid this. He would not have obliged. So the discourse was abruptly stopped at the half way mark. Whose hand is this? It was the crucial question. Anyhow, the present writer could discern the hand of an underground mole in this. This work acquired a better shape without his discourse is a different matter.

Evidently, two judges of the Supreme Court cannot harness this great force. The Bench hearing this case must have great prestige. Therefore, this case must be heard –at least- by a five-judge Bench.

A five – judge Bench alone would have picked up courage to hear the case on a day – to - day basis. It would not have given more than 48 hours to the Government to submit a letter. It would have even arranged live telecast of the hearing.

Now, the present Bench has no courage to mention the date of the next hearing. Tomorrow, the Bench might even allow the petitioner to withdraw the case. Then the people may not get another chance to know the nature of the underground moles.

Further, now the above two judges are hearing the 2G spectrum case. This case demands great talent to tackle. It is not humanly possible to think about the various facets of two very important complex cases simultaneously. Therefore, they must share their workload with other judges.

The reason why this case must be heard by the unattached judges also must be recognized.

The judges hearing such cases must have the courage to claim certain well marked characteristics. The real nature of the judges is not known. The method of selection is also not known to the people. The people know that many judges own the shares of private companies and some others do not possess any shares.

The people cannot demand justice from the judges possessing shares because they cannot command a judge to kill himself.

Therefore, the judges hearing such cases must come forward to return the gifts they received from the companies, demons and demigods. At least they must sell the shares in their hands and take a pledge to remain under the territories of the Constitution of India. Then only the Constitution would create justice.

A leader of the Communist Party of India (M) said that many Union Ministers were industrialist. He added that many industrialists were clients of the rest.

In this connection, it must be noted that the Left parties were shouting slogans against higher vegetables prices two years ago only at the instance of the underground mole. In fact, the Left parties are the real moles of the underground mole.

At a seminar, Mr. Zhaug Yan, the Chinese Ambassador to India, on 13 December 2010 termed the Indo-China ties as a “very fragile, easy to be damaged and difficult to repair” one. Foreign Secretary of India mentioned the “noisy nature of the Indian democracy in which contrary opinions were freely expressed”. It must be noted that none other than the present writer expressed any contrary opinion.

The Chief Justice of India on 14 December 2010 requested the courts to take speedy action over corruption cases.

Addressing a meeting of the officers of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), the Prime Minister of India said that the Government was committed to the strengthening of the PSUs. His statement perplexed the participants.

In this connection, it must be stated that the Prime Minister would not only restore all privatized PSUs but also would attach the assets of the companies tainted by the so-called Radia tapes and the 2G spectrum scandal. He would even implement the suggestions of the present writer in Chapter -1 to prevent corruption. The only condition is that he must be allowed to continue as the Prime Minister of India.

The 2G spectrum case came before the Supreme Court Bench comprising Justice A.K. Ganguly and Justice Singhvi on 16 December 2010.

The above Bench directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the other agencies to investigate the case in a concerted way. The court asked the CBI to give emphasis to the loss caused to the public exchequer. The court wanted the CBI to file First Information Report (FIR) –without influenced by the rank or position of any one.

Above all, the Bench decided to monitor the case. It is a highly positive decision taken for the welfare of all. This must promote the dignity of the Supreme Court. However, a man in a village said that there need be a court called Supreme Court!

A combination of the observations of the learned judges of the Supreme Court in the last two sittings shows that the CBI would have to question all Union Ministers and the Cabinet Secretary to know the role played by them in the Union Cabinet. This is because of the constitutional requirement that any Union Cabinet Minister could be booked under the Prevention of Corruption Act, only if he had pursued or implemented any policy without the knowledge of the Prime Minister; and therefore the Union Cabinet. The Prime Minister and the Union Ministers are a part of the Union Cabinet only. A part, in this matter, cannot represent the whole. Even the Prime Minister and the Group of Ministers cannot bypass the Union Cabinet.

Therefore, the Union Cabinet must resign to facilitate an impartial investigation. The Union Cabinet shall not wait for the CBI to file a FIR.

The Government had taken a decision –Chapter -73- not to give bank funds to the private parties to buy public assets. But the Government had been arranging loans to their favoured men thereby giving a deadly blow to the equality present in the Constitution of India.

Now, the above Bench might have drawn inspiration from the 11 January 2007 nine - judge Bench judgment of the Supreme Court mentioned Chapter-76. This judgment, for all practical purposes, annulled the BALCO judgment. Even otherwise, the act of arranging loans by the Union Ministers vitiates the fundamental rights of the people.

Though late, the Supreme Court has realized the gravity of the ‘wholesale butchery’ mentioned in Chapter -74.

Apparently frightened by the composition of the Bench, the CEO of the public sector TV withdrew his appeal in the Supreme Court. The case came before a Bench comprising Justice Raveendran and Justice A.K. Patnaik- two unattached judges.

A Union Minister on 15 December 2010 said that the activities of underground moles –called lobbyists- would be legalized in India. He said that the lobbyists are common in the USA. An underground mole arranged a Tamil newspaper to publish his words.

When lobbying is legalized, any Union Minister could receive commission or give commission to the moles. The amount of commission would be proportionate to his influence. The rates would be as given below.

*Selling a PSU = 30 % in cash or 50 per cent in shares.

* Selling the shares of PSUs = 15 % in cash

*Buying the shares of private companies using public money = 20% in cash.

*Allotment of land to a private company = 30% in cash or 1% to 30% shares of the company.

* Awarding contract works = 15% in cash or when the contractor gets the bill.

* Importing arms and others = 10 % in cash.

* Awarding mining sites = 10% in cash or 5% in shares.

* For the concessions in the Union Budget =30% in cash immediately or after one or two years.

The above law will obviate the necessity for illegal transactions. Flight of capital also could be controlled. The Department of Anti-corruption and the courts could concentrate on catching the employees receiving “marked” currencies as bribe.

The percentages mentioned above are normal amounts only.

In contrast, when the spectrum was allotted in 2001, the beneficiaries got a net profit of about $ 100 billion to $200 billion in the last nine years. The Government got about $0.5 billion only. Even a Union Minister responsible for getting a cricket franchise could receive 25 % shares.

The Union Minister for Finance said that he would take up teaching after retiring from politics. No public sector bank would have illegally given money in the order of, say, $1 billion without his order. Therefore, the CBI might not give him a chance to work as a teacher.

The President of China, Mr. Wen Jiabao, came to India and paid homage to the greatest mole of the underground mole. He signed 50 trade pacts for $15 billion. India said that the bilateral trade with China would reach $100 billion by 2015. There was no discussion about the naval bases around India. The Prime Minister of China wanted the media in India to promote Indo-China friendship.

In this connection, it must be noted that the media in India did not tell anything against China or against any agreement. The present writer alone pointed out a few problems of India.

As a result of the above pacts, many industries in India, including the generator factories, would perish. Unless otherwise prevented, the trade deficit would reach $200 billion by 2015. In order to embrace China, Indian naval bases would be handed over to the Chinese forces to maintain peace in the Indian Ocean.

The Foreign Secretary on 18 December 2010 gave an interview to a TV channel of a mole. Her talk had an odour of a mole.

A former Union Minister for Communication on 18 December 2010 said that the NDA Government had followed ‘first come first served norm’ in letter and spirit. According to him, an asset worth $100 billion could be given for $1 billion, if the norms were followed in letter and spirit. He talks like this because the CBI did not take any action when he contacted a bank as given in Chapter-51.

It is said that a man enjoying gifts - without returning them to the donor - is certainly a thief.

The facts from 13 December 2010 to 18 December 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 19 December 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 165

165

THE CAUSE OF THE RESULTS

Now, the media revealed that the former Union Minister for Communication had talked to the underground mole several times through phone. The Union Ministers have nothing to talk to the ruler of India or the President of India. But they have many things to talk to the underground mole.

The 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court (SC) was ‘fixed’ in favour of the defendant. A mole and journalist told this to the underground mole on the penultimate day of the judgment. The SC has not given its reaction to this.

The above journalist had challenged the armed forces as given in Chapter-161. He had gone to the extent of saying that cantonment areas were kept neat and tidy.

Needless to say that the then “underground mole” must have fixed the 10-12-2001 BALCO judgment.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 4 December 2010 lodged a complaint in a police station alleging that Army personnel had manhandled the personnel of the CBI. The incident occurred when the CBI raided the military hospital at Pune. The Army however, denied the allegation.

The CBI might have entered the military hospital based on a complaint.

All complaints of the present writer are in the hands of the CBI. The CBI is not taking appropriate actions over them. But the CBI takes quick action against Army personnel.

A Member of Parliament (MP) belonging to the Communist Party of India (CPI) on 5 December 2010 requested the Army Officers not to talk anything about the policy decisions of Government.

Some one working for the underground mole might have directed the public sector TV channel to extract this from the above MP.

In this connection, it must be noted that if the armed forces had not lighted fire as in Chapter 135, the 2G spectrum issue would have gone down as a policy decision. The people also would have considered this as a logical extension of the policy of the NDA Government. In this way, this work would have ended in vain.

Even now, the question of recovering about $ 500 billion to $1 trillion depends on the stand of the armed forces alone. Therefore, the armed forces must see that the retirement of senior officers does not affect their vigil.

The Union Government on 5 December 2010 said that spectrum would be released to private parties again. This shows that more the present writer writes, the more the Union Government acts arbitrarily.

The Union Government said that increased compensation of Re. 750 crore would be distributed to the victims of Bhopal Gas Tragedy before March 2011.

What happened in Bhopal was a big accident. It became a tragedy only when the Union Government - presumably at the instance of the then underground mole – turned down the out of court settlement.

Similarly, tsunami became a disaster only when the Union Government refused to construct houses –Chapter 46 - to the victims comparable to those built for the earthquake victims.

The state owned Areva’s CEO Anne Lauvergeon of France and Nuclear Power Corporation of India signed an agreement on 6 December 2010 in presence of the visiting President of France, Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy, and the Prime Minister of India. The agreement is for building two 1650 megawatt reactors in the Maharastra State.

Some Indian nuclear scientists had said that India could build any number of 500 megawatt reactors. The reason why the Government turned down this suggestion is not known to the people. The Government must direct the nuclear scientists to give a reply to this.

Further, India could have offered small reactors to Pakistan and Sri Lanka to keep away China. Now, India is making the picture a highly complicated one. Pakistan and Sri Lanka would seek the help of China. Her Excellency the President of India could ask the Government to give a reasonable reply to this.

On 6 December 2010, a Bench of the SC comprising Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik ordered status quo on POSCO licence cancellation. In order to defeat the purpose of the order, the Union Government said that a mining site at Bokaro steel plant would be given to the POSCO.

The strength of any nation depends upon its natural assets. The assets are the strength of the weak. The Constitution of India does not permit the Government to hand over these assets to the foreigners.

In the 2G spectrum case, the SC observed that the public sector State Bank of India (SBI) had illegally given over $2 billion to a telephone company. The observation has far reaching consequences.

When the present writer pointed out such manipulations, the previous NDA Government had asked the then Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to quit office as in Chapter - 20.

Now, on hearing the observation of the SC, the RBI Governor should have been asked to quit office.

Further, the SC said that the 2G spectrum case was not a question of about $39 billion but much more. The court directed the CBI to extend the probe to 2001. This is the repercussion of the last mail submitted to Her Excellency the President of India.

Curiously, even a leader mainly responsible for silently transmitting the natural assets of his home State to a boy in Mumbai welcomed the direction of the SC.

The CBI wanted the court to furnish the orders in a sealed cover. But the court rejected this prayer to ensure transparency. This is a positive development.

However, the underground mole did not grant permission to the media to publish the arguments and submissions. The petitioners were conspicuous by their absence. Therefore, the real developments in the SC are not known.

Now, there are three types of probes in India. They are: 1. Bofors Case: In such cases, the there would be multiple investigations and court cases. The stolen assets would not be retrieved. Finally, the SC would say that the CBI failed to prove the case convincingly.

2. Chairman, Unit Trust of India (UTI) case mentioned in Chapter -66: The CBI would create a flutter and then place the case in an incubator. The cases like the recent Medical Council of India (MCI) case come under this category.

3. Satyam Company case: Here, the assets – whether stolen or hard earned - would be impounded or recovered with great alacrity without waiting for probes and court cases. Kidnapping cases, subversion cases, small theft cases and some small assault cases taking place all over India come under this type.

If the SC wanted to put the 2G spectrum case under the first two types, the properties of Satyam Company must be returned to its original owner.

Now, CBI raided the houses of the former Union Minister for Communication. The houses of his friends and relatives were also searched. The CBI gave wide publicity to the raids.

The CBI had raided the biggest house in the world. But it is not disclosing the details of that raid. It is consciously distinguishing between citizen and citizen.

A popular Tamil TV channel on 9 December 2010 reported that the mining companies in Bihar were supplying arms to the militant people. The report said that the mining companies were doing this with the knowledge of the Union Government. The Union Government did not deny this.

After concealing this work, one day, a mole and journalist asked the Chief of the Indian Air Force to tell the reason for not killing the militant people. Now, she might have got the reply. There is nothing wrong in girls functioning as journalists shining like anything. The tragedy is that they take to themselves the highest civilian awards.

The Prime Minister of China would pay a visit to India on 15 December 2010 with a 300 - strong business delegation.

In this connection, it must be stated that the trade relationship with China should not be at the cost of the security of India or the Indian industry. India should have requested China to withdraw from the peripheral countries of India before inviting the Prime Minister of China. Now, apparently, the Union Government is pledging India to China in bad faith.

On 10 December 2010, India and Severstal of Russia signed an agreement to set up a 5 million steel plant in the Karnataka State. The SC would consider the agreement as an unconstitutional one. In this matter, the Government is sacrificing the future of the nation in order to enjoy the present.

The Union Government submitted before a Bench of the SC that the conversations of the underground mole were taped based on complaints that she was maintaining link with foreign intelligence agencies. The Government, further, said that the publication of these recordings –the so called Radia tapes - through internet could not be stopped.

Thus the Union Government indirectly says that the conversations were taped with the knowledge of the Government but the 2G spectrum allocations were done without its knowledge. The SC believes this!

Curiously - in deference to the last mail - Her Excellency the President of India removed the above case from the Bench comprising Justice A.K. Ganguly and Justice G.S. Singhvi and handed over the case to a Bench comprising two unattached judges. She might have done this to meet the ends of justice.

The media, therefore, did not report the names of the judges of the above Bench or their views. In fact, the SC, the Government, the media and the underground mole appeared like one entity in this matter and blacked out vital proceedings.

This is not the first time the nation is witnessing such changes. Once, this happened as in Chapter 26. Again this occurred as in Chapter- 66. The people must know this.

A packet of 800 more so-called Radia tapes were released on 11 December 2010. This contains media manipulations and political plots by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII).

One tape says that there is 15 per cent commission in road works. This shows the importance of Point No.2 in the letter No.1 submitted on 1 June 2001 to the then Prime Minister of India.

The SC has been covering up this work for nine years. Yet, someone in some place taped the conversations of the underground mole for about two years and leaked it to a weekly to establish justice in India. Suddenly, all the averments and predictions of this writer are becoming correct. The present writer is not the cause for this result at all. This shows that a hidden hand always works to establish justice. This must be an arrangement!

Now, the SC can publish not only the entire tape but also this work. In this way, the SC can prove that it has nothing to hide.

In the above matter, the SC is obeying the Constitution of India only. There is no need for hesitation.

The Prime Minister of India on 11 December 2010 said that he was worried about the future of Parliamentary system in India. When he said this the Parliament had lost 21 consecutive working days.

India never remained in the hands of the elected representatives. Many MPs returned without knowing the nature of the India system. Their talks and questions never appeared in the media.

However, the above condition became worse when the present Prime Minister of India entered the Upper House as a resident of Assam. A court “fixed” this case. But all right thinking people thought that he ridiculed the Indians through an act of forgery.

Naturally the existing system is corrupted. It has lost its power for progress. A struggle is going on to conserve the corrupt money through probes. Her Excellency the President of India has a duty to liberate the country from this situation.

The present Prime Minister would always try to cover up the allegations against him. Therefore, another MP –free from the spell of the underground mole- could be chosen. The question of forming an All Party Government is another option. But a new brand of accusers would emerge.

Therefore, the President could consider any other better option that promotes the dignity of her office. However, the President shall not neglect her duties out of fear. At times, even a very small absolutely neutral step - like addressing the Parliament - would solve the problem.

It is said that one should not consider himself the cause of the results of his activities.

The facts from 3 December 2010 to 11 December 2010 are being submitted her Excellency the President of India on 12 December 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 164

164

CHEATING

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 28 November 2010. The copies had been sent to the Chief Justice of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Indian Army and the Indian Air Force.

When the ruler of India praised the Prime Minister of India as mentioned in the last mail, the present writer said that she had no premonition of danger. Now, a petitioner in the 2G spectrum case alleged that her two sisters received 2G spectrum money.

There are reports that the 2G spectrum money was only notionally given as in previous occasions. But the petitioner says that the money was electronically transferred.

The allegations like the above one would hurt the feelings of any real political leader. But the people level such charges against men in public life only. False allegations would only strengthen true conviction. Therefore, they must rebut such charges provided the charges were false. However, if her sisters had actually received the money with her knowledge, all right thinking people would consider her as a mole only.

There are reports that the underground mole had nine telephone connections.

In this connection, it must be stated that as early as on 12 December 1917, a political leader of India said that the other Indian leaders wanted to establish oligarchy in the country. He added that the leaders did not care for their people at all.

Thus the oligarchy was established on the day of Independence. Now, rejecting the mandate of the people an underground mole has been converting all political leaders into her moles and ruling India. She has been doing this to usurp public assets.

The Government said that 347 properties of Satyam Company had been attached and 87 properties would be sold very soon.

In this connection, it must be stated that when the Chief of Satyam used the word fraud, the Company Law Board and others descended on it, plucked its Information Technology wing and connected it with another private company in record time. But, despite present allegations against various companies, the Government is not even taking over public assets. This shows that the underground mole might have played a role in the Satyam matter also.

Some reports said that the Union Cabinet would take a decision to impose import duty on heavy power equipment from China to save domestic industries. The report said that China was heavily subsidizing exports facilitating higher export proceeds.

The Government, apparently, is tantalizing the Indian industries. Otherwise, it would have stopped the imports forthwith. Now, the Government is waiting for the green signal from the underground mole.

Rejecting this work and obeying the order of the underground mole, the Union Government sold the shares of the public sector Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) on 30 November 2010.

Neither did the Chief Justice of India enforce FREEDOM of expression nor did he stop the unconstitutional sale of the shares. He is loyal to his masters only. He cannot establish justice in India. Surely, the present Chief Justice of India is a mole of the underground mole. He has lost his moral and constitutional right to function as the Chief Justice of India.

Now there are reports that five private companies got over $5 billion from the public sector banks for buying the spectrum.

Evidently, the public assets are being converted into private assets using public money. This is a crime against the Constitution of India. This writer pointed out this many times to the President, Supreme Court and the CBI. The Government, therefore, stopped publishing these pieces of information. The recent revelations show that the underground mole has been converting public assets into private assets using public money. This is an organized crime going on with the knowledge of the Supreme Court (SC).

Now, a former Union Minister is giving interviews to the newspapers and the TV channels. He had contacted a bank as given in Chapter 51. Yet the court is not ready to take action in this matter.

The above developments actually affect the dignity of the SC.

The Union Government on 29 November 2010 said that the 2G spectrum allocation was done illegally. In this connection - the Government added - that notices would be sent to 85 private companies. Accepting full responsibility, the Union Cabinet must have taken this decision. The Government should have informed this to the SC Bench hearing the 2G spectrum case.

The petitioners in the 2G spectrum case have no intension to recover the bribe money. They have not sought the court to attach the assets of companies involved in this scandal. The court also is not interested in these.

The petitioners are not seeking the prosecution of all Union Ministers.

As the conspiracy to usurp the spectrum originated from the underground mole long before the allocation of the 2G spectrum, the Court is not interested in approaching the case though the conspiracy angle.

The ND TV on 29 November 2010 hinted that the learned judges of the SC were being ‘fixed’.

Now, the people do not hear the full arguments. The important judgments are also not given in full. Live telecast of vital cases would enable the people to judge the judges. But the SC is not ready for this.

Further, the learned judges of the SC are not appearing in public meetings. When they talk something, the TV channels and newspapers do not publish it. Therefore, it is very difficult to judge the judges.

However, some of the judgments, utterances and advances of the present Chief Justice S. H. Kapadia, Justice A.K Ganguly and Justice Markadey Katju indicate that they are purely attached judges. These judges might hesitate to cheat their masters to establish justice.

The SC on 1 December 2010 ordered the Department of Income Tax to hand over the original tape recorded conversation of the moles with the other back room players to the SC – in a sealed cover - after taking necessary copies. In this way, the SC decided to cover up this for some time.

The SC should have published the entire recorded materials. The people running the telephone companies are tapping the conversations of 1000 million people. Therefore, 1000 million people have a right to hear their private conversations as well. There shall be no privileged class. This must continue so long as the telephone companies roll in their hands.

Due to the retirement of Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Mr. Amar Pratab Singh, senior most Special Director in the CBI, took over as the new Director on 30 November 2010.

However, the above transition was a very sudden one. The CBI raided the biggest house a few days ago. A mole too was brought to the surface. His sudden retirement appeared like an unnatural one. The Government should have reminded the people the procedure adopted to select the new Director a few days before his retirement.

A SC Bench said that the children of the learned judges of the High Court, Allahabad, were amassing wealth. The Bench added that there was something rotten in that court.

The Chief Justice of India could have enquired the corruption chares –if any- against the learned judges. Then, the SC could have taken necessary action against them. The Chief Justice did not do so. Therefore, there is something rotten in the SC.

Justice A.K. Ganguly, one of the judges of the Bench of the SC hearing the 2G spectrum case said that a Cabinet Minister should not have used the words “ unfair, discriminatory, capricious and arbitrary” in his letter addressed to the Prime Minister”.

It must be stated that the Prime Minister of India could have placed the matter in the Union Cabinet. He did not do so.

Further, the Bench could have sent a notice to the Prime Minister to find out his views in this matter. Instead, the learned judge was openly functioning like the advocate of the Prime Minister. Thus, the judge made corrupt practices the principles of government.

It must be firmly reiterated that no boy shall inherit any natural assets saying that his father bought the same through auction or sale deed. The natural assets –consistent with 7 May 2010 judgment of the SC - belong to all people, including the imbeciles. The son of the President of India cannot claim this. The children of the learned judges cannot claim this. Even the son of the General of the Indian Army cannot claim this. But some boys do claim this now.

Therefore, the act of auctioning public assets is a crime against the Constitution of India.

The SC Bench cannot be unaware of the above.

In fact, all right thinking people smell a rat in giving all crucial cases of economic importance to Justice A.K . Ganguly and Justice G.S. Singhvi.

The present revelations show that there exists a conspiracy to usurp public assets by tarnishing the image of the political leaders, the judges and the armed forces. For this, the underground mole and her associates trap them by giving money, shares or properties. If they were not susceptible, they approach their relatives and hand over money in cash or kind. Once trapped, they become their slaves. They cannot use their influence to take over public assets.

In view of the above, it is the paramount duty of Her Excellency the President of India to reconstitute these Benches with unattached judges. This is because the judges owning the shares of the companies would hesitate to cheat their masters to establish justice. When there are private interests, it is not easy to obtain justice.

The President might say that it is too late to change the composition of the Benches.

Therefore, the President may persist with the present judges to hear 2G spectrum case filed by the former Union Law Minister alone.

All other cases pertaining to the economy of the country shall be removed from the Bench comprising Justice A.K . Ganguly and Justice G.S. Singhvi and handed over to the unattached judges alone. This would restrain the ability of the Chief Justice to clone judgments that are biased in favour of the underground mole.

Justices Altamas Kabir, Raveendran, H.S. Bedi, Sudershan Reddy, Mukundakan Sharma, H.L. Dattu, A.K. Patnaik and Surindar Singh Nijjan do not, apparently, own the shares of private companies. Therefore, they are unattached judges. They are distinctly different from other judges. Attached judges could be considered only if larger Benches were needed. There must be no reason for the President to mistrust these judges.

It is said that an incarnation – in order to establish justice - resorted to cheating his opponents.

The facts from 28 November 2010 to 2 December 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 3 December 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

.