CHAPTER 164

164

CHEATING

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 28 November 2010. The copies had been sent to the Chief Justice of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Indian Army and the Indian Air Force.

When the ruler of India praised the Prime Minister of India as mentioned in the last mail, the present writer said that she had no premonition of danger. Now, a petitioner in the 2G spectrum case alleged that her two sisters received 2G spectrum money.

There are reports that the 2G spectrum money was only notionally given as in previous occasions. But the petitioner says that the money was electronically transferred.

The allegations like the above one would hurt the feelings of any real political leader. But the people level such charges against men in public life only. False allegations would only strengthen true conviction. Therefore, they must rebut such charges provided the charges were false. However, if her sisters had actually received the money with her knowledge, all right thinking people would consider her as a mole only.

There are reports that the underground mole had nine telephone connections.

In this connection, it must be stated that as early as on 12 December 1917, a political leader of India said that the other Indian leaders wanted to establish oligarchy in the country. He added that the leaders did not care for their people at all.

Thus the oligarchy was established on the day of Independence. Now, rejecting the mandate of the people an underground mole has been converting all political leaders into her moles and ruling India. She has been doing this to usurp public assets.

The Government said that 347 properties of Satyam Company had been attached and 87 properties would be sold very soon.

In this connection, it must be stated that when the Chief of Satyam used the word fraud, the Company Law Board and others descended on it, plucked its Information Technology wing and connected it with another private company in record time. But, despite present allegations against various companies, the Government is not even taking over public assets. This shows that the underground mole might have played a role in the Satyam matter also.

Some reports said that the Union Cabinet would take a decision to impose import duty on heavy power equipment from China to save domestic industries. The report said that China was heavily subsidizing exports facilitating higher export proceeds.

The Government, apparently, is tantalizing the Indian industries. Otherwise, it would have stopped the imports forthwith. Now, the Government is waiting for the green signal from the underground mole.

Rejecting this work and obeying the order of the underground mole, the Union Government sold the shares of the public sector Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) on 30 November 2010.

Neither did the Chief Justice of India enforce FREEDOM of expression nor did he stop the unconstitutional sale of the shares. He is loyal to his masters only. He cannot establish justice in India. Surely, the present Chief Justice of India is a mole of the underground mole. He has lost his moral and constitutional right to function as the Chief Justice of India.

Now there are reports that five private companies got over $5 billion from the public sector banks for buying the spectrum.

Evidently, the public assets are being converted into private assets using public money. This is a crime against the Constitution of India. This writer pointed out this many times to the President, Supreme Court and the CBI. The Government, therefore, stopped publishing these pieces of information. The recent revelations show that the underground mole has been converting public assets into private assets using public money. This is an organized crime going on with the knowledge of the Supreme Court (SC).

Now, a former Union Minister is giving interviews to the newspapers and the TV channels. He had contacted a bank as given in Chapter 51. Yet the court is not ready to take action in this matter.

The above developments actually affect the dignity of the SC.

The Union Government on 29 November 2010 said that the 2G spectrum allocation was done illegally. In this connection - the Government added - that notices would be sent to 85 private companies. Accepting full responsibility, the Union Cabinet must have taken this decision. The Government should have informed this to the SC Bench hearing the 2G spectrum case.

The petitioners in the 2G spectrum case have no intension to recover the bribe money. They have not sought the court to attach the assets of companies involved in this scandal. The court also is not interested in these.

The petitioners are not seeking the prosecution of all Union Ministers.

As the conspiracy to usurp the spectrum originated from the underground mole long before the allocation of the 2G spectrum, the Court is not interested in approaching the case though the conspiracy angle.

The ND TV on 29 November 2010 hinted that the learned judges of the SC were being ‘fixed’.

Now, the people do not hear the full arguments. The important judgments are also not given in full. Live telecast of vital cases would enable the people to judge the judges. But the SC is not ready for this.

Further, the learned judges of the SC are not appearing in public meetings. When they talk something, the TV channels and newspapers do not publish it. Therefore, it is very difficult to judge the judges.

However, some of the judgments, utterances and advances of the present Chief Justice S. H. Kapadia, Justice A.K Ganguly and Justice Markadey Katju indicate that they are purely attached judges. These judges might hesitate to cheat their masters to establish justice.

The SC on 1 December 2010 ordered the Department of Income Tax to hand over the original tape recorded conversation of the moles with the other back room players to the SC – in a sealed cover - after taking necessary copies. In this way, the SC decided to cover up this for some time.

The SC should have published the entire recorded materials. The people running the telephone companies are tapping the conversations of 1000 million people. Therefore, 1000 million people have a right to hear their private conversations as well. There shall be no privileged class. This must continue so long as the telephone companies roll in their hands.

Due to the retirement of Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Mr. Amar Pratab Singh, senior most Special Director in the CBI, took over as the new Director on 30 November 2010.

However, the above transition was a very sudden one. The CBI raided the biggest house a few days ago. A mole too was brought to the surface. His sudden retirement appeared like an unnatural one. The Government should have reminded the people the procedure adopted to select the new Director a few days before his retirement.

A SC Bench said that the children of the learned judges of the High Court, Allahabad, were amassing wealth. The Bench added that there was something rotten in that court.

The Chief Justice of India could have enquired the corruption chares –if any- against the learned judges. Then, the SC could have taken necessary action against them. The Chief Justice did not do so. Therefore, there is something rotten in the SC.

Justice A.K. Ganguly, one of the judges of the Bench of the SC hearing the 2G spectrum case said that a Cabinet Minister should not have used the words “ unfair, discriminatory, capricious and arbitrary” in his letter addressed to the Prime Minister”.

It must be stated that the Prime Minister of India could have placed the matter in the Union Cabinet. He did not do so.

Further, the Bench could have sent a notice to the Prime Minister to find out his views in this matter. Instead, the learned judge was openly functioning like the advocate of the Prime Minister. Thus, the judge made corrupt practices the principles of government.

It must be firmly reiterated that no boy shall inherit any natural assets saying that his father bought the same through auction or sale deed. The natural assets –consistent with 7 May 2010 judgment of the SC - belong to all people, including the imbeciles. The son of the President of India cannot claim this. The children of the learned judges cannot claim this. Even the son of the General of the Indian Army cannot claim this. But some boys do claim this now.

Therefore, the act of auctioning public assets is a crime against the Constitution of India.

The SC Bench cannot be unaware of the above.

In fact, all right thinking people smell a rat in giving all crucial cases of economic importance to Justice A.K . Ganguly and Justice G.S. Singhvi.

The present revelations show that there exists a conspiracy to usurp public assets by tarnishing the image of the political leaders, the judges and the armed forces. For this, the underground mole and her associates trap them by giving money, shares or properties. If they were not susceptible, they approach their relatives and hand over money in cash or kind. Once trapped, they become their slaves. They cannot use their influence to take over public assets.

In view of the above, it is the paramount duty of Her Excellency the President of India to reconstitute these Benches with unattached judges. This is because the judges owning the shares of the companies would hesitate to cheat their masters to establish justice. When there are private interests, it is not easy to obtain justice.

The President might say that it is too late to change the composition of the Benches.

Therefore, the President may persist with the present judges to hear 2G spectrum case filed by the former Union Law Minister alone.

All other cases pertaining to the economy of the country shall be removed from the Bench comprising Justice A.K . Ganguly and Justice G.S. Singhvi and handed over to the unattached judges alone. This would restrain the ability of the Chief Justice to clone judgments that are biased in favour of the underground mole.

Justices Altamas Kabir, Raveendran, H.S. Bedi, Sudershan Reddy, Mukundakan Sharma, H.L. Dattu, A.K. Patnaik and Surindar Singh Nijjan do not, apparently, own the shares of private companies. Therefore, they are unattached judges. They are distinctly different from other judges. Attached judges could be considered only if larger Benches were needed. There must be no reason for the President to mistrust these judges.

It is said that an incarnation – in order to establish justice - resorted to cheating his opponents.

The facts from 28 November 2010 to 2 December 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 3 December 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

.