CHAPTER 169

169

THE GREATEST EVIL

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 11 January 2011. The mail was immediately posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and it was linked to: www.thattan.com

The Union Ministers present in Delhi met again and again for three days from 12 January 2011. But the moles attributed the reason to onion prices.

17,368 farmers committed suicide in 2009 mainly because they did not get remunerative prices. Another reason was damage to their crops. The Union Ministers need not have met again and again to deny remunerative prices to the farmers.

Obviously, the moles dragged the onion price to ‘kill’ the news about this work.

In the past, they forced a former Prime Minister of India to fight with the Tamil boys in Sri Lanka for more than four years. The present ruler might have requested her husband - at least hundred times - to retract from this. But the underground moles persisted with this to divert the mind of the people. This shows that the moles are solely responsible for his death. Now they “kill” democracy ruthlessly.

The Chiefs of the Armed Forces appeared before the Parliamentary Accounts Committee (PAC) on 12 January 2011. The PAC wanted to know why the soldiers were getting sub-standard rations.

The Chiefs of the Armed Forces might have taken necessary action, if the PAC or any other authority had brought the above matter to their notice.

The recommendations of the Parliamentary Committees have no practical meaning. They might acquire some meaning only when they enjoy the approval of the moles.

Thus, when the Government denied salary to the soldiers as in the letter dated 3-1-2002 – Point No.9 in Chapter 5- the then PAC did not notice.

Further, the Sixth Pay Commission denied a reasonable pay scale to the employees. The present writer in Chapter 89 pointed out this. The PAC did not do anything.

A Parliamentary Committee on 29 April 2008 found fault with the present system of selection of judges as given in Chapter 92. None noticed it.

Now, the PAC requested the Chiefs of the Armed Forces to appear before them only because they lighted fire as mentioned in Chapter 135.

The PAC and the other authorities calling for explanation from the Chiefs of the Armed Forces must send the letters through a competent authority.

Similarly, the Chiefs of the Armed Forces must have the freedom to forward the letters they receive from the public to the Government and to the Chief Justice of India through the competent authority. In order to avoid delay, they must have the freedom to send advance copies. This would check the misuse power.

Whenever the Government denies FREEDOM with the intention of plundering public assets, the Supreme Court (SC) must intervene. The SC is not doing this. This is making the SC an evil institution. The Armed Forces would be reduced to an evil institution when it connives at the above.

Now, everything boils down to the question of identifying the greatest evil in India.

China on 12 January 2011 began to give stapled visa to two people from Arunachal Pradesh State. This is, apparently, a problem created by Dalai Lama.

A SC Bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice R.M. Lodha removed the stay on the so-called Palmolein Case. The SC stayed the case in August 2007. The allegation was that the accused caused a Re. 23.2 crore loss to the exchequer while importing palmolein.

The SC should have vacated the stay long ago. The former Chief Minister of Kerala –the first accused in the case- died a few days ago. Now, the SC wants to be brave at a safe distance.

The question of importing Palmolein was a policy decision of the Government of Kerala. Such policy decisions are associated with some commissions. The SC justifies this whenever the amount is very big. The people in villages say that anyone thieving more than $ 10 billion would be considered as a patriotic person.

Now, the SC vacated the stay because the present Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) is an accused in the above case.

In this connection, it must be stated that the post of the CVC was created only to cover up big acts of corruption by clipping the wings of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

The predecessors of the present CVC, in fact, covered up all big acts of corruption. The present CVC also will do this. The SC alone is attaching sanctity to the CVC.

A TV channel of a mole on 13 January 2011 said, “Too much analysis is paralysis”. This is the reply of the manipulators to the letter submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 11 January 2011.

Sri Lankan Navy personnel on 13 January 2011 killed an Indian fisherman by firing. For this, they used the gun and gun boats donated by India. India did not file even a First Information Report (FIR).

A SC Bench comprising Aftab Alam and R.M. Lodha on 14 January 2011 said, “We cannot allow the Republic to kill its own people”. The Bench made the observation on a petition seeking a probe into the alleged fake encounter killings of two militant people. The Bench wanted the Government to give a convincing answer.

In this connection, it must be noted that if the Government had not given public assets to private parties India would have got about $500 billion to $ 1 trillion during the last 10 years. Then – just like China -India could have utilized the entire man power of India for the development of the infrastructure. The militancy also would have disappeared long ago.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on 14 January 2011 barred five members of Reliance Natural Resources Limited (RNRL) from investing in the stock market for violating various norms including fraudulent and unfair trade practices. A specific charge was that the amount raised by external commercial borrowings was invested in the stock market. The investigation was ‘settled’ for Re. 50 crore without admission or denial of guilt.

Apparently, the above industrialists have committed treasonable offences. But the Directorate of Enforcement has no case against them. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also has no case against them.

Evidently, the above five industrialists are the petitioners. They are the defendants and the judges. They are the rulers. The people must repose their faith in their impartiality.

At a time when the State Bank of India (SBI) and the other Public Sector Banks committed huge amount of money to some people to buy assets in India and abroad, the former Chief of the Satyam Company did not get any money to save his company. Therefore, he described himself as a fraud. It was sufficient for the Government to attach –practically - all his assets.

Now, the SEBI describes the above industrialists as frauds. Yet, the Government allows them to import generators from China. This shows that the Government is in the hand of the moles.

The former Union Minister for Disinvestments in the NDA Government on 15 January 2011 described the present Union Minister for Finance as the crisis manager and key to the Government.

The above former Minister proclaimed to all Indians that he contacted a bank as mentioned in Chapter 51.But the law enforcing agencies ignore this. Therefore, he is talking like this from the roof top.

THE HINDU on 17 January 2011 published a photograph of the 1400 houses built for the tsunami victims. The people are curious to see the photograph of the houses built for the victims of the earth quake. This is to find out whether the Government distinguished between tsunami victims and earth quake victims.

A SC Bench comprising Justice B. Sudershan Reddy and Justice S.S. Nijjar wanted the Union Government to reveal the names of the depositors in the Liechtenstein Bank in Germany. The Government would not oblige without an order.

The leader of the principal opposition party - the BJP -said that the SC would earn the lasting gratitude of the people if it could bring back $ 462 billion stashed in foreign countries.

The preliminary investigations by the Vigilance and Anti-corruption Bureau, Government of Kerala State, found disproportionate assets in the name of the son-in-law of the former Chief Justice of India. Now the agency would probe whether he had accepted any bribe with the intension of influencing the former Chief Justice of India.

In this connection, it must be noted that one letter from a citizen was sufficient for the Chief Minister of Kerala State to launch an investigation into the assets of the son-in-law of the former Chief Justice of India. But the Union Government has ignored the allegations present in 168 letters addressed to Her Excellency the President of India.

The recent revelation confirms the fact that the foster son-in-law of the former Prime Minister of India influenced the decisions of the NDA Government.

It follows that the good of India was not the good of the former Prime Minister of India. Thus, the BALCO was given for a token amount in the pretext of a policy.

The guidelines devised for privatization did not allow the Government to sell public assets to charge-sheeted companies. Yet he handed over the public sector IPCL to a charge-sheeted company- again in the name of a policy.

In fact, exchequer suffered a loss of about $ 500 billion due to his patently corrupt acts. The SC collaborated with him. Most of the assets went in the hands of the people close to him - sugar coating everything as a policy.

A son of a former Naval Chief had been arrested for the corruption mentioned in Chapter -91. Some name sake actions were taken against a son of a former Prime Minister of India in the so-called urea case. Similarly, some actions were taken against a relative of another former Prime Minister of India in the Bofors case. Now the assets of a son-in- law of the former Chief Justice of India are also under scrutiny.

But the law enforcing agencies refuse to take action against a former Prime Minister of India alone. The system is distinguishing between citizen and citizen. In this matter the SC – like the scorpion- turns its poisonous sting against itself. The SC owes an answer to this.

An army court on 21 January 2011 found Lt. General P.K.Rath guilty of corruption in giving 70 acre army land in Calcutta.

Now, there are reports that a special court would be created to prosecute the Union Ministers and the learned judges of the SC.

The SC did not allow the High Courts to hear the BALCO case. In fact, the BALCO judgment delivered on 10 December 2001 was a ‘fixed’ one. The former Chief Justice of India - in all his innocence – reinforced it by ‘fixing’ a two judge judgment mentioned in Chapter 91.

The proposed bill would protect the Union Ministers and the learned judges of the Supreme Court from the courts all over India.

This happens because the SC refuses to enforce freedom of expression.

Sri Lankan Navy personnel on 22 January 2011 killed one more Indian fisherman. This time they tied a rope around the neck of the victim and dragged him to death. The USA had dropped a bomb in Libya for a far smaller crime.

Nietzsche says that great things are possible only when great evil is harnessed.

The facts from 11 January 2011 to 22 January 2011 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 23 January 2011.

V.SABARIMUTHU