191
DARK DESTINY
The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 4 December 2011 . The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Chief Election Commissioner, Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, Allahabad and Calcutta High Courts. Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com
On 4 December 2011 , The New Indian Express, through one of its writers - a Mr. T.J.S. George – said that what should not be “happening” was “happening” in the country.
A Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice A.K. Patnaik and Justice Swatanter Kumar, on 5 December 2011 , declared that the Supreme Court would not undertake any review of the policy decisions. This is the immediate reply to the email – the letter No.190 - sent to the Supreme Court of India on 4 December 2011 .
The Supreme Court of India has been talking like this – intermittently - for the last 10 years. This is the sound of a weird uncultured voice because it has been doing this by keeping a savage weapon – the media- in its hand.
The above bench, in a gruff voice, added that the Supreme Court of India would continue to remain as Supreme Court of India.
So long as the Supreme Court of India talks like this, Mr. Vajpayee, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, Mr. Advani, Dr. Manmohan Singh and other leaders will give Re.3 lakh crore or more in cash to private parties. In fact, these words are its order to give money to private parties in private interest.
Further, so long as the inducted judges cling to their position, the political leaders, CBI, media and others will pay homage to them; and the Supreme Court of India would continue to exist like this.
But all judgments of the inducted judges after 4-12-2011 - the crucial date on which the letter No.190 was sent - will continue to remain unconstitutional until it allows the people to see this work.
The Government of India, on 5 December 2011 , asked the Internet Companies – Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Facebook- to remove objectionable user content.
In the above matter, the Union Government, State Governments, Supreme Court and High Courts, all political leaders, and the media want to delete the entire work of this writer through a click of a mouse. This is to tell the people that they have a natural right to rule the nation by blacking out news and views.
As President Pratbha Devisingh Patil does not aspire for one more term, she could take a different stand.
On 5 December 2011 , the Parliament passed a condolence resolution for the 7 soldiers killed in a land mine blast in the Jharkhand state recently.
In this connection, it must be stated that the newspapers had not reported anything about the blast or the condolences. In this way, the media protects the image of the Supreme Court of India. This is the importance given to the life of the soldiers is a different matter.
The Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) granted permission to Cairn Energy to sell its Indian unit to Vedanta Company. Some newspapers reported this on 7 December 2011 .
The natural assets belong to the people. However, the Government could do anything after allowing the people to see this work.
A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Altamas Kabir, Justice Nijjar and Justice J. Chelmeswar on 7 December 2011stayed a high Court order that overrode the bail granted by Special Judge O.P. Saini to Mr. Chandolia, an accused in the 2G spectrum case.
Now, former Union Minister Raja and another person alone are in the prison.
At the same time, the real offenders continue to sit in the front row of Parliament.
Former Supreme Court judge Santhosh Hegde says that Mr. Advani is like his father. Therefore, the Supreme Court of India need not send anyone sitting in the front row or the big manipulators to jail. But, it must, at least, recover the lost assets.
Pointing out Voltaire, Rouseau, Thomas Paine and Junius, Chairman of Press Council of India Markandey Katju asked the media to promote rational ideas.
In this connection, it must be noted that Thomas Paine wrote the Rights of Man (1791) during the French Revolution. In 1802, he returned to the USA
Junius contributed a series of letters from 21 January 1769 to 26 January 1772 . The letters were famous for their political significance and style. Through the letters, he exposed arbitrary appointments, corruption and problems; and attacked Lord Chief Justice of England Mansfield for setting dangerous legal precedents regarding press freedom.
Evidently, Markandey Katju invoked the above philosophers by keeping the present writer in mind. But, he chose not to mention the name of this writer.
On the above occasion, Markandey Katju, disclosed that there had been pressure to suppress his report. But he posted that in the website. The Hindu reported this on 6 December 2012 .
In this connection, it must be noted that Markandey Katju had been an inducted judge. There still exists a link between him and the manipulators; and he knew from where the demand to suppress his report came. Therefore, he knew the mechanism of suppressing news and views. However, he does not want to offend his clients. Therefore, the PCI conceals everything. The CBI also does not want to know the mechanism presumably because it knew everything.
Her Excellency the President of India, on 7 December 2011 , interacted with five minor girls of West Bengal state for resisting marriage.
In this connection, it must be stated that this work belongs to these children because they bear the badge of darkness. Therefore, the President could have given importance to dispel the darkness from their mind.
However, the Government is not ready to confiscate even the smuggled Chinese items presumably because one or two boys received a huge commission from another end.
The Hindu, on 8 December 2011 , exposed a corruption of Re.500 crore in the purchase of some software for the Indian Army. In this way, The Hindu wants the armed forces to ignore the denial of freedom by the Supreme Court of India.
According to some reports, the Union Government had decided not to sell the shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). President Pratibha Devisingh Patil might have pointed out the unconstitutional nature of the sale.
The police, on 8 December 2011 , filed FIR against three former Chief Ministers of Karnataka state. This is the work of the recipients of public assets. They want to send all small offenders to jail.
The Election Commission of India (ECI), on 8 December 2011 , said that an elected legislator would have to face criminal prosecution, if he released any news after paying money.
The ECI knew that it is not paid news but suppression of news that influences the mind of the people. Yet, it continues to deceive the people by talking about paid news.
President Pratibha Devisingh Patil, on 8 December 2011 , cleared the name of an advocate for appointment as judge of Madras High Court.
In this connection, it must be stated that the present writer has sent hundreds of letters to the Chief Justices of High Courts. They could have accepted them as a writ petition to establish justice. But, they did not send even an acknowledgement. This happens because the inducted judges in High Courts also cannot establish justice.
Many advocates of High Courts have link with the manipulators of public money. They give huge amount of money or shares of the private companies to the advocates under one pretext or other before inducting them. Thus a few advocates in the High Courts outdistance thousands judges for the coveted post through acts of corruption.
President Pratibha Devisingh Patil has added one more to this rank, perhaps to make the appointments a constitutional one.
Had President President Pratibha Devisingh Patil given freedom to the people to know existence of this work, all inducted judges would have resigned thereby pre-empting the appointment of unethical advocates as judges of High Courts.
Does the President not lead the young girls in India
The facts from 4 December 2011 to 10 December 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 11 December 2011 .
The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India
V.Sabarimuthu.
26-3 Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167
No comments:
Post a Comment