155
SETTING AN EXAMPLE
The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 19 September 2010. The Prime Minister of India called on the President of India on the next day.
A former judge of the Supreme Court (SC) requested the Chief Justice of India – through a half page article - to find the correctness or otherwise of the submission of a former Union Law Minister that eight out of the last 16 Chief Justices of the SC were patently corrupt. India gave wide publicity to this. At the same time, India is not ready to inform the existence of this work to the people.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 20 September 2010 arrested 11 postmen allegedly for receiving tips while distributing pension to old age pensioners. Now the CBI might visit various public offices to catch the last grade servants because it is well known that they receive tips to transmit files from one table to another.
The militant people abducted 7 policemen in the Chhattisgarh State on 20 September 2010.
A Union Minister on 20 September 2010 said that India was not opposed to the POSCO getting a majority stake in its proposed joint venture with Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) in the 1.5 million tone integrated steel plant at Bokaro.
In this connection, it must be reiterated that when some Indian companies bought assets in South Korea, the people in Korea came to the street. In order to assuage their feelings, the ruler of India offered a mining cite to the POSCO in the Orissa State. The present writer had pointed out this to the ruler. Yet she refused to retract. Fortunately, the tribal people of Orissa fought against it. Several people were killed. The ruler did not allow the Indians to know the intensity of their agitation. Apparently, the tribal people won the war and the ruler dispatched her son to Orissa to claim the credit for it!
Now, in order to console the POSCO, the ruler is unilaterally offering Bokaro. As the Government is only a tenant, the Constitution of India stands on the way. In fact, but for this work, the Government would not have revealed anything through the media.
Dalai Lama- the Tibetan leader- on 21 September 2010 said that he would go to Tibet with Chinese passport.
In this connection, it must be noted that the present writer alone raised the question of passport. The Government conveyed this to him. Now, his words show that he is not in possession of a Chinese passport. The Constitution of India does not permit the Government to grant Indian passport to him. However, the ruler could clarify this.
India on 22 September 2010 said that the Chinese National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) was planning to set up a one-giga watt nuclear plant in Pakistan. India also revealed that other neighboring countries of India were planning to install nuclear reactors. This is in addition to the Chinese naval bases in their territories. India added that the people should not be frightened by this.
It is not a question of fear at all. Had the ruler of India put a word to Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Maldives, they would have obeyed her. Therefore, she should not have handed over such an environment to the posterity without recording the mildest protest. The Chinese naval bases around India would always remain as a target for the Indian forces. The nuclear reactors are an added irritant. India must firmly remind this to all neighboring countries - not secretly but openly - whenever they seek Indian assistance. At the same time, India could offer nuclear reactors for their energy needs provided they get rid of the naval bases of other countries.
Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Maldives are in the vicinity of India. They are not near to China. Therefore, they must be distinguished from other neighboring countries. India must be very sensitive to their every move.
The all party delegation that visited Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) State returned to New Delhi. As the ruler is not in favour of discussing this work, the delegation did not see any realistic solution.
Indian police on 22 September 2010 registered a First Information Report (FIR) against unknown Sri Lankan Navy personnel for assaulting Indian fishermen.
There was a time when India was quenching its thirst with the blood of the fishermen. During this period, India did not arrest any Sri Lankan fishermen when they strayed into Indian Territory. Now, not only Sri Lankan fishermen are being arrested but also a FIR has been filed for assaulting Indian fishermen. This would send shock wave across Sri Lanka.
A Supreme Court (SC) Bench comprising Justices Mukundakam Sharma and Anil R. Dave on 22 September 2010 said that the SC needed upright and honest judicial officers.
The world would not have heard such words of sitting judges against their colleagues. This must be due to the below par performance of some judges of the SC.
The above learned judges could have remained like a stone in the Supreme Court. But they did not do so. They detailed to themselves a duty only to show the correct way to their colleagues and to the nation so that others also would follow them. Thus, they have lighted fire although the people would not have understood the depth of their words. However, the present writer firmly believes that two judges are sufficient to give FREEDOM to Indians.
The learned judges of the SC must be talented enough to demand at least money equivalent to $10,000 as monthly pay. This is partly because the assets of India warrant this and partly because this salary is necessary for some judges to further their honesty in trying situations. This is the opinion of this writer.
The predecessor of the present Chief Justice of India delivered a toothless judgment on 7 May 2010 because he was keeping an eye on the post of the Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). He, in fact, got it. Even now he is not giving a human meaning to the above judgment. This is happening because of his poor pay in the SC.
Similarly, the present Chairman of the Press Council of India is a former judge of the SC. He could have given FREEDOM long ago. But, he is even now not ready for this presumably because he did not get a decent salary while he was in the SC. For the same reason, many judges directly go to some private companies after retirement.
The former Election Commissioner of India on 25 September 2010 described the substitution of Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) with ballot papers as a retrograde step. He compared it to the act of abandoning computers in banks. However, he wanted more security features in the EVMs. He said this at the instance of the Union Government.
There is no use in conducting elections without giving FREEDOM.
Even when the ballot papers were used, some constituencies in one general election witnessed practically nil invalid votes. In some other constituencies, the number of invalid votes was disproportionately high.
Further, in banks the computers compute the accounts within minutes what otherwise would take months. In contrast, time is not saved due to the introduction of the EVMs.
The former Election Commissioner did not tell the reason why security features must be strengthened. He did not give any reason why the votes polled did not tally in many constituencies. He did not reveal the reason why the Election Commission resorted to re-counting in many constituencies.
A private company is producing 60 million cubic metre of gas everyday from Andra Pradesh State alone. The Government disclosed this through one or two newspapers.
An industrialist had submitted in the SC that his brother was getting a profit of over the US $16 billion per year from one gas field alone. The present revelation confirms that his submission was a correct one.
Whose gas is this? This is the real asset of 1000 million people. Who is taking this? One boy is taking this.
In this connection, it may be pointed out that the USA is preserving its oil reserves. China is not taking its iron ore. Even Bangladesh is thinking of transmitting its gas reserves for the future generations. But the ruler of India is allowing some Indians and a few foreigners to exploit the minerals. The unconstitutional nature of this policy had been pointed out in this work.
If India wanted to exploit the minerals, it could –consistent with the 7 May 2010 judgment of the SC- do so through the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).
The above suggestion is not for communism at all. This is for public welfare only. Then, the salaries of the top public servants including judges, Army Officers, civil servants, bank managers anddoctors and would be equivalent to the US $ 10,000 to $20,000 per month. The starting pay of last grade servant would be $1000 per month. A highly conservative calculation would show that the last grade servant would start with $ 750. The Class I Officers would start with $2000 per month and end with $ 10,000.
The above salary is not after one, two, three or four years but with immediate effect.
The Government would have to spend about 25 per cent of its revenue alone on salaries. The rest could be used for public investments, poverty alleviation measures and others. The growth rate of many sectors would reach 75 to 100 percent. Now the Government is spending 50 per cent of the revenue on salaries.
The paramilitary personnel sacrifice their lives in jungles only to deny this salary to them and to others.
Some learned judges of the SC and others would consider this as an impossible one. They must agree to detail the paramilitary forces to all mining sites and telephone companies to know the real income.
The Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) now said that the salaries of the Chiefs of Public Sector Banks must be made equal to their counterparts in private banks. The Governor could see the salary structure of bank managers only. All others are simply his guards!
Now the Chairman of the Press Council of India (PCI) said that the media was safeguarding the interest of the corporate houses only. He added that the PCI was a toothless body. Her Excellency the President of India might have asked him to tell the reason for the non-publication of this work. However, the Chapters 152 and 153 are being sent to him by post to gauge his mind. It may be recalled that this work had been sent to the Chairman of the Press Trust of India (PTI) in vain.
India on 27 September 2010 revealed that Prince Charles will declare the Commonwealth Games (CWG) open while the President of India will say let the Games begin on 3 October 2010.
On receipt of this work, the Queen of England might have requested India to give FREEDOM to Indians. India would not have responded to this in the proper way. Therefore, the Queen might have decided not to notice the facial expressions of the ruler.
India then asked a former Union Minister to talk against the CWG in the hope that the CWG Federation would cancel the Games. This did not happen until yesterday. Therefore, the Government is concocting stories for the present predicament.
Ignoring the FREEDOM of Indians, the Queen could have come to India to declare the CWG open. Then everyone would have thought that there was nothing serious in the denial of FREEDOM to Indians. Following the example set by her, everyone would have ignored the FREEDOM of Indians. Thus the Queen has sacrificed her greatest interest –the CWG- for the FREEDOM of Indians. In fact, she too has lighted fire by assuming a different duty.
It is said that an incarnation assumed a duty only to set an example to the man so that he too – instead of remaining quiet – would do his duty.
The facts from 19 September 2010 to 27 September 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 28 September 2010.
V.SABARIMUTHU
No comments:
Post a Comment