GREED
The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 28 October 2010. Two or three meetings of the Union Cabinet ensued. The real purpose of the meetings was not disclosed.
An industrialist on 28 September 2010 disclosed that he was in possession of a huge coal reserve.
A Bench of the Supreme Court (SC) on 29 September 2010 - while hearing a case related to the Delhi Commonwealth Games - expressed dismay at the rampant corruption in India.
The officers of the Indian Navy on 29 September 2010 held talks with the Sri Lankan Navy personnel on the attack on Indian fishermen. Sri Lankan Navy personnel gave a solemn assurance that there would not be any further incidents of harm to the Indian fishermen.
A Bench of High Court, Allahabad, comprising Justice Sudhir Agarwal, Justice S.U.Khan and Justice D.V.Sharma, in a crucial judgment on 30 September 2010, ruled that the disputed land at Ayodhya should be partitioned into three parts. A two third portion should be shared by two Hindu plaintiffs and one third portion should go to Sunni Muslims. Justice S.U Khan and Justice Sudhir Agarwal ordered that the portion below the central dome of the demolished structure must be allotted to Hindu plaintiffs.
The judgment was based on two facts.
1. The joint ownership of the land was proved and
2. No party proved the commencement of the title.
The above facts were not known to the people before the judgment. Therefore, they were, apparently, happy with the verdict. In fact, there was no incidence of violence anywhere in the world after the judgment. One Mr. Gulam Mohamed Shaikh said that the photos of the above judges should be hung on each cross road. The Hindu reported this on 1 October 2010.
It must be noted that the Bench comprised two Hindu judges and a Muslim judge. The Muslim judge concurred with a Hindu judge. Therefore, Hindus and Muslims could not oppose the judgment. The Bench had been constituted in partial fulfillment of the Point No.1 of Chapter 34.
The ruler of India on 29 September 2010 distributed the first set of 12 digit Unique Identification Numbers called aadhrar to 10 women of a tribal community.
The militant people killed four paramilitary personnel on 3 October 2010 in the Madhya Pradesh (MP) State. They killed four more on the next day. Besides, they killed 3 people in the West Bengal State. It is not known whether the militant people remain under one leader or many leaders.
The Chief of Indian Air Force, Air Marshal P.V. Naik on 4 October 2010 said that India was watching with caution not only China but also small neighbours. He, further, said that anything that impacted the growth of the nation was a matter of concern.
The Union Cabinet on 5 October 2010 decided to sell 10 per cent shares of the Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) to generate about US $ 350 million.
A perusal of the Chapters from 1 to 31 would show that the previous NDA Government had rescinded hundreds of decisions on privatization. The present ruler had also abandoned the policy of selling shares based on this work. Similarly, the public sector banks and the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) had been stopped from buying the shares of favoured companies. The ruler had done these because of their unconstitutional nature. The careful reading of the Chapters from 41 to 50 would prove this. Now the ruler has resumed all old policies.
If the present policies of the ruler were constitutional, the Government could defeat the purpose of the Preamble, Article 14 and other provisions of the Constitution of India and arbitrarily:
1. Advance money to the favoured people to buy the PSUs.
2. Buy the shares of favoured companies using public funds.
3. Sell the PSUs to charge-sheeted companies.
4. Advance public money to the Unit Trust of India (UTI).
5. Hand over about the US $66 billion rotting in the Provident Fund to two or three people.
6. Give the US $ 88 billion in the Pension Fund to about two or three people and ask all public servants to remain at their mercy.
7. Allow about ten people to remove perennially all natural assets.
8. Hand over roads, ports, airports and others to the same people.
9. Hand over the entire foreign exchange to them and
10. Deny FREEDOM to the people.
In fact, all the above unconstitutional acts are going on now, particularly under the present Chief Justice of India.
This happens mainly because the ruler, SC, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), investigation agencies, bureaucracy, media, Election Commission of India and the paramilitary forces have become a monopoly of the manipulators.
Thus, the cases mentioned in Chapter 6 have not been taken to their logical conclusion.
The public sector Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) still remains in the hands of a charge-sheeted company although a guideline devised for selling the PSUs forbade it.
Similarly, investigation for selling the public sector Indian Petro Chemical Corporation (IPCL) to a charge-sheeted company is still in the preliminary stage of investigation.
A son of a former Prime Minister –Chapter 31- removed a huge amount of money for buying urea. The SC does not remember anything about it.
One day, the SC cancelled the petrol pumps – Point No.7 Chapter 25 - sanctioned by the Members of Parliament (MPs). Then some private companies distributed them in the way they liked. When it was pointed out to the SC, the petrol outlets remained closed for sometime. Now, they again distribute them. Until the judgment, the ex-service men and the handicapped had been getting some petrol outlets. After the judgment, no ex-service man got any petrol outlet. Many soldiers are becoming handicapped everyday. Even they are not getting any.
Why does the ruler resume selling the shares of the PSUs? This cannot be due to dearth funds. The truth is that about ten people get unlimited money from the natural resources. Whenever they fail to buy assets abroad, they direct the ruler to sell the shares. The ruler remains helpless. In this way they use their surplus money.
Some Union Ministers and some learned judges of the SC have not amassed wealth. Apparently, they have no desire for tainted money. Then, why do they not tremble at these manipulations? Surely, “the harm done by the good is the most harmful harm”. In fact, every unfaithful action has been twisted through and through by the good.
Why does the ruler do this? This could be due to greed for wealth or power.
If someone offered the US $10 to an honourable poor old man in a village, he would refuse to accept it. Having lived without accepting gratis from others, he would prefer to spend the rest of his life like this. In contrast, if some money were offered to a greedy man, he would readily accept it.
India is a country of over 1000 million people. None should have agreed to function as the ruler of India with an understanding of transmitting public assets to private parties.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 5 October 2010 questioned Satyam Company founder, Mr. Ramalinga Raju to probe the alleged fund diversion. Mr.Raju generated employment for thousands of graduates. India did not give any natural assets to him. Yet, his assets have been confiscated. He was in the jail for about two years. The cases against him must be compared to the cases against the Chairman of the Medical Council of India (MCI).
The Union Cabinet on 5 October 2010 decided to form a Committee under a retired Chief Justice of India to scrutinize the serious charges of misconduct of the judges of the SC and High Courts.
This is bait for the Chief Justice of India. The Government is expecting his help for its unconstitutional manipulations. Therefore, such Committees and Commissions could be under one, two or three serving judges.
The learned judges of the High Courts and the SC must be given decent salary for their talent, knowledge, service and commitment. But they should not be greedy to the extent of accepting post retirement positions in the Government or in private companies.
The Tibetans in exile on 4 October 2010 conducted the first round of general election at Himachal Pradesh to elect their Prime Minister. Himachal Pradesh shall not be used for any anti-China or pro-Tibetan activities because these actions prompt China to consider Himachal Pradesh as a part of China.
An Indian motor company on 4 October 2010 bought 80 per cent stake of a design and engineering company of Italy.
The Defense Minister of India said that there was a threat to the unity of India from the neighbouring countries.
The Chief of the Air Staff, Air Marshal P.V.Naik on 9 October 2010 gave an interview to the NDTV. The manipulators deployed a journalist to probe his mind to the question of committing the armed forces against the militant people. The interview showed that the other methods adopted by them to approach him had ended in vain.
On the next day, the Air Chief described the security situation in the neighborhood of India to a volcano. He added that the volcano would erupt now or in the next 100 years.
The militant people killed 3 soldiers in the Chhattisgarh State on 10 October 2010. The ruler did not condemn the killings. The gun salutes given to the slain soldiers were also not shown even in the public sector TV channel.
In this connection, it must be reiterated that India is a Republic. This means that the people are supreme and there shall be no privileged class. Further, in a democracy –Chapter 42 - the Government must win not by the force of armed forces but by the force of conviction.
The ruler could kill the militant people only if India did not hand over public assets to about ten privileged people.
Now, the ruler is using the force of the armed forces only to transfer public assets to about ten privileged people.
Therefore, the present action of the ruler is a sacrilegious declaration of war against 1000 million people. This is willful defiance of the rule of law and therefore a First Information Report (FIR) must be filed against the people responsible for such deaths.
The Chief Justice of India has not done justice to the papers before him. Therefore, the learned judges of the Supreme Court must examine whether the Chief Justice of India also is responsible for the above killings.
On 9 October 2010 India sent four naval ships to Sri Lanka for training and joint exercises.
When India was rapt in killing Tamils, not only Sri Lanka but also Bangladesh and Maldives allowed China to establish naval bases in their territories. Thus they opted to remain under the security umbrella of China. Now, these countries look like the mirror image of China.
A SC Bench requested the Union Government to give a reply to the finding of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) that the Nation lost about the US $31 billion in 2G spectrum allotments.
This is the first time that the people are hearing about the report of the CAG in the 2G spectrum matter. Anyone could envisage the amount of money going into the hands of a few people.
Assume that there are a few people with the US$ 1billion each. What will they do when a spectrum worth $30 or $40 billion were auctioned? They would demand the Government to hand over it to them following the precedent set earlier. When a boy takes $ 16 billion from one gas field alone, one or two other boys would also demand a share in the natural assets like this. The remedy is obvious.
The ruler on 9 October 2010 said that the benefits of growth must reach every individual, particularly economically weaker sections of the society that include Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, backward class and minorities.
The ruler has no FREEDOM to take the natural assets for the benefit of the weaker sections. Therefore, the ruler is requesting the people enjoying the natural assets to part with part of their income for the benefit of the weaker sections.
It is said that greed governs the mind of demons.
The facts from 28 September 2010 to 10 October 2010 are submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 11 October 2010.
V.SABARIMUTHU
No comments:
Post a Comment