452. THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA: THE IMPLIED MEANING

452

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA:

THE IMPLIED MEANING

The Government of Tamil Nadu, on 7 December 2015, announced financial assistance to the flood victims.

As many lost their huts, they would be allotted houses in different places.

Apparently, the relief would be comparable to  that of the earthquake victims of Gujarat.

As a permanent flood control measure, the surplus waters from the reservoirs may be taken to some other regions.

The new Chief Justice of India, TS Thakur, on 6 December 2015, said, “We have a Rule of Law. My institution is capable of upholding the rights of citizen”.

Does he talk the truth? The facts do not support his claim. He should not have talked like this because the people trust him. Why should he tell a lie to them?

          The Constitution of India says that the President of India would appoint judges in consultation with the Chief Justice of India.

          The implied meaning is that a citizen would become a judge on his own right based on a well defined law.

          Assume, that the Constitution says that the President of India is free to appoint  anyone as a judge.

          Then, it is a wrong Constitution because a constitution cannot be unjust or immoral.

          The present method of selection is against law.

          This is not Rule of Law.

          Similarly, the Constitution has no specific law for the public properties.

          The implied meaning is that the court would protect the public resources.

          It proved that it is not capable of doing this.

In fact, the court, alienates them.

Further, freedom of expression is the most important fundamental right of the people.

It has dual character – the right to speak and the right to hear according to degree.

It is the implied meaning of freedom of expression.

The Supreme Court of India is the competent authority to enforce this although the High Courts can also do this.

However, the chief justice pretends that he does not know the meaning!

This work is the most important voice of the people.

It has the potential to protect the 70 mines mentioned in the last letter.

It has the potential to give freedom of expression to 1000 million people.

Until the people hear the views presented in this work, the court cannot say that it upholds the rights of citizens.

He has no income from the mines to maintain TV channels or newspapers. What can we do? The Chief Justice of India cannot talk like this.

This is letter No.452.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 8-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

8- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851