457
THE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:
A
MENACE.
The
Supreme Court of India, on 15 December 2015, expressed its unhappiness over the
time taken by the Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) to complete the investigation of coal related cases. The
court posted the case to January 11, 2016. Justices Madan B. Lokur,Kurian Joseph
and A.K.Sikri were in the bench.
A
great illegality occurred and the court wants to put right that public wrong.
This is the pretended stand of the Supreme Court of India in the coal and spectrum cases.
A
constitution must deal with common cause.
It cannot function with private interest.
The
Constitution of India also must deal with public interest.
It
does not allow the court to alienate the public resources.
The
government of India also did not - in public interest- enact any law to
alienate any coal blocks or any other natural resources.
The
Supreme Court of India induced the government to alienate the public resources
with out following any law.
Accordingly,
the government apportioned them.
It
was an induced action.
If
the government had violated any law, the court should have pointed out the law-
violated by the government- before
proceeding with the case.
It
did not do so.
This
is an act of corruption.
It is nothing but ‘a national economic terror’
perpetrated by the court.
Upholding
the Bihar and Odisha anti corruption laws, a Supreme Court of India bench
comprising Justices Anil R. Dave and Dipak Misra, on 15 December 2015, described corruption as ‘a
national economic terror’.
The
laws allow the court to attach the disproportionate assets of public servants.
These
laws are redundant. The disproportionate assets of small offenders are selectively being attached even now.
What
is required is laws for Freedom.
The
bench, further, said,"Corruption, a `noun` when assumes all the
characteristics of a `verb`, becomes self-infective and also develops
resistance to antibiotics."
Anyone going going through the
judgement would say that the court wants to prevent acts of corruption.
The people possessing power alienate
the public resources, amass wealth and park them in foreign countries.
They spend part of the money to run
newspapers and TV channels.
The same people enact laws to attach disproportionate assets.
The court allows this.
Therefore, it has no moral or constitutional
right to talk about corruption.
Actually, when corruption changes into verb,
it acquires an immunity to public cries for Freedom. The immune verb does not reveal what is
happening.
Thus, 456 letters failed to change the court.
The court that denies Freedom is far more
dangerous than the corrupt.
An unscrupulous court is a greater menace than a
corrupt public servant.
Any judge possessing a straight heart would agree
with this.
This
is letter No.457.
This email is being submitted to His Excellency the
President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner,
Indian Army the Indian Air Force,
Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 16-12-- 2015.
16- 12---2015.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
Mobile: 9486214851
No comments:
Post a Comment