Sunday, November 28, 2010

CHAPTER 162

162
KNOWING THE BODY
Former Chief Justice of Delhi High Court, Justice A.P. Shah, on 13 November 2010, said that the judges were chosen based on undisclosed criterion in largely unknown circumstances reflecting an increasing democratic deficit. The present learned judges of the Supreme Court could devise a transparent method of selection without thinking about the fruits of their action.
The L&T Company, a big private company in India, on 14 November 2010, decided to close down its generator, turbine and boiler factories. The company said that its demand to impose import duty on Chinese boilers was turned down by the Government.
Thus the above company was constrained to close down the generator factories in India in total disgust.
In this connection, it must be noted that China wanted to convert India into its vassal state. It is even giving bribe to some Indian industrialists to achieve its goal. In fact, several industries in India have been closed down due to the Chinese onslaught.
The present writer has been pointing out the above matter through this work. In fact, the present writer is the only person in India to consistently point out this. The present writer has been doing this only to save India and the Indian industries. Yet the ruler refuses to listen. This shows that the ruler is wrecking vengeance upon India.
Therefore, Her Excellency the President of India, the armed forces and the learned judges of the Supreme Court must contribute their share to rescue India from the ruler. They must contribute their share –without expecting any fruits for their action - to stop similar imports from China and help revive the closed factories in India.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), on 15-11-2010, arrested two former officials in connection with the corruption in the Delhi Commonwealth Games (DCG).
The 2G spectrum scandal forced the Union Minister for Communication to resign from the Union Cabinet on 15 November 2010.
The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) in his report said that the 2G spectrum was allocated arbitrarily in 2008 to benefit a few players thereby causing a loss of over $39 billion to the exchequer.
Now the Prime Minister of India said that everyone must respect the views of the CAG.
It may be recalled that the Prime Minister had submitted in the Supreme Court that the CAG had no power to question the policy decision of the Government. Now, he is not ready to reiterate it. This is the repercussion of the last mail submitted to Her Excellency the President of India.
A two- judge Bench of the Supreme Court - hearing the 2G spectrum scandal - on 16 November 2010 - questioned the inaction of the Prime Minister over a letter of a former Union Law Minister that sought sanction for the prosecution of the now resigned Union Minister for Communication. Now the Solicitor General (SG) did not want to infuriate the judges by uttering the words policy decision before them. This is also the effect of the last mail submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 13 November 2010.
The above former Law Minister, in an interview to a TV channel on 14 November 2010 disclosed that about $13 billion was given as bribe for 2G spectrum allocation. He said that the money was electronically transferred to some countries. He mentioned the names of the countries also. He added that the USA had agreed to furnish all electronic transactions.
The former Law Minister would not have said this for cheap publicity. If he had said anything to tarnish the image of any political leader during the pendency of his case, the Supreme Court would have taken his revelations seriously.
However, though the above former Law Minister mentioned the names of the recipients of money in Chennai, he did not disclose the names of the recipients of money in Delhi. He should have revealed the names of all recipients. But he did not do so. So he might think of withdrawing the case if the people in Delhi were affected.
An industrialist, on 15 November 2010, revealed that the then Union Minister for Civil Aviation demanded Indian Rupee 15 crore to grant him permission to enter airline business in India 12 years ago. He added that he chose not to give bribe to start a business.
The Hindu, on 16 November 2010, disclosed that a joint venture between the Indian industrialist and Singapore Airlines withdrew a bid to buy Air India (AI) in 2001. The paper said that the reason was political opposition. This shows that the letter dated 1-6-2001 given in Chapter 1 of this work saved the AI in 2001.
The New Indian Express, on 16 November 2010, through a centre page article wanted India to embrace China and not the USA. The paper said that this would enable India and China to control world market and to manipulate the dollar.
China is so rich that its armed forces are besieging India. Yet, the media mafias say that India must embrace China. This shows that the ruler is following the path shown by the media mafias.
Further, the USA entered China in the hope of amassing wealth. But China converted the USA into its vassal. Now China could give $100 billion to any country through a cheque. But the USA is not in a position to give even $10 billion to any country.
India lost $ 462 billion from 1948 to 2008 due to illegal financial outflows. Washington based Global Financial Integrity (GFI) found this. According to the GFI the flight of capital was faster since the so-called economic reforms in 1991. The GFI said that over $125 billion of that was lost during 2000-2008. This revelation is consistent with this work.
In this connection, it may be recalled that some people in India seized power saying that they would bring back truck loads of money siphoned off from India. Now, it is clear that they allowed some people to remove shiploads of money from India. The world would not have seen such a treachery.
The two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court, on 18 November 2010, described the 2G scandal as an extremely serious one and asked the Prime Minister of India to file an affidavit mainly for the following two reasons.
1. The Prime Minister should not say that an opportunity was not given to him to present his case and
2. There were some hidden facts.
The stand of the Bench in this case is similar to the stand taken by the two-judge Bench that heard the BPCL-HPCL appeal case. In the latter case, the two judges circumvented the BALCO judgment saying that the permission of the Parliament was needed to privatize the BPCL and the HPCL.
Now the Bench is circumventing the BALCO judgment through the angle of corruption.
The BALCO judgment allowed the Government to commit acts of corruption through arbitrary decisions. In fact, the Supreme Court has been encouraging the Union Government to commit acts of corruption since the BALCO judgment, all in the name of economic policy. It had gone to the extent of imposing a fine - as in Chapter 63 - for dragging the privatization of the Mumbai and Delhi airports case before it. The court –after allowing the Government to commit acts of corruption - is catching the Union Ministers red-handed.
Anyhow, the developments show that the learned judges of the Supreme Court are realizing the nature of their body. The case is in their hands and they would have to monitor it on a day-to-day basis.
The case would affect all Union Ministers because they are bound by a collective responsibility. In fact, the court should have asked all Union Cabinet Ministers to file affidavits severally and collectively to meet the ends of justice.
The ruler also should have been asked to explain her role in this matter. Without this, it is difficult to unravel the hidden facts.
The Government, on 18 November 2010, revealed that some private telephone companies did not submit the badly needed documents to the CAG to verify their gross revenues during the last three years.
In this connection, it must be noted that the former Chief of the Satyam Company was in jail for about two years for the mere act of boosting his income. Now, some companies are not showing their documents to the CAG. This is not to say that any industrialists should be arrested at all. This is only to say that about ten men in India are stronger than laws.
However, the developments show that the Supreme Court might have asked the competent authorities to ascertain the real income of the companies that exploit the natural assets. This gives the impression that the Supreme Court - as an institution - has started knowing the nature of its body.
In fact, India could be created by the Supreme Court alone; by its reason, image, will and love. For this, the learned judges must be lovers of knowledge.
The Government now said that the initial public offer (IPO) of the public sector Manganese Ore India Limited (MOIL) would start on 26 November 2010.
In this connection, the following letter is submitted to Her Excellency the President of India.
From
V. SABARIMUTHU
26-3 THATTANKONAM
VELLICODE
MULAGUMOODU P.O.
PIN: 629167
To
HER EXCELLENCY THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA
RASTRAPATHI BHAVAN
NEW DELHI
Your Excellency
The Government is selling public assets after transmitting the revenue from natural assets to some private individuals. The arbitrary nature of this arbitrage trading has been explained in various chapters. The Government is repeating this in bad faith because it could deny FREEDOM of expression. It is a plunder and an act of corruption. Therefore, Her Excellency the President of India is requested to sanction permission to this writer to prosecute the Union Cabinet Ministers, including the Prime Minister of India under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The President is requested to consider this as a formal letter from this writer.
THANKING YOUR EXCELLENCY
VELLICODE Yours faithfully
20-11-2010 V. SABARIMUTHU
The ruler now talked about “graft and greed” while keeping the Prime Minister beside her. This is not the voice of a healthy body because everything happened with her knowledge. The policy of the Government could not have been contrary to the policy of the ruler.
However, the son of the ruler supported the Prime Minister. Why does he support the Prime Minister? This shows that all recipients of money must be exposed.
Some newspapers, on 20 November 2010, published the taped conversations of some back room players during the formation of the present Union Government in May, 2009. The papers alleged that money was given to the relatives of political leaders for berths in the Union Cabinet.
Why do the media reveal this now? The reason is that the TV channel of the above leader revealed that the CAG had used the word “fraud” for the spectrum allocation in 2001. Obviously, the spectrum allocation in 2001 was –in the eye of the CAG – more serious than the spectrum allocation in 2008.
Thus the case boils down to a fight between a group of ten families and one family.
Now the Union Government is working on a formula to recover the $39 billion lost in the 2G allocation.
$39 billion is a small amount. The Government would have to recover the money lost in 2001 spectrum allocation.
The minerals- just like spectrum - are natural resources. Therefore, the Government would have to recover the money lost in the exploitation of minerals. About $500 billion to $ 1 trillion would have to be recovered.
The CBI, on 20 November 2010, raided the $ 2 billion 4,00,000 square feet house of Mr. Mukesh Ambani, one of the richest men in the world. He is producing 2 per cent of the global out put of oil.
The CBI had earlier charge-sheeted his company under the Official Secret Act. The CBI had ample evidence before it. Yet the case went into oblivion. What happened to the incriminating materials seized from his office then is not known to anyone.
Therefore, the purpose of the present raid is not immediately known.
A Tamil TV channel from Chennai alone reported the raid today. Even the public sector TV channel did not report the raid. Even in this matter, it appears that there exists a fight between one house and a group of ten houses.
It is said that the act of knowing the nature of the body is knowledge.
The facts from 13 November 2010 to 20 November 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 20 November 2010 at 10 PM.
V. SABARIMUTHU

No comments: