237
A
GREAT POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGE
The
former coal secretary, Mr. Parakh, on
25 October 2013, said that he had obeyed illegal orders that were against his
advice.
“It is the law of the world to serve those
in power”.
The miners and the recipients of the Provident Fund (PF) are the most
powerful people in India. They eclipse even the Supreme Court of India. In
fact, the entire system obeys this “elite group”. However, it is disappointing to note that
there are no exceptional cases.
The NDA Government under Mr. A.B. Vajpayee succeeded in giving
the BALCO, VSNL, IPCL, HZL and a few other
Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) in
private interest to the private parties. But, it gave a small degree of Freedom
to this writer to anticipate its actions. This was sufficient to point out the violation
of the sacred laws of the land. Thus the present writer could cripple the
process of privatization through suitable letters.
But the present government disposed of the
public assets without making the slightest noise- not for one or two years but
for about ten years!
This is nothing but robbing the dead.
There
is no other meaner crime than this.
The Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices R. M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and
Kuria Joseph, on 29 October 2013,
dismissed a petition that sought direction to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to file an affidavit in the coal
case. The Bench said, “We are hearing the matter and you are reaching the
conclusion”.
If the Union Government had not done
anything illegal, it must have openly approached the Supreme Court of India and
restrained the Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) from seeking the documents from the Prime Minister’s
Office (PMOs).
The government could not do so. Therefore,
the government under Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh should have resigned.
Now he cannot take any action to recover even
the revenue taken by the miners. He cannot do anything for the happiness of the
people. He is virtually sitting in a jail.
This is the actual position of the
Constitution of India.
The Bench then appointed an amicus curie. He
might advise the judges to grant Freedom to Indians because this writer is
still unknown to them. This alone would impart legality to the coal case and
all other cases against the economic offenders.
The Central
Bureau of Investigation (CBI), on the same day, submitted the status report
in the coal case to the Supreme Court.
The contents of the report were not
published. This is a bad portent for the nation.
On the same day, four state governments
submitted the guidelines followed by them for the allocation of coal. The Bench
kept their reports away from the eye of the people. This shows that the court
does not want to produce any serious economic change.
A perusal of the website: www. primeministerdevegowda.blogspot.com
shows that the United Front (UF) government
led by Mr. H.D. Deve Gowda had
delegated the power to grant mining licences to the state governments. Coal
also comes under this class. However, the people have no “Freedom” to know the status
of that decision.
The
Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) might have found out the destination of the
ores and the nature of the remittances. The state police and the other anti-corruption
agencies would have – at least partially- detected the deployment of the proceeds.
If asked, the miners would have revealed the
names of the political leaders and the other victors enjoying the spoils.
Thus, the people would have got a chance to
know the real nature of hundreds of political leaders, bureaucrats and miners
all over India. This, in fact, would have led to a great political and economic
change.
Unable to bear the weight of the above changes,
the Supreme Court of India selected Mr.
Birla and Mr. Parakh alone for a First Information Report (FIR). This is
against equality present in the Constitution of India.
Bowing
to the demand of former Cabinet Secretary
TSR Subramonium, former Chief Election Commissioner N. Gopalaswamy, former Election Commissioner T.S. Krisna
Murthy, former CBI Directors Jogindar Singh and D.R. Kaarthekeyen and 77 other retired bureaucrats, a Supreme
Court Bench comprising Jutices K.S.
Radhakrishnan and PC Ghose, on 31
October 2013, directed the government to enact a law to set up a Civil
Service Board within three months.
The Bench said that the Board must ensure
a fixed tenure to the bureaucrats. It must regulate postings, transfers and
disciplinary action against the bureaucrats.
It felt that its order would curtail
political interference and prevent the deterioration of the functioning of the
bureaucracy.
Actually, these are due to the denial of
Freedom by the Supreme Court.
The IAS and the IPS officer’s associations
welcomed the judgement. The TV channels hailed it. The newspapers described
this as a landmark judgement.
According to some reports, the Bench asked
the bureaucrats not to obey oral orders.
In this connection, it must be stated that
the bureaucrats must obey the oral and written orders of the competent
authorities provided they are for the happiness of the people.
Usually, the Supreme Court takes months,
and even years to deliver a judgement.
In contrast, it heard the case secretly and
delivered the judgement instantly.
It did not even ask the petitioners to submit
the list of the public servants shifted in bad faith in the last ten years.
There
is a story behind the extra-ordinary interest taken by the court.
The “elite group” had placed suitable
bureaucrats in key positions during the period of the NDA under Mr. A.B. Vajpayee.
When the UPA under Dr. Mammohan Singh came to power, the coalition partners - some in
supreme public interest- started to transfer them.
Obeying the elite group, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh asked the
ministers not to shift any bureaucrats in the Secretariat.
This enabled them to misuse their position
with the government. Thus they secretly furthered the private interests of the elite
group for the last nine years.
A new grouping will come to power after the
impending election. The coalition partners would shift some bureaucrats in
public interest. In order to maintain the status quo, the elite group
approached the Supreme Court in the guise of public interest.
The court did not understand the devilish
plan of the elite group or the sinister motive of the petitioners.
The judgement seeks to take away the happiness
of the people. It must be withdrawn immediately.
It shall not disobey this writer because it
is non-public information.
Mr.
L.K. Advani and Chief Minister Mr.
Narendra Modi, on 31 October 2013, laid the foundation stone for a 182
metre high statue of Sardar Vallabai
Patel – called Unity Statue- at
Gujarat.
Freedom is more important than unification.
The
New Indian Express, on 28 October 2013, reported that 5, 300 out of 17,987 textile
factories in India remained non-operational during 2000-2010. Is the Supreme
Court not responsible for this?
President of India’s Secretariat sent three
letters to three different departments- Ministry of Defence included – based on
the letters. The present writer received their copies on 30 October 2013.
The
Governor of the Reserve Bank of India
(RBI), on 31 October 2013, gave an
interview to the NDTV. He attributed the slow growth rate of India to
democracy.
This is an indication that he had advised
the Union Government to reinvest the Re. 3 lakh crore in the PF in the hand of the
private parties. This must be verified in public interest.
This is letter No. 237.
The writer alone says that there is no
Freedom to Indians. It is non-public information.
The Supreme Court does not understand this.
Therefore, this writer is unknown to 1000 million people.
His Excellency the President of India
could allow this condition to continue only if it is for the happiness of the
people.
It must be noted that two former Presidents
– Mr. K.R. Narayanan and Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam- had gone to the
Supreme Court to fulfil the demands of this writer.
The
facts from 25 October 2013 to 2 November 2013 are being submitted to His
Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, Chief of Indian
Army, Chief of Indian Air Force, Human Rights Commission and the Chief
Vigilance Commission on 3 November 2013
through email for necessary action.
V.
Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:
629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
3 November 2013
For further reading visit:
1.www. vajpayee.blogspot.com
2.www. primeministervajpayee.blogspot.com
3.www.primeministerdevegowda.blogspot.com
4.www. storyofananthapadmanabhan.blogspot.com
6. www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
Other blogs of this writer are:
1. www.
effectiveinorganicchemistry.blogspot.com
4. www.
mylife-sabarimuthu.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment