Thursday, January 28, 2016

468. PRESIDENT OF FRANCE Mr. FRANCOIS HOLLANDE


Notice: The esteemed viewers are requested to sign a google account to read this blog as it cannot be assessed through others like Facebook.  
   

         
         

          

468

PRESIDENT OF FRANCE Mr. FRANCOIS HOLLANDE:
A UNIVERSAL PROBLEM?

          India and France, on 25 January 2016, signed 14 agreements.
One of the agreements provided for the purchase of 36 Rafale jets for the Indian Air Force (IAF).
India is in need of stealth jets.
The chief of the IAF must tell the reasons for not seeking them.
His silence has ominous portents for the nation.

          The New Indian Express, on 25 January 2016, said that Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi does not support privatization.
          The place that determines the destiny of the nation is the Supreme Court of India.
          He told the court that his government wants to privatize the Public Sector Undertakings (PSU). He, further, unequivocally said that his government does not want to do business.
          He said this not to abandon any business but to transmit the public resources to private parties.
          If he has no courage to tell this to the people, he should not have told this to the court.
          The people are seldom aware that the somersault is due to this work.

          The above paper, in the same article, reiterated that the net worth of two private banks is more than that of a dozen public sector banks.
          Similarly, it said that the market capitalization of a private company is more than that of the public sector IOC, BPCL, GAIL and the HPCL put together.
          The assets of the above so-called private entities are nothing but public assets. The reasons were given earlier in this work. Even the Supreme Court has not refuted it.

          A Judicial Commission questioned Chief Minister of Kerala Mr.Oommen Chandy for 14 hours on 26 January 2016 in a corruption case. The Commission wanted to do a lie detector (polygraph) test.
          However, a Ms. Saritha S. Nair said that she had handed over a bag containing Re.1.1crore to Mr. Thomas Kuruvila, a close aide of the chief minister, at a mall in Delhi and, later, Re.80 lakh to the same person at her house. She added that she did everything as directed by Mr. Jikkumon Jacob, the then additional private secretary to the chief minister.
The chief minister could have cited this work to prevent the questioning.
         
          A prominent leader of the BJP, Mr. L.K. Advani, on 26 January 2016, said that there is no question mark on the freedom of expression in the country.
          A point becomes clear. Even if the government wants to give Freedom, he would not allow it to happen.
          He knows that the Indians would get Freedom as gratis only and not as a matter of right based on specific laws. 
          Indeed, the Constitution of India mentions the phrase freedom of expression. But it does not mention the ways to enforce it.
          The government also did not enact any law to enforce it.
          Similarly, the Constitution mentions the appointment of judges. But it does not mention the ways to select the judges.
          When both the basic features are clubbed, there is nothing other than the inexorable laws for slavery.
          This cannot be the constitution framed by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.
          The ruling class removes the public resources. They report the words of the people prone to perpetrate this condition. 
          It is pertinent to recall, that the Union Cabinet under him, one day, decided to hand over the public sector VSNL to a private individual although no law permitted it.
          Within a few days, the Bank of India (BoI) gave a huge amount to a private company as loan.
          The owner of that company later bought the VSNL.
          He did not receive any money as bribe.
          But, in anticipation of this, the ruling class had made him a national leader.          
          The complaint was sent to the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India severally and collectively. But the court did not act.
          This is the biggest act of corruption.
          The court serves those in power.    
          Thus, might passes on as right,
          Naturally, this anxious question remains unanswered.
          Yet, the people hear his words.
          He did not earn the right to be heard in any good way.
          Further, he said, “I do not know who the people are saying that there is no freedom of expression in India”.
          The present man says that there is no freedom of expression in India. This work is the proof.
          The people have pre-existent constitutional rights to know this work and its consequences. The Constitution of India has taken away such rights because there are no laws for enforcing freedom of expression.
          This work rolled in his hand during his stint in the Union Cabinet. It continues to roll in his hand even after that.
          So he tells a lie.
          If a leader talks like this, he deceives the people in bad faith.
          Now, the government keeps the people as limited animals because they have no way to know the salient points of this work.
          The moment they get a chance to know this, the prime minister would resign. So, it is a catch – 22 to him.

          President of France Mr. Francois Hollande was the chief guest at the 67th Republic Day parade. For the first time, an Infantry Regiment of France took part in the parade.
          Thus France imparted legitimacy to the Indian despotism.
          There are certain desirable essentials in any constitution. If a constitution lacks these, the nation will become a veritable hell for the people. The most important of these is the laws for freedom of expression. If it lacks these essentials, parade is not needed.
          The people of France are not aware of this work. As the freedom of expression comprises the right to know, the French too have no freedom of expression. Apparently, it is a universal problem.
          It must be noted that different letters had been sent to different newspapers all over the world.
          After the parade, the President of France left India.
          In this connection, it must be stated that the President of France must have landed at New Delhi. The Prime Minister of India must have welcomed him at the airport. If the prime minister cannot do this, the heads of other nations need not be invited as the chief guest for the Republic Day.

This is letter No. 468

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 28-1-2016.
The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in
28-1-2016.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
Mobile: 9486214851



         

         
         

          

No comments: