187
A WHIPPING BOY
The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 7 October 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta High Courts. It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com
The new Chief of Indian Air Force, Air Chief Marshal Norman Anil Kumar Browne, on 9 October 2011, said that an Air Force Station each would be started in all metro cities. A Station might be established at Trivandrum also.
The militant people killed 6 soldiers in the Chhattisgarh State on 9 October 2011. The print media did not publish this news.
Army killed two militant people in the Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State on 9 October 2011.
The CBI, on 9 October 2011, said that Home Minister Chithambaram could not be implicated in the 2G spectrum case. As the Supreme Court of India did not bother to find out the money given by the “cash rich” Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to the Unit Trust of India (UTI), the CBI is waiting for a green signal from the court.
Appearing for the Reliance Telecom, Senior Counsel Mukul Rohatgi told the Supreme Court of India that the proceedings of the 2G Special Court adversely affected the companies of Mr. Anil Ambani. In this connection, he requested the court to restrain the media from publishing anything. The bench asked the counsel to seek appropriate remedy from the Special Court. The court might surrender to his demand. If this happens, the people will no longer see the different facets of the case.
Mr. L.K. Advani, the leader of the BJP, started a 40-day nationwide anti corruption journey called “Rath Yathra” on 11 October 2011.
In this connection, it must be stated that the NDA Government had given public money to the executioners of India- as mentioned by this writer on 3 February 2002 in Chapter 8. Some public assets were given to charge – sheeted companies.
The people do not know this. In fact, at least 1% of the people knew what Muammar Gaddafi did to Libya. Even this people do not know what the NDA Government did to the nation.
The crucial point is that the NDA Government gave the public assets to them on behalf of all political leaders –ruling and opposition. This is to make their position secure in India.
Thus the political power of all political leaders is the gratis given by the recipients of this money.
There is no difference between leader Advani or Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Therefore, they can make him - or anyone of their choice – the Prime Minister of India. They will create the necessary public opinion through their media wing. The Rath Yathra and voting are formalities only.
This condition exists because the Supreme Court of India conceals this work from the eye of the people with an “ulterior motive”.
On 12 October 2011, the CBI- in its First Information Report (FIR) – said that former Union Minister Dayanidhi Maran benefited – indirectly - Re.549.96 crore as quid pro quo for various favours to Aircel of Maxis - a Malaysia-based company. According to the FIR, the amount was given to the SUN TV owned by his brother Kalanidhi Maran, through the overvaluation of its shares. However, the people still believe that there exists a truce between the SUN TV, and the ND TV. Otherwise, he would have been arrested.
A group of leading luminaries – Mr. Jamshyd Godrej, Mr. Deepak Parekh, Mr. Keshub Mahindra, Mr. N. Vaghul, Mr. Nachiker Mor, Mr. Yezdi Malegan, Ms. Anu Aga, Mr. Justice Sam Variava, Mr. Justice B.N. Krishna, Prof. S. Narasimham, Dr.A. Vaidyanathan, Mr. Azim Premji, Dr. Vimal Jalan, Dr. Ashok Ganguly- in their second open letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh recommended: 1. A new Anti-corruption Bill 2. Online auction for the allocation of natural resources and 3. Increase of judges to fight against corruption. The first letter was sent in January 2011.
In this connection, it must be reiterated that the judges from Mumbai are, as a rule, representatives of the manipulators. Justice B.N.Krishna and Justice Sam Variava hail from Mumbai. They had been receiving letters from this writer for over four years before their retirement from the Supreme Court of India. Yet, they conceal the salient points of this work from the people. In fact, if Justice Variava goes one step ahead of the manipulators, Justice B.N. Krishna would go two steps.
Mr.Vimal Jalan had to resign from the post of the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) presumably because of the Bank of India (BoI) matter presented in Chapter 8.
Therefore, their proposals are to promote bribery and slavery.
Evidently, the proposal of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to start 74 CBI courts all over India is an idea distilled by them.
Excise Collection dipped by over 8 per cent in September 2011. This happens because India is illegally importing Chinese products just to enable some boys to get commission. Even the bicycles for children come from China either through an illegal route or under negligible import duty thereby jeopardizing the interests of Indian industry.
Former Karnataka Chief Minister Yeddyurappa was, on 15 October 2011, remanded to judicial custody in the so-called illegal de-notification of lands in and around Bangalore.
In this connection, it must be stated that the friends and relatives of the leaders buy assets in certain localities before according sanction to new roads, bus stands or airports.
Further, compared to the crime committed by the judges of the Supreme Court of India, the crime committed by him is a negligible one.
Therefore, there is no justification for sending him to jail. It is a human rights problem.
On 16 October 2011, The New Indian Express –through its writer a Mr. Balbir Punj – said that a massive collapse of Indian System was visible. This could be prevented by initiating prosecution proceedings against the learned judges of the Supreme Court for secretly facilitating the conversion of public assets into private assets.
A Mr. Lal Sharma alleged that Anna Hazare and his group had played a fraud by receiving a cheque for Re.45 lakh for his trust on 31 March 1995 from the Consolidated Fund of India before its registration on 6 April 1995. He levelled a few more similar charges against him. A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, on 17 October 2011, admitted this as Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia, on 19 October 2011, requested the judges to face constructive criticism of their actions for the development of law. Apparently, he is losing his grip over the judges. Otherwise, he would not have talked to the judges through the media as if they were “fallen angels” of Milton.
Though it is a digression, it must be stated that the revolutionary fighters in Libya, on 20 October 2011, killed Gaddafi. He was dragged from hiding in a drainage pipe and shot dead. According to reports, he had begged for mercy from the captors.
The allegation was that he had turned the oil rich Libya into his own personal fiefdom.
Did Gaddafi transfer anything equivalent to Re. 3 lakh crore to anyone?
The Constitution of India permits the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Parliament, media and even the people to control the Prime Minister of India. Yet, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh managed everyone and transferred Re. 3 lakh crore in Provident Fund (PF) to two or three people.
Some people would say that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh did not use his power for terrorist attack. But the killings of the Sri Lankan Tamils are more heinous than the terrorist attacks of Gaddafi. The difference is that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had given food to them before killing.
Markandey Katjiu, Chairman of the Press Council of India (PCI) and former judge of the Supreme Court of India, said that if the media proved incorrigible, harsh measures might be taken to correct it. The Hindu published his words as a centre page article on 22 October 2011. He must abide by the Constitution of India before talking like this.
A Mr. Lal Sharma alleged that Anna Hazare and his group had played a fraud by receiving a cheque for Re.45 lakh on 31 March 1995 from the Consolidated Fund of India before its registration on 6 April 1995. He levelled a few more similar charges against him. A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, on 17 October 2011, admitted this as Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
The Supreme Court of India, on 22 October 2011, denied bail to former Satyam Chief Ramalinga Raju.
In this connection, it must be stated that the Supreme Court of India is even now secretly allowing the public sector Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to buy the shares of private companies. Further, it is allowing tax exemption to investments in the hands of private parties. These are acts of corruption. Therefore, there is no justification for keeping him in prison.
The CBI, on 22 October 2011, said that former Minister Raja committed an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means while allocating 2G spectrum. In order to justify its stand, the CBI said that Raja had dominion over the spectrum. The CBI - in order to shield Prime Minister Manmohan Singh – argues that Raja functioned as a super prime minister.
In this connection, it must be stated that none in India has dominion over the lives of the people or their assets. Even the Chief Justice of India has no absolute power. This is the demand of the Constitution of India.
The Special CBI Court, on 22 October 2011, framed charges against A. Raja and 16 others under section 420 (cheating), section 120B (criminal conspiracy and some other sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Special Judge O.P. Saini in his order said:1. The allegation of bribery for Re.200 crore is not an imaginary one.2. There is no merit in the submission that none would pay a bribe 16 months after obtaining the alleged favour. 3. The supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law cannot be compromised in the grab of affordability of mobile phones at cheaper prices or in the name of fresh investments –domestic or foreign. 4. The private players should not be allowed to violate constitutional norms and 5. The Government is at liberty to follow any laudable policy as long as the same is not in violation of the Constitution of India.
It is obvious that the above orders are against the avowed anti-constitutional doctrine of the Supreme Court of India.
The hard words used against Raja are against the Supreme Court of India. If someone points out this to Judge O.P. Saini, he would say that Raja is being used as a whipping- boy for the crime committed by the Supreme Court of India.
The Union Cabinet, on 25 October 2011, approved a proposal to provide interest-free loans to the tune of Re.108.77 crore to benefit 56 co-operative textile mills in the Maharastra state.
Evidently, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh brings to the notice of the Union Cabinet small issues involving Re. hundreds of crore only. He gives dominion over money matters of Re. one lakh or more to individuals or Group of Minister (GoM). Thus the decisions for the allocations of spectrum and the method of utilization of the PF money were, apparently, taken without the knowledge of the Union Cabinet and the people at large.
The Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India, sent another letter – No.L.15012/1/2011-Jus- on 4 October 2011 to the Registrar (Judicial) Supreme Court of India. In that letter, the Union Government asked the Supreme Court of India to establish justice to the letters received through the President of India under intimation to this writer.
If the Supreme Court had directed the Government to submit an action report over this work, the Government would not have sent these letters.
Now, the above letter is like a presidential reference to the Supreme Court of India. Therefore, it should not hesitate to do justice to the letters before it.
In this connection, it must be noted that the Chief Justice of India needs the pleasure of the President of India to continue in office.
The facts from 7 October 2011 to 27 October 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 28 October 2011.
The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.
28 -10- 2011
V.Sabarimuthu.
26-3 Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167
Kanyakumari District
No comments:
Post a Comment