From
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Vellicode
PIN:629167
India
To
Mr. Ram Nath Kovind
His Excellency the President of India
New Delhi
Sub: Enforcing freedom of expression –reg
The
Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, on 6 May 2018, said that he placed
the minorities in key positions. This is his reply to the inference that he
transmitted a huge amount of public money to the Reliance Industries Limited
(RIL) in the pretext of gas subsidy at the behest of Union Minister Mrs. Susma
Swaraj.
His
party says that it is opposed to the appeasement of the minorities. But he says
that he placed the minorities in key positions.
There
is no use in placing the dalits and the minorities in key positions if such
people are not capable of giving freedom to Indians.
Delivering
the convocation address at the Madras University on 5 May 2018, the President
of India, Mr. Ram Nath Kovind, requested the students to give back to society
in whatever way they choose.
This
could be construed as a justification for this work. However, he also must do
the same.
There
are reports that the 2018 question paper for the NEET examination contained 49
wrong questions.
The
Supreme Court of India must think over it.
A
11- judge bench allowed the State Governments to devise their own method of
selection. A 13-judge bench alone could overtake it. Therefore, the NEET
judgement is in conflict with that judgement.
The
above matter was informed to all newspapers, TV channels, President of India,
Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu State and 25 political leaders in the Tamil Nadu
State.
The
silent rule of the Chief Justice of India is that none shall approach him for
remedy citing that judgement.
Two
Congress Members of the Upper House of Parliament (MPs) - Mr. Partap Singh Bajwa from Punjab and Mr.
Amee Harshadray Yajnik from Gujarat on 7 May 2018 challenged in the Supreme
Court of India Vice-President of India
Venkaiah Naidu’s decision of rejecting the impeachment motion against Chief
Justice of India Dipak Misra.
As
it is a petition against a sitting Chief Justice of India, they brought this
matter before a bench comprising justices Chelameswar and Kishan Kaul. Justice
Chelameswar comes second in the seniority list of the judges of the Supreme
Court of India.
After
hearing Mr.Kapil Sibal and Mr. Prasant Bhushan – the advocates of the MPs- the
bench asked them to mention the matter before the Chief Justice of India. As it
is a case against the Chief Justice of India, the counsels pointed out the
conflict of interest. Then the bench asked them to “come back tomorrow.”
Thus
Justice Chelameswar killed the snake with his three humble and simple words. A
bad faith conspiracy alone would give life to it.
The
three words instantly converted the Chief Justice of India into one among the
equals in the Supreme Court of India.
Now
a learned judge of the Supreme Court of India can entertain a complaint against
the Chief Justice of India if he thinks that the Chief Justice acts in bad
faith.
The
main complaint against the Chief Justices of India is that he concealed 561
letters sent to them to break the political monopoly of power. As a result, a
citizen of India had to knock at the doors of others. This had the effect of
denying freedom to Indians. The people are being denied the chance to check the
contributions of the people and choose their own leaders.
The
three words had the effect of stripping the judicial duties of the present
Chief Justice of India. Thus, technically, the impeachment motion was passed
without any voting.
India
remains under the fingertip of the Chief Justice of India. Yet the three words
made the Chief Justice of India to bite the dust.
Justice
Chelameswar will be in the court for about ten more days. He would retire from
service during vacation. However, he is now virtually the Chief Justice of
India in- charge. He did not attend the court yesterday.
He
must put right the public wrongs committed by the court. He must openly say
that the court treated the people like animals by withholding the news
generated by a citizen of India. Further, it is his duty to consider the
question of implementing the award of the present man contained in letter
No.591 dated 20-1-2018 for enforcing freedom of expression and various
provisions of the Constitution of India..
He
must note that by giving freedom, he is not obeying this man but the
Constitution of India only.
However,
realizing the dangers, the Government of India, within one or two hours,
secretly asked the Chief Justice of India to constitute a Constitution Bench to
clone another judgement to protect the Chief Justice of India.
The
reason for suspecting governmental interference is that the Government of India
has been directing the Chief Justice of India not to do anything that might
lead to the liberation of the people.
Accordingly,
a five-member Constitution Bench comprising Justices A K Sikri, SA Bobde, N V
Ramana, Arun K Mishra and Adarsh K. Girl was constituted
through an administrative order of the Chief Justice of India. In the seniority
list, these judges stand from the sixth to the tenth position.
The
four senior judges - Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph
– were not considered for constituting the bench. The latent reason is their
January 12 press conference. This proves that the benches are being
constituted, in very bad faith.
Thus
the Chief Justice of India pretended that he followed certain latent rules for constituting
the benches.
But
he should not have constituted the bench even before allowing Justice
Chelameswar to complete hearing the case.
Thus
he misused his authority. A person misusing his authority cannot function as
the Chief Justice of India.
The
advocates for the petitioners demanded the copy of the administrative order, if
any, for constituting the bench. The five member bench repeatedly requested
them not to rake up the matter. It asked them to argue the merits of the case
to save the judiciary from disrepute.
Mr.Kapil
Sibal did not oblige. He insisted that only after getting the administrative
order would he decide whether to challenge it or accept it. The bench was
frightened by the stand of Mr. Kapil Sibal. The bench thought that the conspiracy
of the Supreme Court of India to deny freedom to Indians would come to the
open.
Therefore,
it expressed its reluctance to part with the administrative order. Then Mr.
Kabil Sibal abruptly decided to withdraw the petition.
After that, the bench dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Here,
the Chief Justice of India exercised his power without any right. The five
judges should not have obeyed him.
By
accepting an illegal order, the five judges proved that they are incapable for
delivering justice. However, they did not get any time to think over the
matter. Their future action alone would prove whether they did it in good faith
or not.
Union
Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely accused the Congress Party of fishing in troubled
waters by taking a fringe position. Thus he indirectly said. “We are all one in
denying freedom. We rotate the political monopoly of power and remove the
public resources to live in luxury for generations. You take for 10 years and
we take for five years. Why do you spoil this for fringe benefits?”
A
representative of the ruling class, Mr. Shekar Gupta, said that by the act of
moving an impeachment motion the Congress Party launched a nuclear missile so
unthinkingly that it ended up taking it by surprise. He added that it
sleep-walked itself and the country into an unprecedented institutional crisis.
Further,
Shekar Gupta deplores that a new leadership has not developed in the last two
decades.
After
concealing this work for 17 years, he talks like this!
Chief Justice of
India Dipak Misra speaks at an event in New Delhi.(PTI)
The
Vice President of India is on a tour of three nations. He entered Panama
yesterday after visiting Guatemala. Union Minister Jayant Singh is accompanying
him. The latter’s name was seen in the Paradise papers. He did not deny it.
Now, one would think that he goes to Panama to operate his Panama account. He
must clear his name in the Paradise papers.
A
minister in the Tamil Nadu State, Mr. Jayakumar, narrated the income and
expenditure of the Government of Tamil Nadu State through newspapers. He did
not disclose the reason why the income from the rare earth minerals goes into a
few hands.
Madras
High Court directed the police to book the public servants and others under
Goonda’s Act if they abet the removal of sand.
The
judges abet the removal of the natural resources. The court is silent about it.
This
is letter No.634. A copy of the letter is sent to the Supreme Court of India
also for the first time after the letter No.561.
The
award of the citizen of India dated 20-1-2018 is attached herewith for
enforcing freedom of expression.
Regards
V.
Sabarimuthu,
India
10-
5-2018
From
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Vellicode
PIN:629167
India
To
Mr. Ram Nath Kovind
His Excellency the President of India
New Delhi
Sub: Enforcing freedom of expression –reg
The President of India has not given freedom to the
people to know the contents of the 590 letters submitted to the President of
India.
The
learned judges of the Supreme of India have no power to amend, modify or
rewrite their judgement.
In view of the 12
January 2018 four judge judgement of the Supreme Court of India, the present
Chief Justice of India cannot constitute a bench.
However,
the Chief Justice of India has some residual powers.
After
a judgement, it is customary for the judge to stay his own order in order to
enable the convicted person to obtain a stay from the higher court. That power
is usually called residual power.
On
12 January 2018, a four judge bench of the Supreme Court of India declared that
the Chief Justice of India cloned some judgements. 15 days have passed. Yet the
Chief Justice of India has not denied the allegation and the court remains
paralyzed. The judgement shows that the Chief Justice of India cloned some
acquittals or convictions through the aid his confidantes. As it is a criminal
offence, next senior most judge might have taken charge as the acting Chief
Justice of India.
As
the people are the ultimate judges in this matter, it is the duty of the acting
Chief Justice of India to tell the present State of the Supreme Court of India
to people all over India through proper and adequate press release.
The
acting Chief Justice of India must choose a course that does the least violence
to the judgement of a reasonable man.
In
this matter, the President of India shall not induce the learned judges of the
Supreme Court of India and the Government of India to commit more and more
illegalities.
The
following is quoted from the Constitution of India.
"The
Indian Constitution is first and foremost a social document, and is aided by
its Parts III & IV (Fundamental Rights & Directive Principles of State
Policy, respectively) acting together, as its chief instruments and its
conscience, in realizing the goals set by it for all the people."[Note
7][62]
The
Constitution's provisions have consciously been worded in generalities, though
not in vague terms, instead of making them rigid and static with a fixed
meaning or content as in an ordinary statute, so that they may be interpreted
by coming generations of citizens with the onward march of time, to apply to
new and ever-changing and demanding situations, making the Constitution a
living and an organic document.[63] Justice
Marshall asserts: “It is the nature of (a) Constitution that only its great
outlines be marked”. It is a document intended “to endure for ages” and
therefore, it has to be interpreted not merely on the basis of the intention
and understanding of the framers but on the experience of its working
effectively, in the existing social and political context.
For
instance, "right to life" as guaranteed under Article 21,[nb
1] has by interpretation been expanded to progressively mean a
whole lot of human rights[nb
2]
In
the conclusion of his Making of India's Constitution, Justice
Khanna writes:
"If
the Indian constitution is our heritage bequeathed to us by our founding
fathers, no less are we, the people of India, the trustees and custodians of
the values which pulsate within its provisions! A constitution is not a
parchment of paper, it is a way of life and has to be lived up to. Eternal
vigilance is the price of liberty and in the final analysis, its only keepers
are the people."[67
As
the present man, fairly and adequately, represents the people of India and as
the last election was rigged by the present Chief Justice of India - consistent
with the Preamble, Fundamental Rights and the essence of the Constitution of
India- the President of India is directed to carry out the following award.
Award:
1. The
assets of all registered newspapers, TV channels and periodicals in charge of
disseminating news and views would become Government property from today the
28th January 2018 and their management must go to the closest voluntary
organization by distance. Every owner is free to register for new newspapers,
TV channels and periodical and run them under a different name and by hiring
new employees. This is due to their conscious failure to discharge their fiduciary
responsibility to the nation and for contributing their share for rigging the
elections.
2. All
natural resources must go to the State Governments with immediate effect.
3. All
Public Sector Undertakings or their shares must be apportioned among the States
with immediate effect.
4. All
employees – public sector and private sector – will come under a Generalized Pension Scheme (GPS)
with effect from 1-4- 2018 consistent with the income tax paid by them.
5. All people above 60 years, all handicapped and
all widows will get a pension of Re. 1000 per month from April 1, 2018.
6. As
the male members of the judiciary failed to discharge their constitutional
responsibility, all judicial vacancies will be apportioned among the males and
the females in the ratio 1:1 with immediate effect.
7. As
bulk buying involves big commission, buying and selling must be carried out in
pieces. All contract works are similarly related.
8. The
Government must remain in a state of readiness to reserve the foreign exchange
reserves of the Government of India among the States and the Union Government
in the ratio 1:1.
9. The
Government must remain in a state of readiness to hand over the Satyam
Computers to Mr. Ramalinga Ragu.
10. The
Government must remain in a state of readiness to release all economic
offenders subject to the confiscation of all their assets. Similarly, the
Government must remain in a State of readiness to release all other offenders
after the completion of 20 years of jail term.
11. The
Government must remain in a state of readiness to substitute raids with
supervision with the concurrence of the private entities
12. All seats in the IITs IIMs, IIFT, Union
Government services must be reserved among the States equitably with immediate
effect.
13. NEET
must be postponed by 6 years.
14. The
Government must remain in a state of readiness to select judges based on their
date of birth seniority as High Court Judges. The State Government will select
the judges through State Public Service Commission.
15. All
the four judges responsible for the 12 January 2018 judgement can resume their
duties immediately subject to the acceptance of this award. They must remain in
a state of readiness to function as life-time judges as a partial reward for
their selfless service to the nation. All other judges shall resume their
regular duty subject to the approval of the above mentioned four judges. This
to give life to the nation consistent with the Constitution of India. The
judges shall not take any unilateral decision to defeat the essence of the
Constitution of India.
16. The
present man will continue to remain in the present position subject to the
approval of the people.
17. The
President of India must study the award. He must compare his award with this
award. The award closest to the essence of the Constitution of India would
prevail. The present Government must carry it out under the direction from the
Supreme Court of India. In order to sort out any difficulties the officials can
meet the present man with the permission of the Government of India.
18. The
award of the President of India will be final and his award cannot be
questioned for errors in law or facts so long as the award is consistent with
the essence of the Constitution of India.
19. All
conflicting judgments must be interpreted with reference to the Constitution of
India and this letter. The Constitution of India would ultimately prevail. All
others must be discarded.
20. The
President of India must release this award to the media immediately.
This is letter No.591
Regards
V, Sabarimuthu
