196 The Ultimate Goal of President Pratibha Devisingh Patil

196

THE ULTIMATE GOAL

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 4 March 2012. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Election Commission of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

The High Court, Karnataka, on 7 March 2011, quashed the FIR against former Chief Minister Yeddyurappa because he had been condemned unheard.

In this connection, it may be recalled that the Supreme Court of India had praised Prime Minister Manmohan Singh before getting a statement from him. The present writer alone had pointed out this.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested Mr. C. Rajan, Additional Director General in the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, for a bribe of Re. 8 lakh crore from an importer of cell phones. This is consistent with the statement that the authorities received a huge amount of money for every container containing illegally imported items.

Samajwadi Party of Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav defeated Bahujan Samaj Party of Ms. Mayawati in the Utter Pradesh State- the biggest state in India. The results were announced on 6 March 2012.

The people all over the world consider this as a triumph of democracy in India.

But, it must be noted that if Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav had uttered a word about the Re. 3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) account, he would not have got even ten seats. Even now he would not demand its recovery.

Ms. Mayawati is not ready to talk about the PF amount because she wants to capture power keeping, intact, the present system.

All other political leaders are similarly related.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) - in bad faith - ignored the contents of the Letter No.188. It, in fact, withheld the information about that letter from the people. Therefore, the members of the ECI are liable for prosecution.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 7 March 2012, said that his activities could be watched in the “You Tube”.

He gave Re. 3 lakh crore to two or three private parties. Yet, he walks upright because the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Armed Forces, Union Ministers and all important political leaders –through their silence - call this holy.

But the people all over India are not aware of the above. Now, they can watch the “You Tube” "to pick up what falls under the table at his meals"!

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 12 March 2012, said that all people guilty of corruption would be brought to book.

He always talks about the problems that exist in all other places. He does this to carry the point that he is above corruption. He succeeds because of the Re. 3 lakh crore.

Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee presented the Budget for 2012-2013 on 16 March 2012. The date was changed from the usual February 28 due to the elections in five states.

The budget sought to change a tax rule – retrospectively - to annul a recent judgment of the Supreme Court of India that benefited the Vodafone company alone by over Re. 11000 crore. The Government is free to enact laws prospectively or retrospectively to put right the public wrongs committed by the Supreme Court of India. This shows that the Government does not maintain a backdoor relationship with the Supreme Court of India for all matters. The change must be welcomed.

With regard to the budget, it must be noted that the media did not publish the total income and expenditure. But, later Pranab Mukherjee explained certain things in a way un-understandable to the people.

The import duty on gold was increased from 2 per cent to 4 per cent. Some more taxes were also imposed on gold. They might be modified. However, they are primarily for the instant benefit of the recipients of the PF money.

Further, he gave Income Tax (IT) relief for Re. 2000 crore.

Now, there are two categories of public servants. One category has pension and another category has no pension. The latter category is paying tax for their pension component also. The employees have no tongue to talk. But the Government should address this anomaly. Then, those working in the private companies also will get some relief. All public servants must be brought under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) is a different matter.

The Finance Minister presented several things involving less than Re. 10,000 crore. But, as usual, he was silent about the most important middle portion – the money in the banks, PF and Pension Fund. He pretended that he was not aware of the whereabouts of the PF money. Did the President secretly allow some private parties to remove the money again?

The budget has a provision to sell the shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to garner Re. 30,000. The media adds that the Government intends to sell the shares and others for Re.1,50,000 crore.

If former Prime Minister Vajpayee had given public money - to buy the PSUs - to his gate keepers, everyone would have noticed the disproportionate assets of his servants. But, as he gave the money to the rich people, none noticed it.

If President Pratibha Devisingh Patil had given Re. 3 lakh crore to a few manipulators, everyone would have noticed it. As she gave the money through banks none noticed it.

“I did not give my consent to remove the PF money. Even if given, I cannot bring down the tree for Re.3 lakh crore”. President Pratibha Devisingh Patil might talk like this. But, having received hundreds of letters, the President should have restrained the Government. In fact, this is the purpose of the President of India.

If she had done her duty, Re. 3 lakh crore would have generated 10 million jobs. Therefore, her actions or inactions show that her ultimate goal was not to become the President of India but to convert public money into private assets.

If anything had escaped her consciousness, she could do her duty even now.

The facts from 4 March 2012 to 18 March 2012 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 19 March 2012.

The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner for necessary action.

19 March 2012.

V.Sabarimuthu.26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167INDIA

195 Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil - What did the manipulators tell her?

195

A STAR

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 6 February 2012. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Election Commission of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

The manipulators of Maldives ousted President Mohamed Nasheed on 7 February 2012. It was a coup. Before his arrest, he had ordered the military to arrest the Criminal Court Chief Justice for blocking multi-million dollar corruption and human rights cases against the allies of former President Manmoon Abdul Gayoon.

Nasheed later said that his decision to stand up to an influential judge was a right one.

It may be recalled that - in 1988 - some militant people of Sri Lanka entered Maldives and tried to capture the country. But India was alert to defeat them.

Now, it could be construed as an internal problem of that country. However, India did not interfere presumably because similar manipulations take place in India - in a far bigger scale.

Thus, the Supreme Court of India has transmitted more than $ 200 billion to a few private individuals in the last 10 years. It has been blocking even investigations through the effective denial of freedom of expression. Besides, it has been sending political leaders and others - standing in the way of manipulations - to jail, everything in violation of all principles of human rights.

Former Union Minister Raja had not tried to arrest the inducted judges of the Supreme Court of India. But he had questioned the constitutionality of apportioning the spectrum in the pretext of “first come first serve policy” in the same coin. This was his way of standing up to the inducted judges of the Supreme Court. This was sufficient for the Supreme Court to send him to Tihar jail. Surely, it was a coup.

The above is the observation of a man sitting away from the scene of action.

The Maharastra Police confiscated Re.1 crore unaccounted cash from Mr. Raosaheb Shehawat, son of the present President of India, Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh, on 16 February 2012. The President chose not to own or disown responsibility.

The people harbour suspicion in the above matter. Therefore, President Devisingh Patil should consider the question of breaking her silence and informing the fact to the people in a way understandable to everyone.

Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, on 21 February 2012, said that global factors were hitting the growth rate of India. He had given Re. 3 lakh crore to private parties in bad faith. This is the most important factor, if not the only factor, that hits the growth rate.

Though it is a digression, it must be stated that a Fr. Thatheu Leon Jose said that man must continuously strive to change his mind, goal and society.

Coming back, the promoters of the Essar and Loop telecom did not appear before the 2G special court on 22 February 2012. Thus, the summons issued by this court for the second time went in vain.

Abu Dhabi based Etisalat, on 23 February, disclosed its decision to quit India operations in view of the order of the Supreme Court of India to cancel 122 licences. Etisalat is the second foreign company to exit from India after Bahrain Telecom.

This shows that former Union Minister Raja had convinced all ministers in the Union Cabinet with convincing arguments to break the cartel in the Telecom field. In that process some foreign players entered India. As the Supreme Court of India did not relish this, it selected Raja for punishment, and cancelled the spectrum allotted during his period.

The Enforcement Directorate, on 23 February 2012, registered money laundering case against former Union Minister Dayanidhi Maran and his brother, Kalanidhi Maran, in the Re.800 crore Aircel – Maxis scandal. The manipulators said that the CBI would arrest them in mid-May.

Some people belonging to the oppressed class strive to join the oppressing class by amassing wealth. They possess all characteristics of the oppressing class although they identify themselves as the oppressed. Maran may be one among them because he is not ready to give freedom of speech to others.

However, he is capable of giving freedom to Indians. This is the reason why a truce exists between the NDTV and the SUN TV. This is - apparently - the reason why the CBI is distinguishing its offenders.

China, on 25 February 2012, said that the visit of Defense Minister A.K. Antony to Arunachal Pradesh would complicate the border issue.

While China talks like this, India imports many Chinese products without any import duty. The radiation coming out of many Chinese toys has – unlike the radiation in cell phones- health hazards for children. India is not ready to check even this. No wonder, China talks like this.

A court in Bihar - on 29 February 2012 - framed charges against former Chief Minister of Bihar Laloo Prasad Yadav in the 1996 “fodder scam” case.

The NDA Government under Vajpayee apportioned the spectrum among his close friends. The beneficiaries amassed more than Re.20 lakh crore within a few years. With that money power they sent former Union Minister Raja to jail.

Similarly, Vajpayee had given some Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) against public money. Yet, the Supreme Court of India keeps him and his ministers in comfort.

Even in the case of former Chief Ministers, the Supreme Court is distinguishing between, say, Laloo Prasad Yadav, and Miss. Jayalalitha.

The Union Government, on 1 March 2012, sold 5 per cent shares of the Public Sector, ONGC, through auction.

The sale coincides with the retirement notice sent to Army Chief General V.K. Singh. Did the Government sell the shares on the strength of his successor? Nothing is clear.

The Union Government, on 2 March 2012, froze 40 bank accounts of the Kingfisher Airlines – the biggest private airline of India. The Government might hand over it to another private party in the “Satyam” model. Apparently, the above airline did not get any share in the Provident Fund (PF) money.

Former Union Minister Raja, on 2 March 2012, moved the Supreme Court of India, asking it to recall its 2 February 2012 judgment. He contended that the Supreme Court had condemned him without giving an opportunity to hear him.

In this connection, it must be noted that Raja has not moved the court for bail.

Now, Raja alone knows the pain he is experiencing in the Tihar jail. However, the Supreme Court has put not only Raja but also 1000 million people in jail. He would have to remain in jail till the people get freedom from the Supreme Court of India.

Simultaneously, the Union Government moved the Supreme Court saying that the above judgment went beyond judicial review. This stand is consistent with the view expressed in the last letter. However, a statement that the Supreme Court wanted the conversion of public assets into private assets might have sent the inducted judges to jail. The present decision may not break the nexus between the judges, and the Government.

There are reports that the auction of 5 per cent shares of the ONGC was a debacle and that the Government succeeded in selling about 3.5 per cent shares by forcing the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and the State Bank of India (SB) to buy them.

Vajpayee Government sold the shares after giving bank money to private parties. Manmohan Singh Government sells the shares after giving Re.3 lakh crore in the PF. These are acts of corruption. The present writer has been informing this to the Supreme Court of India and to the President of India for the last ten years.

The Supreme Court has been concealing this.

However, there was a feeling that President Pratibha Devisingh Patil would take appropriate action. But she chose not to protect the Re. 3 lakh crore. With this money, she could have single handedly overcome the power shortage all over India.

The people cannot expect a person born as a star to become the President of India. However, the developments show that the manipulators had told Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil like this. “We will make you the President of India. We will manage the Supreme Court, Government and the people. You should not stand in the way of taking Re.3 lakh crore from the PF account”

However, even now the President could change her mind, goal and society. Will she?

The facts from 6 February 2012 to 3 March 2012 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 4 March 2012.

The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner for necessary action.

4 March 2012.

V.Sabarimuthu.26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167INDIA

194. Speech of President Pratibha Devisingh Patil

194

“BRING DOWN THE TREE”

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 23 January 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          In her 63 rd Republic Day address to the nation on 25 January 2012,  President Pratibha Devisingh Patil, said that the future of India must be a glorious one. Constitution, rule of law, equality, equity, justice, democracy, truth, determination, courage; constant expression of opinion, nation building, individual freedom and removal of poverty were some of the words used by her.

          In her speech, she admitted that the system was not without flaws.

          At one point she said that the aspirations of the people were growing and they wanted immediate solution.

          However, at another point she praised the role played by the media and the courts.

      She cautioned that in order to remove a bad fruit one should not bring down the tree itself.

          This work dominated her speech.

          However, the President praises the courts –meaning the Supreme Court of India- and the media in front of 1000 million people. In this way, she risks her honour for evil. This may be to practice loyalty. But, it conveys the impression that the Supreme Court of India gave Re.3 lakh crore to private parties with her latent support. The denial of freedom of expression is similarly related.

          In this connection, it may be noted that her speech in Hindi lasted for 30 minutes. But the same speech translated into English lasted for 20 minutes only. Did anyone censor her English version?

        Her English version is not seen in her website. Does she want to conceal her own speech?

 

     

       The Union Government on 24 January 2012 gave final approval for the acquisition of Cairan India for 8.48 billion by Vedanta.

          The private parties cannot buy or sell public assets. The Constitution of India forbids this. But such sales take place even without the payment of stamp duty because of the support of the Supreme Court of India.

          If the President had allowed the people to see this work, then also the people would have prevented the above sale.

      The promoters of the Essar and the Loop telecom did not appear before the 2G special court on 27 January 2012. Therefore, it issued fresh summons for 22 February 2012.

       Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar on 28 January 2012 said that he would not fight the 2014 polls. He might have amassed Re. thousands of crore. He is a man of practical wisdom.

         

         A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices GS Singhvi and AK Ganguly on 1 February 2012 said that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh did not take appropriate action over the letter of Mr. Subramonia Swamy that sought the prosecution of public servants because the people responsible for giving proper advice to him failed in their duty. The Supreme Court had not obtained a statement from him before coming to this conclusion.

          However, the Supreme Court is coming to the nucleus. No leader in India gets proper advice. This is a fact known to the Supreme Court of India.

          All leaders in India are creations of the manipulators. In fact, the manipulators tell the leaders like this. “We made you leaders of India. We give necessary publicity to you. When you don’t talk, we write about you. We give “Z” category protection to you. Above all, we create conditions for the armed forces to stand in attention before you as if you were the democratically elected leaders. You receive everything. You can even amass wealth. But, the public money and public assets belong to us. If you touch this, we will send you to jail”.

          Evidently, if someone asks the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh or the Union Ministers the reason for giving Re.3 lakh crore to private parties, everyone would strike ignorance.

         

       A three judge bench of the Supreme Court of India on 2 February 2012 said that the Government should grant permission for the prosecution of public servants within three or four months of receipt of application.

      The media did not disclose the names of the judges in the above bench. In fact, the media now suppresses the names of judges in various benches.

      However, The New Indian Express said that the judgment had put an end to many malpractices. Actually, the Supreme Court directs the manipulators to resume their manipulations with renewed vigor.

          The Supreme Court of India knows that ordinary citizens cannot stand before it through an advocate. It also knows that no big manipulators would be sent to jail even for genuine reasons. So any public servant could be prosecuted with permission, or without permission. It is a human rights problem.

 

       The trade deficit of India with China increased to $2707 crore in 2011. Some newspapers reported this on 31 January 2012.

          India perpetrates unethical trade practices to sell the Chinese products in India. The country of make is not present in many Chinese products. India sells many Chinese items disguised as Indian made items or European items.

          China on 1 February 2012 demanded India to hand over its share in Arunachal Pradesh. India remains as a vassal of China. Yet, China takes up the Arunachal Pradesh question occasionally. Then, why does India pay tribute to China?

         President Pratibha Devising Patil forwarded the letter dated 21-11-2011 to the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on 21- 12 – 2011, requesting it to take appropriate action.  The MoD acknowledged it to this writer through a letter dated 23 January 2012. But, the MoD described it as a letter received from the Secretariat of the President. This is the style of functioning of the MoD.

      However, President Devisingh Patil transmits the letters to the Prime Minister of India, Union Ministers, Chief Ministers and even political leaders. If she had actually facilitated the removal of Re. 3 lakh crore, she would not have done this. However, her future actions alone will prove or disprove this conclusion.

          A two judge bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Justices GS Singhvi and AK Ganguly on 2 February 2012 revoked 122 telecom licenses issued after 2008.  This is presumably because about 1 per cent of the spectrum went in the hands of the manipulators known to former Union Minister for Communication Raja. 

          In this judgment, the Supreme Court of India proclaimed that it could review policy decisions either in public interest or because of its unconstitutional nature. The present writer said this hundreds of times. The Supreme Court of India rejected the contentions of the writer hundreds of times. In this way, it allowed its clients to amass over $100 billion in the last ten years. Now, it says that the policy decisions could be reviewed. Should a Union Minister go to jail to annul an unconstitutional judgment?

          Tomorrow, the Supreme Court might cancel the present judgment is a different matter.

     The judgment says that the actions of Raja in this matter were wholly arbitrary, capricious and contrary to public interest.

       The above qualities are the attributes of the Supreme Court of India. Otherwise, it would have removed “the rubies and diamonds in the ears and on the fingers” of the predecessors of Raja. In fact, those are the real rubies and diamonds mentioned in the last chapter.

          The bench, further, said that Raja gifted away important national assets. The fact is that the Supreme Court of India gifted away important national assets. In order to escape, the court and the media cite Raja.

       Furthermore, the bench said that everything was stage managed to favour a few companies. The truth is that the Supreme Court of India stage manages everything.   

         The above bench directed the Union Government to auction the cancelled spectrum based on a new set of norms. Unless this judgment is annulled, auction is the only route for future licenses. The media promptly lauded the judgment.

      The BALCO judgment – better the BALCO law that put the policy decisions beyond judicial review - lasted for 10 years. The present law would not last for even 10 months. This is because the Supreme Court of India is not a law making body. It cannot make a law in private interest at all.

          Now, the Supreme Court wants the Union Government to give public money to about ten people. This is to corner public assets. In the past it said, “See, they bought the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). So they belong to them” Now it says, “See, they got them in an auction. They burnt their midnight oil. So they belong to them”

          It may be recalled that the above licenses were distributed after the Supreme Court had secretly given Re.3 lakh crore to a few people.

          It is a wonder that Raja resisted the private interests of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the Supreme Court of India. However, his murmurs in the Union Cabinet infuriated the Supreme Court and sent him to jail. It did not want a man like him in the Union Cabinet. It was a coup.

          Raja had functioned as an advocate before his stint in the Union Cabinet. Usually, advocates behave like inducted judges. Why did Raja function differently? Centuries of oppression might have changed his traits!

       Citing the above judgment, The New Indian Express on 5 February 2012 said that the “Day of Reckoning” had arrived for the “Wild Animals of Politics”.

          The truth is that the Day of Reckoning” has arrived for the same species in the Supreme Court of India. For this, it is imperative that all political leaders must stand up and say that the Supreme Court of India wants the conversion of public assets into private assets using public money.

          The above paper said that political class is collectively corrupt. This actually refers to the inducted judges.

        The paper described Anna Hazare as a beacon of hope. He is a buoy to divert the attention of the people from the above facts.

          Evidently, when this writer requested President Pratibha Devisingh Patil to give compulsory retirement to the inducted judges, she should have dismissed them. If the President could ensure freedom of expression, they need not be dismissed at all. They would simply quit. Does the President compare the act of giving freedom to the act of bringing down a tree?

          In this connection, it is pertinent to state that this is not the work of an individual. This is the struggle of the 1000 million people for freedom. This struggle must reach them.

          Every news item in the newspapers must generate money for the owners of the newspapers. Therefore, they will not publish this work unless a force acts on it.

       However, the President must prove that the manipulators alone are not the owners of the public sector TV channels.

       The facts from 23 January 2012 to 6 February 2012 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 6 February 2012.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

6 February 2012.

 V.Sabarimuthu.26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode,  Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167INDIA

      

193. A Mystery

193

A MYSTERY

       The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 27 December 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC),  Chief Election Commissioner, Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, Allahabad and Calcutta High Courts.  Later, it was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

             The momentous developments that followed the above letter must be noticed.

       The letter was sent on 27 December 2011 at noon. Mrs. Pratibha Devesingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, transmitted it to the Prime Minister of India, Dr. Manmohan Singh, within minutes. Immediately, the leaders listening to the debate on the new Anti-corruption Bill deserted the Lower House. They agreed that the new law was to bite the unfamiliar leaders and, therefore, decided to retract.

         Accordingly, though the confused House passed the new Anti-corruption Bill, the Government wriggled out by allowing the Bill to die in the Upper House.

       Thus, the Upper House was adjourned sine die without voting on 30 December 2011.

      The great revulsion occurred not because of the indomitable vision of President Pratibha Devi Singh Patil over the forces of evil but because of a small step taken by her. It is true that the office of the President had been waiting for the email from this writer. It is the power of the President of India!

        This is the conclusion of the present writer.

        However, the present writer knows his email and the final result. What happened in between is known to the President only.

          Obviously, had the people been aware of this work, they would have realized the importance of this work. In fact, the people must know the reason for such changes. But, the Supreme Court of India and other competent authorities treat them as animals unworthy to know the value of this work.

       Thus, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh rules India not because of democracy but because of its denial.

        Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 1 January 2012, said that poverty was the greatest problem of India.

       In the context of this work, his statement conveys the impression that some forces in India removed the Re. 3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) because he had no power to prevent it. He indirectly puts the blame on the system.

       The truth is that he could have used the money for public welfare.

      The present danger is that he is scheming to hand over the money to the same people for another three years following the same path.

           Chief Election Commissioner of India (CEC) S.Y. Quraishi said that the absence of job security to two Election Commissioners was inhibiting his ability to conduct free and fair elections. This is his reply to this work – particularly Chapter 189. Thus he admits that he does not conduct elections in India in a free and fair atmosphere.

        The CEC knew that due political recognition had been denied to this work.  He could have asked the newspapers and the TV channels to tell the reason for this. At least, he could have published the salient points of this work. A Tamil Daily – Thina Thanthi – published his reply on 2 January 2012. Thus he gave the reply to this writer only. Does anyone – other than this writer – understand the reason for his utterances?

       By talking like this, the CEC consciously undermines his own authority to enforce freedom of speech.  This may be due to his realization that he has no freedom. Thus, if he talks something to ensure freedom, the media - and therefore the manipulators - would strange his words.

      Despite the constraints, the CEC could ensure freedom of speech.

      Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said that the media should not be controlled from outside. The Hindu published this in its front page on 3 January 2012. The New Indian Express on 8 January 2012 complemented his opinion by describing him as a good man and all others as power wielders.  

            Manmohan Singh could become the Prime Minister of India because there was no freedom of speech. He continues in his position because there is no freedom of speech. The moment he enforces freedom of speech, the people will send him out.

       As ambition is a keynote of Life, he denies freedom of speech to 1000 million people and clings to his post.

        In contrast, this writer has been working for the last 11 years only to rescue India from the people like him. Had the people been aware of this, they would have not only prevented him from giving Re. 3 lakh crore to private parties but also chosen this writer as the Prime Minister of India long ago.

       Naturally, the newspapers describe him as a good man and all others as power wielders.

        Chief Justice of India S.H.Kapadia in his Law Day address said, “1. The court came down heavily on the Centre in the black money issue. 2. The court decided not to undertake a review of the policy decision relating to the safety of nuclear plants. 3. The judiciary stands on public trust.  4. The Supreme Court has taken a decision to constitute a larger bench to review the system of appointment of judges.  5. The Supreme Court stayed the release of Pune based racehorse owner Hasan Ali.  6. The court ordered the suspension of mining operations in the Bellary region to prevent pollution. 7. The court did not entertain Public Interest Petition (PIL) pertaining to the removal of Justice P.D. Dinakaran and Justice Soumitra Sen.

       Everyone knows that there will be some white spots even in a bad man. Similarly there will be some black spots in every good man. However, anyone going though this work would consider the arguments as a hollow one because the Supreme Court is not ready to enforce freedom of speech.

           S.H. Kapadia should have picked up courage to publish the questions of this writer before giving their reply. Now, his reply looks like one way traffic.

         However, with reference to his reply, it must be stated that the Supreme Court of India generated black money of about Re. 6 lakh crore in the last three years alone. Whereabouts of this money is known to it. The other points are similarly related.

         The leaders of the principal opposition party – BJP - on 6 January 2012 met Her Excellency the President of India on 5 January 2012 and urged her to advise the Union Government to reconvene Parliament to put the Lokpal Bill –a new Anti-corruption Bill - to vote.

         In this connection, it must be stated that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh tabled the new Anti-corruption Bill in the Lower House saying that the nation was waiting with bated breath for the Lokpal Bill. Many representatives of the manipulators had supported him before passing the Bill. The BJP had stoutly opposed it.

       Later, the ruling parties abandoned the Bill in the Upper House.

        Now, the BJP wants the Bill. This shows that the Bill actually belonged to the BJP and their manipulators.  However, only very few people understand this.   

      The CEC directed the police to cover the statues of candidates and the statues mainly similar to the symbols of the political party of Miss. Mayavathi on public property.  The CEC did it just for a show.

       The national flag of India closely resembles the flag of the Congress Party. Therefore, he should have covered all national flags on public property before taking this decision.

        Miss. Mayavathi chose not to seek the intervention of the court for remedy. This shows that even some political leaders are losing their faith in the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India.

    Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi on 6 January 2012 said the key officials of the UP were biased in favour of the ruling party. Actions of Quraishi show that he is biased against freedom.

          The Chief Electoral Officer of the UP State issued strict orders to the police to nab people for black money. Accordingly, the police recovered 1.37 crore from an abandoned car in the UP state on 9 January 2012. Later it recovered Re. 41 crore from one place.

       The above order shows that the above officer is implementing the orders of the manipulators.

     Alternatively, the CEC consciously deceives 1000 million people - as mentioned in Chapter 189 - in the pretext of preventing corruption.

A case pertaining to former Union Minister for Communication Sukh Ram came before a Supreme Court bench comprising Justice B.S. Chauhan and T.S. Takur on 9 January 2012. The latter rescued himself from the case due to reasons known to him only. Actually, all inducted judges must rescue themselves from all cases.

    

      Highlighting that 42 per cent children in India were under weight Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on 10 January 2012 described the condition as national shame. After giving Re. 3 lakh crore to the manipulators, he talks like this. This is his real nature. This could be called Manmohanism.

      The High Court, Delhi on 11 January 2012 told the internet providers that the court could block their websites.

        After all, the important internet providers are not enlarging freedom at all. They are not ready to report the salient points of this work. Why do the judges fear them?

     The Enforcement Directorate, on 10 January 2012, decided to attach property worth Re. 223 crore of five companies involved in the 2G case.

            This is to show that the Supreme Court of India and the CBI are doing their duty impartially in the 2G spectrum case.

      The truth is that they cover up their guilt through these actions.

      If the Supreme Court of India punishes former Union Minister Raja for his acts of corruption, it would have removed “those rubies and diamonds on his ears and on his finger” –those 2G licenses granted by him – before sending him to Tihar jail. Now this work alone is the only voice in India to continuously raise this cruelty.

 

          Indian Army Chief Gen. V.K. Singh on 16 January 2012 filed a petition in the Supreme Court for the correction of his date of birth. The infuriated media said that he deceived the Government by going to court. It said, “One of the principles of war is deception” It directed the Supreme Court of India to refer the matter to a tribunal or to any other authority.

          Why does the Government rake up this matter just before his retirement? Does Prime Minister Manmohan Singh depend upon the strength of a section of the armed forces to rule India? Her Excellency the President of India alone knows the answer.

    

         Chinese state banks decided to lend $1.18 billion to Reliance Communications of Anil Ambani. Some newspapers reported this on 18 January 2012.

         According to some reports, China had earlier given him about $7 billion. In fact, China would not have given money like this even to its own citizens. Is this the commission for opening Indian market for the Chinese goods?  An enquiry is necessary to know this.

         Apparently, about ten top industrialists gave a promise to China to convert India into its vassal state against such favours. Freedom is necessary to know this. But, they prevail upon the Supreme Court of India to ignore the freedom of Indians.

           In this connection, it is disturbing to note that India connives at even the safety standards. Thus, the Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) imported from China explode while in use. As they contain mercury vapours, there are health hazards. But the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is ignoring hundreds of letters in this matter.

                                                                                                                  

       With reference to the writ petition filed in the Supreme by Gen V.K. Singh, Defense Minister A.K. Antony on 20 January 2012 said that he had been silent to the extent of being misunderstood. However, consistent with the words of the manipulators, he added that the General should have sought any other constitutional remedy except going to the Supreme Court of India.

        It is true that there exists a misunderstanding about him. He is not a natural leader of India. The media – particularly the Malayalam news paper, Malayala Manorama- had created him for nothing. Otherwise, he would not have given Re. 3 lakh crore PF money after concealing this work. Even now, the media is behind him.

       Militant people killed 13 police personnel in the Jharkhand state on 22 January 2012. It must be condemned by everyone. But, it must be related to the denial of freedom by the Supreme Court of India. Surely, its actions are more heinous.

          Mrs. Sonia Gandhi – a woman- knows that the name obtained by the denial of freedom is worthless. Yet she denies freedom.

           Mrs. Mamata  Banerjee – a woman Chief Minister- knows that the people touch her feet without knowing her real nature. Yet she is not ready to give freedom.

     Miss. Jayalalitha – another woman Chief Minister- also chooses to enjoy the denial of freedom.

     Mrs. Sushma Swaraj, the leader of the opposition in the Parliament, also is a woman. She too abhors freedom.           

       Mrs. Meira Kumar – a Woman Speaker - knows that she is doing a disservice to the neglected section of the people. Yet, she is not ready to utter a word for the freedom of Indians.

     There are many other women leaders in the Government.

     Above all, the President of India is a woman. Her power to establish justice, and therefore freedom, is an absolute one. She could have compulsorily retired all inducted judges to take appropriate action over this work. But she considers her own letter to establish justice as a formality.

       Surely, the women may not get a chance to give freedom to Indians again.  Yet, they are not doing their duty.

       Women – consistent with the words of Professor Stephen  Hawking – are really a mystery.

                    The facts from 27 December 2011 to 22 January 2012 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 23 January 2012.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

23 December 2012

 V.Sabarimuthu.26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode,  Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167INDIA