CHAPTER 149. The Most Abominable Type of Existence

149

ABOMINABLE TYPE OF EXISTENCE

The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 6 July 2010. A meeting of the Union Cabinet ensued.

Sri Lankan Navy on 8 July 2010 caught hold of some Indian fishermen straying in the Sri Lankan waters and killed one of them. There were reports that Sri Lanka had earlier killed more than 500 Indian fishermen.

The ruler of India and the Prime Minister of India did not react to the above incident. However - as usual – some political parties condemned it. The Government arrested a political leader of Tamil Nadu State allegedly because he incited violence in this matter.

The present writer had requested the Union Government to recover the weapons and gun boats given to Sri Lanka. India responded by donating a frigate. Now, they use the same gun boats to capture and kill Indian fishermen.

As the Chinese forces occupy one part of Sri Lanka, India could have taken charge of the Tamil areas based on Indo-Sri Lankan Peace Keeping Accord for rehabilitation. But India gave money to Sri Lanka only to help it to maintain a big army.

Evidently, the fishermen die mainly because India is in the hands of a blood seeking ruler.

China on 9 July 2010 said that India engaged in “under the table” and “unfair” competition against the Chinese industry. China added that India should not try to contain the growth of its neighbour.

The growth of China need not be at the expense of India. China has broken the backbone of Indian industry through the back door. It must allow the Indian industry to survive. It must wait till the trade imbalance is addressed to the satisfaction of India. Besides, it must retreat to the pre-1988 strategic position. Then, India would buy finished products equivalent to finished products and raw materials for raw materials.

Now China signed a $525 million deal to build two highways in the Pak occupied Kashmir (PoK).

India owes more than $25 billion to China. China, in turn, disburses a fraction of this amount to the neighbouring countries of India to secure their loyalty.

The Foreign Secretary of India called on the Tibetan leaders on 12 July 2010.

Just as the neighbouring countries of India should not allow any third party to use their territory to threaten the sovereignty of India, India should not allow anyone to use its territory to threaten the sovereignty of China.

It is true that China invaded Tibet. But no country is isolating China. In fact, no country is recognizing Tibet as an independent nation. Strategically a buffer state between India and China is desirable. But, India is not keeping an eye beyond the Himalayas. Therefore, as a responsible neighbouring country of China, India cannot afford to promote Tibetan freedom struggle in the present way. Other interested countries must take up this matter and take a final decision in one way or other.

It may be recalled that in 1959, India welcomed the Tibetan leaders. They were allowed to stay in a famous House where the so-called Father of the Nation had been staying. India then foolishly allowed the Tibetan leaders to hold international press conferences. These developments - apart from some other factors - prompted China to invade India.

India had been - quite unnecessarily - touching the nose of China by allowing the Tibetan leaders to hold press conferences till May 2010. The Chapter 143 of this work alone curtailed this.

It may not be correct on the part of India to allow any refugees to use Indian passport or the passport of any unrecognized countries. For instance, India could allow a Tamil refugee to use the passport of his homeland, only after officially recognizing him as a citizen of an independent nation. Until then, he must have a Sri Lankan passport.

Some Union Ministers reiterated that India was heading towards 9 per cent growth rate. The cement industry is showing negative growth rate. The paint industry is getting heavy blows. The Union Ministers are not reporting anything that is negative. The Prime Minister had no other thing to talk for a long time. Now the other Union Ministers repeat this only to transmit public asset to private parties.

Unable to compete with the private players, the public sector telephone company, the BSNL, wanted to surrender the 2G spectrum. Further, it wanted the Government to refund the money given for the 3G spectrum. In this connection, it must be noted that there was a time when the employees of the BSNL were somewhat indifferent towards consumers. Now the newly recruited employees have become polite to the extent of speechless. They - in their poor attire - are downcast and sad. Are they not getting decent salary? Is there no security of service? The plight of the employees in the private telephone companies and some other Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) must be more abominable than this. Her Excellency the President of India alone could banish the sorrow from their heart.

The Orissa High Court on 14 July 2010 cancelled the license granted by the Orissa State Government to the Posco to explore the iron ore because the Government had “arbitrarily” and “illogically” ignored an application submitted by another Indian Company in 1991. The court directed the Government to dispose of all pending applications of the petitioner within four months.

What will happen after four months cannot be predicted. If the Union Government had taken over all natural assets, such cases could have been avoided. As the Government ignored this demand, a court has boldly stepped in to establish justice.

The above judgement is a small step for the Orissa High Court. But it is a giant step for the mankind as this court now fearlessly stands for law. This might help establish peace in the Orissa State.

All right thinking people would say that the Orissa High Court – just like the armed forces - lighted fire.

Why did the court take many years for the above? It is not known. The present writer cannot claim any credit for the present judgement. However, many latter Chapters of this work had been emailed to the High Courts in India including the Orissa High Court. The court might have - among other things - reckoned the new stand of the armed forces as mentioned in Chapter 135.

No sooner the above judgement came out, than the public sector Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL) agreed to start a joint venture with the Posco in Bokaro, Jharkhand. Therefore, whether the judgement is due to an arrangement or not is not known.

Since the last mail, the media did not report the whereabouts of the Prime Minister of India. This gave the impression that he was in a self imposed house arrest.

At last, the Prime Minister of India attended a meeting of the Chief Ministers on 14 July 2010. He welcomed the Chief Ministers with folded hands. This must have an ominous meaning because it is not customary for the Prime Minister to telecast such scenes.

During the meeting, the Prime Minister informed the decision of the Government to strengthen the paramilitary forces and to set up a Unified Command to eliminate militancy.

The Union Government did not concede the demands of the militant people before taking the above decision. This shows that the ruler of India is even now seeking blood.

India on 15 July 2010 lifted the ban on the import of power related equipment from China. India, further, agreed to come out with detailed guidelines for importing telecom equipment. Whether the guidelines would include transfer of technology or not is not known. Whether, China agreed to cancel the nuclear deal with Pakistan or not also is not known.

The decision to import power equipments would break the backbone of the Indian generator manufacturers. In fact, the above decisions show the might of China over the Union Government. Obviously, China is forcing India to remain as its vassal in one way or other. Now Her Excellency the President of India alone could protect the Indian industry from the Chinese onslaught.

The Chief of Army Staff on 16 July 2010 asked the Army officers to be mentally prepared to fight against militancy, if the situation on the ground did not improve.

The nation had been sinking down to a demonic rule till the armed forces lighted fire. Since then the death rate has been falling down drastically.

It is pertinent to recall that Bal Gangadhar Tilak in 1917 described the British rule as demonic although even 100 people did not die due to police action in the preceding 5 years. In contrast, 10, 000 people have died in the last five years.

Tilak then said that the British rule ended in slavery. Though the British jailed some leaders, they ensured 100 per cent FREEDOM of expression. In contrast, the people have not tasted FREEDOM since independence.

The ruler of India is not seen anywhere since 6 July 2010. She might have realized that no more deaths would be attributed to her ignorance. She might have come to the conclusion that only Demons would kill people without giving FREEDOM. Therefore, she might have asked the Government to grant FREEDOM of speech. The Prime Minister might have explained his constraints. Therefore, she might have decided to part with politics.

In a democracy, a man must fight his way to the throne in an atmosphere of FREEDOM with lion like valour. Then the armed forces would respect him and even obey him in good faith wherever he sits. A woman should not seek any concession in this matter.

The present ruler posed for TV cameras in the first five years of her political career. The manipulators, in turn, persuaded foreign dignitaries, including the then President of China, to call on her. The media gave great publicity to such visits. She did not utter even a word during this time. However, the people were forced to think that there was no alternative. Even after entering Parliament, she did not utter a word. All that the people saw was her hand signs and various facial expressions.

Now all right thinking people going through this work would tell that the present ruler got the mandate through deception. This must be the reason why she is always seeking blood.

As soon as the Chief of the Army Staff said that the army was getting ready to fight the militant people, the ruler allowed some political leaders to meet her. Therefore, she might again appear before the people to lead a most abominable type of existence with the help of the media mafia and the armed forces.

The Chief Justice of India must note that the Supreme Court must be free from favouritism. Then only it could enforce FREEDOM of speech without fear. As it failed to establish justice in this matter, it failed to establish peace. As a result, more than 10,000 people have died in the last five years.

Apart from the modes of darkness, ignorance, passion and goodness, a man might be situated in a mode of Demons. It is said that a man situated in a mode of demons gradually sinks down to the most abominable type of existence.

The facts from 6 July 2010 to 18 July 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 19 July 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU