204
A
THINKABLE INSTITUTION
The
last mail was submitted to Mrs.
Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her
Excellency the President of India, on 3 July 2012. The same mail was
sent to the Supreme Court of India, Election Commission of India,
Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Later, it was posted in the
blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was
given to www.thattan.com
A
Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices
P. Sathasivam and Dipak Misra, on
6 July 2012,
quashed a nine year -long disproportionate assets case against
former Chief Minister of the Utter Pradesh state Miss.
Mayavathi. The
Bench observed that the method adopted by the CBI was unwarranted and
without jurisdiction.
It is pertinent to
note that the Supreme Court had been monitoring the case.
Doubting
the honesty of the above judgement, the media put her assets at,or
about Re.115 crore and gave a list of her movable and immovable
properties. The latent message was that she amassed this by misusing
her official position.
The
people might think that she got the above relief because the ruling
United Progressive
Alliance (UPA) wanted
her votes to its Presidential candidate – Mr.
Pranab Mukherjee.
However,
it must be noted that Prime
Minister Manmohan
Singh
gave the Provident Fund (PF) money -Re.3 lakh crore- to some private
parties in private interest. The act of running behind the small
offenders before recovering even the black money associated with the
PF money is a grave human rights problem in India. The present writer
pointed out this hundreds of times to the Supreme Court and the
President of India. Therefore, the letters might have made the
Supreme Court a
thinkable
institution.
However, a series of judgements are necessary to confirm this.
Miss.Mayawathi has
pledged her votes in
the Presidential election to a man responsible for the case is a
different matter.
A
Special CBI Court, on 6 July 2012, granted permission to the
Enforcement
Directorate to
question Mr.YSR Jagan
Mohan Reddy -son
of former Chief Minister of Andra Pradesh Y.S.
Rajasekara Reddy. The
donors and the acceptors of the PF money are the executioners in
this case. It must be reiterated that this continues as a human
rights problem.
Planning
Commission Deputy Chairman Mr. Montek Singh Ahluwalia,
on 6 July 2012, said that 9% growth was not possible due to global
slowdown.
Dr.
Manmohan Singh had
been given a treasure -Re.3 lakh crore- when he became the Prime
Minister of India. Using this money, he could have transformed India
into a wonderful land. But his will willed to transmit the money to
private parties. He did not choose to use even Re.3/- for public
investments during the last eight years.
Similarly,
he converted India into a vassal of China. He does not want to ban
the import of even the carcinogenic toys of China. For this, China
gave bribe to Indians in the pretext of giving loan.
These
are the two important reasons for the economic slow down.
Mr.
Ahluwalia is a
confidant of Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh.
He collaborated with him for the above secret deals. Naturally, he
will be the last man to desert him.
Chief
Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu,
8 July 2012, said that Chief
Minister Ms. Mamata Banergee was
against the FDI in retail sector.
The
FDI in retail is different from the conversion of black money into
foreign exchange. As a Union Minister, Ms.Banergee
had given Re.3 lakh crore to private parties. Now she is one of the
most important beneficiaries of this money.
Former
Union Finance Minister Yaswant Sinha,
on 8 July 2012, described Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh as a dishonest
person. He said that he should not have distanced himself from the
action taken by former Finance Minister and Presidential candidate
Mr. Pranab Mukherjee.
He added that India lost about $40 billion in foreign exchange in
the last few months.
The
above revelation reinforces the inference of the present writer that
the recipients of the PF money siphoned off about $100 billion in
foreign exchange.
The
Hindu - in its front
page headline news, on 7 July 2012, said that the Bank
of Maharastra (BoM) sanctioned
a loan of Re.150 crore to Vijay
Mallia of
Kingfisher Airlines
even though he was a
defaulter of Re.40 crore to the same bank. This shows that the
banking rules are applicable to ordinary customers and not to the big
ones.
Supreme
Court advocate and member of the Team Anna Mr.
Prasant Bhusan
described
the verdict of the
Supreme Court in the disproportionate asset case against Ms.
Mayawati -given
above-sent a wrong signal to the people. He said this on 9 July 2012.
He added that India needed a revolution to throw out all corrupt
politicians and bureaucrats. Apparently, he fears that the Supreme
Court of India has become a thinkable institution. In that case, it
would rescue India from the donors and the acceptors of the PF money.
The
CBI, on 10 July 2012, revealed its decision to file a second charge-
sheet against former Union Health Minister Anbumoni
Ramadoss for
showing favours to a Medical College despite Medical Council of India
(MCI) denying permission to the college to run the MBBS course.
A
Union Health Minister -in good faith- could reject the remarks of the
MCI and grant permission to even an imaginary college to run the MBBS
course. On the contrary, if he does anything in bad faith, the Union
Cabinet alone could take action against him.
The
fact that the MCI and the CBI are known corrupt bodies is a different
matter.
The
Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), on
10 July 2012, said that the company would spend 1.31 lakh crore to
expand its production capacity to 45 million tonne per annum by 2020.
However, the final approval was not given.
The
present Union Government has not made any large scale public
investments in the last eight years. Now, it talks about the year
2020. This must be interpreted in the light of the last letter.
Economic
Advisory Chairman C.
Rengarajan, on 10
July 2012, said that there was no scope for economic stimulus
package. Does he fear the Supreme Court now?
The
Hindu on the same day
said that Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh would never
restore the growth rate. This is how the media keeps him in the mind
of the people. Otherwise, it keeps him in the underground most of the
time.
Former
Telecom Minister A.
Raja, on 9 July 2012,
wanted the High Court, Delhi to quash the proceedings against him
because his predecessors were not implicated in the case. He
submitted that 51 licenses were issued during the period from 2003
to 2007 on the same terms and conditions. His contention is
consistent with the Letter No.199 sent on 29 May 2012. He must have
mentioned this point long ago.
Home
Minister Mr.
P.Chithambaram, on 10
July 2007, said that India was the fastest growing economy. He says
this to conserve the black money associated with the PF money. He
pretends that the act of giving the PF money to private parties is a
small thing.
The
Times of India, on 15
July 2012, said that China had beaten India in corruption. The paper
says this to conceal the nature of the corruption in India.
President
of the USA Barack
Obama, on 15 July
2012, said that India prohibited the FDI in too many sectors like
retail thereby affecting the jobs in both countries.The problem with
the FDI is the black money associated with the PF money.
Union
Civil Aviation Minister Mr.
Agit Singh, on 17
July 2012, said that the Union Government would not bailout
Kingfisher Airlines.
He
wanted the owners of the airline to mobilize resources to make it a
functional one.
If
his statement were a true one, Bank of Maharastra would not have
granted loan to the Kingfisher Airlines.
Whatever
happened, Government had extended many benefits to Kingfisher
Airline. Now, the Government wants to withdraw from the scene.
The
recipients of the PF money keep a huge amount of black money. They
now want to buy, or destroy the Kingfisher
Airline.
But for this work, they would have swallowed it long ago. This shows
that “Satyam” must be restored to Mr.
Ramalinga Raju.
The
CBI, on 17 July 2012, closed the case against former Union Minister
Arun Shourie in
the 2G spectrum case. He is a ruler of India. It is not a wonder
that the CBI closed the case against him.
The
Presidential election will be held tomorrow. Mr.
Pranab Mukherjee –
a candidate – together with the recipients of the PF money denied
freedom of expression to Mr.P.A.
Sangma -another
candidate.
Mr.
Sangma might
have talked many things during the canvassing period. But, the media
did not report anything. In fact, 90 per cent of the people are not
aware of the election. Perhaps, even Mr.
Sangma does
not realize it.
As
there is no freedom of expression - barring a miracle - Mr.
Pranab Mukherjee
will take for himself the post of the President of India.
He
had given Re.3 lakh crore to private parties. Therefore, his nature
is a known one. As “the highest evil belongs to the highest
goodness” he may not be as dangerous as the present President of
India or her predecessor.
Her
Excellency the President of India Pratibha
Devi Singh Patil could
have made the Presidential Office a thinkable institution. She could
break her silence even now. All truths shall not be kept silent.
The
facts from 3 July 2012 to 17 July 2012 are being submitted to Mrs.
Pratibha
Devisingh Patil, Her
Excellency the President of India, on 18 July 2012.
The
same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief
Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and
Indian Air Force and CBI for necessary action.
V.
Sabarimuthu
26-3
Thattamkonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu
629167
18-7-2012
18-7-2012
No comments:
Post a Comment