222
A
CREDIT
AND
NOT
A
DISGRACEFUL FIASCO
The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 23
May 2013. The same mail was sent to the
Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Later, it was
sent through post to the President of India and the Chief Justice of India; and
posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
The militant people, on
25 May 2013, killed 27 workers of the Congress Party at Darbha in the Chhattisgarh State.
Earlier, the government had killed eight militant
people in an encounter. This secret killing came to light only after the above
incident.
Even such killings fail to open the eye of
the Supreme Court of India!
No
sooner had the Prime Minister of China finished his India visit, than the Chinese
Army intruded about 5 km into Indian Territory and laid a steel road. Thinamalar newspaper reported this on 27
May 2013.
On 27 May 2013, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh arrived at Tokyo on a three day visit
to Japan. The purpose of the visit was to give a boost to co-operation in
defence, business, energy and other areas.
Apparently, many important countries like
England are not very happy to welcome Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh because he rules India by keeping the people deaf
and dumb. But Japan has chosen to welcome him. This must be the work of the
beneficiaries of the Provident Fund (PF) money.
Kerala Police, on 28 May 2013, arrested Amway MD William Prinkney under section 409 and Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme Banning Act.
The police at Delhi would not have arrested
him.
Immediately, Government of Kerala ordered
an enquiry to find out the circumstances that provoked the police to arrest him.
Union Minister Sachin Pilot said that
the government would remove the ambiguities in law.
This shows that the government does
interfere in criminal cases.
On 30 May 2013, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was re-elected to the Upper House of
Parliament for the fifth consecutive term on 30 May 2013.
Thus his permanent residence is at Assam.
He has stated this five times!
It may be recalled that, on 22 May 2005, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said, “The
people of the country are impatient for change, impatient for a better quality
of life, impatient for new opportunities. We will be failing them if we do not
think out of the box and act with courage”.
Now,
his re-election would serve the purpose of: 1.Conserving the assets of the
beneficiaries of the PF money.
2. Covering up many
illegalities and
3. Keeping Defence
Minister A.K. Antony in his present position and
4. Denying freedom.
The Tamil Nadu state allotted Re.4 crore to
renovate an old palace at Eraniel.
This must have been done long ago.
There exists an old tunnel at Padmanabhapuram Palace. This also could
be renovated.
Enforcement
Directorate (ED), on 31 May 2013, froze fixed deposit worth Re. 34 crore of
Jagan Mohan Reddy. The agency has attached his assets worth Re.300 crore so far.
However, the government does not allow
the ED to look into the transactions of big companies.
Union Law Minister Kapil Sibal, on 2
June 2013, said that the Supreme Court of India would not be allowed to choose
judges anymore. According to him, the 20-year old system disappointed everyone.
He added that the government should have a say in the appointments.
The last letter has encouraged him to talk
like this. However, his government is
not a democratically elected one.
Further, had the judges been selected
through a competitive examination, the people would have realized freedom long
ago. In fact, the Nachiyappan Committee
had recommended this.
The
Department of Telecommunication, on 2 June 2013, imposed a penalty of Re. 1263
crore on the Vodafone Telephone Company
for under reporting of revenues.
This shows that the revenues are not
properly collected.
If the government today asks all entities
to feed all their transactions to a computer at New Delhi, they would do so from tomorrow onwards. Then the
question of selecting a particular company for punishment would disappear and
the revenues also would swell.
The New
Indian Express, on 4 June 2013, said that the refusal of the political
leaders to open themselves to public scrutiny was against the basic tenets of
democracy.
If the newspapers and the TV channels had
given a small opening for democracy, this work would have reached the mind of
the people long ago.
The
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), on 6 June 2013, requested the Union
Ministers to explain the reason why the agency was not allowed to question the
top officials in the so-called coal case.
As the government cannot do anything
illegal, the CBI has asked this question. This is the effect of the last
letter.
However,
it must be noted that the government, on 21 July 2005, directed the CBI to
probe the Centaur Hotels
disinvestments case. The CBI has not produced any result in the last eight
years.
Above all, neither did it inform the
existence of the 221 letters to the people, nor is it ready to ask the
newspapers the reason for suppressing this work from the eye of the people.
Therefore, the Supreme Court must tell the
reason for the priority given to the above case.
Mr.
Mukesh Ambani, on 8 June 2013, said that his Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) would invest Re.1,50,000 crore in the
next three years in India.
The Supreme Court of India had cancelled about 450 petrol-outlets granted by the Members of
Parliament (MPs) before allowing the RIL
to open about 5000 petrol out-lets.
So long as such laws exist, the RIL could invest any amount.
The Pakistan Army killed an Indian soldier
on 8 June 2013.
A court at Delhi, on 10 June 2013, granted
bail to cricket player Sreesanth. The police had invoked Maharastra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOCA) against him.
The First
Information Report (FIR) had been a different one. The court rejected the
“Second FIR” saying that there was not sufficient evidence to say that he had a
nexus with an organized syndicate of
criminals.
Whether there is jurisdiction question or
not, the police at Kerala would not have done this.
What a petitioner –for instance –
tells a doctor in a criminal case, is the FIR. If an Indian Police Service
(IPS) officer changes it in bad faith, the government must cross check it
with its own intelligence report and take remedial measures. This does not
happen to all cases in India.
If Mr.
Sreesanth comes under this category, the cases against him must be dropped
forthwith. He should not be asked to stand in front of a magistrate.
The Supreme Court of India, on 10 June 2013,
did not persist with its order dated 6-5-2013 to make the CBI an autonomous
institution as mentioned in the last letter.
Thus, the last letter virtually annulled
the order of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court obeyed the interpretation of
a citizen at least in one matter.
However, none would believe that a citizen
changed the course of the nation. If the newspapers had published it, it would
have gone down as a credit to the Supreme Court.
Now,
instead of giving a calm judgement, the Supreme Court blacked out the
proceedings that took place on 10 June 2013 considering its stand as a disgraceful fiasco.
The facts from 23 May 2013 to 10 June 2013
are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 11 June 2013.
The same letter is being sent to the
Chief Justice of India and the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force
for necessary action.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3
Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520.
Mobile: 9486214851
11 June 2013.
For further reading
visit:
1.www.
vajpayee.blogspot.com
2.www. primeministervajpayee.blogspot.com
3.www.primeministerdevegowda.blogspot.com
4.www.
storyofananthapadmanabhan.blogspot.com
6. www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
Other blogs of this
writer are:
1. www. effectiveinorganicchemistry.blogspot.com
2. www.temples-and-churches.blogspot.com
3.www.sabarimuthu-vellicode.blogspot.com
3.www.sabarimuthu-vellicode.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment