236
ABOUT
NON PUBLIC INFORMATION
The
Prime Minister of India, Dr. Manmohan
Singh, on 19 October 2013, said that he granted a coal licence to Mr. Birla on the merits of the case
placed before him. He added that his judgement was entirely appropriate.
He
is free to function as the Chief Justice of India or to do the work of the
Cabinet Secretary while holding the office of the Prime Minister of India.
Thus he could have handed over the “fruit”
even to his own “son”.
But he should have given Freedom to this
writer to know this as and when it happened.
He did not do so.
Thus, he treats 1000 million people as mere
animals.
The people consider this as the biggest
criminal offence.
In
contrast, the Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) does not consider this as an offence at all.
Therefore,
this condition would continue as long as it believes in the theory that the
political leaders must be “positively willing to act immorally and illegally at
the right times”.
The
Government of Karnataka State initiated a CBI probe on the illegal export of
iron ore through seven ports. At the same time, it constituted a Special Investigation Team (SIT)
comprising police officers from the state.
Thus, the above State has gone up to the
ports.
It should have probed the destination of the
ores and the method of remittances.
Further, the miners have deployed the
revenue of the nation in various entities under fictitious names as in Sahara
Company. The status of these assets also must be known.
Notwithstanding the above, the people would
commend the decision if the SIT produces results within a few days.
A
Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Justices
G.S. Singhvi and V. Gopala Gowda,
on 19 October 2013, ordered a CBI probe into 14 issues relating to criminal
dimensions arising out of the so-called Radia
tapes. The issues raised in the first report are: supply of low floor buses
by Tata Motors to the Government of
Tamil Nadu, appointment of Mr. Pradip Baijal as Chairman of the Pipeline Advisory Committee, allotment of coal
blocks to Mr. Anil Ambani , allotment
of iron ore mines at Ankua to Tata Steel, favours shown by Mr. V. K. Sibal, then Director General
of Hydrocarbons to the Reliance
Industries Limited (RIL), fudging of numbers in the subscriber base by Reliance Communications and submission
of the same to the Mumbai Stock Exchange
(BSE) to save the money, working of touts and middle men and kickbacks in the aviation
sector, market manipulation of the stocks of the Unitech Company and matters related to corruption/malpractice in
judiciary.
The issues are consistent with the
predictions of this writer.
The Bench used hard words – unscrupulous elements, corrupt means and
extraneous considerations – and asked the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct an enquiry and
submit a report within two months.
In all small criminal cases, the FIRs are
filed as and when they surface. Here, the Supreme Court kept these illegalities
away from the eye of the people for years. Thus, it gave life to many culprits.
The CBI, on 19 October 2013, said that former
coal secretary, Mr. P.C. Parakh, had
joined three private firms – Navbharat
Power Private Limited, Visa Power Limited and Tata Sponge Iron - after
retirement. However, it saw no quid pro quo against him.
The CBI buries many complaints in the
expectation that they will be forgotten.
Does it want to bury this case also?
On 19 October 2013, Mr. M. Veerappa Moily, Union Minister, said, “When rule of law is
concerned it applies to government, it applies to Supreme Court, it applies to
everybody”.
Actually, his words apply to the Supreme
Court.
Apparently, the judges now do not secretly
liaise with the union ministers.
Justice
RV Raveendran, a former judge of the Supreme Court of India, in an
interview to the NDTV on 20 October 2013, resented that retirement came by the
time he matured as a competent judge.
A public servant must seize the
opportunity the nature gives to him. He must give secondary importance to his
wife and children to make use of the opportunity.
Above all, he must prove his worth while in
service.
Cabinet Secretary Agit Seth, on 20
October 2013, expressed dismay over the action of the CBI against the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers.
The
Central IAS Officer’s Association, on the same day, sought safeguard for
the bureaucrats. It said that no honest officers must be harassed.
The bureaucrats are public servants. They
shall not implement the non public orders
of their superiors in private interest.
They shall not withhold any non- public information that might protect
a superior from making a poor decision. This is the important duty of the
bureaucrats.
It
may be recalled that the present writer sent the first letter to the Prime
Minister of India, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee,
on June 1, 2001. At that time, he was taking rest at a hospital in Mumbai.
A bureaucrat received the letter. He immediately
transmitted it to the Cabinet Secretary, apparently, with a note.
The latter did not wait for the Prime
Minister to return to the capital. Instead, he flew to Mumbai with the letter
and things happened as mentioned in Chapter 1.
The bureaucrats must assess their own
present performance in the light of the above.
The
employees of the Airport Authority of
India, on 22 October 2013, started a relay strike protesting the proposed
privatization of six airports.
The report is a reflection of the nature of
the Supreme Court.
RJD
chief Mr. Lalu Prasad Yadav and JD
(U) leader Jagdish Sharma were, on 22 October 2013, disqualified as Members of Parliament (MPs) following
their convictions.
The big offenders take the revenue of the
government. They send the small offenders to jail.
Union
Minister Narayanaswamy, on 22 October 2013, said that the government had
nothing to hide. Describing the
government as an open book, he added that the state governments were the
competent authorities for the allocations.
The government hid everything from the
people.
Even now this writer does not know whether Prime Minister Manmohan Singh disposed
of the resources of the public based on the decision of the Union Cabinet or
not. In fact, the degree of involvement of various Cabinet Ministers remains as
a mystery.
Perhaps,
the Supreme Court alone knows the answer.
After
his two day visit to Russia, Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh paid a three day visit to China. At China, on 2 October 2013, he said
that the USA was fading and China and Russia were best for India.
India depends upon the USA for employment
and foreign exchange. He should have avoided the above discourteous opinion
from the Chinese soil.
It
is clear that the people are paying a heavy price for keeping him as the Prime
Minister of India.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh then said
that when India and China shake hands the world notices.
The world notices the pitiable condition of
India.
India and China, on 23 October 2013, signed
a Border Defence Co-operation Agreement
(BDCA) aimed at maintaining peace and tranquillity along their 4058 km Line
of Actual Control (LAC).
Now China enters India through the southern
side. The moment India tends to annul the trade deficit with China, the latter
would enter India through the northern side.
Thus India sows seeds for a conflict with China.
Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh, on 24 October 2013, said that he was not above law. He added that
the CBI could question him at any time.
He has been sitting in a cave to issue non
public orders. Now, he says that he would remain in a jail to issue public
orders.
His only demand is that he must be allowed
to function as the Prime Minister of India.
The
facts from 19 October 2013 to 24 October 2013 are being submitted to His
Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, Chief of Indian
Army, Chief of Indian Air Force, Human Rights Commission and the Chief
Vigilance Commission on 25 October 2013
through email for necessary action.
V.
Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:
629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
25 October 2013
