234
AN
ETERNAL DISGRACE
A few TV Channels on 30 September 2013
said that the Supreme Court of India wanted
“None of the above” button in the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM)
because of the section 49.
This is the reply of the Supreme Court for
the last letter.
However, the court shall not resort to a
narrow interpretation of the Constitution of India.
The spirit of the Constitution is against
negative voting.
Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh chose not to visit England on his way back home. He
returned to India from the USA on 1 October 2013.
It is true that the Prime Minister of
India cannot pay any visit to any nation to fulfill the demands of a citizen.
However, as the then President of India, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, did not take
appropriate action to grant Freedom to Indians, the present writer
approached Her Highness Queen Elizabeth II.
The fact that this writer approached the
Queen of England was informed to all Commonwealth countries by the Queen.
Whatever happened, she did not, later, visit India to declare open the Delhi
Commonwealth Games.
Thus, the contribution of the Queen to
the Freedom of Indians has no parallel in history.
Therefore, the present writer again and again
requested Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh to pay an official visit to
England. He could not accept it. Therefore, he has no honourable place in the
world.
The people must know this because of the
nature of the Supreme Court of India.
Had the Supreme Court been in the hand of a
good lot, the people would have known this as and when it happened.
Now it has to make amends for the lapses.
It shall not be adamant in this matter.
This is not to project any individual
at the expense of all the rest at all.
If the Supreme Court India still believes
that the Indians need not be at Liberty to know these things, it is an eternal disgrace to 1000 million
people.
Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh, on 1 October 2013, said that his government might
have made some mistakes.
What mistake does he mean?
It seems that he is musing over some
secret worry.
When he assumed power, Re. 3 lakh crore
was rotting in the Provident Fund (PF). No robber would have overlooked it.
However, he could have done anything
with the money after giving Freedom to Indians. Instead, for the mere love of
position, he removed it secretly.
As the Supreme Court of India still
believes that the Indians need not know anything about this matter, the
whereabouts of the money are not known to the people.
It is an eternal disgrace to it.
Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh, Congress leader Mr. Sonia Gandhi and many other leaders paid floral
tribute to Mahatma Gandhi on the
occasion of his birth day on 2nd October.
If Mahatma
Gandhi had achieved Freedom to Indians, this work would have been a
redundant one.
In the light of this work, a committee
must be appointed to examine whether he achieved Freedom or Slavery to Indians
so that the present rituals would not become an eternal disgrace.
A special CBI court at Ranchi convicted
two former Chief Ministers of Bihar – RJD
leader Mr. Lalu Prasad Yadav and
Congress leader Mr. Jagannth Mishra - and 44 others in one of the six 17-
year old fodder scam cases. There were two IAS officers among the convicted
persons.
The case is related to the fraudulent
withdrawal of Re.37 crore from the Chaibasa
treasury by the farmers.
The judge concluded that high-level
politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen connived together and entered into a
criminal conspiracy for fraudulent withdrawals of public money.
The facts and evidences that led him to
arrive at the above conclusion were not revealed.
The defence lawyers argued that the
accused had no knowledge about the illegal withdrawals.
But every public servant must take appropriate action over every paper he receives.
The counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), B.M.P. Singh, said that Mr.
Lalu Prasad Yadav formed enquiry committees instead of a police
investigation.
He, further, said that the CBI had attached
property bought from the fodder scam from every street in Ranchi.
As the police are prone to act in bad
faith, the decision of Chief Minister Mr.
Lalu Prasad Yadav to form an enquiry committee is a correct one.
But the recipients of natural resources had
wanted a CBI enquiry.
The Supreme Court then ordered a CBI
investigation.
The Supreme Court of India also knew that
the CBI habitually acted in bad faith while dealing with the economic
offenders. In fact, the CBI should have been divested of its power to
investigate economic offences long ago. Yet it handed over the case to it
without even waiting for the report of the enquiry committee.
Further, the Supreme Court of India too
habitually acts in bad faith. This can be discerned from the fact that it
refuses to enforce freedom of expression.
When there is no Freedom, the small things
appear as big things; and the big things appear as small things.
Thus, the CBI talks about the properties
attached at Ranchi. It does not talk about the properties bought all over the
world from the proceeds from the minerals.
Therefore, the conviction lacks credibility.
In fact, when there is no Freedom, all prosecutions become a farce.
The Supreme Court of India shall not do
an injustice of personal malice before giving Freedom to Indians.
Later, on 3 October 2013, the court
sentenced Mr. Lalu Prasad Yadav to
five years imprisonment and ordered to pay a fine of Re 25 lakh.
To this, Mr.
Lalu Prasad Yadav asked. “When I have not done any crime, how have I been
punished?’
He was silent when Re.3 lakh crore in the
PF went into private hands.
He did not utter a word for the Freedom of
Indians.
Thus, he is being punished for not doing
his duty to the nation and not for the Re.37 crore.
The special judge retorted, “You can appeal
in the higher court”.
Apparently, the judge was oblivious of the
fact the Supreme Court had not done anything for the judicial error in the 10
July 2013 judgment mentioned in Chapter 224.
Congress leader Mr.Rahul Gandhi, on 3 October 2013, said that he was being
penalized for expressing his opinion on the convicted lawmakers.
It must be interpreted in the light of
the opinions given to the Justice
Patnaik- Justice Mukhopadhyay judgements of 10 July 2013 and 4 September
2013 mentioned in Chapter 224 and Chapter 230 respectively.
Now, the above judges could invalidate the
above judgements, because the Supreme Court could declare any law invalid.
Former Prime Minister of India Mr. H. D. Deve Gowda, on 3 October 2013,
said that the corporate houses and their media were supporting Gujarat Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi.
In his dissenting note to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) report
on the 2G matter, Communist Party leader
Mr. Gurudas Dasgupta said that Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh preferred to remain in office as a matter of
greater priority than acting to prevent a grave irregularity. One or two
newspapers reported this on 6 October 2013.
However, he did not reveal the
irregularity committed by Mr. A Raja.
BJP leader Mr. Narendra Modi, on 6 October 2013, said that there should be
compulsory voting along with the “None Of The Above (NOTA)” option. Mr. L. K. Advani endorsed his view.
The above leaders indulge in flattering
the Supreme Court of India.
It knew that the natural assets like
iron ore are being sold in the international black market. Yet, it allows it,
by defying the Constitution of India.
Therefore, they flatter it.
The moment it directs the government to do
the mining work directly, they would change their attitude towards the Supreme
Court.
It is an
eternal disgrace to it.
Now, the Supreme Court alone could undo the
public wrongs done by it.
The
facts from 29 September 2013 to 7 October 2013 are being submitted to His
Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court, Chief of Indian Army, Chief
of Indian Air Force, Human Rights Commission and the Chief Vigilance Commission
simultaneously on 8 October 2013 through email for necessary action.
V.
Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:
629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
8 October 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment