242
WARPING THE POLITICAL
LEADERS
The last mail was submitted to His
Excellency the President of India, Chief
Justice of India, High Courts, Indian Army, Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) and Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on 12 February 2014. Later, it was posted in the blog www.
howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
On 12 February 2014, the Government of Delhi
announced 50 per cent subsidy to power defaulters.
If implemented, the above decision would go
down as an unconstitutional act.
Mr. L.
Rajagopal, an MP, on 13 February 2013, used a can of pepper spray inside
the Parliament when another MP was attacked.
This happened when the MPs trooped into the Well of the House to protest
against the tabling of the Andra Pradesh
Reorganization Bill.
The present writer had given a concrete
suggestion to help solve the above problem. The government could have implemented
it. Then the people would have debated the pros and cons of division more
vigorously. In this way, it could have gauged the mind of the people. But it did
not do so. Thus, it tends to follow the wrong and leave the right.
The Union Government, on 13 February 2014,
cancelled its decision to sell the shares of the public sector Indian Oil Corporation (IOC).
Instead - the government said - 10 per
cent of its shares would be sold to public sector Oil and Natural Corporation
Limited (ONGC) and Oil India Limited
(OIL).
On the same day, the government decided to
defer the disinvestments of public sector Hindustan
Zinc Limited (HZL) and Bharat
Aluminium Company (BALCO) to 2015.
The government, further, deferred the
privatization of six airports.
The above decisions were the achievements
of the last letter. The people must know it. But they have no way to know it.
The IBM, on 14 February 2014, announced its
decision to cut 15000 jobs globally. According to reports, 50 got what is
called Pink Slips- notice of dismissal-
at Bangalore.
If the IBM is a beneficiary of the
Government of India, it must ensure job security to its employees in India.
Two other big companies had – apparently- obeyed
this writer earlier.
President
of India Mr. Pranab Muukherjee, on 15 February 2014, said that freedom of
speech was one of the most important fundamental rights guarnteed by the
Constitution of India.
Evidently, the fear that the army might demand
freedom and democracy to Indians is causing reverberations in the system.
In this connection, the President of India
must note that freedom of speech has two components: the freedom to talk and
the freedom to hear.
In India, there is freedom to talk but
there is no freedom to hear. Therefore, there is no freedom of speech in India.
Now - for instance - the present unwritten
law is that every Indian news paper must mention the name of former Chief Minister of Delhi and AAP leader Mr. Aravind Kegiriwal in at least two places every day. At the same
time, no news paper shall mention the name of this writer in any places on any
day.
A comparison of the contribution of this
writer to Indian politics with that of others -Mr. Aravid Kejiriwal included- would show that this writer tops the
list.
Accordingly, the views of this writer should
have got precedence over the rest. This does not happen in India.
Thus the system warps the most important
political leader. In fact, the system warps all natural leaders.
Therefore, all leaders possessing power today
are false leaders.
This false art simply corrupts them.
They bring disgrace on this nation by an act
of dishonesty or cowardice.
If there is freedom of speech, all false political
leaders would perish and the most natural of men would lead the nation.
Therefore, the President of India must
enforce freedom of expression without
further delay.
The President of India, on the same day,
requested every Indian to be “argumentative Indian” not “intolerant Indian”.
The first letter was sent to the then Prime
Minister of India, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee,
on 1-6-2001.
Then
the letters were sent to the President of
India, Supreme Court, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Vigilance
Commissioner (CVC) and important political leaders.
The
letters were sent to the armed forces from letter No. 91 onwards only.
The army was requested to give a reply only
in letter No. 241.
This is not a sign of intolerance at all.
In fact, no other citizen of India would have written 240 letters in 12 years
before approaching the army for a reply.
A Supreme Court of India bench comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishn and Vikramajit Sen, on 17 February 2014,
issued notice on a petition filed by Mr.
C. Sudararajan, activist, challenging the non-implementation of the 15
directions issued by the court in May 2013 by the Kudankulam nuclear power plant.
If the order of the court had worked, the
plant would not have been commissioned at all.
Mr.
Aravind
Kejriwal, on 17 February 2014, gave an address to the Confederation of India Industry (CII).
On that occasion, he told them that he
hailed from a business family and he was not against the privatization of the power
corporations.
He deplored that businessmen were viewed
with suspicion as if they had committed theft.
Why do the businessmen warp the political
leaders? Why do they impose some individuals on the people? Why do they deny
freedom and democracy? Is it not to thieve public resources?
It must be noted that his address to the
CII appeared in the internet.
But the
underground moles did not make public his talk through newspapers. They
thus mask his real nature from the eye of the common people.
The Union Minister for Finance, Mr. P. Chithambaram, on 17 February
2014, presented vote-on-account for four months. He asked history be the judge
of the last 10 years.
He can continue to rule India so long as he
could “strange” this work. So it is too early to assess his work.
However, he must disclose the mechanism
followed to strange this work. This is to know whether he is a witness or an accused in the crime.
The Supreme Court of India, on 18 February
2014, commuted the death sentence of three convicts in the “Rajiv Gandhi
assassination case” to life imprisonment because of the inordinate delay in the
execution of its verdict.
The delay was presumably due to the fact
that three successive presidents of India felt that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) had treated one or two witnesses
as accused.
In fact, Mr.
Thiagarajan, one of the officers of the SIT
recently disclosed that he had failed to indicate that one of the convicts
had no prior knowledge about the assassination.
Immediately after the verdict, the
Government of Tamil Nadu decided to release seven convicts with the prior
permission of the Union Government.
However, the families of the victims – Mr. Rahul Gandhi included- opposed the
decision.
The Union Government then obtained a stay
from the Supreme Court.
In this connection, everyone must note that
these things are the fruits of the denial of freedom.
If the then Prime Minister of India, Mrs. Indira Gandhi, had not secretly given training to the Sri Lankan
Tamils in 14 locations, former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and many
security personnel might not have been killed and these convicts might have
lived as gentlemen.
This happened because of the inaction of the
people close to her. In fact, none prevented her.
Evidently, some innocent people suffer
because of the actions or in-actions of others.
Thus the denial of freedom has disastrous
consequences.
Let this open the eye of the system.
The Union Government, on 18 February 2014,
cancelled 16 coal blocks allotted to the big firms. It was followed by the
cancellation of 12 more blocks.
The government secretly allocated the coal
blocks and the other minerals for the last ten years. By this way it could rule
India comfortably. Now, it openly cancels some of them. At the same time, the
Supreme Court has silently reserved the judgement in the coal case.
Mr.
P. Chithambaram, Union Minister for Finance, on 19 February 2014, deplored
that Parliament had 543 members and only 12 from Andra Pradesh had been
disrupting the Parliament day after day. He criticized this as an undemocratic
act.
India had not elected anyone to Parliament in
a “free” election.
Had there been freedom and democracy, many
might not have entered the Parliament at all.
In fact, many had been recruited to annul
the constitutional rights of the people.
Therefore, no Union Minister has any moral
or constitutional right to continue in office at all.
The Parliament, on 20 February 2014, passed
the Talangana Bill with the support
of the principal opposition party – the BJP.
Obviously, the government would not have
concealed many things without the co-operation of the BJP.
This is letter No. 242.
The armed forces must help ensure freedom
and democracy even while they sleep.
Therefore, the Chief of the Indian Army must
give a reply.
The
facts from 12 February 2014 to 20 February 2014 are being submitted to His
Excellency the President of India, Chief Justice of India, chiefs of the Indian
Army and the Indian Air Force, High Courts, Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC)
and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) simultaneously on 21 February
2014.
V.
Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:
629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
21 February 2014
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
No comments:
Post a Comment