335:THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA: INDULGING IN MODERATE REMOVAL OF PUBLIC ASSETS?

335

THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA:

INDULGING IN MODERATE REMOVAL OF PUBLIC ASSETS?

       Madras High Court, on 13 January 2015, stayed the termination of a Mrs. Rekha, an employee of the Tata Consultancy Services (TCS).

       She obtained the stay based on the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

       She contended that the ‘last come, first go’ principle was not followed by the private software company and that her termination was an unwarranted one.
       Pending the adjudication of the dispute by the Labour Commissioner, she prayed for a stay.

         The dismissals convey the message that termination is easy and that it would affect anyone at any time.

       A dismissed employee would not get employment in other companies as easily as in the USA.

Thus the companies murder the employees every day.

The ‘stay’ will have far reaching consequences.

No company would, hereafter, dare to substitute the serving employees with new hands.

However, it is the duty of the government to stand by the employees. It must give job security to all. It must ensure pension based on the formula given by this man or through other means.

       The TCS, on 13 January 2015, revealed that it had been retrenching about 1 per cent of its non-performing employees every year. It has over 3 lakh employees.

          The ‘stay’ obtained by Mrs. Rekha might have forced the TCS to disclose the above.

       The media had not reported any dismissal as and when it happened.

       This shows that the people have no Freedom to know any important events in India.

       The Hindu, on 15 January 2015, reported that the government would sell 10 per cent shares of the public sector Indian Oil Corporation (IOC).    

       The development shows that the Prime Minister of India, Mr. Naredrea Modi, was brought up in the principles of his master, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee.

       Mr. Vajpayee had a slavish passion to hand over the public sector VSNL to the corrupting people as mentioned in Chapter 8.

       Now, they draw Mr. Modi in the same direction. But, this work draws him in the opposite direction. Therefore, he stands on the midway. He simply indulges in moderate removal of public assets.

          However, it is unconstitutional.

       The teachings of Swami Vivekananda have little influence upon him.

          This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.comon 19 January 2015.

19-1-2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.